目的:对泰国结直肠癌(CRC)造口患者的生活质量(QOL)影响因素进行评估和综合研究。
方法:综合综述。
方法:科学数据库CINAHL,Medline,PubMed,WebofScience,GoogleScholar和ThaiJO被问及2011年至2021年之间发表的英语或泰语研究文章。
方法:使用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)报告指南的首选报告项目搜索纳入的研究。通过使用约翰·霍普金斯研究证据评估工具评估研究水平和质量,对符合条件的研究进行了严格评估。Whittemore和Knafl的五阶段框架被用来指导这篇综合评论。提取了每项合适研究的主要数据,编码并分类为子主题。最后,主题是根据审查问题和目标确定的。
结果:8篇文章符合纳入标准。确定了十二个子主题和五个重要主题:社会人口统计学和临床,生理,心理,社会和精神方面。
结论:泰国CRC造口者中影响QOL的因素可分为五个领域。社会人口统计学和临床,生理和心理方面与其他国家相似。同时,社会和精神领域与其他国家不同,特别是在大家庭的支持和佛教信仰。
结论:通过提供QOL影响因素,护士可以调查重要的QOL预测因素,并创建适当的干预措施来促进QOL,特别是在有造口的泰国CRC成年人中。同样,将这一结果纳入泰国和其他类似国家的护理课程,以教导能够为有造口的CRC成人提供直接整体护理的护理学生将是有帮助的.此外,它将作为有关护理实践指南的医疗保健政策的基础,用于评估造口术后的个人生活质量因素和促进生活质量活动。患者或公众贡献:泰国的造口护士参与数据分析阶段。他们在会议前阅读了所有包含的研究报告。他们考虑并评论了代码的生成和合成,次主题和主题。
OBJECTIVE: To appraise and synthesize research investigating the factors contributing to the quality of life (QOL) among Thai patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) with a stoma.
METHODS: An integrative
review.
METHODS: The scientific databases CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and ThaiJO were queried for English or Thai research articles published between 2011 and 2021.
METHODS: Included studies were searched utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. The eligible studies were critically appraised by evaluating the study level and quality using the John Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool. Whittemore and Knafl\'s five-stage framework was used to guide this integrative
review. Primary data from each suitable study were abstracted, coded and categorized into sub-themes. Finally, themes were identified based on the
review question and objective.
RESULTS: Eight articles met the inclusion criteria. Twelve sub-themes and five significant themes were identified: Sociodemographic and clinical, physiological, psychological, social and spiritual aspects.
CONCLUSIONS: Factors contributing to QOL among Thai CRC ostomates can be categorized into five domains. The sociodemographic and clinical, physiological and psychological aspects are similar to those in other countries. In the meanwhile, the social and spiritual domains differ from those in other countries, particularly in extended family support and Buddhist belief.
CONCLUSIONS: By providing the QOL contributing factors, nurses can investigate the significant QOL predictors and create the appropriate interventions for promoting QOL, specifically among Thai CRC adults with a stoma. Likewise, it will be helpful to integrate this result into the nursing curriculum in Thailand and other similar countries to teach nursing students who could give direct holistic care to CRC adults with a stoma. In addition, it will serve as the basis for healthcare policy regarding nursing practice guidelines for assessing the individuals\' QOL factors and promoting QOL activities after ostomy surgery. Patient or Public contribution: The ostomy nurses in Thailand are involved in the data analysis stage. They read all the included studies before the meeting. They considered and commented on the generating and synthesizing of codes, subthemes and themes.