competency

Competency
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在尼日利亚,医学教育系统面临着从基础设施不足到缺乏合格人员的挑战。这些挑战不仅会影响即将毕业的医学生的能力,还会导致学术日历的中断。尼日利亚医疗和牙科顾问协会(MDCAN)在解决这些问题方面的作用至关重要。这篇评论研究了MDCAN在提高即将毕业的医学生的能力和防止尼日利亚学术日历中断方面的影响。它讨论了保持学术连续性的重要性,并探讨了为什么学术日历中断不是向政府施压以改善医生和讲师福利计划的可行选择的原因。通过对相关文献的分析,本综述强调了利益相关者之间合作对确保医学教育质量和尼日利亚学术机构顺利运作的重要性.最终,本文提出了减轻罢工的负面影响,提高本科医学教育质量的对策。
    In Nigeria, the medical education system faces challenges ranging from inadequate infrastructure to a lack of qualified personnel. These challenges not only affect the competency of graduating medical students but also lead to disruptions in academic calendars. The role of the Medical and Dental Consultants\' Association of Nigeria (MDCAN) in addressing these issues is crucial. This review examines the impact of MDCAN in enhancing the competency of graduating medical students and preventing disruptions in academic calendars in Nigeria. It discusses the importance of maintaining academic continuity and explores the reasons why disruptions in academic calendars are not viable options for pressuring the government to improve doctors\' and lecturers\' welfare packages. Through an analysis of relevant literature, this review underscores the significance of collaboration between stakeholders to ensure the quality of medical education and the smooth functioning of academic institutions in Nigeria. Ultimately, this paper proffers some solutions to mitigate the negative effects of strikes and improve the quality of undergraduate medical education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:急诊复苏护士是急诊科重症监护实践最前沿的具有挑战性的专业角色。尽管他们广泛的专业知识和技能要求,在澳大利亚,对于如何最好地提供符合一组固定目标和复苏护士所需技能的培训,没有全州或全国商定的方法.由于护理人口老化和劳动力流失增加,获得专科复苏护理知识的有效加速途径,是必要的。
    目的:这篇综述的目的是确定,巩固和总结有关紧急复苏护士资格标准的必要临床和非技术技能的培训需求的可用证据:关于目前在急诊科工作的护士的论文;包括护士单元经理(NUM),临床护士教育者(CNEs),临床护士顾问(CNCs),临床护士专家(CNSs),包括注册护士(RN)和注册护士(EN)。审查包括初级和非初级研究,包括关于如何培训急诊护士的论文。没有设置日期限制以确保可以审查所有结果。没有用英文发表的论文,包括没有在急诊室工作的护士,或者包括医生,联合健康,和其他无法区分人口群体的工作人员,被排除在外。仅抽象,社论,会议海报或口头报告,也被排除在外。
    方法:在MEDLINE中进行搜索,CINAHL和EMCRE。作者对所包括的研究参考列表以及灰色文献进行了广泛的手工搜索,以确保捕获所有相关文献。
    方法:进行了范围界定文献综述。
    结果:对最后33篇文章(23篇同行评审研究和10篇能力和实践标准文件)进行了数据提取。不存在特定的培训要求,以实现复苏护理中必要的临床和非技术技能的能力。据报道,在没有定期加强的情况下,能力下降。多模式方法,结合不同的教学方法,显示出增强知识保留和技能获取的潜力。
    结论:复苏护理在澳大利亚缺乏标准化的培训方法,导致护士在确保一致的技能获取和知识方面存在差距。需要研究以确定哪些复苏护理技能和培训是必要的,以确保实践有效地满足患者的需求。
    BACKGROUND: The emergency resuscitation nurse is a challenging and specialised role at the forefront of critical care practice in the emergency department. Despite their extensive specialist knowledge and skill requirements, in Australia there is no state-wide or nationally agreed approach to how to best provide training that meets a set of fixed objectives and requisite skills for resuscitation nurses. Due to an ageing nursing population and increasing workforce attrition, an efficacious accelerated pathway to acquire specialist resuscitation nursing knowledge, is necessary.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to identify, consolidate and summarise the available evidence on the training needs for the requisite clinical and non-technical skills of emergency resuscitation nurses ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Papers about nurses currently working in the emergency department; including Nurse Unit Managers (NUMs), Clinical Nurse Educators (CNEs), Clinical Nurse Consultants (CNCs), Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNSs), Registered Nurses (RNs) and Enrolled Nurses (ENs) were included. The review included primary and non-primary research, including papers addressing how emergency nurses are trained. There was no date limitation set to ensure all results could be reviewed. Papers that were not published in English, included nurses who were not working in the ED, or included doctors, allied health, and other staff where population cohorts could not be distinguished, were excluded. Abstract only, editorials, conference posters or oral presentations, were also excluded.
    METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMCARE. The authors conducted extensive hand-searching of the included study reference lists as well as the grey literature to ensure that all relevant literature was captured.
    METHODS: A scoping literature review was conducted.
    RESULTS: Data extraction was conducted on the final 33 articles (23 peer reviewed studies and 10 competency and practice standards documents). Specific training requirements to achieve competence in the requisite clinical and non-technical skills in resuscitation nursing do not exist. A decline in competency without regular reinforcement was reported. Multi-modal approaches, incorporating diverse teaching methods, show potential in enhancing knowledge retention and skill acquisition.
    CONCLUSIONS: Resuscitation nursing lacks a standardised training approach in Australia, leading to a gap in ensuring consistent skill acquisition and knowledge among nurses. Research is required to identify what resuscitation nursing skills and training are necessary to ensure practice effectively meets the needs of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项系统回顾和荟萃分析研究了循证实践(EBP)教育计划对本科护生的影响,专注于提高EBP能力,批判性思维,和解决问题的能力。
    方法:搜索,通过PubMed进行,科克伦图书馆,EMBASE,CINAHL,和截至2023年12月的WebofScience,包括以英语和韩语发表的研究,并遵守PRISMA指南。使用修订的ROBII进行随机试验,使用ROBINS-I进行非随机试验。对于荟萃分析,干预的效应大小计算为标准化平均差.
    结果:在我们的研究中,11项研究符合我们的纳入标准,其中8项研究纳入荟萃分析。EBP能力的影响大小,批判性思维,解决问题的能力分别为1.55、1.29和0.65。荟萃回归分析表明,量身定制的4-7周教育计划并进入4年级可显着提高EBP能力。
    结论:这些发现支持为学生积极开发可定制和应用的EBP教育,准备护理学生在毕业后在临床环境中有效实施EBP。尽管结果变量的影响大小显著,高度异质性提示需要进一步调查以验证护理专业学生的EBP教育结果.
    This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of evidence-based practice (EBP) education programs on undergraduate nursing students, focusing on enhancing EBP competency, critical thinking, and problem-solving ability.
    METHODS: The search, conducted through PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science up to December 2023, included studies published in English and Korean and adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Qualitative appraisal of the studies was conducted using the revised ROB II for randomized trials and the ROBINS-I for non-randomized trials. For the meta-analysis, the effect size of the intervention was calculated as a standardized mean difference.
    RESULTS: In our study, 11 studies met our inclusion criteria, and 8 studies of those were included in the meta-analysis. The effect sizes for EBP competency, critical thinking, and problem-solving ability were 1.55, 1.29, and 0.65, respectively. The meta-regression analysis indicated that tailored education programs of 4-7 weeks and being in the 4th grade significantly enhanced EBP competency.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the development of a customizable and applied EBP education actively for students, preparing nursing students to effectively implement EBP in clinical settings after graduation. Despite the significant effect size of the outcome variables, the high heterogeneity suggests the need for further investigation to validate the EBP educational outcomes for nursing students.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    关于虚拟现实(VR)在护理教育中的有效性的研究已经探索了其对学习成果的影响,情感沉浸和参与,学习者自信,和满意,总体上表现出积极的一面。然而,有必要进行系统评价,以检查基于VR的教育对护生实践能力的具体影响。
    根据PRISMA2020指南,根据579篇文章的纳入标准选择了22项研究,从2018年1月1日至2024年3月31日,在包括PubMed和EMBase在内的9个主要数据库中发布。目标人群包括护理学生,干预的重点是基于VR的模拟,旨在提高能力,与未接受干预或常规非虚拟模拟的对照组相比。主要结果,护理能力,使用MIX2.0Pro(Ver。2.0.1.6,BiostatXL,2017)计算合并效应大小。
    确定护理能力的合并效应大小很大,套期保值的g=0.88(95%CI,0.47至1.29)。荟萃回归分析确定了与护理能力提高相关的几个因素。其中包括2022年后发表的研究,IRB批准,没有资金,随机对照试验(RCT),干预措施报告短于4周或未报告,会话少于4个或未报告,会话持续时间低于1小时或未报告,和观测测量方法。提高护理能力的其他因素是在模拟之前包括预先简报,事后没有汇报,以及在模拟过程中排除其他活动。
    通过结合纳入研究的结果,系统评价和荟萃分析解释了样本量的变化,研究方法,和独立的干预效果,对模拟教育在提高护生能力方面的有效性进行全面评估。
    分析研究的选择标准,其中只包括那些用英文或韩文出版的,并报告了确切的方法,标准偏差,和样本大小,可能导致选择偏差,限制我们研究结果的推广。
    PROSPERO国际系统评价前瞻性注册:http://www。crd.约克。AC.英国/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42023446348。
    Studies on the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) in nursing education have explored its impact on learning outcomes, emotional immersion and engagement, learner self-confidence, and satisfaction, generally showing positive aspects. However, there is a need for a systematic review to examine the specific influence of VR-based education on nursing students\' practical competency.
    According to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 22 studies were selected based on inclusion criteria from 579 articles, published from January 1, 2018, to March 31, 2024, across nine major databases including PubMed and EMbase. The target population comprised nursing students, and the intervention focused on VR-based simulations aimed at enhancing competency, compared to control groups receiving either no intervention or conventional non-virtual simulation. The primary outcome, nursing competency, was analyzed using MIX 2.0 Pro (Ver. 2.0.1.6, BiostatXL, 2017) to calculate pooled effect sizes.
    The pooled effect size for nursing competency was determined to be large, with Hedge\'s g = 0.88 (95% CI, 0.47 to 1.29). Meta-regression analysis identified several factors associated with an increase in nursing competency. These included studies published after 2022, approval of an IRB, absence of funding, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), interventions reported as shorter than 4 weeks or not reported, sessions fewer than 4 or not reported, session duration under 1 h or not reported, and observational measurement methods. Additional factors enhancing nursing competency were the inclusion of a pre-briefing before simulations, the absence of a debriefing afterward, and the exclusion of other activities during the simulation.
    By combining the results of the included studies, the systematic review and meta-analysis accounted for variations in sample size, study methodology, and independent intervention effects, providing an overall evaluation of the effectiveness of simulation-based education in improving nursing students\' competency.
    The selection criteria for the studies analyzed, which included only those published in English or Korean and reported precise means, standard deviations, and sample sizes, could lead to selection bias and limit the generalization of our study results.
    PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023446348.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    麻醉提供者必须是先进的气道管理技术的专家,例如喉罩气道和气管导管插入。然而,执业麻醉提供者可以在很少需要先进气道管理技术的临床环境中工作.在这些临床环境中罕见的高级气道技能表现可导致技能衰减,这是通过不经常练习或长时间不使用技能而逐渐丧失获得的技能。本文献综述综合了有关高级气道管理技能衰减的可用证据。从文献综述中出现的主题包括与气管插管成功率降低相关的技能衰减,高级气道管理技能衰减可能开始发生的时间框架,以及防止先进气道管理技能衰退的建议。在临床环境中很少使用先进的气道技术,常规练习对于技能维护至关重要。临床模拟可以在减轻执业麻醉提供者的技能衰退中发挥作用,该执业麻醉提供者面临因技能不实践而导致的高级气道管理技能衰退的风险。
    Anesthesia providers must be experts in advanced airway management techniques such as laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube insertion. However, practicing anesthesia providers may work in clinical settings where advanced airway management techniques are rarely required. Infrequent advanced airway skill performance in these clinical settings can lead to skill decay, which is the gradual loss of acquired skills through infrequent practice or extended periods of skill nonuse. This literature review synthesizes available evidence regarding advanced airway management skill decay. Themes emerging from the literature review include skill decay association with decreased endotracheal intubation success rates, a timeframe within which advanced airway management skill decay may begin to occur, and recommendations for preventing decay of advanced airway management skills. With infrequent use of advanced airway skills in clinical settings, routine practice is crucial for skill maintenance. Clinical simulation could play a role in mitigating skill decay among practicing anesthesia providers at risk for decay in advanced airway management skills resulting from skill nonpractice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:私人执业是发展最快的,但是澳大利亚研究生营养师的就业部门研究不足,限制以证据为基础的劳动力发展。本范围审查审查了现有的国际文献,以了解当前的私人执业劳动力规模,分布,人口统计学和劳动力发展考虑因素,包括能力,供给和需求,薪酬和专业发展活动。
    方法:数据库MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,EMCARE,2023年8月,使用关键搜索词对PsycInfo(Ovid)和灰色文献进行了系统搜索,以确定纳入研究。包括与私人执业营养学有关的文章,并描述了劳动力的一个方面。原创研究,政府和组织报告,包括提供政府或组织统计数据的实践声明和网站。使用了定向内容分析和定性常数比较技术,将情报来源演绎地映射到劳动力发展框架。还进行了差距分析,以便为未来的劳动力发展研究提供重点。
    结果:共包括72个同行评审和灰色文献来源,65%的研究是基于澳大利亚的出版物。在过去的十年中,私人实践营养学研究的兴趣有所增加。尽管有广泛的公开资料来源,这篇评论发现,关于劳动力规模的公布数据很少,分布,人口统计学,供应,需求,持续的专业发展和薪酬,表明证据基础存在显著差距。现有文献侧重于劳动力挑战和障碍,私人执业营养师的工作,对研究生私人从业者的能力要求的探索有限。
    结论:全球缺乏关于私人执业营养学劳动力的文献,这限制了基于证据的劳动力发展计划。所有劳动力方面的劳动力发展研究都有必要解决当前的证据差距。
    OBJECTIVE: Private practice is one of the most rapidly growing, but under-researched employment sectors for graduate dietitians in Australia, limiting evidence-based workforce development. This scoping review examines existing international literature to gain an understanding of the current private practice workforce size, distribution, demography and workforce development considerations, including competencies, supply and demand, remuneration and professional development activities.
    METHODS: The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, EMCARE, PsycInfo (Ovid) and grey literature were systematically searched in August 2023 using key search terms to identify studies for inclusion. Articles were included if they related to private practice dietetics and described an aspect of workforce. Original research, government and organisational reports, statements of practice and websites providing governmental or organisational statistics were included. A directed content analysis and qualitative constant comparison technique were used to deductively map intelligence sources against a workforce development framework. A gap analysis was also conducted to provide a focus for future workforce development research.
    RESULTS: A total of 72 peer-reviewed and grey literature sources were included, with 65% of the studies being Australian-based publications. Private practice dietetics research interest has increased in the last decade. Despite a breadth of published sources, this review found little published data on workforce size, distribution, demography, supply, demand, continued professional development and remuneration, indicating a significant gap in the evidence base. Existing literature focuses on workforce challenges and barriers, the work of private practice dietitians, with limited exploration of competency requirements for graduate private practitioners.
    CONCLUSIONS: The literature on the private practice dietetics workforce is lacking worldwide, which constrains evidenced-based workforce development initiatives. Workforce development research across all workforce aspects is warranted to address current evidence gaps.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:模拟是一种在医疗保健教育中越来越多地使用的技术,它提供了评估护理熟练程度的机会。使用有效和可靠的工具被认为是可靠评估的基础,然而,研究生护士基于能力的健康评估课程可以成为衡量熟练程度的简化者。
    目标:具体的复习问题是:在基于模拟的教育中,评估研究生护理学生获得健康史和患者评估表现的能力的标准是什么?
    方法:本综述纳入了11项研究。论文通过JoannaBriggs研究所准实验研究清单进行了严格评估。布卢姆的分类法被用来构建这篇叙述性评论。
    结果:七篇论文通过问卷评估认知,两篇论文使用李克特量表来确定自我感知知识。六篇论文用行为清单评估了精神运动技能。在测试情感技能时,应用的多样性被纳入研究。三篇论文使用了李克特量表来评估准备情况,六篇论文使用Likert量表来评估自信心,一篇论文使用Likert量表来评估自主性。三篇论文使用清单来评估专业水平。四篇论文使用了教职员工/标准化的患者反馈。
    结论:还原论评估工具在评估能力时会造成障碍。仿真中评估仪器的有效性和可靠性有限,以及情感技能评估缺乏标准化,对仿真研究提出了挑战。情感技能包括态度,行为和沟通能力,由于其主观性,这对标准化评估构成了重大挑战。对仿真文献的回顾强调了情感领域评估中缺乏鲁棒性。本文提出模拟评估工具应包括情感领域熟练程度的标准化,例如:适应患者的认知功能,解释和综合相关信息的能力,证明临床判断的能力,准备采取行动,对专业局限性和教师/标准化模拟患者反馈的认识。将情感领域纳入标准化评估工具对于确保对模拟进行全面评估非常重要,特别是在健康史和身体评估熟练程度的发展中。在模拟评估期间注意Blooms分类法中的所有领域,有可能为患者护理环境更好地准备专业人员。
    BACKGROUND: Simulation is a technique being used increasingly in healthcare education which offers opportunities to evaluate nursing proficiencies. The use of valid and reliable instruments is recognised as the foundation for a robust assessment, however competency-based health assessment courses for graduate nurses can consequently become reductionist in measuring proficiencies.
    OBJECTIVE: The specific review question was: In simulation-based education, what are the criteria that evaluate graduate nursing student\'s competence in obtaining a health history and performance of patient assessment?
    METHODS: Eleven studies were included in the review. Papers were critically appraised with The Joanna Briggs Institute quasi-experimental studies checklist. Bloom\'s taxonomy was used to structure this narrative review.
    RESULTS: Seven papers evaluated cognition through questionnaires and two papers used a Likert-scale to determine self-perceived knowledge. Six papers evaluated psychomotor skills with a behavioural checklist. Diversity of application was factored into the studies when testing affective skills. Three papers used Likert-scales to evaluate preparedness, six papers used Likert-scales to evaluate self-confidence and one used a Likert-scale to evaluate autonomy. Three papers used a checklist to evaluate professionalism. Four papers used faculty member/ standardised patient feedback.
    CONCLUSIONS: Reductionist evaluation instruments create a barrier when evaluating competency. The limited validity and reliability of assessment instruments in simulation, as well as the lack of standardisation of affective skills assessment, presents a challenge in simulation research. Affective skills encompass attitudes, behaviours and communication abilities, which pose a significant challenge for standardised assessments due to their subjective nature. This review of the simulation literature highlights a lack of robustness in the evaluation of the affective domain. This paper proposes that simulation assessment instruments should include the standardisation of affective domain proficiencies such as: adaptation to patients\' cognitive function, ability to interpret and synthesise relevant information, ability to demonstrate clinical judgement, readiness to act, recognition of professional limitations and faculty/standardised-simulated patient feedback. The incorporation of the affective domain in standardised assessment instruments is important to ensure comprehensive assessment of simulation particularly in the development of health history and physical assessment proficiencies. Attention to all of the domains in Blooms taxonomy during simulation assessment has the potential to better prepare professionals for the patient care setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目标:内窥镜医师的能力可能差异很大,如腺瘤检出率(ADR)的变异所示。计算机辅助质量评估(CAQ)可以在各个程序中自动评估性能。本文旨在确定和描述结肠镜检查的不同CAQ系统。
    方法:使用MEDLINE对文献进行了系统回顾,EMBASE,和SCOPUS根据纳入标准基于三个术语:结肠镜检查,能力评估,和自动评估。两位审稿人对文章进行了系统审查,首先是抽象,然后是全文。使用医学教育研究质量工具(MERSQI)评估方法学质量。
    结果:确定了12,575项研究,删除重复项后剩下6,831,和6806没有通过资格标准,被排除在外,留下13项研究供最后分析。确定了五类CAQ系统:退出速度表(七项研究),范围移动分析(三项研究),有效停药时间(一项研究),折叠考试质量(一项研究),和视觉凝视模式(一项研究)。撤回速度计是唯一通过检查ADR变化来测试其反馈的CAQ系统。三项研究观察到ADR有所改善,两项研究没有。研究的方法学质量很高(MERSQI平均15.2分,最多18分)。
    结论:开发或测试CAQ系统的13项研究,最常见的是将其与ADR相关联。只有五项研究通过实施CAQ系统来测试反馈。由于研究设计的异质性,荟萃分析是不可能的,更多的研究是必要的。
    OBJECTIVE: Endoscopists\' competence can vary widely, as shown in the variation in the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Computer-aided quality assessment (CAQ) can automatically assess performance during individual procedures. In this review we identified and described different CAQ systems for colonoscopy.
    METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was done using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus based on 3 blocks of terms according to the inclusion criteria: colonoscopy, competence assessment, and automatic evaluation. Articles were systematically reviewed by 2 reviewers, first by abstract and then in full text. The methodological quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI).
    RESULTS: Of 12,575 identified studies, 6831 remained after removal of duplicates and 6806 did not pass the eligibility criteria and were excluded, leaving 25 studies, of which 13 studies were included in the final analysis. Five categories of CAQ systems were identified: withdrawal speedometer (7 studies), endoscope movement analysis (3 studies), effective withdrawal time (1 study), fold examination quality (1 study), and visual gaze pattern (1 study). The withdrawal speedometer was the only CAQ system that tested its feedback by examining changes in ADR. Three studies observed an improvement in ADR, and 2 studies did not. The methodological quality of the studies was high (mean MERSQI, 15.2 points; maximum, 18 points).
    CONCLUSIONS: Thirteen studies developed or tested CAQ systems, most frequently by correlating it to the ADR. Only 5 studies tested feedback by implementing the CAQ system. A meta-analysis was impossible because of the heterogeneous study designs, and more studies are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目标:目前越来越重视基于能力的培训,其中培训和评估起着至关重要的作用。本系统评价的目的是创建一个实用的训练方法和评估工具的阑尾切除术和结肠和直肠外科手术程序的概述,腹腔镜或机器人辅助方法。
    方法:对Medline,Embase,Cochrane和Scopus数据库是按照PRISMA指南进行的。我们在2023年3月9日进行了最后一次搜索。所有发表的描述动手培训的论文,绩效数据的评估和评估工具的开发是合格的。报告了研究质量和评估工具的有效性证据。
    结果:确定了51项研究。腹腔镜评估工具丰富,但是文献仍然缺乏开放阑尾切除术的高质量评估工具,机器人结肠切除术和开放式直肠手术。总的来说,缺乏关于建立合格/不合格标准和评估后果的讨论。与结直肠手术相比,虚拟现实模拟更多用于阑尾切除术。只有少数调查培训的研究具有可接受的质量。需要在开放式和机器人辅助的结肠手术以及所有直肠手术方法中进行高质量的研究。
    结论:本综述概述了当前的培训方法和评估工具,并根据研究质量和当前的有效性证据确定了需要进行更多研究的地方。
    OBJECTIVE: There is currently an increased focus on competency-based training, in which training and assessment play a crucial role. The aim of this systematic review is to create an overview of hands-on training methods and assessment tools for appendicectomy and colon and rectal surgery procedures using either an open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach.
    METHODS: A systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted the last search on 9 March 2023. All published papers describing hands-on training, evaluation of performance data and development of assessment tools were eligible. The quality of studies and the validity evidence of assessment tools are reported.
    RESULTS: Fifty-one studies were identified. Laparoscopic assessment tools are abundant, but the literature still lacks good-quality assessment tools for open appendicectomy, robotic colectomy and open rectal surgery. Overall, there is a lack of discussion regarding the establishment of pass/fail standards and the consequences of assessment. Virtual reality simulation is used more for appendicectomy than colorectal procedures. Only a few of the studies investigating training were of acceptable quality. There is a need for high-quality studies in open and robotic-assisted colon surgery and all approaches to rectal surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an overview of current training methods and assessment tools and identifies where more research is needed based on the quality of the studies and the current validity evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    临床研究护士(CRN)的特点和职责随着医疗技术的进步和患者护理需求的增加而不断发展和变化。随着临床试验的不断深入和规范化,CRNs在临床试验全过程中的重要性和地位也日益受到重视。
    对与CRN的特征和职责有关的研究进行了范围审查,以阐明相关的角色和概念。对三个英文数据库进行了电子搜索(PubMed,WebofScience,Embase)和2023年12月的两个中文数据库(CNKI和万方数据库)。两位作者独立筛选了文献,从包含的文献中提取信息,并总结和报告研究结果。
    分析了1991年至2023年之间发表的总共26篇文章,CRN的四个特征被确定为临床试验的参与者和管理者,受试者的看护者和保护者,研究团队的协调员,和教育工作者。基础知识,技能和识字,沟通协调能力,先进的研究能力是CRN所需的能力。
    进一步的研究应集中在CRN的各种特征的重要性,从而提高临床试验质量,促进临床循证实践。
    UNASSIGNED: The characteristics and duties of clinical research nurses (CRNs) are constantly developing and changing with the progress of medical technology and increasing needs in patient care. With the continuous deepening and standardization of clinical trials, the importance and status of CRNs during the whole process of clinical trials are also increasingly valued.
    UNASSIGNED: A scoping review of studies related to the characteristics and duties of CRNs was conducted to clarify relevant roles and concepts. An electronic search was conducted on three English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase) and two Chinese databases (CNKI and Wanfang database) in December 2023. Two authors independently screened the literature, extracted information from the included literature, and summarized and reported the findings.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 26 articles published between 1991 and 2023 were analyzed, and four characteristics of CRNs were identified as participants and managers of clinical trials, caregivers and protectors of subjects, coordinators of research teams, and educators. Basic knowledge, skills and literacy, communication and coordination ability, and advanced research ability are the competencies required for CRNs.
    UNASSIGNED: Further studies should focus on the importance of various characteristics of CRNs, so as to improve the quality of clinical trials and promote clinical evidence-based practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号