UNASSIGNED: The recommended duration of vasoactive drugs in esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) spans 2-5 days. Prior meta-analyses of randomized trials include only a few studies that compared short vs. long vasoactive drug durations approximating this time range, including older management techniques, and only assessed variceal rebleeding at 5 days. We identified several additional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing rebleeding at various durations, with updated management of EVB.
UNASSIGNED: We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effect of shortening the vasoactive drug duration by 48-72 h. The primary outcome was rebleeding within 5 days. Secondary outcomes included rebleeding, mortality due to rebleeding, and all-cause mortality within 4-6 weeks (extended period) with subgroup analysis by vasoactive drug and type of endoscopic therapy. Length of stay, blood transfusion requirements and terlipressin-related adverse events were additional secondary outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Our comprehensive search strategy and screening process yielded 14 RCTs with 1060 patients (75.1% male): 7 trials used terlipressin, 4 octreotide, and 3 somatostatin. Shortened durations combined with band ligation led to similar rebleeding, with a trend towards less rebleeding when populations with more severe liver disease were excluded. There was greater rebleeding and mortality over an extended period when shorter durations were combined with sclerotherapy. Longer durations were associated with a longer hospital stay and, for terlipressin, more adverse events.
UNASSIGNED: Shorter vasoactive drug durations combined with band ligation in selected populations appear safe. Higher powered RCTs are needed, involving patients with different degrees of severity of EVB and liver disease.

UNASSIGNED: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) comprise more than a quarter of all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and are at higher risk of adverse events. We sought to reexamine the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) postpercutaneous coronary intervention in patients with DM.
UNASSIGNED: We systematically included randomized controlled trials comparing any 2 of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT that reported major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), net adverse clinical events (NACE), bleeding, or stent thrombosis in DM, and performed a frequentist network meta-analysis. We also performed a sensitivity analysis of trials that exclusively enrolled patients with acute coronary syndrome.
UNASSIGNED: In 16 randomized controlled trials comprising 16,376 adults with DM, there was no significant difference in NACE, MACE, stent thrombosis, or major bleeding between pairwise comparisons of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT, except for a signal for lower bleeding with 3 months of DAPT compared to 12 (risk ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99). Sensitivity analysis of trials that solely included acute coronary syndrome similarly showed no significant difference in MACE between 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT.
UNASSIGNED: Our study found no meaningful difference in NACE or MACE between pairwise comparisons of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT by study-level meta-analysis of patients with DM, with lower bleeding risk observed with 3 months than with 12 months of DAPT. This finding may provide clinicians greater flexibility to personalize patients\' DAPT duration based on other non-DM comorbidities that might affect bleeding or thrombosis risk.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to resolve the uncertainty of whether transfusion of fresher red blood cells (RBCs) is better or not with regard to the safety and efficacy.
METHODS: This systematic review was performed in accordance with our protocol registered on PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022379183).
RESULTS: After a literature search, 13,247 records were identified, and 26 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 53,859 participants were eligible and included in this review. The results in our review suggested that there was no significant effect of fresher vs older RBCs on mortality (relative risk [RR] = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.99-1.09; P = .39; I2 = 0%), transfusion reactions (RR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.57-1.33; P = .64; I2 = 0%). However, the transfusion of fresher RBCs might increase the risk of nosocomial infection (RR = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.20; P = .02; I2 = 0%), whereas there was no significant difference in the fresh vs old subgroup (RR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.12; P = .28; I2 = 0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study updated and reinforced the evidence of previously published systematic reviews that support the safety and efficiency of current practice of issuing the oldest available RBCs in the blood bank inventory.

UNASSIGNED: Orientation programs for new nurses play an essential role in preparing them for challenges in clinical practice. Different countries have applied varying program components and durations in organizing these programs.
UNASSIGNED: To explore the program components, impact, and duration of the orientation programs for new graduate nurses in hospital care settings.
UNASSIGNED: We gathered information from studies conducted in various countries. Searches were conducted on databases including PubMed, Sage Journal, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, and Wiley, with secondary searches from 2018 to 2023 using Arkey and O\'Malley\'s Review Scoping Framework. The inclusion criteria comprised studies with primary data, both qualitative and quantitative, focusing on new nurses undergoing orientation programs in hospitals.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 989 articles screened, 14 were included. Methods identified included providing hands-on experience, sharing information, reflecting on work experiences, and developing technical skills. Significant findings encompassed increased competence, knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction, as well as professional development and positive organizational impacts. The duration of orientation programs ranged from 2 weeks to 2 years, depending on the program type and new graduate nurse needs.
UNASSIGNED: This scoping review elucidates program components, impact, and duration of new nurse orientation programs in hospitals, providing valuable insights for hospital management in designing and developing improved programs.
UNASSIGNED: Exploring program components, impact, and duration of hopitals new graduate nurse orientation programs, revealing insights to enhance patient care and nursing practice@Ns_Ernawaty.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is first-line treatment for cervical dystonia (CD). Treatment of CD with BoNT usually requires injections every 3-4 months for as long as symptoms persist, which can be for the lifetime of the individual. Duration of BoNT effect can impact quality of life since it is important that efficacy is maintained throughout an injection cycle to avoid fluctuations of effect after each injection. There is currently no consensus on how to assess duration of BoNT effect in patients with CD.
METHODS: A scoping review was conducted to summarize the available evidence from phase 3 clinical trials of BoNT in CD and on the interpretation of the reported duration of effect. The available evidence was analyzed in the context of clinical experience and real-world treatment practices of CD.
RESULTS: Methods for estimating duration of effect varied across publications; most were based on artificial constructs developed for clinical trials (time until a pre-specified efficacy endpoint was reached) and are not appropriate to apply in clinical practice. Clinical trial outcomes in CD were not objectively evaluated, and did not prioritize patients\' needs or focus on factors that impact patients\' daily living activities and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: Better evidence and consistency of reporting for duration of effect for BoNT in CD is needed to help guide clinicians on when reinjection is likely to be required. The goal should be to keep patients as symptom-free as possible with flexible reinjection intervals tailored to individual needs.

OBJECTIVE: While tuberculosis remains a significant global health concern, prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) caused by members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex are exceptionally rare. Our objective is to perform a retrospective search of new cases of this disease and analyze all cases available in the literature of tuberculous PJIs, aiming to detect factors that may influence patient outcomes.
METHODS: The ESGIAI and ESGMYC study groups were used to collect information on non-published cases of tuberculous prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Additionally, a literature review of all published cases of tuberculous PJIs was conducted. All identified cases in the retrospective study and in the literature review were merged and included in the statistical analysis, involving both univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Fifteen previously unreported cases of tuberculous prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) from four countries were detailed. Among them, ten patients were female, with a median age of 76 years. The hip was affected in 13 cases. Seven patients experienced co-infection with another microorganism. Treatment approaches varied, with 13 patients undergoing implant removal, one treated with DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention), and one case was treated with an unknown treatment method. All patients received antibiotic therapy and achieved a cure. The literature review that was conducted detected 155 published cases. Univariate analysis revealed a statistical significance for previous tuberculosis, joint, and no importance of surgery for cure.
CONCLUSIONS: Tuberculous prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare condition, typically presenting as a localized chronic infection. Antibiotic treatment is essential for the management of these patients, but neither surgical treatment nor duration of treatment seems to have importance in the outcome.

The optimal duration of therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (PSA-BSI) is unknown, with prolonged therapy frequently favored due to severity of infection, patient complexity, risk of multi-drug resistance, and high mortality. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with head-to-head comparison of short versus prolonged therapy for PSA-BSI. A comprehensive search including Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus was performed. We pooled risk ratios using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model and performed subgroup analysis of outcomes including all-cause mortality, recurrent infection, and composite of these outcomes among patients receiving short versus prolonged therapy for PSA-BSI. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I2-index. Risk of bias for cohort studies was assessed using ROBINS-I tool. Of the 908 identified studies, six were included in the systematic review and five studies with head-to-head comparison of treatment duration were assessed in the meta-analysis, totalling 1746 patients. No significant difference in propensity score-weighted composite outcome (30-day all-cause mortality or recurrent infection) was noted between patients receiving short or prolonged therapy, with a pooled RR risk ratio of 0.80 (95% CI confidence interval 0.51-1.25, P=0.32; I2 = 0%). Additionally, duration of therapy did not impact individual outcomes of 30-day all-cause mortality or recurrent/persistent infection. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that short duration of antimicrobial therapy may have similar efficacy to prolonged treatment for PSA-BSI. Future randomized trials will be necessary to definitively determine optimal management of PSA bacteraemia.

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is a standard therapy in patients with ischemic vascular diseases (IVD) including coronary artery, cerebrovascular and peripheral arterial diseases, although the optimal duration of this treatment is still debated. Previous meta-analyses reported conflicting results about the effects of long-term and short-term as well as non-DAPT use in various clinical settings. Herein, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of different durations of DAPT.
METHODS: We reviewed relevant articles and references from database, which were published prior to April 2023. Data from prospective studies were processed using RevMan5.0 software, provided by Cochrane Collaboration and transformed using relevant formulas. The inclusion criteria involved randomization to long-term versus short-term or no DAPT; the endpoints included at least one of total or cardiovascular (CV) mortalities, IVD recurrence, and bleeding.
RESULTS: A total of 34 randomized studies involving 141 455 patients were finally included. In comparison with no or short-term DAPT, long-term DAPT reduced MI and stroke, but did not reduce the total and CV mortalities. Meanwhile, bleeding events were increased, even though intracranial and fatal bleedings were not affected. Besides, the reduction of MI and stroke recurrence showed no statistical significance between long-term and short-term DAPT groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term DAPT may not reduce the mortality of IVD besides increasing bleeding events, although reduced the incidences of MI and stroke early recurrence to a certain extent and did not increase the risk of fatal intracranial bleeding.

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a short course of antibiotics (2-4 days), to a standard course (5-7 days), for the treatment of culture-negative neonatal sepsis.
Relevant databases were searched for RCTs comparing short- vs. standard-course of antibiotics for culture-negative sepsis. The primary outcomes were mortality and treatment failure, defined as the reappearance of clinical signs suggestive of sepsis within 7 days of stoppage of antibiotics. Secondary outcomes included neurological impairment, duration of hospital stay, need for oxygen, respiratory support and double-volume exchange transfusion (DVET).
Seven RCTs were included in the review with 729 neonates >30 weeks gestational age at birth. No mortality occurred in either of the groups (2 studies; 276 neonates). Treatment failure rates were similar in the short- and standard-course antibiotic groups [7 studies; 729 neonates; risk ratio (RR) = 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55 to 1.86; very low certainty]. The short course of antibiotics resulted in a shorter hospital stay [3 studies; 293 neonates; mean difference (MD), -2.46 days; 95% CI, -3.16 to -1.75]. There was no difference in the need for oxygen supplementation (2 studies; 258 neonates; RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.40 to 4.91), any respiratory support (2 studies; 258 neonates; RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.17) or DVET (2 studies; 258 neonates; RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.56 to 2.95).
Very-low certainty evidence suggests that a short antibiotic course, compared to a standard course, does not affect treatment failure rates in culture-negative neonatal sepsis. There is a need for well-designed RCTs powered enough to assess critical outcomes such as mortality and neurological sequelae to generate stronger evidence and inform guidelines.
CRD42023437199.
Prolonged antibiotic usage has been associated with increased mortality and morbidity in neonates. The standard practice in culture-negative neonatal sepsis has been to administer antibiotics for 5–7 days, based on expert consensus. In this systematic review, a short course of antibiotics (2–4 days), in comparison to a standard course (5–7 days), did not affect the treatment failure rates in culture-negative neonatal sepsis. However, the certainty of evidence was too low to make robust conclusions. There is a need for well-designed large trials to generate stronger evidence and inform guidelines.

暂无摘要。