Cytogenetic analysis is mandatory at initial assessment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) due to its diagnostic and prognostic value. Results from chromosome banding analysis and complementary FISH are taken into account in therapeutic protocols and further completed by other techniques (RT-PCR, SNP-array, MLPA, NGS, OGM). Indeed, new genomic entities have been identified by NGS, mostly RNA sequencing, such as Ph-like ALL that can benefit from targeted therapy. Here, we have attempted to establish cytogenetic guidelines by reviewing the most recent published data including the novel 5th World Health Organization and International Consensus Classifications. We also focused on newly described cytogenomic entities and indicate alternative diagnostic tools such as NGS technology, as its importance is vastly increasing in the diagnostic setting.

Bone marrow failure syndromes are rare disorders characterized by bone marrow hypocellularity and resultant peripheral cytopenias. The most frequent form is acquired, so-called aplastic anemia or idiopathic aplastic anemia, an auto-immune disorder frequently associated with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, whereas inherited bone marrow failure syndromes are related to pathogenic germline variants. Among newly identified germline variants, GATA2 deficiency and SAMD9/9L syndromes have a special significance. Other germline variants impacting biological processes, such as DNA repair, telomere biology, and ribosome biogenesis, may cause major syndromes including Fanconi anemia, dyskeratosis congenita, Diamond-Blackfan anemia, and Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. Bone marrow failure syndromes are at risk of secondary progression towards myeloid neoplasms in the form of myelodysplastic neoplasms or acute myeloid leukemia. Acquired clonal cytogenetic abnormalities may be present before or at the onset of progression; some have prognostic value and/or represent somatic rescue mechanisms in inherited syndromes. On the other hand, the differential diagnosis between aplastic anemia and hypoplastic myelodysplastic neoplasm remains challenging. Here we discuss the value of cytogenetic abnormalities in bone marrow failure syndromes and propose recommendations for cytogenetic diagnosis and follow-up.

Mature T-cell and natural killer (NK)-cell neoplasms (MTNKNs) are a highly heterogeneous group of lymphomas that represent 10-15 % of lymphoid neoplasms and have usually an aggressive behavior. Diagnosis can be challenging due to their overlapping clinical, histological and immunophenotypic features. Genetic data are not a routine component of the diagnostic algorithm for most MTNKNs. Indeed, unlike B-cell lymphomas, the genomic landscape of MTNKNs is not fully understood. Only few characteristic rearrangements can be easily identified with conventional cytogenetic methods and are an integral part of the diagnostic criteria, for instance the t(14;14)/inv(14) or t(X;14) abnormality harbored by 95 % of patients with T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia, or the ALK gene translocation observed in some forms of anaplastic large cell lymphoma. However, advances in molecular and cytogenetic techniques have brought new insights into MTNKN pathogenesis. Several recurrent genetic alterations have been identified, such as chromosomal losses involving tumor suppressor genes (SETD2, CDKN2A, TP53) and gains involving oncogenes (MYC), activating mutations in signaling pathways (JAK-STAT, RAS), and epigenetic dysregulation, that have improved our understanding of these pathologies. This work provides an overview of the cytogenetics knowledge in MTNKNs in the context of the new World Health Organization classification and the International Consensus Classification of hematolymphoid tumors. It describes key genetic alterations and their clinical implications. It also proposes recommendations on cytogenetic methods for MTNKN diagnosis.

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) consist of a wide range of clinically, phenotypically and genetically distinct neoplasms. The accurate diagnosis of mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma relies on a multidisciplinary approach that integrates morphological, phenotypical and genetic characteristics together with clinical features. Cytogenetic analyses remain an essential part of the diagnostic workup for mature B-cell lymphomas. Karyotyping is particularly useful to identify hallmark translocations, typical cytogenetic signatures as well as complex karyotypes, all bringing valuable diagnostic and/or prognostic information. Besides the well-known recurrent chromosomal abnormalities such as, for example, t(14;18)(q32;q21)/IGH::BCL2 in follicular lymphoma, recent evidences support a prognostic significance of complex karyotype in mantle cell lymphoma and Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization is also a key analysis playing a central role in disease identification, especially in genetically-defined entities, but also in predicting transformation risk or prognostication. This can be exemplified by the pivotal role of MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements in the diagnostic of aggressive or large B-cell lymphomas. This work relies on the World Health Organization and the International Consensus Classification of hematolymphoid tumors together with the recent cytogenetic advances. Here, we review the various chromosomal abnormalities that delineate well-established mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma entities as well as newly recognized genetic subtypes and provide cytogenetic guidelines for the diagnostic management of mature B-cell lymphomas.

Molecular analysis is the hallmark of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) categorization. Several T-ALL sub-groups are well recognized based on the aberrant expression of specific transcription factors. This recently resulted in the implementation of eight provisional T-ALL entities into the novel 2022 International Consensus Classification, albeit not into the updated World Health Organization classification system. Despite this extensive molecular characterization, cytogenetic analysis remains the backbone of T-ALL diagnosis in many countries as chromosome banding analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization are relatively inexpensive techniques to obtain results of diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic interest. Here, we provide an overview of recurrent chromosomal abnormalities detectable in T-ALL patients and propose guidelines regarding their detection. By referring in parallel to the more general molecular classification approach, we hope to offer a diagnostic framework useful in a broad clinical genetic setting.

Risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains principle in survival prognostication and treatment selection. The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations were recently published, with notable updates to risk group assignment. The complexity of risk stratification and comparative outcomes between the 2022 and 2017 ELN guidelines remains unknown. This comparative analysis evaluated outcomes between the 2017 and 2022 ELN criteria in patients enrolled within the multicenter Beat AML cohort. Five hundred thirteen patients were included. Most patients had 1 or 2 ELN risk-defining abnormalities. In patients with ≥2 ELN risk-defining mutations, 44% (n = 132) had mutations spanning multiple ELN risk categories. Compared with ELN 2017 criteria, the updated ELN 2022 guidelines changed the assigned risk group in 15% of patients, including 10%, 26%, and 6% of patients categorized as being at ELN 2017 favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk, respectively. The median overall survival across ELN 2022 favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk groups was not reached, 16.8, and 9.7 months, respectively. The ELN 2022 guidelines more accurately stratified survival between patients with intermediate- or adverse-risk AML treated with induction chemotherapy compared with ELN 2017 guidelines. The updated ELN 2022 guidelines better stratify survival between patients with intermediate- or adverse-risk AML treated with induction chemotherapy. The increased complexity of risk stratification with inclusion of additional cytogenetic and molecular aberrations necessitates clinical workflows simplifying risk stratification.

Among all sarcoma types, liposarcoma is the most common sarcoma that develops \"dedifferentiation.\" Since its initial description by Dr Harry Evans, the spectrum of what is now acceptably included under the rubric of \"dedifferentiated liposarcoma\" (DL) has expanded, sometimes supported by cytogenetic and molecular advances. Similarly, the range of morphologic appearances considered to represent the precursor of DL, atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT)/well-differentiated liposarcoma, also has broadened, not uncommonly creating variants with significant, almost indistinguishable, morphologic overlap with occasional forms of DL, especially problematic in small biopsy specimens. More specifically, the precise criteria separating cellular forms of ALT from what some consider \"low-grade\" variants of DL remains controversial and inconsistently applied, even among individual pathologists within institutions. For this separation, the only objective and reproducible criteria historically shown to accurately predict a statistically significant difference in prognosis and survival is mitotic rate, alone or incorporated into a histologic grade [eg, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)], consistently identifying a higher grade neoplasm capable of metastases. While DL may have a better prognosis than other nonmyoid adult pleomorphic soft tissue sarcomas, definitive conclusions are difficult to establish due to nonuniform criteria for staging and establishing tumor size/volume of the high-grade component, compounded by variable definitions and thresholds for rendering the diagnosis of DL. If appropriate therapeutic approaches are to be applied to DL, there needs to uniform agreement regarding the histologic definition, grading, and staging of DL. Herein, is a comprehensive historical perspective on DL and ALT/well-differentiated liposarcoma, seeking to provide insights, updates, and a proposal for uniform, evidence-based guidelines.

In an effort to standardize hematopoietic stem cell allograft procedures, the Francophone bone marrow transplantation and Cell Therapy Society (SFGM-TC) organized the 9th Allograft Harmonization Practice Workshop in Lille in September 2018. The purpose of these workshops is to propose a consensual attitude to the centers that wish it. In this workshop, we discuss how to capture the cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities of acute leukaemias, myelomas, myelodysplasias, myeloproliferative syndromes and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative syndromes in the database common to all European transplant centers called ProMISe and managed by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). The complexity of cytogenetic and molecular data makes it difficult to enter data into the ProMISe registry. This workshop proposes a tool for input assistance, in tabular form by pathology. The main recommendation for the karyotype remains that of the complex karyotype that must be entered in \"Full caryotype\". Concerning the molecular anomalies, it is necessary to enter all the items proposed by ProMISe. In reviewing all the sheets proposed by ProMise, we note the absence of some relevant elements that can be added later.

暂无摘要。

The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients is undergoing rapid changes, with a number of important publications in the past five years. Because of this, a group of Canadian leukemia experts has produced an update to the Canadian Consensus Guidelines that were published in 2013, with several new agents recommended, subject to availability. Recent studies have supported the survival benefit of induction chemotherapy for patients under age 80, except those with major co-morbidities or those with adverse risk cytogenetics who are not candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Midostaurin should be added to induction therapy for patients up to age 70 with a FLT3 mutation, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin for de novo AML up to age 70 with favorable or intermediate risk cytogenetics. Daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 is the recommended dose for 3+7 induction therapy. Acute promyelocytic leukemia should be treated with arsenic trioxide plus all-trans retinoic acid, regardless of age, with cytotoxic therapy added upfront only for those with initial white blood count > 10. HSCT may be considered for selected suitable patients up to age 70-75. Haploidentical donor transplants may be considered for older patients. For non-induction candidates, azacitidine is recommended for those with adverse risk cytogenetics, while either a hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low-dose cytarabine can be used for others. HMA may also be used for relapsed/refractory disease after chemotherapy. For patients with secondary AML, CPX-351 is recommended for fit patients age 60-75.