feedback

反馈
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与心理治疗服务机构合作实施康复计划,根据政府机构的要求,旨在改善患者预后(有效性)和减少从业者变异性(公平性)。利用学习卫生系统组件的案例研究,包括国家规定的患者结果数据,包括三个18个月的阶段:(1)回顾性基线;(2)改善患者结局(管理主导);和(3)降低执业医师的变异性(临床医师主导).主要分析集中于35名从业者(NPR=35),他们在三个阶段中保持不变,每个阶段的患者(NPA分别为930、1226、1217)。可靠的改善率决定了患者的预后,多层次建模产生了从业者的影响。为了测试泛化性,将结果与每个阶段的整个从业者样本进行比较:(1)NPR=81,NPA=1982;(2)NPR=80,NPA=2227;(3)NPR=74,NPA=2267。卫生研究机构授予了道德批准。对于核心和整个从业者样本,患者结果在连续阶段都得到了改善,其中最大的影响发生在管理主导的干预措施中。除了管理主导的对整个样本的干预外,在核心和整个从业者样本中,从业者的变异性均在连续阶段降低。与管理层主导的干预相比,医师主导的干预在核心样本中降低了超过60%的医师效应,在整个样本中降低了接近50%.实施学习卫生系统的多个组成部分可以改善心理治疗服务的有效性和公平性。
    To work with a psychological therapies service to implement a recovery plan, as required by a government body, aimed at improving patient outcomes (effectiveness) and decreasing practitioner variability (equity). A case-study utilizing components of a learning health system, including nationally mandated patient outcome data, comprising three 18-month phases: (1) retrospective baseline; (2) improving patient outcomes (management-led); and (3) reducing practitioner variability (clinician-led). Primary analyses focused on 35 practitioners (NPR = 35) who were constant across the three phases and their patients in each phase (NPA = 930, 1226, 1217, respectively). Reliable improvement rates determined patient outcomes and multilevel modeling yielded practitioner effects. To test generalizability, results were compared to the whole practitioner sample for each phase: (1) NPR = 81, NPA = 1982; (2) NPR = 80, NPA = 2227; (3) NPR = 74, NPA = 2267. Ethical approval was granted by the Health Research Authority. Patient outcomes improved in successive phases for both the core and whole practitioner samples with the largest impact occurring in the management-led intervention. Practitioner variability decreased in successive phases in both the core and whole practitioner samples except in the management-led intervention of the whole sample. Compared with the management-led intervention, the practitioner-led intervention yielded a decrease in practitioner effect exceeding 60% in the core sample and approaching 50% in the whole sample. The implementation of multiple components of a learning health system can lead to improvements in both the effectiveness and equity of a psychological therapy service.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    横向撕脱是一种中风后现象,其特征是身体越过中线向受影响较大的一侧主动推动和/或重量向受影响较小的一侧转移的阻力。在治疗机制中,反馈系统已被证明是有效的。本研究的目的是通过对使用反馈机制进行文献综述来创建知识体系,并报告两例接受基于反馈的治疗的侧向撕脱患者。
    方法:审查是在五个不同的数据库中进行的(Embase,Medline/PubMed,Scopus,WebofScience,和PEDro)至2024年2月,触觉反馈干预已纳入病例系列(以侧向撕脱和步行能力为主要变量)。
    结果:总计,在文献回顾后,确定了211条记录,纳入了6项研究。最常用的反馈方式是视觉反馈。在案例系列中,从干预中观察到积极的结果,特别是在侧向撕脱和平衡的恢复中,以及改善一名患者的步态。患者表现出对干预方案的良好依从性,无不良反应。
    结论:视觉反馈是侧撕脱患者最常用的反馈方式,但触觉反馈等其他机制也是可行的,应予以考虑。样本量较大,延长随访期,必须建立隔离反馈机制以澄清证据。
    Lateropulsion is a post-stroke phenomenon marked by an active push of the body across the midline towards the more affected side and/or a resistance of the weight shift towards the less affected side. Within the mechanisms of treatment, feedback systems have been shown to be effective. The aim of the present study was to create a body of knowledge by performing a literature review on the use of feedback mechanisms in the treatment of lateropulsion and to report two cases of lateropulsion patients who had undergone feedback-based treatment.
    METHODS: The review was performed across five different databases (Embase, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PEDro) up to February 2024, and haptic feedback intervention was incorporated into the case series (with lateropulsion and ambulation capacity as the main variables).
    RESULTS: In total, 211 records were identified and 6 studies were included after the review of the literature. The most used feedback modality was visual feedback. In the case series, positive results were observed from the intervention, particularly in the recovery of lateropulsion and balance, as well as in the improvement of gait for one patient. Patients demonstrated good adherence to the intervention protocol without adverse effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: Visual feedback is the most commonly used feedback modality in lateropulsion patients but other mechanisms such as haptic feedback also are feasible and should be taken into account. Larger sample sizes, extended follow-up periods, and the isolation of feedback mechanisms must be established to clarify evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    社会和科学的进步导致了新的学习计划的形成,通常是多学科课程。此类课程的担保人和教师必须做好准备,以迅速适应学生的需求和要求,社会,就业市场,和商业领域,因为许多问题在项目生命的最初几年开始浮出水面。在这里,我们分享了自2019年以来在布尔诺的Masaryk大学教授的“环境与健康”学习计划中这样一个过程的经验,捷克共和国。学生和校友的反馈可以改善课程和组织。我们从三个角度展示了反馈循环:来自即时短期经验的反馈可以在一年内纳入,中期反馈循环可以在几年后显现,和长期的甚至几十年。虽然目前的学生通常只感知短期或中期问题,该计划的哲学和结构必须通过预测未来几十年的社会和商业需求来建立。这样的长期方面往往与学生的愿景背道而驰,但仍然必须考虑该计划对新申请人保持吸引力。平衡最初的愿景,准备和应用更改,处理各级反馈是成功学习计划的关键管理挑战。
    Societal and scientific progress has led to the formation of new study programs, often with multidisciplinary curricula. Guarantors and teachers of such programs must be prepared to quickly adapt to the needs and demands of students, society, the job market, and the commercial sphere since many issues start surfacing during the first years of the programs\' life. Here we share our experience with such a process in the study program \"Environment and Health\" taught since 2019 at Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic. Feedback from students and alumni allows for improvement of the curriculum and organization of the program. We show feedback loops from three perspectives: Feedback from immediate short-term experience can be incorporated within a year, medium-term feedback loops can manifest after several years, and long-term ones even decades. While current students usually perceive only short- or medium-term issues, the philosophy and structure of the program must be built by predicting societal and commercial needs in the following decades. Such long-term aspects are often counterintuitive to students\' vision, but still have to be considered for the program to remain attractive to new applicants. Balancing the original vision, preparing and applying changes, and dealing with feedback on all levels are key managerial challenges of successful study programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    持续的头晕和平衡缺陷是常见的,通常病因不明。持续姿势知觉头晕(3PD)是一种相对较新的诊断,症状可能包括头晕,不稳定,或非眩晕性头晕,并且在至少90天内持续大部分时间。本病例系列的目的是调查使用手动治疗干预减少头晕症状的短期结果,该治疗干预侧重于使用实用的生物力学方法恢复筋膜的活动性。筋膜操纵®方法(FM®),3PD患者。初步的前瞻性病例系列包括12名(n=12)患有持续头晕的患者,他们在先前接受前庭康复后接受了系统的手动治疗以改善筋膜活动度。手动治疗包括基于FM®Stecco方法中提出的模型的战略评估和触诊。该模型利用指向战略点的深筋膜的切向振荡。包括6名男性(n=6)和女性(n=6),平均年龄为68.3±19.3岁。平均干预次数为4.5±0.5。进行非参数配对样本t检验。观察到症状的解决和改善的结果的显着改善。指标包括头晕障碍库存以及静态和动态平衡指标。头晕障碍库存得分下降(即,改进)43.6点(z=-3.1和p=0.002)。计时和前进分数下降(即,改进)3.2s(z=-2.8和p=0.005)。左边的串联增加(即,改进)8.7s(z=2.8和p=0.005),右边的串联增加(即,改进)7.5s(z=2.8和p=0.005)。四到五个手动治疗疗程似乎对3PD患者的头晕投诉和平衡的短期改善有效。这些结果应谨慎解释,因为未来的研究必须使用严格的方法和对照组进行。
    Persistent dizziness and balance deficits are common, often with unknown etiology. Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness (3PD) is a relatively new diagnosis with symptoms that may include dizziness, unsteadiness, or non-vertiginous dizziness and be persistent the majority of time over a minimum of 90 days. The purpose of this case series was to investigate short-term outcomes of reducing dizziness symptoms using a manual therapy intervention focused on restoring mobility in the fascia using a pragmatically applied biomechanical approach, the Fascial Manipulation® method (FM®), in patients with 3PD. The preliminary prospective case series consisted of twelve (n = 12) patients with persistent complaints of dizziness who received systematic application of manual therapy to improve fascial mobility after previously receiving vestibular rehabilitation. The manual therapy consisted of strategic assessment and palpation based on the model proposed in the FM® Stecco Method. This model utilizes tangential oscillations directed toward the deep fascia at strategic points. Six males (n = 6) and females (n = 6) were included with a mean age of 68.3 ± 19.3 years. The average number of interventions was 4.5 ± 0.5. Nonparametric paired sample t-tests were performed. Significant improvements were observed toward the resolution of symptoms and improved outcomes. The metrics included the Dizziness Handicap Inventory and static and dynamic balance measures. The Dizziness Handicap Inventory scores decreased (i.e., improved) by 43.6 points (z = -3.1 and p = 0.002). The timed up and go scores decreased (i.e., improved) by 3.2 s (z = -2.8 and p = 0.005). The tandem left increased (i.e., improved) by 8.7 s (z = 2.8 and p = 0.005) and the tandem right increased (i.e., improved) by 7.5 s (z = 2.8 and p = 0.005). Four to five manual therapy treatment sessions appear to be effective for short-term improvements in dizziness complaints and balance in those with 3PD. These results should be interpreted with caution as future research using rigorous methods and a control group must be conducted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:评估提供反馈报告以提高VA家庭基础初级保健(HBPC)团队完成LST注释的有效性。生命维持治疗决定计划(LSTDI)于2017年在美国整个退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)实施,以确保重病退伍军人有护理目标,并引发并记录LST决定。
    方法:我们在2018年10月至2020年2月期间向13个HBPC干预地点分发了总结LST模板完成率的月度反馈报告,作为唯一的实施策略。我们使用主成分分析将干预与26个比较站点进行匹配,并使用中断时间序列/分段回归分析来评估干预站点和比较站点之间LST模板完成率的差异。除了在混合方法过程评估中进行访谈和调查外,数据还从VAHBPC的国家数据库中提取。
    结果:在2018年3月1日至2020年2月26日期间,干预和比较HBPC团队的LST模板完成率从6.3%上升到41.9%。收到反馈报告的干预部位没有统计学上的显着差异。
    结论:反馈报告并没有增加退伍军人在干预时对LST偏好的记录,与比较站点相比。观察到的干预和比较地点的完成率增加可能归因于在全国范围内作为LSTDI推广的一部分而在全国范围内使用的实施战略。我们的结果表明,仅反馈报告并不是增强HBPC团队国家实施战略的有效实施战略。
    BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness of delivering feedback reports to increase completion of LST notes among VA Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) teams. The Life Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI) was implemented throughout the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in the United States in 2017 to ensure that seriously ill Veterans have care goals and LST decisions elicited and documented.
    METHODS: We distributed monthly feedback reports summarizing LST template completion rates to 13 HBPC intervention sites between October 2018 and February 2020 as the sole implementation strategy. We used principal component analyses to match intervention to 26 comparison sites and used interrupted time series/segmented regression analyses to evaluate the differences in LST template completion rates between intervention and comparison sites. Data were extracted from national databases for VA HBPC in addition to interviews and surveys in a mixed methods process evaluation.
    RESULTS: LST template completion rose from 6.3 to 41.9% across both intervention and comparison HBPC teams between March 1, 2018, and February 26, 2020. There were no statistically significant differences for intervention sites that received feedback reports.
    CONCLUSIONS: Feedback reports did not increase documentation of LST preferences for Veterans at intervention compared with comparison sites. Observed increases in completion rates across intervention and comparison sites can likely be attributed to implementation strategies used nationally as part of the national roll-out of the LSTDI. Our results suggest that feedback reports alone were not an effective implementation strategy to augment national implementation strategies in HBPC teams.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为脑瘫(CP)儿童规定了家庭锻炼计划(HEP),以增加运动练习的频率,然而,坚持HEP可能很低。本文概述了采用交替治疗的单例实验设计(SCED)的方案,使用新的家庭治疗锻炼应用程序,BootleBootCamp(BBCamp),提供有和没有运动跟踪反馈。这项研究将探讨反馈对参与度的影响,运动质量,下肢功能和家庭经验,以帮助了解技术支持的HEP应如何转化和附加值,如果有的话,运动跟踪技术。
    方法:在使用SCED的解释性序贯混合方法研究中,16名CP儿童(6-12岁,粗大运动功能分类系统I-II级)将设置下肢目标,并由其物理治疗师指定个性化HEP,以在配备有三维摄像机计算机系统的家庭电视上使用BBCamp完成。儿童将在6周内完成每周四次的锻炼。儿童将被随机分配到16个交替治疗方案中的1个,BBCamp将在前4周内提供或保留反馈。导致最大治疗益处的BBCamp版本将持续2周。将重新评估目标,并采访家人。主要结果是依从性(重复尝试的规定锻炼的比例)作为行为参与的量度。次要结果是情感和认知参与(笑脸评分),运动保真度,下肢功能,目标成就和参与者体验。SCED数据将使用视觉和统计方法进行分析。定量和定性数据将使用联合显示进行整合。
    背景:获得了Bloorview研究所和多伦多大学研究伦理委员会的伦理批准。结果将通过同行评审的期刊和科学会议分发。
    背景:NCT05998239;预结果。
    BACKGROUND: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) are prescribed home exercise programmes (HEPs) to increase the frequency of movement practice, yet adherence to HEPs can be low. This paper outlines the protocol for a single-case experimental design (SCED) with alternating treatments, using a new home therapy exercise application, Bootle Boot Camp (BBCamp), offered with and without movement tracking feedback. This study will explore the impact of feedback on engagement, movement quality, lower limb function and family experiences to help understand how technology-supported HEPs should be translated and the added value, if any, of movement tracking technology.
    METHODS: In this explanatory sequential mixed-methods study using a SCED, 16 children with CP (aged 6-12 years, Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I-II) will set lower limb goals and be prescribed an individualised HEP by their physiotherapist to complete using BBCamp on their home television equipped with a three-dimensional camera-computer system. Children will complete four weekly exercise sessions over 6 weeks. Children will be randomised to 1 of 16 alternating treatment schedules where BBCamp will provide or withhold feedback during the first 4 weeks. The version of BBCamp that results in the most therapeutic benefit will be continued for 2 final weeks. Goals will be re-evaluated and families interviewed. The primary outcome is adherence (proportion of prescribed exercise repetitions attempted) as a measure of behavioural engagement. Secondary outcomes are affective and cognitive engagement (smiley face ratings), exercise fidelity, lower limb function, goal achievement and participant experiences. SCED data will be analysed using visual and statistical methods. Quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated using joint displays.
    BACKGROUND: Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Boards at Bloorview Research Institute and the University of Toronto. Results will be distributed through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences.
    BACKGROUND: NCT05998239; pre-results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    减少粮食损失是可持续发展目标12-负责任的消费和生产的关键目标。本研究旨在探讨澳大利亚绵羊生产者对收获后反馈的知识和态度,以及这些反馈如何影响澳大利亚绵羊肉价值链中消费者的前损失。采取了混合方法,使用结构化调查和焦点小组讨论。对已完成的结构化调查进行了描述性分析,对焦点小组讨论笔录进行了框架分析。结构化调查结果表明,销售方式是影响收复质量的主要因素。没有受访者报告收到有关食用内脏的反馈。大多数生产者表示,他们希望对尸体有更详细的反馈,所有受访者都希望对食用内脏有更详细的反馈。焦点小组讨论产生了四个主题:形势,知识,以及生产者对反馈系统的态度;因素,启用者,和反馈系统中的障碍;反馈系统中的公平性;以及价值链的可持续性。此外,作者确定了几种短期到中期和长期策略,以减少澳大利亚绵羊肉价值链中的消费前损失,基于这项研究的结果。
    Reducing food loss is a key target for Sustainable Development Goal 12-responsible consumption and production. This study aimed to explore Australian sheep producers\' knowledge of and attitude towards post-harvest feedback and how these influence pre-consumer losses in the Australian sheep meat value chain. A mixed-methods approach was taken, using a structured survey and focus group discussions. Descriptive analysis was performed on the completed structured surveys and framework analysis was performed on the focus group discussion transcripts. The structured survey results showed that sale method was the main factor influencing the quality of feedback received on carcases. No respondents reported receiving feedback on edible offal. Most producers indicated that they wanted more detailed feedback on carcases and all respondents wanted more detailed feedback on edible offal. Four themes emerged from the focus group discussions: situation, knowledge, and attitudes of producers to the feedback system; factors, enablers, and barriers in the feedback system; equity in the feedback system; and sustainability of the value chain. In addition, several short-to-medium- and long-term strategies were identified by the authors to reduce pre-consumer losses in the Australian sheep meat value chain, based on the results of this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生态瞬间评估(EMA)是一种利用智能手机应用程序或可穿戴设备收集日常生活见解的数据收集方法。EMA比传统调查有优势,例如提高生态有效性。然而,特别是长时间的数据收集会扰乱参与者的日常活动,给他们带来负担。因此,EMA研究的数据缺失率可能相当高,并面临合规性问题。让参与者通过可访问的反馈报告访问他们的数据,正如在公民科学倡议中看到的那样,可以增加参与者的动机。生成此类报告的现有框架集中于临床环境中的单个个体,并且不能很好地扩展到大型数据集。这里,我们引入FRED(EMA数据反馈报告)来应对向许多参与者提供个性化报告的挑战。FRED是一种交互式在线工具,参与者可以在其中探索自己的个性化数据报告。我们使用WARN-D研究的数据展示FRED,连续85天查询867名参与者,每天四次和每周一次调查,导致每位参与者最多352次观察。FRED包括描述性统计数据,时间序列可视化,并对选定的EMA变量进行网络分析。参与者可以作为Shiny应用程序的一部分在线访问报告,通过R编程语言开发。我们提供FRED的代码和基础设施,希望它对研究和临床环境都有用,鉴于它可以灵活地适应其他项目的需求,以生成个性化的数据报告为目标。
    Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) is a data collection approach utilizing smartphone applications or wearable devices to gather insights into daily life. EMA has advantages over traditional surveys, such as increasing ecological validity. However, especially prolonged data collection can burden participants by disrupting their everyday activities. Consequently, EMA studies can have comparably high rates of missing data and face problems of compliance. Giving participants access to their data via accessible feedback reports, as seen in citizen science initiatives, may increase participant motivation. Existing frameworks to generate such reports focus on single individuals in clinical settings and do not scale well to large datasets. Here, we introduce FRED (Feedback Reports on EMA Data) to tackle the challenge of providing personalized reports to many participants. FRED is an interactive online tool in which participants can explore their own personalized data reports. We showcase FRED using data from the WARN-D study, where 867 participants were queried for 85 consecutive days with four daily and one weekly survey, resulting in up to 352 observations per participant. FRED includes descriptive statistics, time-series visualizations, and network analyses on selected EMA variables. Participants can access the reports online as part of a Shiny app, developed via the R programming language. We make the code and infrastructure of FRED available in the hope that it will be useful for both research and clinical settings, given that it can be flexibly adapted to the needs of other projects with the goal of generating personalized data reports.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自动从电子病历中提取信息并以质量指标的形式向初级保健实践提供数据的比较可视化的数字应用程序可以促进本地质量改进(QI)。这种QI工作的必要条件是实践主动访问数据。这项研究的目的是探索在瑞典初级保健中可视化质量指标的应用程序的使用,由专业主导的QI计划(“Primärvárdskvalitet”)开发。我们还描述了或多或少广泛使用该应用程序的实践的特征,以及使用强度与选定绩效指标变化之间的关系。
    方法:我们在长达5年的时间内研究了122项初级保健实践\'访问页面(页面视图)的纵向数据。我们比较了高用户和低用户,按每月平均页面浏览量分类,关于实践和患者特征以及性能指标子集的基线测量。我们估计了在1.5年内,对具有糖尿病相关指标的页面的访问与所选糖尿病指标的测量变化之间的线性关联。
    结果:在给定月份中,不到一半的所有实践访问了数据,尽管大多数实践在至少三分之一的观察月份访问了数据。就研究最多的特征而言,高用户和低用户相似。我们发现糖尿病指标的使用与三个糖尿病指标的测量变化之间存在统计学上的显着正相关。
    结论:尽管本研究中的大多数实践表明对自动反馈报告感兴趣,使用强度可以描述为变化和平均有限。使用与绩效变化之间的积极关联表明,政策制定者应增加对实践/QI努力的支持。这种支持可以包括为数据的对等组讨论提供形式化的结构,促进对数据和可能的行动点的理解,以提高性能,同时保持专业主导的应用程序使用。
    BACKGROUND: Digital applications that automatically extract information from electronic medical records and provide comparative visualizations of the data in the form of quality indicators to primary care practices may facilitate local quality improvement (QI). A necessary condition for such QI to work is that practices actively access the data. The purpose of this study was to explore the use of an application that visualizes quality indicators in Swedish primary care, developed by a profession-led QI initiative (\"Primärvårdskvalitet\"). We also describe the characteristics of practices that used the application more or less extensively, and the relationships between the intensity of use and changes in selected performance indicators.
    METHODS: We studied longitudinal data on 122 primary care practices\' visits to pages (page views) in the application over a period up to 5 years. We compared high and low users, classified by the average number of monthly page views, with respect to practice and patient characteristics as well as baseline measurements of a subset of the performance indicators. We estimated linear associations between visits to pages with diabetes-related indicators and the change in measurements of selected diabetes indicators over 1.5 years.
    RESULTS: Less than half of all practices accessed the data in a given month, although most practices accessed the data during at least one third of the observed months. High and low users were similar in terms of most studied characteristics. We found statistically significant positive associations between use of the diabetes indicators and changes in measurements of three diabetes indicators.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although most practices in this study indicated an interest in the automated feedback reports, the intensity of use can be described as varying and on average limited. The positive associations between the use and changes in performance suggest that policymakers should increase their support of practices\' QI efforts. Such support may include providing a formalized structure for peer group discussions of data, facilitating both understanding of the data and possible action points to improve performance, while maintaining a profession-led use of applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    介绍虚拟逃生室(VERs)在医疗保健环境中提供了教育。开发VERs以提供与儿科毒理学相关的医学教育。本研究探讨了仿真技术,特别是用于创建和托管VER的门户,包括Google网站,一个网站建设平台,和Articulate360,一个电子学习平台。设计目标是在两种儿科毒理学场景中使用VER创建一个引人入胜的教育工具。方法在Google网站和Articulate360上开发基于案例的VER。这些病例集中在有机磷酸盐毒性和急性铁毒性。谷歌网站技术被用来建立有机磷酸酯毒性案例,该项目在印度的急诊医学(EM)学员和2022年国际儿科模拟研讨会和研讨会(IPSSW)的研讨会参与者中实施和试点。铁毒性病例是使用Articulate360开发的,并于2023年在IPSSW进行了试验。反馈作为来自参与者的调查收集。问题集中在使用VERs作为一种引人入胜的教育模式,好处,需要改进的地方,和未来参与VERs。在研究之后,与主持人和开发者举行了一次焦点小组会议,随后进行了分析。结果来自参与者和焦点小组的评估提供的数据证明了这两个平台的实用性。参与者在每次VER后完成调查。总的来说,84.2%的受访者(n=60)来自印度的EM培训项目,2022年,来自IPSSW的90.9%的受访者(n=11)和2023年来自IPSSW的100%的受访者(n=23)同意或强烈同意这是一种引人入胜的教育模式。结论不同平台可用于开发具有吸引力的VERs,以实现教育游戏化。这项研究发现,基于在GoogleSites和Articulate360上创建的儿科毒理学场景的VER正在吸引远程学习的教育工具。仿真技术对GoogleSites和Articulate360有好处和缺点。模拟开发人员和教育工作者应该考虑时间,资金,技术需求,和参与者在决定在构建VER时选择哪个门户时的反馈。
    Introduction Virtual escape rooms (VERs) have provided education in healthcare settings. VERs were developed to provide medical education related to pediatric toxicology. This study explores simulation technologies, specifically portals to create and host VERs, including Google Sites, a website-building platform, and Articulate 360, an e-learning platform. The design objective was to create an engaging educational tool using a VER on two pediatric toxicology scenarios. Methods Case-based VERs were developed on Google Sites and Articulate 360. The cases focused on organophosphate toxicity and acute iron toxicity. Google Sites technology was used to build the organophosphate toxicity case, which was implemented and piloted with emergency medicine (EM) trainees in India and workshop participants at the International Pediatric Simulation Symposia and Workshops (IPSSW) in 2022. The iron toxicity case was developed using Articulate 360 and piloted at IPSSW in 2023. Feedback was collected as a survey from participants. Questions focused on using VERs as an engaging educational model, benefits, areas for improvement, and future participation in VERs. Following the study, a focus group meeting was held with facilitators and developers and subsequently analyzed. Results Evaluations from participants and a focus group provided data demonstrating both platforms\' utility. Participants completed surveys after each VER. Overall, 84.2% of respondents (n=60) from EM training programs in India, 90.9% of respondents (n=11) from IPSSW in 2022, and 100% of respondents (n=23) from IPSSW in 2023 agreed or strongly agreed that this was an engaging education model. Conclusion Different platforms may be used to develop engaging VERs for gamification in education. This study found that VERs based on pediatric toxicology scenarios created on Google Sites and Articulate 360 are engaging educational tools for distance learning. Simulation technologies have benefits and disadvantages for Google Sites and Articulate 360. Simulation developers and educators should consider time, funding, technological needs, and participant feedback when deciding which portal to choose when building a VER.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号