Background: The treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) is debated. This study compares open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with minimally invasive osteosynthesis (MIOS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 70 patients with DIACF treated between January 2018 and September 2022, divided into ORIF (n = 50) and MIOS (n = 20) groups. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Maryland Foot Score (MFS) and the Creighton-Nebraska Health Foundation Assessment Scale (CNHFAS). Radiographic outcomes, complication rates, and reintervention rates were evaluated. A chi-square analysis examined the correlation between Sanders classification and treatment choice. Results: The chi-square analysis indicated no significant correlation between the complexity of the fracture and the type of treatment chosen (χ2 = 0.175, p = 0.916). Additionally, the Cochran-Armitage test for trend showed no significant trend in the choice of treatment based on fracture complexity (statistic = 0.048, p = 0.826). A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a longer time to reintervention for MIOS (p = 0.029). Complication rates were similar, with specific complications varying between groups. Quality-of-life outcomes were comparable. Conclusions: ORIF is preferable for high-demand patients due to better anatomical outcomes, while MIOS suits high-risk patients by reducing reinterventions and complications. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

BACKGROUND: Several methods have been used for the treatment of pediatric distal femoral fractures, such as elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN), external fixator (EF) and plate osteosynthesis, but there has been no consensus about the optimal method. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome between EF and ESIN techniques used in metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (MDJ) fractures of the pediatric distal femur.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed operatively treated MDJ fractures of pediatric distal femur between January 2015 and January 2022. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, injury and data of radiography. All of the patients were divided into EF and ESIN groups according to the operation techniques. Malalignment was defined as more than 5 degrees of angular deformity in either plane. Clinical outcomes were measured by Flynn scoring system.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included in this study, among which, 23 were treated with EF, and 15 with ESIN. The mean follow-up time was 18 months (12-24 months). At the final follow-up, all of the fractures were healed. Although there were no statistical differences between the two groups in demographic data, length of stay, estimated blood loss (EBL), rate of open reduction, time to fracture healing and Flynn score, the EF was superior to ESIN in operative time, fluoroscopic exposure and time to partial weight-bearing. The EF group had a significantly higher rate of skin irritation, while the ESIN had a significantly higher rate of malalignment.
CONCLUSIONS: EF and ESIN are both effective methods in the treatment of MDJ fractures of the pediatric distal femur. ESIN is associated with lower rates of skin irritation. However, EF technique has the advantages of shorter operative time, reduced fluoroscopic exposure, and shorter time to partial weight-bearing, as well as lower incidence of malalignment.
METHODS: Level III.

To compare the biomechanical properties of several anterior pelvic ring external fixators with two new configurations in the treatment of Tile C pelvic fractures, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the new configurations and provide a reference for their clinical application. A finite element model of a Tile C pelvic ring injury (unilateral longitudinal sacral fracture and ipsilateral pubic fracture) was constructed. The pelvis was fixed with iliac crest external fixator (IC), anterior inferior iliac spine external fixator (AIIS), combination of IC and AIIS, combination of anterior superior iliac spine external fixator (ASIS) and AIIS, and S1 sacroiliac screw in 5 types of models. The stability indices of the anterior and posterior pelvic rings under vertical longitudinal load, left-right compression load and anterior-posterior shear load were quantified and compared. In the simulated bipedal standing position, the results of the vertical displacement of the midpoint on the upper surface of the sacrum are consistent with the displacement of the posterior rotation angle, and the order from largest to smallest is IC, AIIS, ASIS + AIIS, IC + AIIS and S1 screw. The longitudinal displacement of IC is greater than that of the other models. The displacements of ASIS + AIIS and IC + AIIS are similar and the latter is smaller. In the simulated semi-recumbent position, the vertical displacement and posterior rotation angle displacement of the midpoint on the upper surface of the sacrum are also consistent, ranking from large to small: IC, AIIS, ASIS + AIIS, IC + AIIS and S1 screw. Under the simulated left-right compression load state, the lateral displacements of the highest point of the lateral sacral fracture end are consistent with the highest point of the lateral pubic fracture end, and the order from large to small is S1 screw, IC, AIIS, ASIS + AIIS and IC + AIIS, among which the displacements of S1 screw and IC are larger, and the displacements of ASIS + AIIS and IC + AIIS are similar and smaller than those of other models. The displacements of IC + AIIS are smaller than those of ASIS + AIIS. Under the simulated anterior-posterior shear load condition, the posterior displacements of the highest point of the lateral sacral fracture end and the highest point of the lateral pubic fracture end are also consistent, ranking from large to small: IC, AIIS, ASIS + AIIS, IC + AIIS and S1 screw. Among them, the displacements of IC and AIIS are larger. The displacements of ASIS + AIIS and IC + AIIS are similar and the latter are smaller. For the unstable pelvic injury represented by Tile C pelvic fracture, the biomechanical various stabilities of the combination of IC and AIIS are superior to those of the external fixators of conventional configurations. The biomechanical stabilities of the combination of ASIS and AIIS are also better than those of the external fixators of conventional configurations, and slightly worse than those of the combination of IC and AIIS. Compared with sacroiliac screw and conventional external fixators, the lateral stabilities of IC + AIIS and ASIS + AIIS are particularly prominent.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to assess and compare the clinical efficacy of bone transport with either circular or unilateral external fixators over an intramedullary nail in the treatment of tibial bone defects caused by infection.
METHODS: Between May 2010 and January 2019, clinical and radiographic data were collected and analyzed for patients with bone defects caused by infection. Thirteen patients underwent bone transport using a unilateral external fixator over an intramedullary nail (Group A), while 12 patients were treated with a circular external fixator over an intramedullary nail (Group B). The bone and functional outcomes of both groups were assessed and compared using the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of the Ilizarov criteria, and postoperative complications were evaluated according to the Paley classification.
RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were successfully treated with bone transport using external fixators over an intramedullary nail, with a mean follow-up time of 31.63 ± 5.88 months. There were no significant statistical differences in age, gender, previous surgery per patient, duration of infection, defect size, and follow-up time between Group A and Group B (P > 0.05). However, statistically significant differences were observed in operation time (187.13 ± 21.88 min vs. 255.76 ± 36.42 min, P = 0.002), intraoperative blood loss (39.26 ± 7.33 mL vs. 53.74 ± 10.69 mL, P < 0.001), external fixation time (2.02 ± 0.31 month vs. 2.57 ± 0.38 month, P = 0.045), external fixation index (0.27 ± 0.08 month/cm vs. 0.44 ± 0.09 month/cm, P = 0.042), and bone union time (8.37 ± 2.30 month vs. 9.07 ± 3.12, P = 0.032) between Group A and Group B. The excellent and good rate of bone and functional results were higher in Group A compared to Group B (76.9% vs. 75% and 84.6% vs. 58.3%). Statistically significant differences were observed in functional results (excellent/good/fair/poor, 5/6/2/0 vs. 2/5/4/1, P = 0.013) and complication per patient (0.38 vs. 1.16, P = 0.012) between Group A and Group B.
CONCLUSIONS: Bone transport using a combined technique of external fixators over an intramedullary nail proved to be an effective method in treating tibial bone defects caused by infection. In comparison to circular external fixators, bone transport utilizing a unilateral external fixator over an intramedullary nail resulted in less external fixation time, fewer complications, and better functional outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The lack of resources limits the treatment of craniomaxillofacial fractures (CMF) in low-income countries (LIC). Therefore, Barton bandages and/or interdental wiring are considered in these regions. Fracture reduction is maintained by permanent occlusion for 6 weeks, which often leads to limited compliance and dissatisfying results. The aim of this cadaver-based study is to evaluate the feasibility of the use of an external face fixator (EFF) for the treatment of CMF, its biomechanical values and to define the optimal pin insertion points and angles.
METHODS: An AO hand fixator was used. CMF of types Le Fort 1-3 with split fractures of the hard palate were treated with EFF on 13 anatomical specimens. Fractures were created using a chisel, and pins were placed in specific anatomical regions. The maximal pull-out force [N] of pins was analysed by a tensile force gauge, and Fmax of the mandibular pins was evaluated. Computer tomography scans were performed on the healthy, fractured and EFF-treated skulls.
RESULTS: The pull-out forces for the single pins were mandibular pins (n = 15, median 488.0 N), supraorbital pins (n = 15, median 455.0 N), zygomatic pins (n = 14, median 269.1 N), medial hard palate pins (n = 12, median 208.4 N) and lateral hard palate pins (n = 8, median 49.6 N).
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the operation technique is feasible, and the stability of the EFF is sufficient for maintaining the reduction. The required pins can safely be inserted into the described areas with good reduction results. Using EFF offers a feasible alternative to the non-surgical treatment of CMF in LIC.

UNASSIGNED: To analyze the effectiveness comparison of external fixator combined with Kirschner wire fixation and Kirschner wire fixation in the treatment of cubitus varus deformity in children.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective case-control study was conducted to collect 36 children of postoperative supracondylar humerus fracture complicating cubitus varus deformity between January 2018 and July 2022. Among them, 17 cases were treated with distal humeral wedge osteotomy external fixation combined with Kirschner wire fixation (observation group), and 19 cases were treated with distal humeral wedge osteotomy and Kirschner wire fixation (control group). The baseline data including age, gender, deformity side, time from fracture to operation, carrying angle of the healthy side and preoperative carrying angle of the affected side, elbow flexion and extension range of motion, and lateral condylar prominence index (LCPI) showed no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, hospitalization cost, healing time of osteotomy, postoperative complications, and the carrying angle, LCPI, and elbow flexion and extention range of motion were recorded and compared between the two groups. The elbow function was assessed by Oppenheim score at 3 months after operation and at last follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: The children in both groups were followed up 13-48 months, with an average of 26.7 months. There was 1 case of needle tract infection in the observation group and 2 cases in the control group, and no nerve injury occurred, the difference in the incidence of complication (5.88% vs 10.53%) between the two groups was not significant ( χ 2=0.502, P=0.593). There was no significant difference in the operation time and fracture healing time between the two groups ( P>0.05); the hospitalization cost of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group ( P<0.05). The Oppenheim score of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group at 3 months after operation ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the Oppenheim score between the two groups at last follow-up ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, the carrying angle of affected side significantly improved in both groups when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05); the differences of the pre- and post-operative carrying angle of affected side and elbow flexion and extension range of motion showed no significant differences between the two groups ( P>0.05), but the difference in pre- and post-operative LCPI of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group ( P<0.05).
UNASSIGNED: External fixator combined with Kirschner wire fixation and Kirschner wire fixation both can achieve satisfactory correction of cubitus varus deformity in children, and the former can achieve better short-term functional recovery of elbow joint and reduce the incidence of humeral lateral condyle protrusion.
UNASSIGNED: 比较外固定架结合克氏针固定与克氏针固定治疗儿童肘内翻畸形的疗效。.
UNASSIGNED: 回顾分析2018年1月—2022年7月收治且符合选择标准的36例肱骨髁上骨折术后并发肘内翻畸形患儿临床资料。其中17例采用肱骨远端楔形截骨外固定架结合克氏针固定（观察组），19例采用肱骨远端楔形截骨克氏针固定（对照组）。两组患儿年龄、性别、畸形侧别、骨折至此次手术时间、健侧提携角及术前患侧提携角、肘关节屈伸活动度、外侧髁突出指数（lateral condylar prominence index，LCPI）等基线资料比较，差异均无统计学意义（ P>0.05）。记录并比较两组患儿手术时间、住院费用、截骨愈合时间、术后并发症及末次随访时患侧提携角、LCPI和肘关节屈伸活动度；术后3个月、末次随访时采用Oppenheim评分评估肘关节功能。.
UNASSIGNED: 两组患儿均获随访，随访时间13～48个月，平均26.7个月。观察组和对照组分别发生1例和2例针道感染，均无神经损伤发生，两组并发症发生率（5.88% vs 10.53%）比较差异无统计学意义（ χ 2=0.502， P=0.593）。两组手术时间和截骨愈合时间比较差异无统计学意义（ P>0.05）；观察组住院费用高于对照组（ P<0.05）。观察组术后3个月Oppenheim评分优于对照组（ P<0.05），但末次随访时两组Oppenheim评分比较差异无统计学意义（ P>0.05）。末次随访时，两组患侧提携角均较术前显著改善（ P<0.05）；两组间患侧提携角和肘关节屈伸活动度手术前后差值比较差异均无统计学意义（ P>0.05），但观察组LCPI手术前后差值优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。.
UNASSIGNED: 采用外固定架结合克氏针固定及单纯克氏针固定治疗儿童肘内翻畸形均可获得满意畸形矫正，而前者术后早期肘关节功能恢复更好，并可降低术后肱骨外侧髁突出的发生。.

Previous works had successfully demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of unilateral external fixator in treating various types of fracture, ranging from the simple type, such as oblique and transverse fractures, to complex fractures. However, literature that investigated its biomechanical analyses to further justify its efficacy is limited. Therefore, this paper aimed to analyse the stability of unilateral external fixator for treating different types of fracture, including the simple oblique, AO32C3 comminuted, and 20 mm gap transverse fracture. These fractures were reconstructed at the distal diaphysis of the femoral bone and computationally analysed through the finite element method under the stance phase condition. Findings showed a decrease in the fixation stiffness in large gap fracture (645.2 Nmm-1 for oblique and comminuted, while 23.4 Nmm-1 for the gap fracture), which resulted in higher displacement, IFM and stress distribution at the pin bone interface. These unfavourable conditions could consequently increase the risk of delayed union, pin loosening and infection, as well as implant failure. Nevertheless, the stress observed on the fracture surfaces was relatively low and in controlled amount, indicating that bone unity is still allowable in all models. Briefly, the unilateral fixation may provide desirable results in smaller fracture gap, but its usage in larger gap fracture might be alarming. These findings could serve as a guide and insight for surgeons and researchers, especially on the biomechanical stability of fixation in different fracture types and how will it affect bone unity.

BACKGROUND: External fixators (EF) are widely employed for pediatric tibial shaft fractures, being a prevalent choice in clinical practice. However, they are associated with numerous complications, such as loss of reduction, delayed union, and nonunion. An alternative approach involves the use of Ilizarov external fixators (IEF), which have been documented in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures in various studies. This study endeavors to retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes of EF and IEF in the treatment of pediatric tibial shaft fractures.
METHODS: The study retrospectively examined patients aged 5-14 years who underwent treatment for tibial shaft fractures at our institute between January 2017 and January 2023. These individuals were subsequently classified into EF and IEF groups. Exclusions comprised patients presenting with pathological fracture, neuromuscular disorder, metabolic disease, prior tibial fracture or instrumentation, and polytrauma. Additionally, individuals with a follow-up duration of more than 12 months or incomplete medical records were excluded.
RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were divided into two groups: the EF group, comprising 24 patients (18 males, 6 females), and the IEF group, consisting of 21 patients (17 males, 4 females). The two groups exhibited no statistically significant differences in terms of sex, age, body weight, time from injury to surgery, AO classification, or concomitant injuries. There were two cases of nonunion in the EF group. Radiological union occurred more rapidly in the IEF group (7.8 ± 0.4 weeks) than in the EF group (9.3 ± 1.1 weeks) (P < 0.05). The mean hospitalization duration differed significantly between the EF group (6.7 ± 3.4 days) and the IEF group (7.5 ± 1.1 days) (P > 0.05). The mean duration of the operative procedure significantly differed between the IEF group (147.8 ± 24.5 min) and the EF group (77.2 ± 43.9 min) (P < 0.001). A significant difference (P < 0.001) in weight-bearing time was observed between the IEF group (2.6 ± 0.7 weeks) and the EF group (9.9 ± 1.4 weeks). According to the Johner-Wruhs criteria, no significant differences were found between the two groups. A significant difference (P < 0.001) in hospitalization costs was observed between the IEF group (7848.0 ± 262.4 $) and the EF group (5403.0 ± 233.3 $).
CONCLUSIONS: EF is cheaper, quicker and simpler and we need more randomized controlled studies and that this is a pilot study only. Both types of surgery are good choices for children. Nevertheless, the IEF group demonstrates advantages such as early weight-bearing capability and faster fracture healing.

BACKGROUND: Transosseous distraction osteosynthesis is prioritized in orthopedic care for children with achondroplasia. However, difficulties encountered during treatment and rehabilitation directly impact patients\' quality of life. Using rod external fixators within a semicircular frame for osteosynthesis is less traumatic compared to spoke circular devices. Their straightforward assembly and mounting on the limb segment can help significantly reduce treatment duration, thereby improving children\'s quality of life during treatment and rehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of the quality of life (measured by postoperative pain syndrome, physical activity, and emotional state) among children with achondroplasia undergoing paired limb lengthening using either an external fixator with modified distraction control or a circular multiaxial system developed by the authors.
METHODS: This was an observational, prospective, nonrandomized, and longitudinal study with historical control. The study group consisted of 14 patients ranging from 5 to 15 (mean 7.6, SD 2.3) years old with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of achondroplasia. All patients underwent paired limb lengthening with a rod external fixator and a modified distraction control developed by the authors. A total of 28 limb segments, among them 4 (14%) humeri, 8 (29%) femurs, and 16 (57%) tibias, were lengthened in 1 round. Unpublished data from the previous study served as the control group, comprising 9 patients (18 limb segments) of the same age group (mean age at surgery 8.6, SD 2.3 years), who underwent limb lengthening surgery using a circular multiaxial system-2 (11%) humeri, 6 (33%) femurs, and 10 (56%) tibias. The Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale was used to measure pain symptoms, while the Russified Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) v4.0 questionnaire assessed quality of life.
RESULTS: During the latent phase (7 to 10 days after surgery), a more pronounced decrease in the indicators of physical activity and emotional state on the PedsQL v4.0 questionnaire was noted in the control group (mean 52.4, SD 4.8 versus mean 52.8, SD 5.5 points according to children\'s responses and their parents\' responses, respectively) compared to the experimental group (mean 59.5, SD 6.8 points and mean 61.33, SD 6.5 points according to the children\'s responses and their parents\' responses, respectively). The differences between the groups were statistically significant (P<.05 for children\'s responses and P<.01 for parents\' responses). Importantly, 6 months after surgery, these quality-of-life indicators, as reported by children in the experimental group, averaged 70.25 (SS 4.8) points. Similarly, their parents reported a mean of 70.54 (SD 4.2) points. In the control group, the corresponding values were 69.64 (SD 5.6) and 69.35 (SD 6.2), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The external fixator with modified distraction control developed by the authors provides a higher standard of living compared with the circular multiaxial system during the latency phase.

UNASSIGNED: External fixator (EF) devices are commonly used in the management of complex skeletal trauma, as well as in elective limb reconstruction surgery for the management of congenital and acquired pathology. The subsequent removal of an EF is commonly performed under general anaesthesia in an operating theatre. This practice is resource-intensive and limits the amount of time available for other surgical cases in the operating theatre. We aimed to assess the use of regional anaesthesia as an alternative method of analgesia to facilitate the EF removal in an outpatient setting.
UNASSIGNED: This prospective case series evaluated the first 50 consecutive cases of EF removal in the outpatient clinic between 10/06/22 and 03/02/23. Regional anaesthesia using ultrasound-guided blockade of peripheral nerves was administered using 1% lidocaine due to its rapid onset and short half-life. Patients were assessed for additional analgesia requirements and then were asked to evaluate their experience and perceived pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS).
UNASSIGNED: Fifty patients were included in the study. The mean age was 46.8 years (range 21-85 years). About 54% of the patients were male patients (N = 27). Post-procedure, all patients indicated positive satisfaction ratings, each participant responded as either \'satisfied\' (N = 6), \'very satisfied\' (N = 24) or \'highly satisfied\' (N = 20). In addition, 90% of the participants reported that they would opt for this method of EF removal again in future. The VAS for pain immediately following completion of the procedure was low, with a mean score of 0.36 (range 0-4), where a score of 0 = \'No pain\', and 10 = \'worst pain possible\'. The median score was 0.
UNASSIGNED: We present the first description of outpatient EF removal using regional anaesthesia, with a prospective case series of 50 fully conscious patients from whom the EF was removed. This novel technique is likely to be cost-effective, reproducible, and safe. This technique reduces the burden of EF removal from an operating list and also improves the patient\'s experience when compared with other forms of conscious sedation. By eliminating the use of Entonox and methoxyflurane for sedation and analgesia, this technique also demonstrates a method of improving environmental sustainability.
UNASSIGNED: Williams LM, Stamps G, Peak H, et al. Circular External Fixator Removal in the Outpatient Clinic Using Regional Anaesthesia: A Pilot Study of A Novel Approach. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(1):7-11.