OBJECTIVE: This review explores the mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies for COVID-19-induced liver injury, with a focus on its impact on patients with pre-existing liver conditions, liver cancer, and those undergoing liver transplantation.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature review included studies on clinical manifestations of liver injury due to COVID-19. Key areas examined were direct viral effects, drug-induced liver injury, cytokine storms, and impacts on individuals with chronic liver diseases, liver transplants, and the role of vaccination. Data were collected from clinical trials, observational studies, case reports, and review literature.
RESULTS: COVID-19 can cause a spectrum of liver injuries, from mild enzyme elevations to severe hepatic dysfunction. Injury mechanisms include direct viral invasion, immune response alterations, drug toxicity, and hypoxia-reperfusion injury. Patients with chronic liver conditions (such as alcohol-related liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma) face increased risks of severe outcomes. The pandemic has worsened pre-existing liver conditions, disrupted cancer treatments, and complicated liver transplantation. Vaccination remains crucial for reducing severe disease, particularly in chronic liver patients and transplant recipients. Telemedicine has been beneficial in managing patients and reducing cross-infection risks.
CONCLUSIONS: This review discusses the importance of improved diagnostic methods and management strategies for liver injury caused by COVID-19. It emphasizes the need for close monitoring and customized treatment for high-risk groups, advocating for future research to explore long-term effects, novel therapies, and evidence-based approaches to improve liver health during and after the pandemic.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an adverse reaction to drugs and their metabolites. The activation of adaptive immune and inflammatory responses plays an important role in the pathogenesis of DILI. Glucocorticoids (GCs) have powerful anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects and have been used to treat a variety of immune-mediated liver diseases. Due to the important role of the immune system in DILI, GCs are widely used in the clinical treatment of DILI; however, whether they are beneficial to patients remains controversial. There is no uniform standard for the timing, dosage, and population selection of GCs, which mainly depend on the clinician\'s experience. Therefore, elucidating whether GCs are beneficial for patients with DILI is an urgent clinical problem. Our review summarizes the recent literature and discusses the clinical efficacy, applicable population, application timing, and efficacy of GCs in special types of DILI, providing a reference for the clinical application of GCs.

Plant polysaccharides (PP) demonstrate a diverse array of biological and pharmacological properties. This comprehensive review aims to compile and present the multifaceted roles and underlying mechanisms of plant polysaccharides in various liver diseases. These diseases include non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), alcoholic liver disease (ALD), fibrosis, drug-induced liver injury (DILI), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to elucidate the intricate mechanisms and therapeutic potential of plant polysaccharides, shedding light on their significance and potential applications in the management and potential prevention of these liver conditions. An exhaustive literature search was conducted for this study, utilizing prominent databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI. The search criteria focused on the formula \"(plant polysaccharides liver disease) NOT (review)\" was employed to ensure the inclusion of original research articles up to the year 2023. Relevant literature was extracted and analyzed from these databases. Plant polysaccharides exhibit promising pharmacological properties, particularly in the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism and their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. The ongoing progress of studies on the molecular mechanisms associated with polysaccharides will offer novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of chronic liver diseases (CLDs).

OBJECTIVE: Clinical evidence for early identification and diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (LC) caused by different types of liver disease is limited. We investigated this topic through a meta-analysis of quantitative metabolomics.
METHODS: Four databases were searched until October 31, 2022 for studies comparing metabolite levels between patients with different types of liver disease and control individuals. A random-effects model was applied for the meta-analysis.
RESULTS: This study included 55 studies with 8266 clinical participants, covering 348 metabolites. In LC related to drug-induced liver injury (DILI), hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the primary bile acid biosynthesis (taurocholic acid: SMD, 1.08[0.81, 1.35]; P < 0.00001; glycocholic acid: SMD, 1.35[1.07, 1.62]; P < 0.00001; taurochenodeoxycholic acid: SMD, 1.36[0.94, 1.78]; P < 0.00001; glycochenodeoxycholic acid: SMD, 1.49[0.93, 2.06]; P < 0.00001), proline and arginine (l-proline: SMD, 1.06[0.53, 1.58]; P < 0.0001; hydroxyproline: SMD, 0.81[0.30, 1.33]; P = 0.002), and fatty acid biosynthesis (palmitic acid: SMD, 0.44[0.21, 0.67]; P = 0.0002; oleic acid: SMD, 0.46[0.19, 0.73]; P = 0.0008; stearic acid: SMD, 0.37[0.07, 0.68]; P = 0.02) metabolic pathways were significantly altered.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified key biomarkers and metabolic characteristics for distinguishing and identifying LC related to different types of liver disease, providing a new perspective for early diagnosis, disease monitoring, and precise treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a complex and unpredictable event caused by drugs, and herbal or dietary supplements. Early identification of human hepatotoxicity at preclinical stages remains a major challenge, in which the selection of validated in vitro systems and test drugs has a significant impact. In this systematic review, we analyzed the compounds used in hepatotoxicity assays and established a list of DILI-positive and -negative control drugs for validation of in vitro models of DILI, supported by literature and clinical evidence and endorsed by an expert committee from the COST Action ProEuroDILI Network (CA17112).
METHODS: Following 2020 PRISMA guidelines, original research articles focusing on DILI which used in vitro human models and performed at least one hepatotoxicity assay with positive and negative control compounds, were included. Bias of the studies was assessed by a modified \'Toxicological Data Reliability Assessment Tool\'.
RESULTS: A total of 51 studies (out of 2,936) met the inclusion criteria, with 30 categorized as reliable without restrictions. Although there was a broad consensus on positive compounds, the selection of negative compounds lacked clarity. 2D monoculture, short exposure times and cytotoxicity endpoints were the most tested, although there was no consensus on drug concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: Extensive analysis highlighted the lack of agreement on control compounds for in vitro DILI assessment. Following comprehensive in vitro and clinical data analysis together with input from the expert committee, an evidence-based consensus-driven list of 10 positive and negative control drugs for validation of in vitro models of DILI is proposed.
UNASSIGNED: Prediction of human toxicity early in the drug development process remains a major challenge, necessitating the development of more physiologically relevant liver models and careful selection of drug-induced liver injury (DILI)-positive and -negative control drugs to better predict the risk of DILI associated with new drug candidates. Thus, this systematic study has crucial implications for standardizing the validation of new in vitro models of DILI. By establishing a consensus-driven list of positive and negative control drugs, the study provides a scientifically justified framework for enhancing the consistency of preclinical testing, thereby addressing a significant challenge in early hepatotoxicity identification. Practically, these findings can guide researchers in evaluating safety profiles of new drugs, refining in vitro models, and informing regulatory agencies on potential improvements to regulatory guidelines, ensuring a more systematic and efficient approach to drug safety assessment.

Clozapine is an effective medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, and it has been associated with well-documented side effects that limit its use. Clozapine-induced hepatotoxicity is a less-known complication of clozapine therapy. The literature is unclear about the psychopharmacologic options available following clozapine cessation on account of liver toxicity. We present a patient with clinical symptomatology in keeping with clozapine-induced hepatotoxicity who achieved full recovery following clozapine cessation and conservative medical management. Her psychiatric symptomatology was successfully managed with oral olanzapine augmented with haloperidol without recurrence of psychosis or liver toxicity.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused changes in the global health system, causing significant setbacks in healthcare systems worldwide. This pandemic has also shown resilience, flexibility, and creativity in reacting to the tragedy. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection targets most of the respiratory tract, resulting in a severe sickness called acute respiratory distress syndrome that may be fatal in some individuals. Although the lung is the primary organ targeted by COVID-19 viruses, the clinical aspect of the disease is varied and ranges from asymptomatic to respiratory failure. However, due to an unorganized immune response and several affected mechanisms, the liver may also experience liver cell injury, ischemic liver dysfunction, and drug-induced liver injury, which can result in respiratory failure because of the immune system\'s disordered response and other compromised processes that can end in multisystem organ failure. Patients with liver cirrhosis or those who have impaired immune systems may be more likely than other groups to experience worse results from the SARS-CoV-2 infection. We thus intend to examine the pathogenesis, current therapy, and consequences of liver damage concerning COVID-19.

Treatment of hepatic diseases presents a significant challenge due to their diverse nature. Ginsenosides, bioactive compounds derived from the root of Panax ginseng and widely used in traditional Chinese medicine, offer multifaceted protection to various organs in the body. Their versatile effects, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic and more, make them a promising approach for addressing hepatic disorders. This review explores the intricate molecular mechanisms and properties of ginsenosides in the prevention and treatment of liver ailments, from mild conditions to severe damage and liver fibrosis. Given the increasing prevalence of hepatic disorders, this article sheds light on the significant pharmaceutical potential of ginsenosides in the realm of hepatic disease management.

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a significant global health concern and generally leads to fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Various factors, such as metabolic abnormalities, viral infections, alcoholism, genetics and autoimmune responses, contribute to liver damage. CLD is characterized by different phenotypes, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, drug-induced liver injury and alcoholic liver disease. These conditions have seen an increase in comorbidities and hospitalizations over the past decade, imposing a substantial burden on patients and healthcare systems. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of liver injury is crucial for effective management and reducing the clinical and economic burden of CLD. Although several attempts have been evaluated to find a drug therapy option for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, there is no effective drug approved to date. However, different studies have demonstrated that silymarin, the milk thistle extract, could exert hepatoprotective, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties and should therefore be considered an efficacious, tolerable and promising herbal product for the management of liver activity in CLDs. This review discusses the clinical features, diagnosis and available treatments for major liver diseases, acting as an introduction to a clinical case collection based on the management and treatment of major liver diseases with silymarin. This article is part of the Current clinical use of silymarin in the treatment of toxic liver diseases: a case series Special Issue: https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/current-clinical-use-of-silymarin-in-the-treatment-of-toxic-liver-diseases-a-case-series.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 27% of individuals seeking Korean medicine (KM) services in South Korea are prescribed herbal decoctions. The South Korean government has considered the validity of providing National Health Insurance coverage for herbal decoctions. Therefore, it is important to investigate their safety.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety of herbal decoctions commonly prescribed by KM doctors and to assess their effects on liver and kidney function by comprehensively analyzing Korean clinical studies in a scoping review.
METHODS: The Arksey and O\'Malley framework and modified methods were applied in this scoping review. A comprehensive search of seven electronic health databases was conducted, and relevant clinical studies published between 2000 and 2022 were identified. Subsequently, only clinical studies reporting the results of liver and/or renal function tests in patient prescribed herbal decoctions by KM doctors were included. The characteristics of the included clinical studies and the reported proportion of each liver and/or renal function indicator were analyzed. Meta-analyses of the effects of herbal decoction on liver and/or renal function reported in prospective cohort studies were also performed.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine clinical studies were included in this review. The proportion of prospective cohort studies markedly decreased in the 2010s compared to the 2000s, while there was no noticeable change in the number of relevant clinical studies. Herbal decoctions were prescribed for less than one month in most included studies. Abnormal changes in liver or renal function indicators were identified in a small number of studies (3.70% and 7.69%, respectively). In a meta-analysis of 15 prospective cohort studies, no statistically significant changes in four liver function indices and two renal function indices were observed before and after the prescription of herbal decoctions.
CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative and quantitative analyses demonstrated favorable safety profiles for herbal decoctions. This scoping review includes the gaps noted between clinical application and research regarding the safety profiles of herbal decoctions. These findings could be used as evidence to support the inclusion of herbal decoction prescriptions in the National Health Insurance coverage in South Korea.