Nitrogen permease regulator-like 3 (NPRL3) has been reported to play a role in seizure onset. The principal manifestation of NPRL3-related epilepsy is a range of epilepsy-associated syndromes, such as familial focal epilepsy with variable foci (FFEVF), sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (SHE), and temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The association between phenotype and genotype of NPRL3 mutations remains inadequately described. This study aimed to explore the phenotypic and genotypic spectra of NPRL3-related epilepsy. We reported two novel NPRL3 variants in two unrelated epilepsy cases, including a nonsense (c.1174C > T, p.Gln392*) and a missense variant (c.1322C > T, p.Thr441Met). Following a review of the literature, a total of 116 cases of NPRL3-related epilepsy were assessed, mostly with nonsense and frameshift mutations. Our findings suggest that patients harboring various NPRL3 variants exhibit variable clinical manifestations. In addition, it may be worthwhile to consider the existence of NPRL3 mutations in epilepsy patients with a family history. This study provides useful information for the treatment and prognosis by expanding the phenotypic and genotypic spectrum of NPRL3-related epilepsy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study expands the phenotypic and genotypic spectra of NPRL3-related epilepsy by reporting two cases with different novel variants. Following a review of the literature, it was observed that patients harboring various NPRL3 variants exhibited a variability of clinical manifestations. Also, patients carrying nonsense mutations are frequently prone to drug resistance and other severe comorbidities such as developmental delay, but more cases need to be collected to confirm these findings.

BACKGROUND: NPRL2-related epilepsy, caused by pathogenic germline variants of the NPRL2 gene, is a newly discovered childhood epilepsy linked to enhanced mTORC1 signalling. However, the phenotype and genotype of NPRL2 variants are still poorly understood. Here, we summarize the association between the phenotype and genotype of NPRL2-related epilepsy.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for four Chinese children with epilepsy due to likely pathogenic NPRL2 variants identified through whole-exome sequencing (WES). Previous reports of patients with NPRL2-related epilepsy were reviewed systematically.
RESULTS: One of our patients presented focal epilepsy involving the central region, which should be distinguished from self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (SeLECTS). The four novel likely pathogenic NPRL2 variants consisted of two nonsense variants, one frameshift variant, and one copy number variant (CNV). Bioinformatics analysis revealed the two nonsense variants to be highly conserved and cause alterations in protein structure. Including our four cases, a total of 33 patients with NPRL2-related epilepsy have been identified to date. The most common presentation is focal epilepsy (70%), including sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (SHE), temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE). Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) is also a notable feature of NPRL2-related epilepsy. Malformations of cortical development (MCD, 8/20), especially focal cortical dysplasia (FCD, 6/20), are common neuroimaging abnormalities. Two-thirds of the NPRL2 variants reported are loss of function (LoF) (14/21). Among these mutations, c.100C>T (p.Arg34*) and c.314T>C (p.Leu105Pro) have been detected in two families (likely due to a founder effect).
CONCLUSIONS: NPRL2-related epilepsy shows high phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity. Our study expands the genotype spectrum of NPRL2-related epilepsy, and the phenotype of focal epilepsy involving the central region should be clearly distinguished with SeLECTS, with reference value for clinical diagnosis.

An aura is a subjective experience felt in the initial phase of a seizure. Studying auras is relevant as they can be warning signs for people with epilepsy. The incidence of aura tends to be underestimated due to misdiagnosis or underrecognition by patients unless it progresses to motor features. Also, auras are associated with seizure remission after epilepsy surgery and are an important prognostic factor, guiding the resection site and improving surgical outcomes. Somatosensory auras (SSAs) are characterized by abnormal sensations on one or more body parts that may spread to other parts following a somatotopic pattern. The occurrence of SSAs among individuals with epilepsy can range from 1.42% to 80%. The upper extremities are more commonly affected in SSAs, followed by the lower extremities and the face. The most common type of somatosensory aura is paresthetic, followed by painful and thermal auras. In the primary somatosensory auras, sensations occur more commonly contralaterally, while the secondary somatosensory auras can be ipsilateral or bilateral. Despite the high localizing features of somatosensory areas, cortical stimulation studies have shown overlapping sensations originating in the insula and the supplementary sensorimotor area.

Different neurostimulation modalities are available to treat drug-resistant focal epilepsy when surgery is not an option including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Head-to-head comparisons of efficacy do not exist between them nor are likely to be available in the future. We performed a meta-analysis on VNS, RNS, and DBS outcomes to compare seizure reduction efficacy for focal epilepsy.
We systematically reviewed the literature for reported seizure outcomes following implantation with VNS, RNS, and DBS in focal-onset seizures and performed a meta-analysis. Prospective or retrospective clinical studies were included.
Sufficient data were available at years one (n = 642, two (n = 480), and three (n = 385) for comparing the three modalities with each other. Seizure reduction for the devices at years one, two, and three respectively were: RNS: 66.3%, 56.0%, 68.4%; DBS- 58.4%, 57.5%, 63.8%; VNS 32.9%, 44.4%, 53.5%. Seizure reduction at year one was greater for RNS (p < 0.01) and DBS (p < 0.01) compared to VNS.
Our findings indicate the seizure reduction efficacy of RNS is similar to DBS, and both had greater seizure reductions compared to VNS in the first-year post-implantation, with the differences diminishing with longer-term follow-up.
The results help guide neuromodulation treatment in eligible patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

UNASSIGNED: Epilepsy is still a real mental health problem; although most epilepsies are curable, their psychopathological consequences are often significant and complex to manage. In this framework, the association of epilepsy with psychotic disorders has long been known.
UNASSIGNED: To discuss the links between epilepsy and psychosis, we report the observation of a 52-year-old man, treated for complex focal epilepsy, admitted to a psychiatric department for auditory and visual hallucinations and a behavioural disorder not improved by antiepileptic treatment alone or an antipsychotic alone.
UNASSIGNED: Psychotic symptoms in epilepsy can be part of intercritical, post-critical or alternative psychoses. In our patient\'s case, the psychotic symptoms were post-critical and alternative. It was probably an associated schizophreniform disorder. Emotional indifference and activity restriction are rarely encountered in this setting, while rapid mood fluctuations are frequent. Delusional themes are often mystical, fueled by auditory and unusual visual hallucinations. Negative disorders are rare.
UNASSIGNED: Epileptic psychoses have not been identified as nosographic entities in the psychiatric classification systems (DSM-V and ICD-10), which poses a problem in recognizing these disorders. Therefore, a collaboration between psychiatrists and neurologists is necessary to understand this complex comorbidity better, avoid diagnostic errors, and optimize management.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of Levetiracetam (LEV) and Oxcarbazepine (OXC) as monotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar from January 1, 2000 to May 11, 2022, with no language restrictions along with The ClinicalTrials.gov website and the WHO International Controlled Trials Registry platforms. We pooled the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the efficacy and safety outcomes. The quality of included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration\'s tool.
RESULTS: Two RCTs included a total of 574 newly diagnosed focal epilepsy patients (the LEV group [282 patients] and the OXC group [292 patients]). LEV group when compared with the OXC group had no significant difference in the pooled estimate of seizure freedom at week 24. (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.62-1.05, p = .11). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the pooled estimate of withdrawal due to adverse events (AEs) (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.34-2.23, p = .77). The commonly reported AEs in both trials were dizziness, headache, rash, somnolence, and nasopharyngitis with zero medication-related death and few serious AEs.
CONCLUSIONS: LEV is noninferior to OXC in terms of seizure freedom at week 24 and treatment withdrawal rate due to AEs among adults but long-term treatment data is still missing. Future multicentric double-blinded RCTs and real-world studies are of great need.

In order to characterize the real-world effectiveness and safety of perampanel during clinical use in Europe, we conducted a structured literature search and scoping review of real-world studies conducted in Europe in adolescents (aged ≥ 12 years) or adults who were prescribed perampanel for focal epilepsy or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in the context of idiopathic generalized epilepsy, published between January 2016 and July 2021. We identified 29 relevant studies (20 retrospective and 9 prospective) in 3608 patients; median study duration was 12 months. Most patients (76.1%) were receiving two or more antiseizure drugs (ASDs) when perampanel was initiated. The maintenance perampanel dose ranged from 2 to 16 mg/day (most commonly 6 mg/day). Retention rate at 12 months ranged from 46% to 90.5% (median 71.1%). The proportion of patients who were free of seizures during perampanel ranged from 1.8% to 84.6%, but were consistently below 20% in studies where patients had received an average of ≥5 prior ASDs and above 20% where patients had received an average of <5 prior ASDs. The proportion of patients who achieved ≥50% reduction in seizures during perampanel ranged from 20.0% to 85.7%. Across all studies, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) ranged from 18.2% to 67.4% (median 37.1%) and discontinuation due to AEs from 6.2% to 56% (median 12.5%). Discontinuation rates tended to be higher in UK studies than in studies from Italy or Spain. The most commonly reported individual AEs were dizziness/vertigo (median incidence 13.7%), somnolence (median 11.9%), aggression (median 9.8%), irritability (median 9.1%), and cognitive deficits (median 7.0%). There was no relationship between the overall rate of AEs and perampanel dose, perampanel plasma levels, or number of concomitant medications. Our global overview of European observational studies with perampanel provides evidence that this agent is effective and safe in clinical practice in a range of countries, patients, and settings.

Rasmussen\'s encephalitis (RE) is a severe, rare, chronic inflammatory brain disease resulting in drug-resistant epilepsy and progressive destruction of one hemisphere with loss of neurological function. RE is associated with a deterioration of background electroencephalography (EEG) activity, a progressive atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging and an extensive positron emission tomography hypometabolism over the affected hemisphere. RE is an immune-mediated disease, with a predominant role of CD8+ T cytotoxic cells, microglial cells, and activation of inflammasome pathway. The diagnosis of RE is based on clinical (intractable epilepsy and neurological deterioration), electrophysiological (unilateral EEG slowing) and MRI (hemiatrophy) criteria. Antiseizure medications are generally unable to stop seizures. The most effective procedure is hemispherotomy (surgical disconnection of one cerebral hemisphere), but this is associated with permanent motor and neurological deficits. Treatments targeting the immune system are recommended especially in the early stages of the disease or in patients with slow disease progression and mild deficits and/or not eligible for surgery. Based on the pathophysiology, several immunotherapies have been tried in RE (none exhaustively: corticosteroid, intravenous immunoglobulins, tacrolimus, azathioprine, adalimumab, mycophenolate mofetil, natalizumab). However, only small cohorts have been reported without comparative study. In this review, we will summarise some pathophysiological mechanisms of RE, before reporting the literature data concerning immunotherapies. We then discuss the limitations of these studies and the prospects for further research.

The phenotype of nitrogen permease regulator-like 2 (NPRL2) gene-related epilepsy clinically manifests as a range of epilepsy syndromes, including familial focal epilepsy with variable foci (FFEVF), sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (SHE), temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE), and infantile spasms (IS). The association between phenotype and genotype of NPRL2 variants has not been widely explored. This study aimed to explore the phenotype and genotype spectrum of NPRL2-related epilepsy. Here, we presented two clinical cases with NPRL2-related epilepsy, and discussed the characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment processes in the context of existing literature. Two novel NPRL2 likely pathogenic variants were identified by next-generation sequencing, including one splicing mutation (c.933-1G>A), and one frameshift mutation (c.257delG). The results of literature review showed that there were a total of 20 patients with NPRL2-related epilepsy whose mutations were mostly missense and hereditary. These findings indicate that the possibility of NPRL2 gene mutations in focal epilepsy should be considered for patients with family history, and that patients carrying different NPRL2 variants have different clinical manifestations. Our study expanded the genotype spectrum of NPRL2 and suggested that the type of NPRL2 variants might provide important information for the prognosis evaluation.

Abnormalities of the brain network organization in focal epilepsy have been extensively quantified. However, the extent and directionality of abnormalities are highly variable and subtype insensitive. We conducted meta-analyses to obtain a more accurate and epilepsy type-specific quantification of the interictal global brain network organization in focal epilepsy. By using random-effects models, we estimated differences in average clustering coefficient, average path length, and modularity between patients with focal epilepsy and controls, based on 45 studies with a total sample size of 1,468 patients and 1,021 controls. Structural networks had a significant lower level of integration in patients with epilepsy as compared to controls, with a standardized mean difference of -0.334 (95 % confidence interval -0.631 to -0.038; p-value 0.027). Functional networks did not differ between patients and controls, except for the beta band clustering coefficient. Our meta-analyses show that differences in the brain network organization are not as well defined as individual studies often propose. We discuss potential pitfalls and suggestions to enhance the yield and clinical value of network studies.