UNASSIGNED: The management of hip dislocation in patients older than 9 years of age is a challenge in terms of deciding which is the best treatment course to follow since the main sequelae are as follows: pain, discrepancy in the length of the pelvic extremities and lame gait, with the consequent disability for activities of daily living. In Ho Choi, Thabet A mention limited treatment options, including total hip arthroplasty and hip arthrodesis. These options have their benefits and limitations. The pelvic support osteotomy initially indicated for the treatment of septic arthritis of the hip and performed for the first time by Bavoier in 1838 and modified in 1970 by Ilizarov aims to improve the aforementioned sequelae. These cases report showed us the functional improvement with the treatment of dislocated hip dysplasia with pelvic support osteotomy with monolateral fixator and the 2nd osteotomy 4 cm distal to the hip. This was corroborated through the application of the modified Harris test.
UNASSIGNED: A series of six female Mexican adolescent patients from 11 to 17 years of age who come to the clinic due to long-standing pain symptoms in the coxofemoral joint, three patients in the right and three in the left hip when walking. All were treated with pelvic support osteotomy. The six patients continued with mild positive Trendelenburg but all of them diminished the discrepancy in the pelvic extremities, the mobility arcs were preserved and pain was suppressed in all. The modified Harris test showed increased scores (103.3%) after the surgery. There was just a minor complication in a patient, and it was resolved with surgical lavage.
UNASSIGNED: The modifications in the technique, monolateral fixator and second osteotomy 4 cm from the first one, allowed our patients to present functional improvement at the hip, which was assessed with the modified Harris scale. Patients achieved independent walking without pain and Trendelenburg less evident. The changes we found in our patients are evidence of the goodness and effectiveness of this type of osteotomy in patients older than 9 years of age, to improve the function of the hip.

BACKGROUND: Several methods have been used for the treatment of pediatric distal femoral fractures, such as elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN), external fixator (EF) and plate osteosynthesis, but there has been no consensus about the optimal method. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome between EF and ESIN techniques used in metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (MDJ) fractures of the pediatric distal femur.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed operatively treated MDJ fractures of pediatric distal femur between January 2015 and January 2022. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, injury and data of radiography. All of the patients were divided into EF and ESIN groups according to the operation techniques. Malalignment was defined as more than 5 degrees of angular deformity in either plane. Clinical outcomes were measured by Flynn scoring system.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included in this study, among which, 23 were treated with EF, and 15 with ESIN. The mean follow-up time was 18 months (12-24 months). At the final follow-up, all of the fractures were healed. Although there were no statistical differences between the two groups in demographic data, length of stay, estimated blood loss (EBL), rate of open reduction, time to fracture healing and Flynn score, the EF was superior to ESIN in operative time, fluoroscopic exposure and time to partial weight-bearing. The EF group had a significantly higher rate of skin irritation, while the ESIN had a significantly higher rate of malalignment.
CONCLUSIONS: EF and ESIN are both effective methods in the treatment of MDJ fractures of the pediatric distal femur. ESIN is associated with lower rates of skin irritation. However, EF technique has the advantages of shorter operative time, reduced fluoroscopic exposure, and shorter time to partial weight-bearing, as well as lower incidence of malalignment.
METHODS: Level III.

BACKGROUND: Miserable malalignment syndrome is a complex torsional lower limb deformity with limited consensus on surgical treatment. We present the outcome of de-rotation of the tibia alone using an external fixator.
METHODS: Fifteen patients (22 segments) were operated on between 2012 and 2020; 13 presented with anterior knee pain, and two presented with out-toeing. Gait analysis was done in nine patients, and CT scan rotational profile, including tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance, femoral version, and tibial torsion, were calculated. Kujala knee pain score and visual analogue pain score (VAS) were recorded. All underwent infra-tubercular osteotomy of the tibia and midshaft osteotmy of the fibula and application of a hexapod circular frame to gradually internally rotate the tibia until the foot aligned with the patella.
RESULTS: There was no preoperative clinical or radiographic evidence for patellar instability, femoral anteversion 30° (21°-54°), and external tibial torsion 50° (37-70). The mean age at surgery was 21 years (12-37) with a mean follow-up of 20 months (9-83). All osteotomies healed, and the frames were removed at a mean of 111 days (80-168). The mean VAS score improved from 8(5-9) to 1(0-4) postoperatively (P < 0.001). The mean Kujala knee pain score increased from 53 (30-75) to 92 (54-100) postoperatively (P < 0.001). The mean preoperative foot progression angle (FPA) was 37° (20°-50°), with 13 postoperatively walking with neutral FPA. One patient walked with symmetrical + 10° and the other with - 5° FPA. All patients reported relief of knee pain and were satisfied with the alignment.
CONCLUSIONS: Gradual correction of severe external tibia torsion with a hexapod external fixator and an infra-tubercle tibial osteotomy could provide an optimum method to eliminate knee pain and improve limb alignment in miserable malalignment syndrome.

Traumatic knee dislocation represents a rare event, contributing to less than 0.02 % of all orthopedic trauma and 0.05 % of joint dislocations, respectively. It is critically important to recognize, identify, and appropriately manage such cases as \'time\' is implicated as an outcome-determining factor. Thus, such cases warrant quick consideration and appropriate management to mitigate the possibility of neurovascular damage and long-term sequelae. We report a case of a 59-year-old man struck by a motor vehicle in a remote rural community in northern Mexico managed with external fixation 16 h after the initial trauma, and later resulting in a supracondylar amputation. The authors of this case report underline the importance of timely intervention strategies when faced with such cases of knee dislocation and promote enhanced training of peripheral trauma-care providers to help improve patient outcomes.

Studies have reported a high percentage of ankle fracture dislocations with secondary loss of reduction during primary treatment with a splint or cast. This study aimed to assess the rate of secondary loss of reduction in unimalleolar ankle fracture dislocations treated primarily with a cast or external fixator, identify the potential influence of fracture morphology, and investigate the potential implications. Unimalleolar ankle fracture dislocations with and without posterior malleolar fracture between 2011 and 2020 were included. Patients were categorized into two groups, depending on the method of temporary treatment. Fracture morphology, time to definitive surgery, and soft-tissue complications were compared. Of 102 patients, loss of reduction tended to occur more often in the cast group (17.3%) than in the external fixator group (6.0%). The presence of a posterior malleolar fracture did not have a significant influence on loss of reduction in cast immobilization; however, the fragment proved to be significantly bigger in cases with loss of reduction. No statistically significant differences in soft tissue complications or time to definitive surgery were found. Surgeons should consider the application of interval external fixation in the primary treatment of unimalleolar ankle fracture dislocations with additional posterior malleolar fractures.

Internal fixation using plates remains the gold standard for facial fracture fixation. External wound fixators are rarely used. In the present study, we successfully treated multiple comminuted facial fractures with midfacial depressions by using a Hoffman-type external fixator and achieved good functional and cosmetic results. Internal fixation using plates is sometimes problematic in comminuted facial fractures, such as those associated with high-energy trauma. Depending on the fracture pattern, a Hoffman-type external fixator, which is a single pillar type of external fixator, can be effective.

BACKGROUND: To determine if temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixator (ex-fix) in ankle fracture-dislocations with delayed surgery or moderate soft-tissue injury, we analysed the early complications and re-dislocation rates of cast immobilization in relation to ex-fix in patients sustaining these injuries.
METHODS: All skeletally mature patients with a closed ankle fracture-dislocation and a minimum 6-months follow-up treated between 2007 and 2017 were included. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, injury description, treatment history and complications were assessed.
RESULTS: In 160 patients (94 female; mean age 50 years) with 162 ankle fracture-dislocations, 35 underwent primary ex-fix and 127 temporizing cast immobilizations. Loss of reduction (LOR) was observed in 25 cases (19.7%) and 19 (15.0%) were converted to ex-fix. The rate of surgical site infections (ex-fix: 11.1% vs cast: 4.6%) and skin necrosis (ex-fix: 7.4% vs cast: 6.5%) did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.122 and p = 0.825). Temporizing cast immobilization led to an on average 2.7 days earlier definite surgery and 5.0 days shorter hospitalization when compared to ex-fix (p < 0.001). Posterior malleolus fragment (PMF) size predicted LOR with ≥ 22.5% being the threshold for critical PMF-size (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Temporizing cast immobilization was a safe option for those ankle fracture-dislocations in which immediate definite treatment was not possible. Those temporized in a cast underwent definite fixation earlier than those with a fix-ex and had a complication rate no worse than the ex-fix patients. PMF-size was an important predictor for LOR. Primary ex-fix seems appropriate for those with ≥ 22.5% PMF-size.
BACKGROUND: The study does not meet the criteria of a prospective, clinical trial. There was no registration.

UNASSIGNED: Denosumab is used as a neoadjuvant therapy for giant cell tumours (GCT) prior to surgery to improve surgical clearance and reduce the rate of recurrence. However, the use of denosumab as adjuvant therapy following an external fixator for GCT of the distal radius has not been commonly described. We describe the use of adjuvant denosumab following curettage and external fixation in a patient with GCT of the distal radius presenting with a pathological fracture.
METHODS: A 23-year-old male presented with a right distal radius fracture. Imaging was suggestive of a Campanacci grade 3 GCT at the distal radius with a pathological fracture. His chest X-ray was normal. He was managed with a dorsal open distal radius curettage and stabilization of the fracture with an external minifixator. Histology confirmed a GCT and adjuvant denosumab therapy was given. The response was satisfactory and the external fixator was removed at 5 months. At 42 months post-treatment, he had satisfactory function with no evidence of recurrence.
UNASSIGNED: The extensive involvement of the distal radius and local invasion precluded the use of internal fixation after thorough curettage. Therefore, an external minifixator was applied to stabilize the fracture and started on denosumab following oncology opinion.
CONCLUSIONS: External fixation and adjuvant denosumab may be considered as an option in patients who are not suitable for internal fixation. However, cohort studies with long term follow up is necessary before it can be recommended in routine practice.

BACKGROUND: Open knee fracture-dislocation is a rare orthopedic injury. However, the importance of its correct management could not be overstated. To the best of our knowledge, this is the fifth study reporting a case with simultaneous Hoffa fracture and knee dislocation and the 1st study describing a patient with open plateau fracture-dislocation accompanied with Hoffa fracture, patella fracture, and patellar tendon tear. In addition, this report is noticeable as our case had no gross ligament injury unlike frequent association of knee dislocation with knee collateral ligament damage.
METHODS: In this study, we describe a 34-year-old motorcyclist referred to our center following a motor car accident. Further work-up revealed an open irreducible posterolateral knee dislocation, type 5 Hohl and Moore plateau fracture, lateral femoral condyle Hoffa\'s fracture, patellar fracture, and patellar tendon tear of his right knee. During an open reduction, it turned out that an entrapped lateral meniscus prevented the joint to be reduced by closed means. After applying a temporary external fixator, the patient was finally managed with open reduction and internal fixation.
CONCLUSIONS: Irreducible knee dislocation needs further work up to rule out any interposed soft tissue into the joint. Aggressive irrigation/ debridement, early anatomic reduction, and internal fixation may help reduce open fracture complications including infection, non-union, and stiffness.

暂无摘要。