dyspepsia

消化不良
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    功能性消化不良(FD)是一种常见的慢性消化系统疾病,严重影响患者的生活质量。睡眠障碍(SD)在FD患者中很常见,然而,SD和FD之间的关系仍然缺乏表征。这篇系统的综述探讨了FD和SD之间的双向关系,调查潜在的机制和对管理的影响。在PubMed进行了严格而全面的系统搜索,PubMedCentral(PMC),谷歌学者,科克伦图书馆,和ScienceDirect使用与SD和FD相关的选择关键字。仅纳入了过去10年以英语发表的符合纳入和排除标准的研究。使用特定于研究类型的质量评估工具来最小化偏差。在应用纳入和排除标准和质量评估后,该综述包括30项研究.主要研究结果表明,FD经常与SD相关,相当比例的FD患者报告睡眠质量差。连接SD和FD的机制很复杂,涉及昼夜节律,内脏过敏,免疫反应,和心理因素。非药物治疗,如认知行为疗法(CBT),针灸,和药理学神经调节剂在管理FD和SD方面显示出希望,为改善患者预后提供希望。SD和FD具有显著的双向关系,受复杂的生理相互作用的影响,心理,和生活方式因素。解决FD患者的SD可能会改善整体症状管理。进一步的研究至关重要,因为它应该专注于分离特定的SD原因及其对FD和其他功能性胃肠道疾病(FGID)的直接影响,为理解和治疗开辟新的途径。
    Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a prevalent chronic digestive disorder that significantly impacts patients\' quality of life. Sleep disturbance (SD) is common among FD patients, yet the relationship between SD and FD remains poorly characterized. This systematic review explores the bidirectional relationship between FD and SD, investigating underlying mechanisms and implications for management. A rigorous and comprehensive systematic search was conducted across PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect using select keywords related to SD and FD. Only studies published in English from the past 10 years that met inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. Quality assessment tools specific to study types were employed to minimize bias. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and quality assessments, the review encompassed 30 studies. The key findings reveal that FD is frequently associated with SD, with a significant proportion of FD patients reporting poor sleep quality. The mechanisms linking SD and FD are complex, involving the circadian rhythm, visceral hypersensitivity, immune responses, and psychological factors. Nonpharmacological treatments like cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), acupuncture, and pharmacological neuromodulators have shown promise in managing FD and SD, offering hope for improved patient outcomes. SD and FD share a significant bidirectional relationship, influenced by a complex interplay of physiological, psychological, and lifestyle factors. Addressing SD in FD patients may improve overall symptom management. Further research is crucial, as it should focus on isolating specific SD causes and their direct impacts on FD and other functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), opening up new avenues for understanding and treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    功能性消化不良是一种常见的功能性胃肠病,通常难以治疗。心理治疗干预已被提议作为常规治疗的替代或辅助方法。但其疗效尚不清楚.
    本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估心理治疗干预治疗功能性消化不良的疗效。
    对电子数据库进行了全面检索,从开始到2023年3月,用于评估心理治疗干预对功能性消化不良患者的影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果指标是胃肠道症状,生活质量,抑郁症,和焦虑。使用ReviewManager5.3软件提取和分析数据。使用Cochrane偏差风险工具评估纳入研究的偏差风险。
    包含1550例功能性消化不良患者的16个RCT纳入荟萃分析。纳入研究中使用的心理治疗干预措施的类型是认知行为疗法(CBT),催眠疗法,和基于正念的减压(MBSR)。对照组进行常规护理,安慰剂,支持疗法,或者没有治疗。荟萃分析显示,心理治疗干预对减轻胃肠道症状有显著作用,功能性消化不良患者的抑郁和焦虑。然而,与对照组相比,接受心理治疗干预的患者的生活质量评分没有显著改善.
    心理治疗干预,比如CBT,催眠疗法,MBSR,可能是功能性消化不良常规治疗的有用辅助手段,因为发现它们可以显着减轻患者的胃肠道症状和焦虑。然而,需要进一步的研究来评估这些干预措施的长期效果和普遍性.
    Functional dyspepsia is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder that is often challenging to treat. Psychotherapeutic interventions have been proposed as an alternative or adjunctive approach to conventional treatments, but their efficacy remains unclear.
    This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions in the treatment of functional dyspepsia.
    A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted, from inception to March 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of psychotherapeutic interventions on patients with functional dyspepsia. The primary outcome measures were gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, depression, and anxiety. Data were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 software. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
    Sixteen RCTs comprising 1550 patients with functional dyspepsia were included in the meta-analysis. The types of psychotherapeutic interventions used in the included studies were cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), hypnotherapy, and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). The control groups were usual care, placebo, supportive therapy, or no treatment. The meta-analysis showed that psychotherapeutic interventions had a significant effect on reducing gastrointestinal symptoms,depression and anxiety in patients with functional dyspepsia. However, no significant improvement was observed in the quality-of-life scores of patients who received psychotherapeutic interventions compared to those in the control group.
    Psychotherapeutic interventions, such as CBT, hypnotherapy, and MBSR, could be a useful adjunct to conventional treatments for functional dyspepsia, as they were found to significantly reduce gastrointestinal symptoms and anxiety in patients. However, further studies are needed to assess the long-term effects and generalizability of these interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项全面审查的目的是验证消化不良患者中幽门螺杆菌(Hp)细菌的患病率在牙周或非牙周患者的口腔中是否较高。书目搜索是针对发表在PubMed上的科学研究进行的,科克伦图书馆,SciELO,还有BVS.焦点问题是:“在消化不良和牙周炎患者中,口腔中Hp细菌的患病率是否高于仅有消化不良或没有任何疾病的患者?葡萄牙语,或西班牙语,在2000年至2022年之间发表,其中包括18岁以上的患者,旨在评估患有疾病(牙周炎和消化不良)或没有疾病的患者的口腔和胃壁保护性粘膜层中Hp细菌的存在;临床试验,随机对照临床试验,比较研究,病例对照研究,横断面研究,和队列研究。使用JoannaBriggs研究所的工具对所包括的文章进行方法学质量评估。最终分数可能是“低”质量(至少两个“没有”[红色]或≥五个“不清楚”),“中等”质量(发现一个“没有”[红色]或达到四个“不清楚”标准),或“高”质量(全部为绿色[是]或最多两个“不清楚”)。在155篇可能符合条件的文章中,在适用资格标准后,有10人被纳入本次全面审查。对所选择的研究进行了关于口腔和胃中Hp定植之间关系的仔细检查。它对胃部感染的严重程度和并发症的影响,以及口腔和胃Hp的存在对牙齿和全身参数的影响。Hp可以定植牙周袋,无论其在胃中的存在。牙周病消化不良患者口腔生物膜的患病率较高,与非牙周患者相比,牙周患者的出血控制较差,口腔卫生较低。对于que质量评估,科学研究包括低到中等的方法学质量。结论:可以得出结论,Hp是一种可以独立于胃定植牙菌斑的细菌,反之亦然;但是,当这两种疾病都被发现时,它的存在可能更重要。牙龈上和牙龈下的牙菌斑可能是Hp的储库,提示胃部感染患者更有可能在口腔中出现Hp。由于本评论中存在的局限性,必须仔细分析结果。
    The goal of this comprehensive review was to verify if the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) bacteria in patients with dyspepsia is higher in the oral cavity of periodontal or non-periodontal patients. The bibliographic search was conducted on scientific studies published in PubMed, Cochrane Library, SciELO, and BVS. The focus question was: \"In patients with dyspepsia and periodontitis, is the prevalence of Hp bacteria in the oral cavity higher than in patients with only dyspepsia or without any disease?\" The inclusion criteria were human studies in English, Portuguese, or Spanish languages, published between 2000 and 2022, that included patients over the age of 18 and aimed to evaluate the presence of Hp bacteria in the oral cavity and in the protective mucosal layer of the gastric lining of patients with the diseases (periodontitis and dyspepsia) or without disease; clinical trials, randomized controlled clinical trials, comparative studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and cohort studies. The methodological quality evaluation of the included articles was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The final scores could be of \"Low\" quality (at least two \"no\" [red] or ≥ five \"unclear\" found), \"Moderate\" quality (one \"no\" [red] was found or up to four \"unclear\" criteria were met), or \"High\" quality (all green [yes] or at maximum two \"unclear\"). Of 155 potentially eligible articles, 10 were included in this comprehensive review after the application of the eligibility criteria. The selected studies were scrutinized regarding the relationship between Hp colonization in the oral cavity and stomach, its impact on severity and complications of gastric infection, as well as the effect of the presence of oral and gastric Hp on dental and systemic parameters. Hp can colonize periodontal pockets regardless of its presence in the stomach. There was a higher prevalence of oral biofilm in dyspeptic patients with periodontal disease, and worse control of bleeding and low oral hygiene was observed in periodontal compared to non-periodontal patients. For que quality assessment, the scientific studies included presented low to moderate methodological quality. Conclusions: It is possible to conclude that Hp is a bacterium that can colonize dental plaque independently of the stomach and vice versa; however, when both diseases are found, its presence may be more significant. Supra and subgingival dental plaque may be a reservoir of Hp, suggesting that patients with gastric infections are more likely to have Hp in the oral cavity. The results must be carefully analyzed due to the limitations present in this review.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:急性胃肠炎后可能出现肠-脑相互作用紊乱。病原体类型对感染后IBS(PI-IBS)风险的影响的数据,如感染后功能性消化不良(PI-FD),是有限的。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定急性胃肠炎后PI-IBS或PI-FD的患病率。
    方法:我们纳入观察性研究,招募≥50名成人,报告急性胃肠炎后IBS或FD的患病率,随访≥3个月。使用随机效应模型估计患病率和OR,CI为95%。
    结果:总计,47项研究(28170名受试者)符合资格。PI-IBS和PI-FD的总体患病率分别为14.5%和12.7%,分别。在诊断后的长期(>5年随访)中,IBS在39.8%的受试者中持续存在。患有急性胃肠炎的个体发生IBS(OR4.3)和FD(OR3.0)的几率明显高于未暴露的对照组。PI-IBS与寄生虫最相关(患病率30.1%),但只有两项研究,其次是细菌(18.3%)和病毒(10.7%)。在现有的研究中,弯曲杆菌与PI-IBS患病率最高(20.7%)相关,而变形杆菌和SARS-CoV-2产生PI-IBS的几率最高(均为OR5.4)。SARS-CoV-2的PI-FD患病率为10.0%,细菌为13.6%(肠杆菌科19.4%)。
    结论:在一项大型系统综述和荟萃分析中,14.5%的急性胃肠炎患者发生PI-IBS,12.7%的PI-FD,IBS的几率增加了四倍以上,FD的几率增加了三倍。促炎微生物,包括变形杆菌和子类别,和SARS-CoV-2,可能与PI-IBS和PI-FD的发展有关。
    OBJECTIVE: Disorders of gut-brain interaction may arise after acute gastroenteritis. Data on the influence of pathogen type on the risk of postinfection IBS (PI-IBS), as on postinfection functional dyspepsia (PI-FD), are limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine prevalence of PI-IBS or PI-FD after acute gastroenteritis.
    METHODS: We included observational studies recruiting ≥50 adults and reporting prevalence of IBS or FD after acute gastroenteritis with ≥3-month follow-up. A random effects model was used to estimate prevalence and ORs with 95% CIs.
    RESULTS: In total, 47 studies (28 170 subjects) were eligible. Overall prevalence of PI-IBS and PI-FD were 14.5% and 12.7%, respectively. IBS persisted in 39.8% of subjects in the long-term (>5 years follow-up) after diagnosis. Individuals experiencing acute gastroenteritis had a significantly higher odds of IBS (OR 4.3) and FD (OR 3.0) than non-exposed controls. PI-IBS was most associated with parasites (prevalence 30.1%), but in only two studies, followed by bacteria (18.3%) and viruses (10.7%). In available studies, Campylobacter was associated with the highest PI-IBS prevalence (20.7%) whereas Proteobacteria and SARS-CoV-2 yielded the highest odds for PI-IBS (both OR 5.4). Prevalence of PI-FD was 10.0% for SARS-CoV-2 and 13.6% for bacteria (Enterobacteriaceae 19.4%).
    CONCLUSIONS: In a large systematic review and meta-analysis, 14.5% of individuals experiencing acute gastroenteritis developed PI-IBS and 12.7% PI-FD, with greater than fourfold increased odds for IBS and threefold for FD. Proinflammatory microbes, including Proteobacteria and subcategories, and SARS-CoV-2, may be associated with the development of PI-IBS and PI-FD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定焦虑/抑郁之间的患病率和关联,胃轻瘫和功能性消化不良的胃肠道(GI)症状。
    方法:通过系统搜索三个数据库(PubMed,CINAHL和PsycINFO)于2023年9月。进行荟萃分析以估计胃轻瘫和功能性消化不良的焦虑和抑郁的合并患病率。并确定胃轻瘫与功能性消化不良的焦虑/抑郁和胃肠道(GI)症状的关联是否不同。
    结果:胃轻瘫(49%)和功能性消化不良(29%)的焦虑总体汇总患病率相似(χ2(1)=2.45,p=.12)。胃轻瘫抑郁症的总体合并患病率(39%),功能性消化不良(32%)也相似(χ2(1)=0.81,p=0.37)。在胃轻瘫中,焦虑与胃肠道症状(r=0.11)或抑郁与胃肠道症状(r=0.16)之间没有显着关系。虽然意义重大,虽然虚弱,在功能性消化不良中,焦虑和胃肠道症状(r=0.30)与抑郁和胃肠道症状(r=0.32)之间存在正相关。胃肠道症状和焦虑之间的关联,但不是抑郁症,发现胃轻瘫和功能性消化不良具有显著性(χ2(1)=5.22,p=.02)。
    结论:促进正在进行的关于胃轻瘫和功能性消化不良是否是可互换综合征的辩论,这篇综述发现,焦虑和抑郁的患病率在这两种情况下是相似的。因此,有必要在这两种情况下进行心理评估以及有效和全面的护理。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and associations between anxiety/depression, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms across gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia.
    METHODS: Twenty adult studies were identified through systematic searches of three databases (PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO) in September 2023. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence rates of anxiety and depression across gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia, and to determine whether the associations of anxiety/depression and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms differ in gastroparesis versus functional dyspepsia.
    RESULTS: The overall pooled prevalence rate for anxiety was similar (χ2(1) = 2.45, p = .12) in gastroparesis (49%) and functional dyspepsia (29%). The overall pooled prevalence rate for depression in gastroparesis (39%), and functional dyspepsia (32%) was also similar (χ2(1) = 0.81, p = .37). No significant relationship between anxiety and GI symptoms (r = 0.11) or depression and GI symptoms (r = 0.16) was found in gastroparesis, whilst significant, though weak, positive relationships between anxiety and GI symptoms (r = 0.30) and depression and GI symptoms (r = 0.32) were found in functional dyspepsia. The association between GI symptoms and anxiety, but not depression, across gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia was found to be significant (χ2(1) = 5.22, p = .02).
    CONCLUSIONS: Contributing to ongoing debate as to whether gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia are interchangeable syndromes, this review found that anxiety and depression prevalence was similar in both conditions. Psychological assessment and the utilisation of effective and holistic care in both conditions is therefore warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景几个世纪以来,春天和其他天然水域已被推荐作为多种疾病的外部或内部补救措施。对于研究饮用矿泉水对胃灼热的影响的研究,胃食管反流病(GERD),或功能性消化不良缺乏系统评价。目的本系统评价的主要目的是通过确定所有已发表的干预研究,批判性地评估其方法并总结其结果,来研究饮用天然矿泉水对各种原因引起的胃灼热的影响。方法系统检索最大的医学文献数据库MEDLINE,随机和非随机试验的进一步相关网络来源和灰色文献,有或没有对照组,到2021年9月,没有语言限制。进一步的纳入标准是成年胃灼热患者,饮用天然矿泉水作为干预治疗,与没有或其他干预措施相比(照常护理,等待名单)。我们将胃灼热症状的减少和疾病发作的持续时间定义为主要结果,将生活质量定义为次要结果。两名评审员使用美国国立卫生研究院研究质量评估工具独立进行研究质量评估(偏倚风险)。结果9项试验包括来自意大利的393名患者,俄罗斯,乌克兰,德国符合所有纳入标准。我们确定了三项随机对照试验(均为方法学质量差),加上6项干预前后(前/后)研究,没有对照组。三项比较试验的干预组似乎显示出更强的自我报告的胃灼热症状的减少,和胃灼热发作的持续时间比各自的对照组,然而,它们的方法质量都很差。结论基于现有的最佳临床研究证据,我们不能建议或建议不要饮用天然矿泉水作为胃灼热的治疗方法。在一些证据水平较低的研究中报告的天然矿泉水的潜在益处(例如,缺乏对照组)应通过具有足够的比较组和更长的随访期的高质量随机临床试验来验证。.
    BACKGROUND: For centuries, spring and other natural waters have been recommended as external or internal remedies for numerous diseases. For studies that examined the effects of drinking mineral waters against heartburn, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), or functional dyspepsia, a systematic review is lacking.
    OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this systematic review was to examine the effects of drinking natural mineral waters on heartburn from various causes by identifying all published intervention studies and critically appraising their methods as well as summarizing their results.
    METHODS: We systematically searched the largest medical literature database MEDLINE, further relevant web sources, and gray literature for randomized and nonrandomized trials, with or without control groups, up to September 2021 and no language restrictions. Further inclusion criteria were adult patients with heartburn, drinking cure with natural mineral water as the intervention, compared to no or other interventions (care-as-usual, waiting list). We defined the reduction of heartburn symptoms and duration of disease episodes as primary and quality of life as secondary outcomes. Two reviewers independently carried out the study quality assessments (risk of bias) using the National Institutes of Health-Study Quality Assessment Tools.
    RESULTS: Nine trials comprising 393 patients from Italy, Russia, Ukraine, and Germany fulfilled all inclusion criteria. We identified three randomized controlled trials (all with poor methodological quality), plus six before-after (pre/post) intervention studies without a control group. The intervention groups of the three comparative trials seemed to show a stronger reduction of self-reported heartburn symptoms, and duration of heartburn episodes than the respective control groups; however, they all had poor methodological quality.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on the best available evidence of clinical studies, we cannot recommend or advise against drinking natural mineral waters as a treatment for heartburn. The potential benefits of natural mineral waters that were reported in some studies with a lower evidence level (e.g., lacking a control group) should be verified by good quality randomized clinical trials with adequate comparison groups and longer follow-up periods.
    HintergrundSeit Jahrhunderten werden Quell- und andere natürliche Wässer als äußerliche oder innerliche Heilmittel für zahlreiche Krankheiten empfohlen. Für Studien, die die Wirkung des Trinkens von Mineralwasser gegen Sodbrennen, gastroösophageale Refluxkrankheit (GERD) oder funktionelle Dyspepsie untersuchten, fehlt eine systematische Übersicht.ZielsetzungDas Hauptziel dieser systematischen Übersichtsarbeit war es, die Auswirkungen von Trinkkuren mit natürlichen Mineralwässern auf Sodbrennen verschiedener Ursachen zu untersuchen, indem alle veröffentlichten Interventionsstudien identifiziert und ihre Methoden kritisch bewertet sowie ihre Ergebnisse zusammengefasst wurden.MethodenWir durchsuchten systematisch die größte medizinische Literaturdatenbank MEDLINE, weitere relevante Internetquellen und graue Literatur nach randomisierten und nicht-randomisierten Studien, mit oder ohne Kontrollgruppen, bis September 2021 und ohne sprachliche Einschränkungen. Weitere Einschlusskriterien waren erwachsene Patienten mit Sodbrennen, Trinkkur mit natürlichem Mineralwasser als Intervention, im Vergleich zu keiner oder anderen Interventionen (care-as-usual, Warteliste). Wir definierten die Abnahme der Symptome des Sodbrennens und die Dauer der Krankheitsepisoden als primäre und die Lebensqualität als sekundäre Endpunkte. Zwei Gutachter bewerteten unabhängig voneinander die Qualität der Studien (Verzerrungsrisiko) anhand der National Institutes of Health-Study Quality Assessment Tools.ErgebnisseNeun Studien mit 393 Patienten aus Italien, Russland, der Ukraine und Deutschland erfüllten alle Einschlusskriterien. Wir identifizierten drei randomisierte kontrollierte Studien (alle mit schlechter methodischer Qualität) sowie sechs Vorher-Nachher-Studien (Prä-/Post-Studien) ohne Kontrollgruppe. Die Interventionsgruppen der drei randomisierten Vergleichsstudien schienen eine stärkere Verringerung der selbstberichteten Symptome und der Dauer der Episoden des Sodbrennens zu zeigen als die jeweiligen Kontrollgruppen, allerdings waren sie alle von schlechter methodischer Qualität.SchlussfolgerungAuf der Grundlage der besten verfügbaren Belege aus klinischen Studien können wir das Trinken natürlicher Mineralwässer zur Behandlung von Sodbrennen weder empfehlen noch davon abraten. Die potenziellen Vorteile natürlicher Mineralwässer, die in einigen Studien mit geringerer Evidenz (z. B. ohne Kontrollgruppe) berichtet wurden, sollten durch qualitativ hochwertige randomisierte klinische Studien mit angemessenen Vergleichsgruppen und längeren Nachbeobachtungszeiträumen überprüft werden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:评价针刺治疗功能性消化不良(FD)患者抑郁和焦虑的疗效。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,CNKI,万方数据,Sinomed,和VIP数据库在2023年4月30日之前搜索随机对照试验(RCT),比较针灸与安慰剂或缓解症状的药物.两名独立审核员进行了这项研究搜索,数据提取,并使用Cochrane偏差风险工具进行偏差风险评估。平均差(MD),风险比(RR),并计算相应的95%置信区间(CI)。还进行了亚组和敏感性分析。建议评估的分级,发展,采用评估(GRADE)系统评估证据水平。
    结果:共纳入16项RCTs,涉及1315名参与者。针灸在减轻焦虑自评量表(SAS)得分方面比安慰剂(MD=-7.07,95CI:-11.03至-3.10,质量非常低的证据)明显优于安慰剂(MD=-4.63,95CI:-6.28至-2.98,低质量证据)或一线药物(MD=-2.71,非常低质量的5.95CI:0.23)。在减轻汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分方面,针灸始终优于安慰剂(HAMA:MD=-2.58,95CI:-4.33至-0.83,极低质量证据;HAMD:MD=-1.89,95CI:-3.11至-0.67,低质量证据)和一线药物(HAMA:MD=-5.76,95CI:-10.18至-1.35,极低质量证据;HAMD:MD=-5.59,极低质量3.95CI:然而,在医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)评分的改善方面,针刺和安慰剂之间没有观察到显著差异.
    结论:根据目前的临床证据,针刺可能对FD患者的抑郁和焦虑有积极作用。进一步的大样本,多中心,需要高质量的RCT验证,结论受到纳入研究的数量和质量的限制。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of acupuncture for treating depression and anxiety in patients diagnosed with functional dyspepsia (FD).
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, Sinomed, and VIP Database were searched until April 30, 2023 for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture to placebo or drugs for symptom alleviation. Two independent reviewers conducted the study search, data extraction, and bias risk assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was employed to evaluate the evidence level.
    RESULTS: A total of 16 RCTs involving 1315 participants were included. Acupuncture demonstrated marked superiority over placebo (MD = -7.07, 95%CI: -11.03 to -3.10, very low quality evidence) in mitigating Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores and was found to be more effective in reducing Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores than either placebo (MD = -4.63, 95%CI: -6.28 to -2.98, low quality evidence) or first-line drugs (MD = -2.71, 95%CI: -5.19 to -0.23, very low quality evidence). In terms of attenuating Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) scores, acupuncture consistently outperformed both placebo (HAMA: MD = -2.58, 95%CI: -4.33 to -0.83, very low quality evidence; HAMD: MD = -1.89, 95%CI: -3.11 to -0.67, low quality evidence) and first-line drugs (HAMA: MD = -5.76, 95%CI: -10.18 to -1.35, very low quality evidence; HAMD: MD = -5.59, 95%CI: -7.59 to -3.59, very low quality evidence). However, no significant difference was observed between acupuncture and placebo in terms of improvement in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on current clinical evidence, acupuncture might have a positive effect on depression and anxiety in patients with FD. Further large-sample, multi-center, high-quality RCTs validation are required, as the conclusion is limited by the quantity and quality of the included studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    尽管功能性消化不良(FD)是一种常见的功能性胃十二指肠疾病,具有很高的社会经济负担,对它的全球流行知之甚少。因此,我们进行了一项综合研究,以估计FD患病率的长期趋势.我们搜索了PubMed/MEDLINE,Embase,和GoogleScholar从1990年到2022年进行的基于人群的研究,根据罗马I报告了成年人(≥18岁)的FD患病率,II,III,或IV标准。从纳入的研究中提取FD的患病率,以获得具有95%置信区间(CI)和95%预测区间的合并患病率。根据某些特征进行亚组分析,包括地理区域。共有44项研究符合资格标准,包括来自六大洲40个国家的256,915名参与者。FD的总体全球汇总患病率为8.4%(95%CI7.4-.9.5)。患病率在罗马I中最高(11.9%;95%CI5.1-25.4),在罗马IV中最低(6.8%;95%CI5.8-7.9)。发展中国家的患病率高于发达国家(9.1%对8.0%),女性的患病率更高,无论使用的定义如何(9.0%对7.0%)。从1990年到2020年,合并患病率逐渐下降(1990-2002年为12.4%[8.2-18.3],2013-2020年为7.3%[6.1-8.7])。FD的患病率因国家而异,经济地位,地理区域,和性,全球患病率逐渐下降。尽管样本群体存在异质性,我们的研究估计了目前全球FD的负担,并为医疗保健政策决策提供了信息.
    Although functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common functional gastroduodenal disorder with a high socioeconomic burden, little is known about its global prevalence. Thus, we performed a comprehensive study to estimate long-term trends in the prevalence of FD. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar from 1990 to 2022 for population-based studies that reported the prevalence of FD in adults (≥ 18 years old) according to Rome I, II, III, or IV criteria. The prevalence of FD was extracted from included studies to obtain pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and 95% prediction intervals. Subgroup analysis was performed according to certain characteristics, including geographic region. A total of 44 studies met the eligibility criteria, including 256,915 participants from 40 countries across six continents. The overall global pooled prevalence of FD was 8.4% (95% CI 7.4-.9.5). The prevalence was the highest in Rome I (11.9%; 95% CI 5.1-25.4) and lowest in Rome IV (6.8%; 95% CI 5.8-7.9). Developing countries showed a higher prevalence than developed countries (9.1% versus 8.0%), and prevalence was higher in women, irrespective of the definition used (9.0% versus 7.0%). The pooled prevalence gradually decreased from 1990 to 2020 (12.4% [8.2-18.3] in 1990-2002 versus 7.3% [6.1-8.7] in 2013-2020). The prevalence of FD differs by country, economic status, geographical region, and sex, and the global prevalence has been gradually declining. Despite the heterogeneity of sample population, our study estimates the current global burden of FD and provides information to heath care policy decisions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • Acotiamide is a prokinetic with a novel mechanism of action - an antagonist of muscarinic M1 and M2 receptors and an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. Acetylcholine is the central mediator of the tone of the muscular components of the gastrointestinal tract, increasing its motor activity. Blockade of presynaptic M1 and M2 receptors neutralizes the inhibitory effect of the feedback mechanism on the acetylcholine synthesis, while inhibition of acetylcholinesterase in the synaptic cleft reduces the acetylcholine degradation. Currently, the clinical efficacy of acotiamide in the population of patients with functional dyspepsia is demonstrated in more than 10 clinical studies in different regions of the world, demonstrating a reduction of the symptoms of the disease during treatment with this agent and an improvement in the quality of life of patients. In addition, the combination of acotiamide with proton pump inhibitors optimizes the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Акотиамид является прокинетиком принципиально нового механизма действия – антагонист мускариновых М1- и М2-рецепторов, а также ингибитор ацетилхолинэстеразы. Блокада М1- и М2-рецепторов на пресинаптической мембране нивелирует тормозное влияние по механизму обратной отрицательной связи на синтез ацетилхолина, тогда как ингибирование ацетилхолинэстеразы в синаптической щели снижает распад данного нейротрансмиттера, который представляет собой основной медиатор тонуса мышечных компонентов желудочно-кишечного тракта, увеличивая его моторную активность. В настоящее время клиническая эффективность молекулы акотиамида на популяции пациентов с функциональной диспепсией показана более чем в 10 клинических исследованиях из разных регионов мира, демонстрирующих регресс симптоматики заболевания на фоне применения данного прокинетика и улучшение качества жизни пациентов. Помимо этого комбинация акотиамида с ингибиторами протонной помпы позволяет оптимизировать тактику ведения пациентов с симптомами гастроэзофагеальной рефлюксной болезни.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    功能性消化不良(FD)是一种常见的上消化道疾病,以烦人的上腹痛或灼烧为特征,饭后饱腹感或早饱腹感。精确的病理生理学仍未完全了解,但可能包括肠-脑通讯紊乱导致胃十二指肠生理功能紊乱的作用。即使有几种药物治疗选择,它是一种慢性和复发性疾病,具有持续的症状,使其治疗困难。瑜伽是一种快速传播的补充和替代医学(CAM)专业,在医学领域获得了关注,因为它能够解决物理问题,情感,健康和疾病的心理和社会方面。各种其他CAM疗法正在以不同的功效用于FD。然而,除了一项使用瑜伽疗法治疗儿童腹痛相关功能性胃肠病的研究外,其中也包括少数FD病例(11.6%),根据我们的最佳知识,FD中没有其他使用瑜伽疗法的研究。因此,在本次审查中,我们总结了目前对瑜伽对FD(胃动力,基金住宿,超敏反应,十二指肠炎症,心理困扰和肠脑功能障碍)。文献表明,瑜伽可以在FD的管理中发挥有益的作用。然而,需要严格的研究和临床试验来证实这一点。
    Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common upper gastrointestinal disorder, characterized by bothersome epigastric pain or burning, fullness after meals or early satiety. The precise pathophysiology remains incompletely understood but may include the role of disordered gut-brain communication leading to disturbances in gastro-duodenal physiological functioning. Even if there are several pharmacological treatment options, it is a chronic and relapsing disorder with persistent symptoms that makes its management difficult. Yoga is a fast-spreading complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) specialty, that has gained attention in the medical field for its ability to address the physical, emotional, mental and social aspects of health and disease. Various other CAM therapies are being used for FD with varying efficacy. However, apart from one research study that used yoga therapy on abdominal pain related functional gastrointestinal disorders in children which included a few FD cases as well (11.6%), no other study using yoga therapy has been done in FD as per our best knowledge. Therefore, in the present review, we have summarized the current scientific understanding of the probable effects of yoga on the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in FD (gastric motility, fundic accommodation, hypersensitivity, duodenal inflammation, psychological distress and gut-brain dysfunction). The literature suggests yoga can have a beneficial role in the management of FD. However, rigorous research and clinical trials are required to confirm the same.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号