UNASSIGNED: Older adults suffer from increased rates of dysphagia and dysphonia, both of which have a profound effect on quality of life and are often underdiagnosed. We sought to better understand the prevalence of these complaints and the potential utility of a patient-reported screening program in a geriatrics clinic.
UNASSIGNED: Using an IRB-approved cross-sectional survey and retrospective cohort design, we recruited participants from a population of new patients seeking care at an academic geriatrics clinic. We used three validated questionnaires to assess self-reported dysphagia, dysphonia, and pill dysphagia: the Eating-Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10), the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), and the PILL-5. Patients who screened positive on any questionnaire were offered referral to a laryngologist for additional evaluation. Patients who screened positive on the PILL-5 were also offered referral to our geriatric pharmacist.
UNASSIGNED: Among our 300 patients surveyed, the mean age was 76 (SD 8.46). A total of 82 (27.3%) patients screened positive (73 on EAT-10, 10 on PILL-5, 13 on VHI-10) and were offered referral, of which 36 accepted. These positive screening patients took more prescription medications (p = .024) and had a higher GDS score (p < .001) when compared to the patients who screened negative.
UNASSIGNED: Many new patients seeking generalized care at our center screened positively for dysphagia and/or dysphonia on validated questionnaires. Geriatric patients may benefit from integrating screening for these disorders to identify the need of further evaluation. It is unknown if these survey tools are appropriate in a non-otolaryngology clinic.
UNASSIGNED: III.

OBJECTIVE: Injection laryngoplasty (IL) has been widely used as an initial treatment option for unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP). An additional (second) IL is considered a salvage treatment for unsatisfactory outcomes of initial IL resulting from inadequate injection or early resorption of the injection material. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of additional IL, distinguishing between \"salvage\" (within 4 months) and \"repeated\" injections (beyond 4 months), and to analyze prognostic factors for successful outcomes.
METHODS: This retrospective study involved patients who received IL at Asan Medical Center from January 2014 to December 2020. Voice parameters were collected after each procedure, and those who conducted the statistical analysis were blinded to the study subjects. Among the 65 patients who underwent additional IL, 51 patients were enrolled in this study. Postinjection grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain (GRBAS) scales were used to determine satisfactory treatment outcomes. Success of the additional IL was defined as a postinjection grade of dysphonia score of 0 or 1, with a reduction in grade compared with the preinjection grade.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 61.6 years. Out of a total of 51 patients, 37 were men participating in the study. The odds ratio represents the likelihood of success in the second IL. Improved voice outcome after the additional IL was maintained in 23 (45%) patients. Compared with the failure group, the success group had a longer injection time interval between the initial and additional injection (9.1 vs. 7.4 months, respectively, p = 0.010). The success group had a higher proportion of patients with injection intervals >6 months (73.9% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.026). Logistic regression analysis revealed an injection interval >6 months had an odds ratio of 0.265 (confidence interval: 0.080-0.874, p = 0.029).
CONCLUSIONS: Additional injections would benefit the patients whose voice outcomes are maintained for a longer period (>6 months) after the first injection.

BACKGROUND: The intricate relationship between swallowing and phonation, sharing anatomical and physiological substrates, underscores a clinical demand for integrated therapeutic approaches. Existing interventions often address these functions in isolation, overlooking their interconnected dynamics.
OBJECTIVE: To design and validate a cross-therapy protocol incorporating dysphagia therapy techniques (maneuvers/exercises) into voice rehabilitation. This protocol aims to exploit the shared biomechanical components of swallowing and phonation to improve both functions simultaneously in patients with underlying hypofunctional laryngeal pathology.
METHODS: A descriptive research design was employed, consisting of three phases: a comprehensive literature review and expert discussions in a German seminar format to conceptualize the protocol; detailed analysis and categorization of swallowing maneuvers/exercises; and content validation by a panel of seven experts through a structured evaluation instrument. The process integrated motor learning and exercise physiology principles to ensure the protocol\'s clinical applicability and theoretical coherence.
RESULTS: The developed cross-therapy protocol incorporates four core swallowing therapy techniques to voice therapy procedures. Selected swallowing therapy techniques target laryngeal excursion and vocal fold closure because they are critical components of swallowing and phonation. Expert validation yielded a Content Validity Coefficient exceeding 0.90 for most items, indicating high consensus on the protocol\'s relevance, clarity, and applicability. Adjustments were made based on feedback, enhancing the protocol\'s precision and user-friendliness.
CONCLUSIONS: We present a novel, evidence-based therapy protocol for voice and swallowing difficulties resulting from hypofunctional laryngeal pathology. Its development marks a significant step toward bridging the gap between swallowing and voice therapy. Future empirical studies are needed to assess its effectiveness in clinical settings.

UNASSIGNED: To describe the clinical courses and interventions of symptomatic patients with bilateral vocal fold motion impairment (BVFMI) attributed to diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH).
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective cohort study.
UNASSIGNED: Single Institution Academic Health Center.
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective chart review of patients ≥18 years old evaluated and treated for symptomatic BVFMI secondary to DISH between February 2021 and March 2023. A literature review was conducted.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 4 cases were identified. All patients were male and had symptomatic BVFMI attributed to cervical spine DISH, as seen on imaging. Symptoms ranged from life-threatening dyspnea to breathy dysphonia in addition to dysphagia. Each patient was offered surgery for DISH. Two patients underwent osteophyte removal at the C5-C6 level with improved vocal fold (VF) mobility, breathing, and voice quality. Two patients elected serial observation as voice, swallow, and airway symptoms were manageable. The literature review showed a male-dominant (100%) presentation with an average of 70 years of age. Hypertension (45%) and diabetes mellitus (36%) were the most common comorbidities. Most patients were treated surgically (55%).
UNASSIGNED: Both surgical and conservative interventions may be considered for symptomatic relief and improvement in VF mobility on a patient-to-patient basis. Further study is warranted to investigate the etiology and treatment outcomes in these cases.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the current assessment practices of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in the United States working with adult clients with voice disorders with regard to the frequency, utility, and confidence in the use of five elements of a comprehensive voice evaluation, as well as training, access to instrumentation, and the use of published scales.
METHODS: An online survey was distributed to SLPs who currently see adults with dysphonia as part of their caseload. Clinicians in a voice-focused setting were compared to those who worked in a general medical setting.
RESULTS: Nearly all of the 86 participants reported using published validated scales for patient self-assessment and auditory-perceptual ratings. Most respondents had received training in auditory-perceptual voice assessment, acoustic assessment, and videostroboscopy, but a minority reported training in aerodynamic assessment. The majority of SLPs had access to acoustic equipment but a minority had access to the instrumentation for videostroboscopic or aerodynamic assessment. Auditory-perceptual voice evaluation was the procedure most commonly performed and most highly rated for diagnostic utility. Postgraduate training and access to instrumentation were associated with significantly higher frequency of use and confidence with all three instrumental assessment methods. SLPs in voice-focused settings were significantly more likely to have received training in videostroboscopy and perform or interpret it. SLPs in voice-focused settings were also significantly more likely to have access to equipment for all three instrumental techniques and reported significantly higher confidence in their use. Both groups rated the utility of the different components of a voice evaluation similarly and there were no significant differences between the groups in the use of validated patient questionnaires or auditory-perceptual scales.
CONCLUSIONS: Most clinicians in our survey reported following practice guidelines when performing comprehensive voice evaluations across settings, despite barriers of training and access to instrumentation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the role of one of these models in the field of voice pathology and compare its performance in distinguishing the perceived dysphonia level.
METHODS: Demographic information, voice self-assessments, and acoustic measurements related to a sample of 50 adult dysphonic outpatients were presented to ChatGPT and Perplexity AI chatbots, which were interrogated for the perceived dysphonia level.
RESULTS: The agreement between the auditory-perceptual assessment by experts and ChatGPT and Perplexity AI chatbots, as determined by Cohen\'s Kappa, was not statistically significant (p = 0.429). There was also a low positive correlation (rs = 0.30, p = 0.03) between the diagnosis made by ChatGPT and Perplexity AI chatbots (rs = 0.30, p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: It seems that AI could not play a vital role in helping the voice care teams determine the perceptual level of dysphonia.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric laryngotracheal stenosis often requires open airway reconstruction. While these surgeries establish an airway for adequate ventilation, many patients develop subsequent dysphonia. Numerous studies have reported outcomes related to voice.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate dysphonia in pediatric patients following open airway reconstruction, focusing on acoustic parameters, perceptual voice quality, and voice-related quality of life.
METHODS: A comprehensive search using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across 6 databases identified articles involving pediatric patients who underwent open airway reconstruction and reported postoperative vocal acoustic parameters, perceptual voice quality, voice-related quality of life, or vocal mechanics. Articles were assessed for bias risk, and common outcomes were synthesized qualitatively and quantitatively using meta-analyses.
RESULTS: Among 4089 articles, 21 were included, involving 497 pediatric patients. Laryngotracheoplasty was the most common procedure followed by cricotracheal resection. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) scale was frequently used to assess voice quality, with a mean score of 55.6 [95% confidence intervals (CIs): 47.9-63.3]. Voice-related quality of life was measured using the pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI) and Pediatric Voice-Related Quality of Life Survey, with mean scores of 35.6 (95% CI: 21.4-49.7) and 83.7 (95% CI: 74.1-93.2), respectively. The fundamental frequency was 210.5 (95% CI: 174.6-246.3). Other common findings included supraglottic phonation, anterior commissure blunting, posterior glottic diastasis, and abnormal vocal cord mobility.
CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients experiencing dysphonia after open airway reconstruction exhibited moderately decreased voice quality and reduced voice-related quality of life. However, there was inconsistency in study protocols and outcome measures used. Preserving voice quality during airway reconstruction is crucial to avoid negative impacts on quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to clarify the clinical characteristics of pediatric voice disorders.
METHODS: The clinical data of 1782 pediatric patients presenting with voice disorders were retrospectively analyzed. These cases were categorized into four age-based cohorts: 0-3, 4-7, 8-11, and 12-15years. Variables such as gender disparities, laryngoscopic manifestation, disease types, and acoustic parameters were thoroughly examined.
RESULTS: A total of 1782 children with acoustic hoarseness were included in this study, comprising 1325 males and 457 females. When the sex ratio among the children in each group was compared, males were found to outnumber females. A notable male predominance was observed across all age groups. Laryngoscopic results revealed that the most prevalent condition was vocal cord nodules (1363 cases, 76.48%), followed by vocal cord polyps (271 cases, 15.20%). Other diseases included laryngeal papillomas, vocal fold movement impairment, vocal cord cysts, functional dysphonia, leukoplakia of the vocal cords, and benign laryngeal tumors such as laryngeal amyloidosis and subglottic granular cell tumors. Among these, adenoid hypertrophy was presented in 382 children (21.44%). Additionally, the Reflux Finding Score (RFS) was conducted, and 799 cases (44.83%) were found to have a score above 7. The distribution of various diseases across different age groups indicated that children with vocal cord nodules (637 cases, 46.74%), vocal cord polyps (109 cases, 40.22%), and laryngeal papillomas (35, 36.84%) were predominantly found in the 4-7 years age group. Pediatric acute laryngitis (three cases, 75%) and vocal fold movement impairment (eight cases, 36.36%) were more common in the 0-3 years age group. Functional dysphonia (four cases, 66.67%) and vocal cord leukoplakia (four cases, 80%) were mainly observed in the 12-15 years age group, while vocal cord cysts were predominantly seen in the 8-11 years age group (four cases, 57.14%). A comparative analysis of acoustic parameters among 153 children showed statistically significant differences in jitter, fundamental frequency (F0), voice handicap index (VHI), reflux symptom index (RSI), and RFS across different pathologies.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted that vocal cord nodules, vocal cord polyps, and laryngeal papillomas were the primary causes of pediatric hoarseness, although the possibility of tumors and rare diseases cannot be disregarded. There was a noticeable gender bias towards males, and functional dysphonia was significantly more prevalent in older children.