Azithromycin, an azolide antibiotic with structural and functional similarities to macrolides, possesses distinct features such as its effects persisting for seven days, an extended half-life by administering it once daily for three days, and strong antimicrobial activity. Notably, vomiting and diarrhea are recognized as the primary adverse events related to azithromycin. In this particular case, we present a unique case describing a purpuric-type drug eruption associated with azithromycin, which represents an uncommon cutaneous manifestation. A 64-year-old female developed a purpuric eruption on her trunk and lower extremities seven days after receiving daily intravenous azithromycin for upper bronchitis. A previous occurrence of punctate purpuric eruption following azithromycin administration was documented in her medical history. The diagnosis of azithromycin-induced skin eruption was confirmed based on the clinical progression and the recurrence of the eruption upon re-administration of the drug. In response to this diagnosis, the patient underwent treatment involving the discontinuation of azithromycin and the application of topical betamethasone butyrate propionate ointment. Remarkably, her eruption significantly improved within two weeks, although residual pigmentation persisted post-treatment. Additionally, we offer a comprehensive review of the literature, examining cases of drug eruptions related to azithromycin.

Onychomycosis is the most prevalent nail disease and is frequently encountered in clinical practice. Despite having multiple therapeutic options, of which systemic antifungals are the most effective, treatment is not always mandatory in all patients. Especially when considering systemic treatment, the risk of adverse reactions may outweigh the potential benefits of treatment. In this case report, we present a clinical case of a 49-year-old male patient with a blank past medical history who experienced a severe drug eruption from terbinafine prescribed for mild onychomycosis that required discontinuation of terbinafine, additional evaluation, and treatment of this adverse reaction.

A new quinolone antibiotic called garenoxacin was developed in Japan. Garenoxacin is known to produce cutaneous adverse effects, particularly fixed drug eruption in Japan, despite several reports of cutaneous adverse events in English-language literature. However, English-language literature has not yet reported that fixed drug eruption is a common clinical manifestation of garenoxacin-induced drug eruption. In this article, we present a case of multiple fixed drug eruptions and review the literature on case reports of drug eruptions caused by garenoxacin.

Apalutamide is an antiandrogen used to treat prostate cancer. Although it sometimes induces mild cutaneous adverse events and occasionally severe ones, clinical differences between severe and mild cases remain unclear. To assess the risks in patients experiencing apalutamide-related cutaneous adverse events (ARCAEs), we aimed to characterize severe and mild ARCAEs in terms of onset time and lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) for apalutamide. We reviewed 41 ARCAE cases: 24 from our institute and 17 from the literature, comprising (i) eight severe cases including six with toxic epidermal necrolysis, one with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, and one with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and (ii) 33 mild cases. Patients with evere cases developed ARCAEs significantly earlier than patients with mild cases (5.2 vs 9.6 weeks). No severe cases appeared ≥8 weeks after initiation of apalutamide. LTTs showed positive results in two of seven mild cases (28.6%) and four of four severe cases (100.0%). In conclusion, we found that severe ARCAEs are characterized by earlier onset and LTT positivity. Dermatologists and urologists should pay special attention to patients who develop ARCAEs <8 weeks after initiating apalutamide and/or show positive LTT results.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) typically involves a skin rash, mucositis, and conjunctivitis. Previous reports of SJS without skin manifestations affect children and are usually associated with Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. We present a rare case of oral and ocular SJS without skin lesions in a healthy adult after exposure to azithromycin without mycoplasma pneumonia infection.

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi) are now standard of care in patients with EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are increasingly being used in other EGFR mutated cancers, including gastrointestinal, and head and neck. However, EGFRi are well known to cause acneiform eruptions, which are shown to positively correlate with tumor response to treatment, but may be severe enough to cause interruption of their treatment. Although most guidelines call for the use of tetracyclines to treat these acneiform eruptions, there is mounting evidence for the use of systemic retinoids instead. The objective of this review is to summarize available data on the use of systemic retinoids for management of acneiform eruptions on EGFRi. This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from database inception until December 10th, 2021. All articles were screened and relevant data extracted independently in duplicate by two reviewers. In total, 16 case reports, case series and retrospective reviews were included. Forty-three patients were treated with retinoids for their acneiform eruption due to EGFRi. The majority (77%) noted moderate to significant improvement after treatment initiation with minimal adverse events (16%). The findings of this systematic review suggest that systemic retinoids are a safe and effective therapy for the management of acneiform eruptions induced by EGFRi.

BACKGROUND: Identification of culprit drugs when managing cutaneous drug eruptions is essential. Causality assessment methods (CAMs) have been proposed, including lab-based techniques. However, no consensus guidelines exist.
OBJECTIVE: To identify and map the functionality and feasibility of lab-based CAMs.
METHODS: A scoping review was conducted to identify culprit drug identification methods. Publications on lab-based methods were analyzed. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched.
RESULTS: Twenty-five publications met inclusion criteria. Nine lab-based CAMs were studied, including lymphocyte transformation test, cytokine measurement (ELISpot, ELISA, beads array assay), modified IFN-ɣ ELISpot, CellScan, histamine release, granzyme B-ELISpot, intracellular granulysin, lymphocyte toxicity assay, and HLA allele genotyping. Diagnostic accuracy was reported for 8/9 methods. Clinical assessment and operational algorithms were commonly used as validation benchmarks. Lab-based methods were assessed at different phases of a drug eruption including in the acute (18.1%), recovery (27.3%), acute and recovery (27.3%), or an unspecified phase (27.3%). Lymphocyte transformation test (specificity 30% to 100%, sensitivity 27% to 73%) and cytokine measurement (specificity 76% to 100%, sensitivity 20% to 84%) were the most common methods studied.
CONCLUSIONS: Lab-based CAMs can be low-risk, effective, and complementary of clinical methods. High-quality studies are needed to adequately develop and validate these tools for clinical practice.

Anecdotal evidence suggests that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) cause cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs). However, there is limited information on the factors associated with these occurrences. In this study, we aimed to describe the demographic, clinical and pharmacological characteristics associated with CADRs encountered by patients administered SSRIs and/or SNRIs for psychiatric diagnoses and to compare the differences in these factors between severe and non-severe CADRs. A protocol was developed a priori (PROSPERO: CRD42020204830) in line with the PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO and SCOPUS from inception to October 2020 to identify case reports and/or case series of SSRI and SNRI associated CADRs. Additional cases were obtained from the retrieved articles\' bibliography. A total of 141 articles were included in the study, documenting 173 CADRs. Females accounted for 128 (74.0%) of the analysed CADRs. The median age of the cases was 42 IQR (27; 53) with no statistically significant differences in age between males and females (P = 0.542). A total of 157 (90.8%) of the reported CADRs were associated with SSRIs, particularly fluoxetine 68 (39.5%), sertraline 30 (17.4%) and paroxetine 25 (14.5%). Non-severe CADRs and severe CADRs accounted for 23 (13.4%) and 149 (86.6%) reports respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed for gender (P = 0.616), age at onset (P = 0.493) and time to onset (P = 0.105) between non-severe CADRs and SCARs. In conclusion, CADRs following SSRIs and SNRIs disproportionately affect females in the reproductive age group compared to males and are mostly associated with SSRIs.

OBJECTIVE: Enzalutamide is the most frequently prescribed compound for treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Common adverse drug events of enzalutamide are febrile neutropenia, hot flashes, hypertension, and fatigue.
METHODS: We present a case of a patient with mCRPC who received enzalutamide and developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS). The culprit drug was confirmed using the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale. Clinical characteristics and management principles were analyzed in combination with literature reports.
RESULTS: SJS occurred within two weeks of enzalutamide therapy. Supportive care such as steroid treatment led to a complete resolution of skin lesions and improved clinical symptoms after three weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Most cutaneous adverse events occur early during enzalutamide therapy, and close observation should be given within two weeks of starting treatment.

Apalutamide, an oral androgen receptor signaling inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and metastatic prostate cancer. In the international randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials, apalutamide was associated with a higher rate of rash than placebo. However, given that reports from a dermatological perspective are limited, the skin manifestations and histopathology of the skin lesions caused by apalutamide are largely unknown. Here, we report a case of apalutamide-induced drug eruption. A 66-year-old man developed itchy maculopapular erythema on the trunk and extremities 10 weeks after starting apalutamide for progressive prostate cancer. A biopsy specimen showed interface dermatitis with perivascular lymphocytic infiltration in the upper dermis. The lymphocyte transformation test was positive for apalutamide. The skin manifestations improved after discontinuation of apalutamide and treatment with topical corticosteroids and systemic prednisolone. A review of the dermatology literature on apalutamide-induced drug eruption yielded only six cases, including our case. Dermatologically, there were four cases of maculopapular rash and two of toxic epidermal necrolysis and histopathologically, there were three cases of interface dermatitis, two of epidermal necrosis, and one of spongiotic dermatitis. Four patients had peripheral eosinophilia. A lymphocyte transformation test was performed in three cases and was positive for apalutamide in all cases. Except for the two cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, which were fatal, the skin eruptions appeared 10 weeks after starting apalutamide. Considering the increasing number of patients with prostate cancer being treated with apalutamide, cases of apalutamide-induced drug eruption need to be accumulated and analyzed.