cross-immunity

交叉免疫
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人类针对不同冠状病毒的一般免疫反应相似性可能反映了一定程度的交叉免疫,因此,暴露于一种冠状病毒可能会赋予另一种冠状病毒部分免疫力。目的是确定先前的MERS-CoV感染是否与随后的COVID-19疾病及其相关结局的较低风险相关。
    方法:我们对2012年至2020年初在沙特阿拉伯一家三级医院筛查MERS-CoV的所有患者进行了回顾性队列研究。从2020年初至2021年9月,MERS-CoV阳性和阴性患者均接受了RT-PCR检测证实的COVID-19感染的随访。
    结果:共有397名参与者在COVID-19大流行期间平均随访15个月(距MERS-CoV感染4.9年)。在397名参与者中,基线时,93例(23.4%)的MERS-CoV阳性;61例(65.6%)的阳性病例是有症状的。在397名参与者中,48名(12.1%)参与者在随访期结束时发展为COVID-19。Cox回归分析调整了年龄,性别,和主要合并症显示,在MERS-CoV阳性的患者中,COVID-19疾病(风险比=0.533,p=0.085)和住院(风险比=0.411,p=0.061)的风险略显着降低。此外,在有症状的MERS-CoV感染(风险比=0.324,p=0.034)和住院(风险比=0.317,p=0.042)的患者中,COVID-19疾病的风险进一步降低,并且变得显著.
    结论:当前的发现可能表明部分交叉免疫,有症状的MERS-CoV患者未来发生COVID-19感染和相关住院的风险较低。目前的结果可能需要使用免疫标记在全国范围内进行进一步检查。
    BACKGROUND: The general human immune responses similarity against different coronaviruses may reflect some degree of cross-immunity, whereby exposure to one coronavirus may confer partial immunity to another. The aim was to determine whether previous MERS-CoV infection was associated with a lower risk of subsequent COVID-19 disease and its related outcomes.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among all patients screened for MERS-CoV at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia between 2012 and early 2020. Both MERS-CoV positive and negative patients were followed up from early 2020 to September 2021 for developing COVID-19 infection confirmed by RT-PCR testing.
    RESULTS: A total of 397 participants followed for an average 15 months during COVID-19 pandemic (4.9 years from MERS-CoV infection). Of the 397 participants, 93 (23.4%) were positive for MERS-CoV at baseline; 61 (65.6%) of the positive cases were symptomatic. Out of 397, 48 (12.1%) participants developed COVID-19 by the end of the follow-up period. Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, and major comorbidity showed a marginally significant lower risk of COVID-19 disease (hazard ratio = 0.533, p = 0.085) and hospital admission (hazard ratio = 0.411, p = 0.061) in patients with positive MERS-CoV. Additionally, the risk of COVID-19 disease was further reduced and became significant in patients with symptomatic MERS-CoV infection (hazard ratio = 0.324, p = 0.034) and hospital admission (hazard ratio = 0.317, p = 0.042).
    CONCLUSIONS: The current findings may indicate a partial cross-immunity, where patients with symptomatic MERS-CoV have a lower risk of future COVID-19 infection and related hospitalization. The present results may need further examination nationally using immunity markers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们使用基于模拟的实验研究了可传播性和疫苗接种对现有病毒的新兴毒株在受感染人群中占主导地位所需时间的影响。假定出现的菌株对可用的疫苗具有完全抗性。开发了针对新兴病毒株的改良SIR模型的随机版本,以模拟感染的监测数据。使用逻辑曲线对感染者中的紧急病毒株感染的比例进行建模,并记录每个模拟的优势时间(TTD)。进行了阶乘实验,以比较不同传递系数的TTD值,疫苗接种率,和初始疫苗接种覆盖率。我们发现了TTD与低接种覆盖率人群的新兴菌株的相对传播性之间的非线性关系。此外,人群中更高的疫苗接种覆盖率和更高的疫苗接种率产生了显著更低的TTD值.对易感个体接种当前毒株的疫苗增加了紧急病毒的易感池,这导致紧急菌株传播更快,并且需要更少的时间来控制感染人群。
    We studied the effect of transmissibility and vaccination on the time required for an emerging strain of an existing virus to dominate in the infected population using a simulation-based experiment. The emergent strain is assumed to be completely resistant to the available vaccine. A stochastic version of a modified SIR model for emerging viral strains was developed to simulate surveillance data for infections. The proportion of emergent viral strain infections among the infected was modeled using a logistic curve and the time to dominance (TTD) was recorded for each simulation. A factorial experiment was implemented to compare the TTD values for different transmissibility coefficients, vaccination rates, and initial vaccination coverage. We discovered a non-linear relationship between TTD and the relative transmissibility of the emergent strain for populations with low vaccination coverage. Furthermore, higher vaccination coverage and high vaccination rates in the population yielded significantly lower TTD values. Vaccinating susceptible individuals against the current strain increases the susceptible pool of the emergent virus, which leads to the emergent strain spreading faster and requiring less time to dominate the infected population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:越来越多的实验表明,严重急性呼吸道综合征冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2)与以前的人类冠状病毒之间存在潜在的交叉反应性免疫。我们进行了本回顾性队列研究,以调查先前的中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)感染与SARS-CoV-2感染风险之间的关系,以及先前的MERS-CoV与COVID-19相关的住院和死亡率之间的关系。
    方法:从2020年3月开始,我们前瞻性追踪了两组COVID-19感染检测呈阴性的个体。第一组先前已确认MERS-CoV感染,将其与MERS阴性个体的对照组进行比较。随后,研究的队列被追踪到2020年11月,以追踪感染COVID-19感染的证据。
    结果:共有82名(24%)MERS阳性和260名(31%)MERS阴性个体感染了COVID-19。MERS阳性组患者感染COVID-19的风险低于MERS阴性组(风险比[RR]0.696,95%置信区间[CI]0.522-0.929;p=0.014)。MERS阳性组中COVID-19相关住院的风险明显更高(RR4.036,95%CI1.705-9.555;p=0.002)。COVID-19的病死率(CFR)在MERS阳性组为4.9%,在MERS阴性组为1.2%(p=0.038)。MERS阳性组的死亡风险高于MERS阴性组(RR6.222,95%CI1.342-28.839;p=0.019)。然而,当根据年龄(p=0.068),年龄和性别(p=0.057)校正死亡时,两组的死亡风险相似.在控制了所有独立变量之后,只有医护人员职业和>1合并症是SARS-CoV-2感染的独立预测因子.
    结论:先前患有MERS-CoV感染的个体可以对SARS-CoV-2感染表现出交叉反应性免疫应答。我们的研究表明,与MERS阴性者相比,MERS-CoV感染患者与COVID-19相关的住院和死亡风险更高。
    BACKGROUND: A growing number of experiments have suggested potential cross-reactive immunity between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and previous human coronaviruses. We conducted the present retrospective cohort study to investigate the relationship between previous Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as the relationship between previous MERS-CoV and COVID-19-related hospitalization and mortality.
    METHODS: Starting in March 2020, we prospectively followed two groups of individuals who tested negative for COVID-19 infection. The first group had a previously confirmed MERS-CoV infection, which was compared to a control group of MERS-negative individuals. The studied cohort was then followed until November 2020 to track evidence of contracting COVID-19 infection.
    RESULTS: A total of 82 (24%) MERS-positive and 260 (31%) MERS-negative individuals had COVID-19 infection. Patients in the MERS-positive group had a lower risk of COVID-19 infection than those in the MERS-negative group (Risk ratio [RR] 0.696, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.522-0.929; p =0.014). The risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization in the MERS-positive group was significantly higher (RR 4.036, 95% CI 1.705-9.555; p =0.002). The case fatality rate (CFR) from COVID-19 was 4.9% in the MERS-positive group and 1.2% in the MERS-negative group (p =0.038). The MERS-positive group had a higher risk of death than the MERS-negative group (RR 6.222, 95% CI 1.342-28.839; p =0.019). However, the risk of mortality was similar between the two groups when death was adjusted for age (p =0.068) and age and sex (p =0.057). After controlling for all the independent variables, only healthcare worker occupation and >1 comorbidity were independent predictors of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with previous MERS-CoV infection can exhibit a cross-reactive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our study demonstrated that patients with MERS-CoV infection had higher risks of COVID-19-related hospitalization and death than MERS-negative individuals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号