epileptic seizure

癫痫发作
  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:在癫痫监测不可行的情况下,回顾视频(无脑电图)以区分癫痫发作(ES)和非癫痫法术(NES)可能会有所帮助。以前的基于视频的诊断研究受到了不同准确性的影响,灵敏度,和特异性。
    方法:我们系统回顾了PubMed,Embase,和WebofScience从成立到2022年9月,确定了报道基于视频的ES和NES诊断的文章。在初步分析中,对于每一项研究,当不同的审稿人群体对视频进行分类时,选择了最多的专家组(例如,癫痫专家和普通神经科医生)。在次要分析中,我们比较了不同专业知识水平的诊断准确性(例如,癫痫学家,普通神经学家,居民,医学生)。进行荟萃分析以获得可靠性测量的汇总估计。
    结果:从确定的5245篇文章中,13符合纳入标准,在主要分析中,来自683例患者(696个视频)的累积数据由95名独立审阅者审查。仅视频就有很强的区分ES和NES的能力,如以下度量曲线下的区域-0.9(被认为“杰出”)所证明的那样,敏感性-82.2%(95%置信区间[C.I],80.2%-84.0%),特异性-84.7%(C.I.,82.8%-86.5%),和诊断几率-24.7(C.I.,11.5-52.9)。二次分析显示,与审阅者相关的准确性,癫痫学家的准确性最高(DOR81.2,C.I.,90.0%-94.6%)。
    结论:视频在区分ES和NES方面具有可靠的诊断性能。荟萃分析的局限性包括研究间的异质性,包括可变的视频质量和审稿人的专业知识。联合视频脑电图仍然是诊断癫痫和NES的金标准。
    BACKGROUND: Review of videos (without electroencephalography) to differentiate epileptic seizures (ES) from non-epileptic spells (NES) may be helpful where epilepsy monitoring is not feasible. Previous studies of video-based diagnosis have suffered from variable accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
    METHODS: We systematically reviewed relevant literature in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to September 2022, identifying articles that reported on the video-based diagnosis of ES and NES. In primary analysis, for each study, the most expert group was chosen when different groups of reviewers classified the videos (e.g., epilepsy specialists and general neurologists). In secondary analysis, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of different expertise levels (e.g., epileptologists, general neurologists, residents, medical students). Meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled estimates of reliability measures.
    RESULTS: From 5245 articles identified, 13 met the inclusion criteria, with cumulative data from 683 patients (696 videos) reviewed by 95 independent reviewers in primary analysis. Video alone had a strong ability to differentiate ES from NES as evidenced by the following metrics- area under the curve- 0.9 (considered \"outstanding\"), sensitivity- 82.2% (95% Confidence Interval [C.I], 80.2%-84.0%), specificity- 84.7% (C.I., 82.8%-86.5%), and diagnostic odds ratio- 24.7 (C.I., 11.5-52.9). The secondary analysis showed reviewer-dependent accuracy with epileptologists showing the highest accuracy (DOR 81.2, C.I., 90.0%-94.6%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Video alone has reliable diagnostic performance for differentiating ES from NES. Meta-analysis limitations include inter-study heterogeneity including variable video quality and reviewer expertise. Combined video-EEG remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of epilepsy and NES.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    BACKGROUND: Intracranial dermoid cyst is a rare, benign, nonneoplastic tumor-like lesion that could cause seizures, headache, and hydrocephalus. We hypothesized that the temporal lobe dermoid cyst in combination with other factors were causing the epileptic seizure.
    METHODS: We encountered a 17-year-old girl with anti-seizure medication-resistant epilepsy secondary to dermoid cyst located in the temporal region depicted on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). She showed neither symptoms of meningitis nor rupture of the cyst according to serial MRI. We hypothesized that temporal lobe dermoid cyst in combination with other factors, such as focal cortical dysplasia (FCD), etc., was causing epileptic seizures in this case. She underwent dermoid cyst removal surgery with resection of the tip of the antero-inferior temporal lobe.
    RESULTS: Histopathological study showed multiple small intramedullary dermoid cysts in the left antero-inferior temporal lobe in addition to MRI lesions and FCD.
    CONCLUSIONS: A patient with medically intractable epilepsy secondary to left temporal lobe dermoid cyst showed multiple intramedullary dermoid cysts and focal cortical dysplasia that might have interacted to create epileptogenicity. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of dermoid cyst concomitant with FCD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从病理生理学的角度来看,癫痫样事件的传播是一个非常有趣的现象,因为它涉及神经网络的几种募集机制。已经进行了广泛的体内和体外研究,这表明多个网络以及细胞候选机制控制着这个过程,包括波传播的共存,耦合振荡器动力学,还有更多.癫痫发作传播的临床重要性主要源于以下事实:癫痫发作的表现不能仅归因于癫痫发作焦点本身的活动,而是将癫痫活动传播到其他大脑结构。传播,尤其是当引起二次概括时,由于反复跌倒会给患者带来风险,外伤,和不良的神经系统结果。抗癫痫药物(ASM)以不同的方式和不同的效力影响传播。重要的是,对于耐药患者,靶向性癫痫发作传播可以改善生活质量,即使简单局灶性事件没有大幅减少.受这一现象的广泛影响,我们试图回顾有关癫痫活动传播的文献,特别是常用ASM对其的影响。基于这些知识,我们提出了一种新的ASM分类,分为三大类:主要,未成年人,和减少癫痫样活动传播的中等功效。
    The propagation of epileptiform events is a highly interesting phenomenon from the pathophysiological point of view, as it involves several mechanisms of recruitment of neural networks. Extensive in vivo and in vitro research has been performed, suggesting that multiple networks as well as cellular candidate mechanisms govern this process, including the co-existence of wave propagation, coupled oscillator dynamics, and more. The clinical importance of seizure propagation stems mainly from the fact that the epileptic manifestations cannot be attributed solely to the activity in the seizure focus itself, but rather to the propagation of epileptic activity to other brain structures. Propagation, especially when causing secondary generalizations, poses a risk to patients due to recurrent falls, traumatic injuries, and poor neurological outcome. Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) affect propagation in diverse ways and with different potencies. Importantly, for drug-resistant patients, targeting seizure propagation may improve the quality of life even without a major reduction in simple focal events. Motivated by the extensive impact of this phenomenon, we sought to review the literature regarding the propagation of epileptic activity and specifically the effect of commonly used ASMs on it. Based on this body of knowledge, we propose a novel classification of ASMs into three main categories: major, minor, and intermediate efficacy in reducing the propagation of epileptiform activity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    癫痫-运动障碍性脑病是罕见的癫痫,其特征是具有不自主运动的早发性癫痫性脑病(EOEEs)。在这里,我们研究了基因变异在癫痫-运动障碍性脑病中的影响.从东京都神经医院招募了来自四个家庭的四名独立患者,他们表现出非自主运动。纳入标准如下:出生后1年内发病,频繁的癫痫发作,严重的发育迟缓和伴随的不自主运动。我们检测到四种基因突变,包括STXBP1、GNAO1、CYFIP2和SCN8A变体。非自主运动具有抗药性。然而,在GNAO1变异型患者中,苍白虫电凝后加巴喷丁在治疗舞蹈病和四肢的波利斯病方面部分有效,和perampanel部分抑制了一名SCN8A变体患者的癫痫发作和不自主运动。运动障碍是许多神经发育障碍常见的疾病,包括各种EOEEs。尽管我们无法使用EOEE和运动障碍患者的遗传变异建立明确的相关性,EOEEs患者的非自主运动可能是一个关键的诊断结果。随着对更多患有癫痫-运动障碍性脑病的患者进行研究,遗传变异的使用在将来可能是有益的。
    Epileptic-dyskinetic encephalopathies are rare epilepsies characterized by early-onset epileptic encephalopathies (EOEEs) with involuntary movement. Herein, we investigated the impact of gene variants in epileptic-dyskinetic encephalopathies. Four independent patients from four families who exhibited involuntary movements were recruited from Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital. The inclusion criteria were as follows: onset within 1 year after birth, frequent seizures, severe developmental delay and accompanying involuntary movements. We detected four genetic mutations, including STXBP1, GNAO1, CYFIP2, and SCN8A variants. The involuntary movements were drug-resistant. However, pallidal electrocoagulation followed by gabapentin were partially effective in treating chorea and ballismus of the extremities in patients with GNAO1 variants, and perampanel partially suppressed seizures and involuntary movements in one patient with a SCN8A variant. Movement disorders are common to many neurodevelopmental disorders, including a variety of EOEEs. Although we could not establish a definitive correlation using genetic variants in patients with EOEE and movement disorders, involuntary movements in patients with EOEEs may be a key diagnostic finding. The usage of genetic variants could prove beneficial in the future as more patients are investigated with epileptic-dyskinetic encephalopathies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    心律失常是在癫痫发作期间或之后发生的常见但经常被忽视的症状。癫痫相关的心律紊乱的表征可以揭示所谓的“中枢自主神经网络”的功能组织,并可能揭示癫痫患者猝死(SUDEP)的病理生理学。的确,癫痫性放电可能通过累及皮质区域选择性地驱动自主神经功能而影响心脏。心房颤动是一种极其罕见的现象,通常与全身性强直-阵挛性癫痫发作有关。这里,我们报告了一例阵发性心房颤动作为局灶性非运动性癫痫发作的核心特征的68岁男性,最初误诊为典型的心源性心律失常。包括简短的文献综述。
    Cardiac arrhythmias are a common but often overlooked symptom that occur during or after epileptic seizures. The characterization of seizure-related heart rhythm disorders could shed light on the functional organization of the so-called \"central autonomic network\" and possibly on the pathophysiology of sudden death of epilepsy patients (SUDEP). Indeed, epileptic discharges may affect the heart through the involvement of cortical regions selectively driving autonomic functions. Ictal atrial fibrillation is an exceedingly rare phenomenon, usually associated with generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Here, we report a case of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation as a core presenting feature of a focal non-motor seizure in a 68-year-old man, at first misdiagnosed and treated for a typical cardiogenic arrhythmia. A brief literature review is included.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Complexity science has provided new perspectives and opportunities for understanding a variety of complex natural or social phenomena, including brain dysfunctions like epilepsy. By delving into the complexity in electrophysiological signals and neuroimaging, new insights have emerged. These discoveries have revealed that complexity is a fundamental aspect of physiological processes. The inherent nonlinearity and non-stationarity of physiological processes limits the methods based on simpler underlying assumptions to point out the pathway to a more comprehensive understanding of their behavior and relation with certain diseases. The perspective of complexity may benefit both the research and clinical practice through providing novel data analytics tools devoted for the understanding of and the intervention about epilepsies. This review aims to provide a sketchy overview of the methods derived from different disciplines lucubrating to the complexity of bio-signals in the field of epilepsy monitoring. Although the complexity of bio-signals is still not fully understood, bundles of new insights have been already obtained. Despite the promising results about epileptic seizure detection and prediction through offline analysis, we are still lacking robust, tried-and-true real-time applications. Multidisciplinary collaborations and more high-quality data accessible to the whole community are needed for reproducible research and the development of such applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Very little has been written on seizure management in palliative care (PC). Given this situation, and considering the forthcoming setting up of the Palliative Care Unit at our neurorehabilitation centre, the Clínica San Vicente, we decided to establish a series of guidelines on the use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for handling seizures in PC.
    METHODS: We conducted a literature search in PubMed to identify articles, recent manuals, and clinical practice guidelines on seizure management in PC published by the most relevant scientific societies.
    RESULTS: Clinical practice guidelines are essential to identify patients eligible for PC, manage seizures adequately, and avoid unnecessary distress to these patients and their families. Given the profile of these patients, we recommend choosing AEDs with a low interaction potential and which can be administered by the parenteral route, preferably intravenously. Diazepam and midazolam appear to be the most suitable AEDs during the acute phase whereas levetiracetam, valproic acid, and lacosamide are recommended for refractory cases and long-term treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines provide general recommendations that must be adapted to each particular clinical case. Nevertheless, we will require further well-designed randomised controlled clinical trials including large samples of patients eligible for PC to draft a consensus document recommending adequate, rational, and effective use of AEDs, based on a high level of evidence, in this highly complex area of medical care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:外伤性癫痫发作(PTS)是硬膜下血肿(SDH)患者的严重并发症。然而,到目前为止,几项研究表明,SDH相关的癫痫发作在发病率方面存在差异,危险因素和预防性抗癫痫治疗。
    目的:本研究的目的是分析发病率,PTS的危险因素和预防性抗癫痫治疗在SDH患者中的作用。
    方法:使用PubMed网关对SDH患者的PTS进行了系统文献综述,Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,和ExcerptaMedicadataBASE在1961年9月至2016年2月之间。搜索词包括硬膜下血肿,癫痫发作,癫痫,预防性抗癫痫药物,抗惊厥药物,和风险因素。
    方法:针对SDH患者癫痫发作的基于人类的临床研究。
    方法:PRISMA语句用于评估数据质量。两名独立审稿人从纳入的研究中提取数据,并通过共识解决了分歧。确定了24项研究纳入研究。
    结果:在急性SDH(aSDH)中,早期PTS(ePTS)和晚期PTS(lPTS)/2年的总发生率分别为28%和43%,而e和lPTS的发生率在慢性SDH中更低(cSDH;5.3%vs.10%)。aSDH患者PTS的总体危险因素是:术后24h格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)低于9分(OR10.5),开颅术(或3.9),术前GCS低于8(OR3.1)。在cSDH患者中,危险因素是酒精滥用(OR14.3),精神状态变化(OR7.2),既往卒中(OR5.3)和计算机断层扫描中的血肿密度(OR3.8)。年龄,性别,在两种类型的SDH中,血肿大小/侧位和中线移位均不是PTS的显著危险因素.在预防PTS苯妥英和左乙拉西坦有相似的疗效(OR1.3),而左乙拉西坦的不良反应显著降低(OR0.1).
    结论:大多数研究是回顾性的,样本量小。由于纳入标准,一些研究不得不排除,这可能导致选择偏倚.
    结论:PTS是SDH患者的严重并发症,特别是在ASDH中。抗癫痫药物的“预防性使用”可能对具有累积危险因素的患者有益。
    BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic epileptic seizures (PTS) are a serious complication in patients with subdural haematoma (SDH). However, to date, several studies have shown discordances about SDH-associated seizures in terms of incidence, risk factors and prophylactic antiepileptic treatment.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence, risk factors of PTS and the role of prophylactic antiepileptic treatment in patients with SDH.
    METHODS: A systematic literature review examining PTS in patients with SDH was performed using PubMed gateway, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Excerpta Medica dataBASE between September 1961 and February 2016. Search terms included subdural haematoma, seizure, epilepsy, prophylactic antiepileptic drugs, anticonvulsive medication, and risk factors.
    METHODS: Human-based clinical studies focusing on epileptic seizures in patients with SDH.
    METHODS: PRISMA statements were used for assessing data quality. Two independent reviewers extracted data from included studies and disagreement was solved by consensus. Twenty-four studies were identified for inclusion into the study.
    RESULTS: Overall incidence of early PTS (ePTS) and late PTS (lPTS)/2 years was 28% and 43% in acute SDH (aSDH) whereas the incidence of e- and lPTS was lower in chronic SDH (cSDH; 5.3% vs. 10%). Overall risk factors for PTS in patients with aSDH were: 24h postoperative Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) score below 9 (OR 10.5), craniotomy (OR 3.9), preoperative GCS below 8 (OR 3.1). In patients with cSDH the risk factors were alcohol abuse (OR 14.3), change of mental status (OR 7.2), previous stroke (OR 5.3) and density of haematoma in computer tomography (OR 3.8). Age, sex, haematoma size/side and midline shifts were not significant risk factors for PTS in both types of SDH. In prevention of PTS phenytoin and levetiracetam showed similar efficacy (OR 1.3), whereas levetiracetam was associated with significantly lower adverse effects (OR 0.1).
    CONCLUSIONS: Most of the studies were of retrospective nature with a small sample size. Due to the inclusion criteria, some studies had to be excluded and that might lead to selection bias.
    CONCLUSIONS: PTS are a serious complication in patients with SDH, particularly in aSDH. The \"prophylactic use\" of antiepileptic drugs might be beneficial in patients with cumulative risk factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号