目的本研究的目的是评估牙髓病病例报告首选报告项目(PRICE)2020指南对已发布的牙髓病病例报告(CRs)报告的影响。方法所有病例报告发表在国际牙髓杂志,欧洲牙髓学杂志,牙髓学和修复性牙科和牙髓学杂志,在2020年价格发布前后的一年,都包括在内进行分析。由牙医组成的两个小组根据该指南改编的评分系统对病例报告进行了评分。单个项目的得分最高为1;然后求和,每个CR的总得分最高为47。每份报告提供了总体遵守百分比,小组一致性使用组内相关系数(ICC)计算。在达成共识之前,讨论了评分方面的分歧。使用不成对的双尾t检验比较了PRICE指南发布前后的分数。结果在PRICE之前和之后的指南出版物中总共确定了19个CR。在其发表后,对2020年价格的平均依从性从70.0%±8.89增加到77.9%±6.23,增加了7.9%(p=0.003)。小组之间的协议是中等的(ICC前期价格:0.673{p=0.011};ICC后期价格:0.742{p=0.003})。项目1a,6c,6e,6f,6g,6j,6q,6s,7a,9a,11a,12c和12d的合规性下降。结论PRICE2020指南在牙髓病例报告报告方面有了适度的改善。需要在牙髓期刊中提高对指南的认识以及更广泛的接受和实施,以提高对新指南的依从性。
Aim The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Case reports in Endodontics (PRICE) 2020
guideline on the reporting of published endodontic case reports (CRs). Methodology All case reports published in the International Endodontic Journal, European Endodontic Journal, Journal of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, in the year before and after the release of PRICE 2020, were included for analysis. Two panels comprising dentists scored case reports against a scoring system adapted from the
guideline. Individual items were scored up to a maximum of 1; scores were then summated to provide an overall maximum of 47 for each CR. Each report provided an overall percentage adherence, and panel agreement was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Disagreement on scoring was discussed until a
consensus was reached. Scores before and after PRICE guideline publication were compared using an unpaired two-tailed t test. Results A total 19 CRs were identified in both the pre- and post-PRICE
guideline publication. Mean adherence to PRICE 2020 increased by 7.9% (p=0.003) from 70.0%±8.89 to 77.9%±6.23 following its publication. Agreement between panels was moderate (ICC pre-PRICE: 0.673 {p=0.011}; ICC post-PRICE: 0.742 {p=0.003}). Items 1a, 6c, 6e, 6f, 6g, 6j, 6q, 6s, 7a, 9a, 11a, 12c and 12d experienced a fall in compliance. Conclusion The PRICE 2020 guideline has resulted in a modest improvement in the reporting of endodontic case reports. Greater awareness and a wider acceptance and implementation of the guideline in endodontic journals are needed to improve adherence to the novel
guideline.