coiling

卷取
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    迟发性脑缺血(DCI)是动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)最重要的预后决定因素之一。VASOGRADE,结合了世界神经外科医师联合会等级和改良的费舍尔等级,是预测aSAH后DCI的有用量表。然而,没有研究调查VASOGRADE是否影响治疗方案.我们回顾性分析了2013年至2021年在9个主要卒中中心前瞻性招募的781例aSAH患者。总队列包括76例(9.7%)VASOGRADE-Green患者,390例患者(49.9%)为VASOGRADE-Yellow,和315例患者(40.3%)的VASOGRADE-Red。更糟糕的VASOGRADE有更高的DCI发生率,发生在190例患者中(24.3%)。由于只有5例(6.6%)VASOGRADE-Green患者发生DCI,因此我们在VASOGRADE-黄色和-红色患者中搜索DCI相关因子。多因素分析显示抑制DCI的独立治疗因素如下:无术后出血并发症,联合使用盐酸法舒地尔和西洛他唑,夹闭和脑池引流相结合,和波浪形黄色卷取;和剪裁,和服用盐酸法舒地尔,有或没有西洛他唑的VASOGRADE-Red。研究结果表明,应根据VASOGRADE确定治疗策略,以预防aSAH后的DCI。
    Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is one of the most important outcome determinants for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). VASOGRADE, which combines World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade and modified Fisher grade, is a useful scale for predicting DCI after aSAH. However, no studies have investigated whether VASOGRADE influences the treatment options. We retrospectively analyzed 781 aSAH patients who were prospectively enrolled in 9 primary stroke centers from 2013 to 2021. The total cohort consisted of 76 patients (9.7%) with VASOGRADE-Green, 390 patients (49.9%) with VASOGRADE-Yellow, and 315 patients (40.3%) with VASOGRADE-Red. Worse VASOGRADE had higher incidences of DCI, which occurred in 190 patients (24.3%). As only 5 patients (6.6%) with VASOGRADE-Green developed DCI, we searched for DCI-associated factors in patients with VASOGRADEs-Yellow and -Red. Multivariate analyses revealed independent treatment factors suppressing DCI as follows: no postoperative hemorrhagic complication, combined administration of fasudil hydrochloride and cilostazol, combination of clipping and cisternal drainage, and coiling for VASOGRADE-Yellow; and clipping, and administration of fasudil hydrochloride with or without cilostazol for VASOGRADE-Red. The findings suggest that treatment strategies should be determined based on VASOGRADE to prevent DCI after aSAH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:颅内动脉瘤存在重大健康风险,因为它们的破裂会导致蛛网膜下腔出血,这反过来又有很高的发病率和死亡率。有几个因素会影响颅内动脉瘤的复杂性。然而,在开放手术和血管内治疗中定义复杂颅内动脉瘤(CIA)的标准可能不同,实际上,对“复杂”动脉瘤的定义没有共识。这项DELPHI研究旨在评估定义aCIA的变量的共识。
    方法:由50名成员组成的国际小组,代表各种专业,被招募通过三轮德尔菲过程定义为。小组成员参加了Likert量表回答和开放式问题的调查。建立了共识标准来确定CIA变量,统计分析评估了共识和稳定性。
    结果:在开放手术中,CI由梭形或水泡状定义,解剖病因,巨型尺寸(≥25毫米),宽颈包裹着父母的动脉,广泛的颈部表面,壁钙化,管腔内血栓,囊的附属分支,位置(AICA,SCA,basilar),血管痉挛背景,和计划旁路(EC-IC或IC-IC)。对于血管内治疗,CI包括巨大的尺寸,非常宽的颈部(圆顶/颈部比例≤1:1),和囊的附属分支。
    结论:动脉瘤复杂性的定义因治疗方式而异。由于与复杂性相关的要素在开放手术和血管内治疗之间有所不同,CIAs的这些共识标准甚至可以指导选择最佳治疗方法。
    OBJECTIVE: Intracranial aneurysms present significant health risks, as their rupture leads to subarachnoid haemorrhage, which in turn has high morbidity and mortality rates. There are several elements affecting the complexity of an intracranial aneurysm. However, criteria for defining a complex intracranial aneurysm (CIA) in open surgery and endovascular treatment could differ, and actually there is no consensus on the definition of a \"complex\" aneurysm. This DELPHI study aims to assess consensus on variables defining a CIA.
    METHODS: An international panel of 50 members, representing various specialties, was recruited to define CIAs through a three-round Delphi process. The panelists participated in surveys with Likert scale responses and open-ended questions. Consensus criteria were established to determine CIA variables, and statistical analysis evaluated consensus and stability.
    RESULTS: In open surgery, CIAs were defined by fusiform or blister-like shape, dissecting aetiology, giant size (≥ 25 mm), broad neck encasing parent arteries, extensive neck surface, wall calcification, intraluminal thrombus, collateral branch from the sac, location (AICA, SCA, basilar), vasospasm context, and planned bypass (EC-IC or IC-IC). For endovascular treatment, CIAs included giant size, very wide neck (dome/neck ratio ≤ 1:1), and collateral branch from the sac.
    CONCLUSIONS: The definition of aneurysm complexity varies by treatment modality. Since elements related to complexity differ between open surgery and endovascular treatment, these consensus criteria of CIAs could even guide in selecting the best treatment approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    揭示大脑前动脉远端动脉瘤破裂(DACAA)患者夹闭和卷绕的安全性和有效性,并计算影响随访患者两年生存率的危险因素。
    对12个医疗中心在2年内接受神经外科治疗的140例DACAA破裂患者(21例失访)的数据进行了回顾性研究,从2017年1月到2020年12月。使用单变量分析来检查导致患者预后不良的因素,并比较卷绕和夹闭治疗的预后。生存分析用于比较卷取和修剪之间的生存率,采用多因素Cox回归分析对影响患者生存的危险因素进行分析。
    在140例DACAA破裂患者中,80(57.1%)为男性,60名(42.9%)为女性。共111例(79.3%)患者根据亨特-赫斯量表I-III级进行分类,根据WFNs分类,95(67.9%)为I-III级。其中,63例(45%)采用夹钳治疗,和77(55%)进行了卷取。出院后2年内,31例(59.6%)接受夹闭的患者和54例(80.6%)接受卷取的患者预后良好。多因素Cox回归分析显示,只有WFNs分类(I-III)是影响DACAA破裂患者2年生存率的保护因素。
    在医疗实践中,对于WFNs分类低于或等于III的病例,神经外科医生更有可能选择夹闭作为治疗方法.在出院时的两年预后中,夹闭和卷绕之间没有差异。应高度重视具有WFNs分级(I-III)的DACAA病例,可以取得更好的结果。未来将继续扩大样本量,以获得更准确的发现。评论摘要,技术说明,历史小插曲不需要分成几部分。他们应该从明确陈述论文的目的开始,然后是支持作者结论的适当细节。
    UNASSIGNED: To reveal the safety and efficacy of clipping and coiling in patients with ruptured distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms (DACAA) and to calculate the risk factors affecting the two-year survival rate in follow-up patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study was conducted on the data of 140 patients (21 were lost to follow-up) with DACAA rupture who were treated by neurosurgery at 12 medical centers over a 2-year period, from January 2017 to December 2020. Univariate analysis was used to examine factors contributing to poor patient prognosis and to compare the prognosis of coiling and clipping treatments. Survival analysis was employed to compare survival rates between coiling and clipping, and risk factors affecting patient survival were analyzed using multivariate Cox regression analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Out of 140 patients with ruptured DACAA, 80 (57.1%) were male, and 60 (42.9%) were female. A total of 111 (79.3%) patients were classified under Hunt-Hess scale grades I-III, while 95 (67.9%) were graded I-III according to the WFNs classification. Among them, 63 (45%) were treated with clipping, and 77 (55%) underwent coiling. Within 2 years of discharge from the hospital, 31 (59.6%) patients who underwent clipping and 54 (80.6%) who underwent coiling had a good prognosis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that only WFNs classification (I-III) was a protective factor influencing the 2-year survival of patients with ruptured DACAA.
    UNASSIGNED: In the reality of medical practice, neurosurgeons are more likely to choose clipping as the treatment for cases with WFNs classification than or equal to III. There was no difference between clipping and coiling in the two-year prognosis at discharge. High priority should be given to DACAA cases with WFNs grading (I-III), as better outcomes can be achieved. The sample size will continue to be enlarged in the future to obtain more accurate findings. Abstracts for reviews, technical notes, and historical vignettes do not need to be separated into sections. They should begin with a clear statement of the paper\'s purpose followed by appropriate details that support the authors\' conclusion(s).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIAs)的治疗策略应参考破裂和并发症发生率仔细考虑。最大限度地减少住院时间(LOS)并确保高质量的医疗护理也很重要。在这项研究中,我们旨在使用Rosai医院集团的住院临床-职业数据库(ICOD-R),阐明影响接受UIA治疗的患者的LOS的因素.这是一项基于2000年至2019年ICOD-R数据的全国性多中心研究。被诊断患有UIA的患者被包括在该研究中,这些患者接受夹闭或卷绕治疗。进行多因素分析以确定影响LOS的因素。还比较了按手术程序或治疗期分类的组之间的LOS。我们在数据库中确定了3294名患者,他们在研究期间接受了UIAs的剪裁或卷绕。多变量分析显示,在2000年代初和2010年代末住院,年龄,治疗机构与LOS显著相关(p<0.05)。夹闭组(20.3天)和卷绕组(9.65天)的平均LOS之间存在显着差异(p<0.001)。按治疗期比较,LOS随着时间的推移显著缩短。我们的结果表明,治疗的类型,治疗时间,患者年龄,治疗机构影响UIAs术后LOS。尽管发现卷绕导致的平均LOS低于裁剪,治疗选择应考虑每个患者的动脉瘤的特点。
    Treatment strategies for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) should be carefully considered with reference to rupture and complication rates. It is also important to minimize the length of hospital stay (LOS) and to ensure a high quality of medical care. In this study, we aim to clarify the factors that affect the LOS of patients treated for UIAs using the Inpatient Clinico-Occupational Database of the Rosai Hospital Group (ICOD-R). This was a nationwide-multicenter study based on ICOD-R data from 2000 to 2019. Patients diagnosed with UIAs who were treated with clipping or coiling were included in the study. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the factors affecting LOS. LOS was also compared between groups classified by surgical procedure or treatment period. We identified 3294 patients on the database who underwent clipping or coiling of UIAs during the study period. Multivariate analysis revealed hospital admission during the early 2000s and the late 2010s, age, and treating institution to be significantly correlated with LOS (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference between the mean LOS of the clipping group (20.3 days) and the coiling group (9.65 days) (p < 0.001). Compared by treatment period, LOS significantly shortened over time. Our results suggest that the type of treatment, time of treatment, patient age, and the treating institution affect postoperative LOS for UIAs. Although coiling was found to lead to a lower average LOS than clipping, treatment selection should take the characteristics of each patient\'s aneurysm into consideration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血管内治疗是有眼肌麻痹体征的海绵窦硬脑膜动静脉瘘(CS-dAVFs)的金标准,视觉缺陷,或无法忍受的临床症状。虽然栓塞的疗效已得到证实,在更广泛的CS-dAVFs病例系列中未比较血管内治疗后并发症.因此,我们比较了经静脉栓塞术与使用液体栓塞剂的经动脉栓塞术(TAE)的有效性和围手术期并发症.
    方法:我们回顾了2005/7至2016/7在一家医疗中心的71例CS-dAVF患者。我们对71名患者进行了77次手术,包括6例复发病例。我们比较了经静脉线圈和TAE的疗效和围手术期并发症。
    结果:经静脉卷绕的完全闭塞率为79.2%,TAE为75.0%。研究结果表明:(1)眼肌麻痹并发症发生率相似(p=0.744);(2)使用液体栓塞剂更频繁和永久性的CN5或CN7神经病变(分别为p=0.031和0.028);(3)对侵袭性TAE的反应,梗塞或ICH的风险更高(分别为p=0.002和0.028)。
    结论:经静脉海绵窦盘绕比经动脉Onyx/氰基丙烯酸正丁酯(NBCA)产生相似的闭塞率和更低的并发症风险。我们可以通过闭塞的岩下窦(甚至对侧)进入,直接经眶穿刺是一种安全的选择.使用Onyx/NBCA的TAE在寡聚饲养者的情况下很有帮助,但对于有多个喂食器和复杂瘘管的患者,通常需要多学科治疗和多疗程TAE.
    BACKGROUND: Endovascular management is the gold standard for cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas (CS-dAVFs) in patients with signs of ophthalmoplegia, visual defects, or intolerable clinical symptoms. Although the efficacy of embolization has been confirmed, complications during post-endovascular management have not been compared in a more extensive CS-dAVFs case series. Therefore, we compared the effectiveness and peri-procedural complications of transvenous coiling with those of transarterial embolization (TAE) using liquid embolic agents.
    METHODS: We reviewed 71 patients with CS-dAVFs in one medical center from 2005/7 to 2016/7. We performed seventy-seven procedures on 71 patients, including six recurrent cases. We compared the efficacy and peri-procedural complications of transvenous coiling and TAE.
    RESULTS: The complete occlusion rate for transvenous coiling was 79.2%, and that for TAE was 75.0%. Findings revealed (1) similar ophthalmoplegia complication rates (p = 0.744); (2) more frequent and permanent CN5 or CN7 neuropathy with liquid embolic agent use (p = 0.031 and 0.028, respectively); and (3) a higher risk of infarction or ICH (p = 0.002 and 0.028, respectively) in response to aggressive TAE.
    CONCLUSIONS: Transvenous cavernous sinus coiling resulted in a similar occlusion rate and lower complication risk than transarterial Onyx/n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA). We can access via an occluded inferior petrosal sinus (even contralateral), and direct transorbital puncture was a safe alternative. TAE with Onyx/NBCA was helpful in cases of oligo-feeders, but multidisciplinary treatment and multi-session TAE were usually needed for patients with multiple feeders and complex fistulas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:最近推出的带有盾构技术的管道Vantage栓塞装置是第四代管道分流器装置。由于术中技术并发症的发生率相对较高,在2020年有限发布该装置后,随后对该装置进行了修改。本研究旨在评估该设备的改进型的安全性和有效性。
    方法:这是一个多中心回顾性系列。主要疗效终点是没有再治疗的动脉瘤闭塞。主要安全终点是任何神经系统发病率或死亡。研究包括破裂和未破裂的动脉瘤。
    结果:总共对60个目标动脉瘤进行了52次手术。对5例破裂动脉瘤患者进行了治疗。技术成功率为98%。平均临床随访时间5.5个月。在出现未破裂动脉瘤的患者中,没有死亡,主要并发症3例(6.4%),次要并发症7例(13%)。在出现蛛网膜下腔出血的5例患者中,有2例(40%)主要并发症,其中1例(20%)导致死亡。和1(20%)轻微并发症。29例患者(56%)接受了6个月的术后血管造影成像,平均时间为6.6个月,表明83%的患者实现了动脉瘤的充分闭塞(RROC1/2)。
    结论:在这项非行业赞助的研究中,封堵率和安全性结果与之前发表的使用分流器装置和早期Pipeline装置的研究相似.对设备的修改似乎提高了部署的便利性。
    OBJECTIVE: The recently introduced Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device with Shield Technology is the fourth generation of Pipeline flow diverter devices. Due to the relatively high rate of intraprocedural technical complications, modifications were subsequently made to the device after a limited release of the device in 2020. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the modified version of this device.
    METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective series. The primary efficacy endpoint was aneurysm occlusion in the absence of retreatment. The primary safety endpoint was any neurological morbidity or death. Ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were included in the study.
    RESULTS: A total of 52 procedures were performed for 60 target aneurysms. Treatment was performed on 5 patients with ruptured aneurysms. The technical success rate was 98%. The mean clinical follow-up time was 5.5 months. In patients presenting with unruptured aneurysms there were no deaths, 3 (6.4%) major complications and 7 (13%) minor complications. In the five patients presenting with subarachnoid haemorrhage there were 2 (40%) major complications with 1 (20%) of these resulting in death, and 1 (20%) minor complication. Of the patients 29 (56%) had undergone 6‑monthly postprocedural angiographic imaging with a mean time of 6.6 months demonstrating that 83% of patients had achieved adequate occlusion (RROC1/2) of the aneurysm.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this non-industry-sponsored study, the occlusion rates and safety outcomes were similar to those seen in previously published studies with flow diverter devices and earlier generation Pipeline devices. Modifications to the device appear to have improved ease of deployment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:囊内血流破坏剂(IFD)已被引入颅内动脉瘤(IA)的治疗中,以克服动脉瘤闭塞率低和卷绕技术的再通率高的问题。其中,轮廓神经血管系统(CNS)和神经支架(NQS)旨在重建动脉瘤颈,两者均可用作辅助卷绕装置。我们旨在报告我们在流量干扰器辅助卷取(IFD-AC)技术方面的初步经验。方法:我们对所有接受IFD-AC治疗的IAs患者的前瞻性数据进行回顾性分析。结果:在2021年2月至2022年4月之间,我们用IFD-AC治疗了15个IA:10个破裂,5个未破裂。13例成功进行了IFD-AC,术后RROC112例(92.3%),RROC21例(7.7%)。有1例缺血事件(6.7%),无出血并发症。12例患者接受了中期放射学随访:10例IAs(83.4%)表现出足够的闭塞,2例(16.7%)复发。结论:IFD-AC,中枢神经系统和NQS,似乎是一种安全的技术,具有有希望的疗效。在破裂病例中,IFD-AC已证明无需抗血小板治疗是安全的。需要进一步的研究来证实我们的初步结果。
    Background: Intrasaccular flow disruptors (IFD) have been introduced in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) to overcome the low aneurysm occlusion rate and the high recanalization rate of the coiling technique. Among them, the Contour Neurovascular System (CNS) and the Neqstent (NQS) were designed to reconstruct the aneurysmal neck and both can be used as assisting coiling devices. We aimed to report our preliminary experience with the flow disruptor-assisted coiling (IFD-AC) technique. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all patients with IAs treated with the IFD-AC. Results: Between February 2021 and April 2022, we treated 15 IAs with the IFD-AC: 10 ruptured and 5 unruptured. The IFD-AC was successfully performed in 13 cases, with a post-operative RROC 1 in 12 cases (92.3%) and RROC 2 in 1 case (7.7%). There was one ischemic event (6.7%) and no hemorrhagic complications. Twelve patients underwent a mid-term radiologic follow-up: Ten IAs (83.4%) presented an adequate occlusion, while 2 (16.7%) had a recurrence. Conclusions: The IFD-AC, both with the CNS and the NQS, seems a safe technique with promising efficacy profile. The IFD-AC has proved to be safe without antiplatelet therapy in ruptured cases. Further studies are needed to confirm our preliminary results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:据报道,在复杂的血管内卷绕过程中,各种辅助装置都有帮助,宽颈脑动脉瘤.这项研究旨在描述最近推出的专为促进线圈栓塞而设计的囊内颈桥接植入物的利用。
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了8例连续患者在2022年2月至2022年5月期间接受Nautilus囊内桥接系统治疗颅内动脉瘤。我们评估了手术结束和早期随访时治疗动脉瘤的血管造影表现,临床状况及并发症。
    结果:8例脑动脉瘤患者(3名男性和5名女性,我们分析了平均年龄52.8岁(范围39-66岁).在急性病例中处理了五个治疗的动脉瘤。执行该技术时没有技术困难。没有记录其他程序不良事件。在6例患者中发现动脉瘤立即完全闭塞,颈部残留1例,动脉瘤稳定再灌注1例。对5名患者进行了早期放射学随访,在所有放射学筛查的动脉瘤中,观察到的闭塞率为-RRI级。
    结论:Nautilus辅助弹簧圈栓塞是治疗复杂脑动脉瘤的一种快速、安全的解决方案。我们认为,该设备象征着治疗颅内动脉瘤的重要一步。我们认为,该技术的实际价值在于,该装置与现代低轮廓微导管技术完全兼容,不需要抗血小板药物。
    OBJECTIVE: Various adjunctive devices have been reported to be helpful during the endovascular coiling of complex, wide-necked cerebral aneurysms. This study aimed to describe the utilization of a recently introduced intrasaccular neck-bridging implant specifically designed to facilitate coil embolization.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed eight consecutive patients who underwent treatment for intracranial aneurysms with the Nautilus intrasaccular bridging system between February 2022 to May 2022. We evaluated the angiographic appearances of treated aneurysms at the end of the procedure and early follow-up, the clinical status and complications.
    RESULTS: Eight patients with eight cerebral aneurysms (3 men and 5 women, mean age 52.8 years (range 39-66) were analyzed. Five of the treated aneurysms were managed in an acute case scenario. There were no technical difficulties while executing the technique. No other procedural adverse events were documented. Immediate complete occlusion of the aneurysm was seen in 6 patients, neck remnant in 1 and stable aneurysm reperfusion in one case. Early radiological follow-up was available in five patients, and the observed occlusion rates were - RR class I in all radiologically screened aneurysms.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nautilus-assisted coil embolization represents a rapid and safe solution for complex cerebral aneurysms. In our opinion this device symbolizes a significant step forward in treating intracranial aneurysms. We believe that the technique\'s actual value consists of the fact that the device is fully compatible with the modern low-profile microcatheter technology and does not involve the need for antiplatelet medications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血管内栓塞技术目前在急性动脉出血的治疗中已经建立。然而,下一代干预主义者的教育和培训仍然基于传统的学徒模式,受训者直接在病人身上学习和练习,这可能会影响患者的安全。这项研究的目的是设计和开发一种标准化的血管内模拟概念,用于训练急性出血栓塞,基于现实生活中的案例。
    结果:使用内部3D打印实验室开发了一种适应性强且具有成本效益的血管内模拟器。包括超过一年的所有胸部和腹部急性出血栓塞以及适当的介入前计算机断层扫描,以制造3D打印血管模型。使用蠕动泵来产生脉动流动曲线。40例栓塞病例参与本研究,在模拟设置中完全再现了27例(69.23%)。肺栓塞的模拟成功率明显较低(p=0.031),而软组织(p=0.032)和线圈栓塞(p=0.045)的模拟成功率明显较高。总体模拟成功率为10个可用点中的7.8个。
    结论:在标准化模拟概念中使用立体光刻3D打印,在大多数情况下,可以根据患者特定的解剖结构,在广泛的不同原因下,模拟和训练用于治疗胸部和腹部急性内出血的血管内栓塞技术。
    BACKGROUND: Endovascular embolization techniques are nowadays well established in the management of acute arterial bleedings. However, the education and training of the next generation of interventionalists are still based on the traditional apprenticeship model, where the trainee learns and practices directly at the patient, which potentially affects the patient\'s safety. The objective of this study was to design and develop a standardized endovascular simulation concept for the training of acute bleeding embolizations, based on real-life cases.
    RESULTS: An adaptable and cost-effective endovascular simulator was developed using an in-house 3D print laboratory. All thoracic and abdominal acute bleeding embolizations over more than a year with appropriate pre-interventional computed tomography scans were included to manufacture 3D printed vascular models. A peristaltic pump was used to generate pulsatile flow curves. Forty embolization cases were engaged in this study, and 27 cases were fully reproduced in the simulation setting (69.23%). The simulation success was significantly lower in pulmonary embolizations (p = 0.031) and significantly higher in soft tissue (p = 0.032) and coil embolizations (p = 0.045). The overall simulation success was 7.8 out of 10 available points.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using stereolithography 3D printing in a standardized simulation concept, endovascular embolization techniques for treating acute internal hemorrhages in the chest and abdomen can be simulated and trained based on the patient-specific anatomy in a majority of the cases and at a broad spectrum of different causes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    线圈栓塞已成为治疗颅内动脉瘤的公认选择。然而,宽颈分叉动脉瘤(WNBAs)仍然是一个挑战。pCONUS是用于桥接WNBAs以实现卷绕的第一代支架状植入物。pToWin的研究是前瞻性的,单臂,进行了多中心研究,以分析PCOUS治疗WNBAs的安全性和有效性。主要有效性终点是在3-6个月和7-12个月时动脉瘤的充分闭塞率。主要安全终点是随访期间发生严重同侧卒中或神经系统死亡。共纳入115名患者。动脉瘤部位为大脑中动脉52例(45.2%),前交通动脉35例(30.4%),基底动脉23(20%),颈内动脉终末三例(2.6%),2例(1.7%)患者的腹周动脉。除一名患者外,所有患者均成功进行了治疗。3-6个月和7-12个月的死亡率分别为1.9%和2.3%,分别。在动脉瘤中,75.0%和65.6%在3-6个月和7-12个月时显示出足够的闭塞,分别。PCONUS提供了一种安全和合理有效的治疗WNBA,表现为可接受的充分动脉瘤闭塞和低的不良神经系统事件发生率。
    Coil embolization has become a well-established option for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Yet, wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) remain a challenge. The pCONUS is the first generation of a stent-like implant for the bridging of WNBAs to enable coiling. The pToWin study was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study conducted to analyze the safety and efficacy of the pCONUS in the treatment of WNBAs. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the rate of adequate occlusion of the aneurysm at 3-6 and 7-12 months. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of major ipsilateral stroke or neurological death during the follow-up. A total of 115 patients were included. Aneurysm locations were the middle cerebral artery in 52 (45.2%), the anterior communicating artery in 35 (30.4%), the basilar artery in 23 (20%), the internal carotid artery terminus in three (2.6%), and the pericallosal artery in two (1.7%) patients. Treatment was successfully performed in all but one patient. The morbi-mortality rate was 1.9% and 2.3% at 3-6 and 7-12 months, respectively. Of the aneurysms, 75.0% and 65.6% showed adequate occlusion at 3-6 and 7-12 months, respectively. pCONUS offers a safe and reasonably effective treatment of WNBAs, demonstrated by acceptable adequate aneurysm occlusion and low rates of adverse neurologic events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号