<b><br>Introduction:</b> Obesity's associated comorbidities and treatment costs have risen significantly, highlighting the importance of early weight loss strategies. Bariatric surgeries like Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) have been effective in promoting weight loss and improving type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The aim was to determine whether Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is more effective than vertical sleeve gastrectomy in the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</br> <b><br>Methods:</b> A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. A literature search was performed in the databases Web of Science, Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Medline/Ovid. A total of 1323 results were identified; after screening, 14 articles were selected and included in the systematic review. Primary and secondary outcomes were measured by RR with a 95% CI.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> The primary outcome of T2DM remission was 15% in favor of VSG (RR: 1.15, [95% CI: 1.04-1.28]). For secondary outcomes, hypertension remission was 7% in favor of VSG (RR: 1.07, [95% CI: 1.00-1.16]). Remission of dyslipidemia was 16% in favor of VSG (RR: 1.16, [95% CI: 1.06-1.26]). BMI after surgery was in favor of RYGB (MD: -1.31, [95% CI: -1.98 to -0.64]). For weight loss, the results favored VSG (MD: 6.50, [95% CI: 4.99-8.01]). In relation to total cholesterol, they were 65% favorable for RYGB (MD: -0.35, [95% CI: -0.46 to -0.24]), with a value of p <0.05. For LDL values, our results were 69% favorable for RYGB (MD: -0.31, [95% CI: -0.45 to -0.16]), p <0.01 value.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is more effective in T2DM remission, hypertension remission, dyslipidemia remission, and weight loss compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is more effective at lowering BMI, total cholesterol, LDL, and TG compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.</br>.

BACKGROUND: Measuring treatment burden is important for the effective management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) care. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the most robust approach for measuring treatment burden in people with T2DM based on existing evidence.
METHODS: Articles from seven databases were retrieved. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies examining treatment burden in adults with T2DM and/or reporting relevant experiences were included. A convergent segregated approach with a mixed-methods design of systematic review was employed, creating a measurement framework in a narrative review for consistent critical appraisal. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. The measurement properties of the instruments were evaluated using the Consensus based Standards for selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist.
RESULTS: A total of 21,584 records were screened, and 26 articles were included, comprising 11 quantitative, 11 qualitative, and 4 mixed-methods studies. A thematic analysis of qualitative data extracted from the included articles summarised a measurement framework encompassing seven core and six associated measurements. The core measurements, including financial, medication, administrative, lifestyle, healthcare, time/travel, and medical information burdens, directly reflect the constructs pertinent to the treatment burden of T2DM. In contrast, the associated measurement themes do not directly reflect the burdens or are less substantiated by current evidence. The results of the COSMIN checklist evaluation demonstrated that the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS), Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ), and Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ) have robust instrument development processes. These three instruments, with the highest total counts combining the number of themes covered and \"positive\" ratings in COSMIN evaluation, were in the top tertile stratification, demonstrating superior applicability for measuring T2DM treatment burden.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides evidence for the currently superior option of measuring treatment burden in people with T2DM. It also revealed that most current research was conducted in well-resourced institutions, potentially overlooking variability in under-resourced settings.

Gender-affirming hormonal therapy (GAHT), which includes estrogen, testosterone, androgen agonists, is commonly used in transgender individuals to change their secondary sexual characteristics to align with their gender identity. However, this treatment could result in metabolic side effects that could increase the chances of acquiring type 2 diabetes mellitus. Thus, this study aims to compare differences in body mass index (BMI), insulin resistance, and the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus between cisgender and transgender individuals undergoing GAHT. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards, we conducted a systematic review searching through PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), and ResearchGate for articles published between 2014 and 2024. The final search was conducted in February 2024. Out of the 3,934 articles reviewed, 11 were selected, focusing on insulin sensitivity/resistance, diabetes incidence, and BMI changes with GAHT. Although our result findings did not show clear evidence of increased diabetes incidence among GAHT patients, it was observed that GAHT does increase BMI and insulin resistance in transgender individuals. Notably, compared to transgender men, transgender women on GAHT were found to be more prone to insulin resistance. We recommend regularly monitoring insulin sensitivity parameters and HbA1c during GAHT to monitor metabolic side effects. Further research and more clinical trials are needed to confirm the GAHT\'s impact on insulin resistance and to evaluate its role in the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: Have the most current evidence in relation to the evaluation of medical healthcare for patients with diabetes in primary care.
METHODS: During the review process, we followed the recommendations to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and the preferred reporting points for PRISMA systematic reviews. The bibliographic search was carried out in Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), SCOPUS, Scielo, MedLine/ PubMed, Cochrane databases and in the Google Scholar search engine, with free and controlled language, using the MeSh search terms: «Physicians, Primary Care», «Diabetes Mellitus, Type2». Eight selected articles were analyzed. The articles were selected based on their relevance, published in peer-reviewed academic journals and published between 2019 and 2023.
RESULTS: The main study tool represents interventions in knowledge and practice about the care of patients with diabetes among primary care physicians. The most important discussion topics extracted in the analyzed articles refer to knowledge, clinical inertia, patients\' housing challenges, adherence intervention programs, and a self-care application for patients with diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate the need to improve medical health care through knowledge, attitudes and practices in primary care regarding patients with diabetes. In this way, it could be considered a useful tool to promote medical healthcare in primary care.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) use is associated with an increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). The clinical data regarding the use of SGLT2i and its potential side effects in oncology patients is limited. We are retrospectively reporting four oncology patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using SGLT2i who were admitted with DKA. The mean age of the patients was 61.25 years, and male to female ratio was 1:1. The duration of type 2 diabetes ranged from 10 to 20 years (mean 15.75 years) and the types of SGLT2i used were empagliflozin 25 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg. The types of malignancy in our case series included squamous cell carcinoma of the cheek, ovarian cancer, and two patients had laryngeal carcinoma (squamous cell carcinoma). Diabetic ketoacidosis was diagnosed in three patients following chemotherapy or concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. Poor oral intake and infections were the main risk factors in our patients. Mean blood glucose level, anion gap, and bicarbonate level were 11.7 mmol/l, 32.25, and 5 mmol/l, respectively. The majority had moderate DKA based on pH (mean 7.13). The hospital course was complicated by acute kidney injury (n=4), infections (n=4) (urinary tract infections, and pneumonia), and three patients required critical care. The mean length of hospitalization was 19.2 days and no mortality was reported among our patients. SGLT2i-related DKA is an emerging complication recognized in oncology patients. Some of the risk factors for this complication are starvation, poor oral intake, and infection which are quite prevalent in oncology patients. Temporary holding of SGLT2i medication during this period might have a potential preventive role.

A review of publications devoted to the analysis of genetic polymorphisms and features of the functioning of genes that affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) is presented. Objective of the study was to reveal information about genes whose polymorphism may affect the effectiveness of SGLT2i. The review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 recommendations, the search for publications was carried out in the PubMed databases (including Medline), Web of Science, as well as Russian scientific electronic libraries eLIBRARY.RU from 1993 to 2022. Polymorphisms in the structure of several genes (SLC5A2, UGT1A9, ABCB1, PNPLA3) have been described that may affect the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by diseases such as chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The information found on the genetic features of the development of the effects of SGLT2i is limited to a description of the differences in their pharmacokinetics. The relevance of currently available pharmacogenetic studies is largely constrained by small sample sizes.
Представлен обзор публикаций, посвященных анализу генетических полиморфизмов и особенностей функционирования генов, влияющих на фармакокинетику и фармакодинамику ингибиторов натрий-глюкозного котранспортера 2-го типа (SGLT2i). Задачей являлось выявление информации о генах, полиморфизм которых может оказывать влияние на SGLT2i. Обзор проводили в соответствии с рекомендациями PRISMA 2020. Публикации проанализировали в базах данных PubMed (включая Medline), Web of Science, а также в российской научной электронной библиотеке eLIBRARY.RU за период 1993–2022 гг. Описаны полиморфизмы в строении генов SLC5A2, UGT1A9, ABCB1, PNPLA3, которые могут оказывать влияние на терапию сахарного диабета 2-го типа, осложненного такими заболеваниями, как хроническая сердечная недостаточность, хроническая болезнь почек или неалкогольная жировая болезнь печени. Найденная информация о генетических особенностях развития эффектов SGLT2i ограничена описанием различий их фармакокинетики. Актуальность доступных фармакогенетических исследований в значительной степени сдерживается небольшими размерами выборок.

Bone fragility is a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) that has been identified in recent decades. Trabecular bone score (TBS) appears to be more accurate than bone mineral density (BMD) in diabetic bone disease, particularly in menopausal women with T2DM, to independently capture the fracture risk. Our purpose was to provide the most recent overview on TBS-associated clinical data in T2DM. The core of this narrative review is based on original studies (PubMed-indexed journals, full-length, English articles). The sample-based analysis (n = 11, N = 4653) confirmed the use of TBS in T2DM particularly in females (females/males ratio of 1.9), with ages varying between 35 and 91 (mean 65.34) years. With concern to the study design, apart from the transversal studies, two others were prospective, while another two were case-control. These early-post-pandemic data included studies of various sample sizes, such as: males and females (N of 245, 361, 511, and 2294), only women (N of 80, 96, 104, 243, 493, and 887), and only men (N = 169). Overall, this 21-month study on published data confirmed the prior profile of BMD-TBS in T2DM, while the issue of whether checking the fracture risk is mandatory in adults with uncontrolled T2DM remains to be proven or whether, on the other hand, a reduced TBS might function as a surrogate marker of complicated/uncontrolled T2DM. The interventional approach with bisphosphonates for treating T2DM-associated osteoporosis remains a standard one (n = 2). One control study on 4 mg zoledronic acid showed after 1 year a statistically significant increase of lumbar BMD in both diabetic and non-diabetic groups (+3.6%, p = 0.01 and +6.2%, p = 0.01, respectively). Further studies will pinpoint additive benefits on glucose status of anti-osteoporotic drugs or will confirm if certain glucose-lowering regimes are supplementarily beneficial for fracture risk reduction. The novelty of this literature research: these insights showed once again that the patients with T2DM often have a lower TBS than those without diabetes or with normal glucose levels. Therefore, the decline in TBS may reflect an early stage of bone health impairment in T2DM. The novelty of the TBS as a handy, non-invasive method that proved to be an index of bone microarchitecture confirms its practicality as an easily applicable tool for assessing bone fragility in T2DM.

Diabetes is a major economic burden and an illness with a rising incidence worldwide. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the most prevalent kind of diabetes, is characterized by insulin resistance and insufficient insulin production. Recent research has implicated gut microbiota dysbiosis as a contributing factor to T2DM pathogenesis. The present study employed a methodology based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the therapeutic efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of T2DM. A thorough search was done in PubMed and Medline for articles written in English and published between 2017 and 2023. Studies were chosen based on predetermined inclusion criteria, and the search technique adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) principles. This study also employed a robust assessment instrument, widely recognized in the medical and health sciences, to evaluate the potential presence of bias within the selected research studies. Out of 96 identified articles, 22 RCTs met the eligibility criteria. Both short-term (8 weeks or less) and long-term (12 weeks or more) probiotic administrations were made. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) following the probiotic intervention (P=0.02) and considerably decreased glycated hemoglobin HbA1c levels (P=0.004) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels (P<0.0001) in T2DM patients compared to placebo. This research offers proof that probiotics are clinically effective in the treatment of T2DM. Probiotic supplementation demonstrated favorable effects on glycemic control markers. However, the findings from RCTs were heterogeneous, and some studies showed inconsistent results. To clarify the processes underlying the probiotics\' therapeutic benefits and to determine the best probiotic strains, doses, and therapy durations, more research is required. Nevertheless, probiotics offer a promising therapeutic approach for T2DM management and warrant consideration as a potential adjunct therapy in clinical practice.

People with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a greater risk of developing cardiovascular problems. Since cardiovascular diseases are a major cause of mortality all over the world, we need to find more efficient measures to control this risk in the diabetes population in addition to conventional glycemic control. In this systematic review, we aim to explore the latest findings on the cardiovascular effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists and dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar as the main sources for data collection. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 recommendations for conducting this review. The outcomes of interest included mortality due to cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, effects on cardiovascular risk factors, heart failure, and development of arrhythmias. After thorough literature screening and quality analysis, 14 articles were finally included for qualitative synthesis. GLP-1 receptor agonists appeared to be effective in reducing the risk of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke. They were found to reduce the risk of composite major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) outcomes by 12-14% when compared to placebo. Their role in preventing heart failure and arrhythmias is uncertain, and further trials are needed to confirm the same. The cardiovascular outcomes of GLP-1/GIP dual agonists are currently under investigation. Studies completed to date show that they do not increase the risk of cardiovascular disease when compared to placebo.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus type 2 is a growing health concern that affects several systems in the body, among which is the phonatory apparatus. Voice may be affected in view of the high prevalence of myopathy and neuropathy in diseased subjects. The authors aimed to answer the following question: does type 2 diabetes have an effect on voice?
METHODS: The systematic review included search terms such as \"speech, voice, larynx, glucose, diabetes, and hyperglycemia.\" The search strategy yielded 221 articles, only five of which satisfied the inclusion criteria. Articles were considered for inclusion using the PRISMA method. Analysis included 321 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 171 controls. All studies included were case-control studies except for one study which was an observational cohort. Six parameters were chosen as endpoints for the systematic review and meta-analysis: the presence/absence of voice complaints, fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, noise-to-harmonic ratio, and maximum phonation time.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the prevalence of voice complaints (i.e., hoarseness) between diabetic patients and control groups. There was also no significant difference in any of the acoustic and aerodynamic measures between patients with type 2 diabetes and controls. These findings can be ascribed to the high resilience of the laryngeal muscles to the adverse effect of systemic diseases.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no consensus in the literature that the prevalence of voice symptoms in diabetic patients is significantly higher than that reported in healthy subjects.