UNASSIGNED: Electrical stimulation (ES) has been shown to substantially enhance the quality of life by alleviating pain in patients with chronic wounds. This study aimed to observe the effects of low-frequency pulsed wearable ES at the common peroneal nerve on chronic refractory wounds of the lower limb.
UNASSIGNED: Forty-eight participants were randomly divided into control group (n = 24) and treatment group (n = 24) in this study. The control group received standard wound care (SWC) exclusively, whereas the treatment group was administered both SWC and the wearable low-frequency ES targeting the common peroneal nerve. Measurements of wound area, pain intensity, wound status, and quality of life scores were systematically recorded both before and after 4 weeks treatment.
UNASSIGNED: After 4 weeks of intervention, the percentage area reduction was significantly higher in the treatment group compared to the control group (Z = -3.9, p < 0.001), and the healing rate of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group (33% vs. 4%). Moreover, the visual Analog Scale for Pain score (β = -0.65, p = 0.019), the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool score (p < 0.05), and the questionnaire on quality of life with chronic wounds (Wound-Qol) score (β = -4.23, p = 0.003) were significantly decreased in the patients in the treatment group compared to the control group.
UNASSIGNED: The wearable low-frequency pulsed ES at the common peroneal nerve for the treatment of chronic refractory wounds showed significant improvement and were far superior compared to SWC. Future research should broaden its scope to include a diverse range of wound types and benefit from collaboration across multiple research centers.

UNASSIGNED: This simulation study on MRI of the knee was performed to assess the risk of injury to the popliteal artery (PA) and common peroneal nerve (CPN) during all-inside meniscal repairs in adults.
UNASSIGNED: We simulated repair of the posterior horn of both medial (PHMM) and lateral menisci (PHLM) through anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) portals, using straight and curved devices, on 200 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans taken with the knee in extension. For simulation using straight devices, the shortest distance from the menisco-capsular junction (MCJ) and the free edge of the meniscus to PA and CPN in vectors of AM and AL portals was measured. In curved devices, the closest extracapsular distance from the device tip to PA was measured.
UNASSIGNED: With a straight device through AM portal, the mean distance from the MCJ of PHMM to the PA was 20.7 ± 3.15 mm (13.5-27.4). In PHMM repair through AM portal using a curved device, the mean extracapsular distance from the device tip to PA was 18.8 ± 4 mm (7.7-27.2) while pointing toward and 26 ± 4.5 mm (15.5-35.6) while pointing away from the midline. When using straight devices, the average distance from free edge of LM to PA was 18.5 ± 3.3 mm (9.6-31.2) and from MCJ to PA was 8.9 ± 2.4 mm (3.5-18.8). The average distance measured from the MCJ to CPN through AM and AL portals using straight devices was 19.4 ± 2.8 mm (10.2-32.5) and 22 ± 2.8 mm (10.4-36.7) respectively.
UNASSIGNED: In adults, PA is safe in PHMM repairs using both straight and curved devices irrespective of depth and direction of insertion. In PHLM repairs, the PA is at risk with both straight and curved devices. We recommend adjusting the depth of insertion to as minimum as possible to just penetrate the capsule. The CPN is safe in LM repairs using all-inside devices.
UNASSIGNED: Level IV.

OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study was to analyse the incidence of Common Peroneal Nerve Palsy (CPNP) after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) for all alignments. Secondarily, the efficiency and safety of a Peroneal Nerve Release (PNR) prior to TKA in preoperative severe fixed valgus deformities were evaluated to prevent a CPNP.
METHODS: Overall, 7612 TKAs were performed in the institution from 2009 to 2021. 1913 TKAs were performed by three surgeons, who consistently performed a PNR in case of a fixed valgus deformity of (1) more than 15°, or (2) more than 10° but in combination with a flexion contracture of more than 15°. Patients with fixed valgus deformities of more than 10° were identified (81 knees) and a comparison was made between the patients who received a PNR (26 knees) and those who did not receive a PNR (55 knees). Data for the analysis were collected from patient medical files and were compared with the Chi2-test or Fisher Exact test.
RESULTS: A CPNP incidence of 0.2% (16/7612) was found after TKA for all alignments together. No CPNP cases (0%) were developed in the PNR-group, compared to five (9%) in the non-PNR group (p = NS). A larger preoperative valgus angle (17° vs 13°, p < 0.001) and flexion contracture (10° vs 3°, p < 0.001) was present in the PNR group compared with the non-PNR group. No PNR-related complications were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: The CPNP incidence in this study is consistent with the previous literature. Furthermore, although not significant, the group that received a PNR procedure developed fewer CPNPs compared to the group without PNR.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study, III.

BACKGROUND: The recurrent peroneal nerve (RPN) branches from the common peroneal nerve or the deep peroneal nerve and it innervates to the lower patellar region. It has recently been reported that damage to the RPN causes pain in the lower patellar region; therefore, this study examined the recurrent position and the innervation pattern of the RPN.
METHODS: Cases of knee deformity or atrophy were excluded, and 50 legs (25 males and 25 females) of 34 cadavers (15 males and 19 females) were examined to assess the recurrent position and the innervation pattern of the RPN.
RESULTS: The recurrent position of the RPN was 27.9 ± 3.6 mm from the tip of the fibula. The RPN innervated to the patellar tendon in five of the 50 legs (10%), to the infrapatellar fat pad in 13 legs (26%), and to both the patellar tendon and the infrapatellar fat pad in 20 legs (40%), and to neither the patellar tendon nor the infrapatellar fat pad in 12 legs (24%). No significant sex differences were observed in the recurrent position and the innervation pattern of the RPN.
CONCLUSIONS: In all cases, the recurrent position of the RPN was almost fixed from the tip of the fibula. The RPN frequently innervated to the patellar tendon or the infrapatellar fat pad (76%) in both males and females. These findings would be useful in knee surgery to preserve the RPN or for the diagnosis of pain in the lower patellar region.

BACKGROUND: Sciatic Nerve (SN) is the nerve of the posterior compartment of thigh formed in the pelvis from the ventral rami of the L4 to S3 spinal nerves. It leaves the pelvis via the greater sciatic foramen below piriformis and divides into Common Peroneal Nerve (CPN) and Tibial Nerve (TN) at the level of the upper angle of the popliteal fossa. Higher division of the sciatic nerve is the most common variation where the TN and CPN may leave the pelvis through different routes. Such variation may lead to compression of the nerve and lead to Non-discogenic sciatica.
METHODS: Fifty lower limbs were used for the study from Department of Anatomy, J.J.M.M.C Davangere, Karnataka, India.
RESULTS: In our study on 25 cadavers (50 lower limbs), we have observed 4 (8 %) lower limbs high division of sciatic nerve was noted. High division of sciatic nerve in the back of thigh was noted in one specimen (2%), while high division within the pelvis was noted in 3 specimens (6%), while in 46 (92%) it occurred outside the pelvis.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge regarding such variation and differences in the course of SN is important for the surgeons to plan for various surgical interventions pertaining to the gluteal region. The variant anatomy of SN may cause piriformis syndrome and failure of SN block. Hence present study is undertaken to know the level of division, exit, course, relationship to piriformis and variations in the branching pattern of SN.