目的:急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者完全血运重建(CR)的临床益处尚不清楚。此外,在AMI合并糖尿病(DM)患者中,CR的益处尚不清楚。我们试图比较AMI和多支血管疾病患者的CR和不完全血运重建(IR)的预后,根据DM的存在。
方法:对2,150例AMI合并多支血管病变患者进行分析。CR是基于血管造影图像定义的。这项研究的主要终点是以患者为导向的复合结果(POCO),定义为全因死亡的复合结果,任何心肌梗塞,以及3年内的任何血运重建。
结果:总体而言,接受血管造影CR的患者的3年POCO显着降低(985例患者,45.8%)与IR(1165例患者,54.2%)。当根据DM的存在分为亚组时,CR降低了非DM组而不是DM组的3年临床结局(POCO:11.7%vs.23.2%,p<0.001,任何血运重建:7.2%vs.10.8%,非DM组p=0.024,POCO:24.3%与27.8%,p=0.295,任何血运重建:13.3%vs.11.3%,DM组p=0.448,对于CR与IR)。多变量分析表明,CR显著降低了3年POCO(风险比,0.52;95%置信区间,0.36-0.75)仅在非DM组中。
结论:在患有多支血管疾病的AMI患者中,CR在DM患者中的临床益处可能低于非DM患者。
OBJECTIVE: The clinical benefits of complete revascularization (CR) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients are unclear. Moreover, the benefit of CR is unknown in AMI with diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. We sought to compare the prognosis of CR and incomplete revascularization (IR) in patients with AMI and multivessel disease, according to the presence of DM.
METHODS: A total of 2,150 AMI patients with multivessel coronary artery disease were analyzed. CR was defined based on the angiographic image. The primary endpoint of this study was the patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) defined as a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization within 3 years.
RESULTS: Overall, 3-year POCO was significantly lower in patients receiving angiographic CR (985 patients, 45.8%) compared with IR (1,165 patients, 54.2%). When divided into subgroups according to the presence of DM, CR reduced 3-year clinical outcomes in the non-DM group but not in the DM group (POCO: 11.7% vs. 23.2%, p<0.001, any revascularization: 7.2% vs. 10.8%, p=0.024 in the non-DM group, POCO: 24.3% vs. 27.8%, p=0.295, any revascularization: 13.3% vs. 11.3%, p=0.448 in the DM group, for CR vs. IR). Multivariate analysis showed that CR significantly reduced 3-year POCO (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.75) only in the non-DM group.
CONCLUSIONS: In AMI patients with multivessel disease, CR may have less clinical benefit in DM patients than in non-DM patients.