circulating biomarker

循环生物标志物
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:医疗保健系统需要一种新的方法来改善和诊断早期口咽鳞状细胞癌,以防止其低生存率。我们对血液和唾液microRNAs(miRNAs)的诊断作用进行了系统评价和综合荟萃分析。方法:在PubMed中进行无偏见和彻底的文献检索,从合格的文章中获得了有关不同miRNA生物标志物的适当数据。提取方法,研究地点,和出版年份。Stata被用来计算灵敏度,特异性,诊断赔率比,并总结接收器工作特性曲线。结果:我们纳入了9项研究,其中399例合格的口咽鳞癌患者,血液miRNAs联合唾液miRNAs的诊断准确率高,灵敏度为0.70(p<0.001),特异性为0.75(p=0.26),诊断比值比为7,曲线下面积为0.78。结论:血液和唾液来源的miRNAs联合检测口咽鳞癌具有较高的诊断准确性。系统审查注册:https://www。crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024509424。
    Objective: The healthcare system needs a novel approach to improve and diagnose early oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma against its low survival rate. We conduct a systematic review and a comprehensive meta-analysis for the diagnostic role of blood and salivary microRNAs (miRNAs). Methods: An unbiased and thorough literature search in PubMed yielded appropriate data from qualified articles regarding different miRNA biomarkers, method of extraction, research location, and year of publication. Stata was used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: We included 9 studies with 399 qualified oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients, which yielded a high diagnostic accuracy of blood miRNAs in combination with salivary miRNAs with a sensitivity of 0.70 (p < 0.001), specificity of 0.75 (p = 0.26), diagnostic odds ratio of 7, and an area under the curve of 0.78. Conclusion: Combined blood- and saliva-derived miRNAs demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024509424.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    宫颈癌(CC)是全球范围内的公共卫生问题,包括墨西哥。这种类型的癌症是全球女性中第四常见的癌症;在墨西哥,它是仅次于乳腺癌的女性中第二常见的癌症。CC的诊断主要基于巴氏涂片和阴道镜检查,迫切需要鉴定作为这些方法支持的分子工具。关于这一点,已检测到特定循环生物分子的差异表达,基于此,它们被认为是CC诊断的潜在生物标志物,预后,和/或鉴定对治疗的反应。重要的是,这些分子的联合分析大大提高了它们作为生物标志物的功效,并且它们在医疗护理中的潜在用途是有希望的。
    Cervical cancer (CC) is a public health problem worldwide, including Mexico. This type of cancer is the fourth most frequent in women worldwide; in Mexico it is the second most common type in women after breast cancer. The diagnosis of CC is based mainly on Pap smears and colposcopy and the identification of molecular tools that serve as a support for these methods is urgent. Regarding this, differential expressions of specific circulating biomolecules has been detected and, based on this, they have been postulated as potential biomarkers for CC diagnosis, prognosis, and/or to identify the response to treatments. Importantly, the combined analysis of these molecules considerably improves their efficacy as biomarkers and their potential use in the medical attention is promising.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    如果不治疗,腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的自然过程是生长和破裂。已经研究了许多标记;然而,没有一个得到广泛承认。我们的目的是确定AAA生长和破裂的潜在预后标志物。
    潜在循环,生物力学,并对遗传标记进行了研究。在PubMed进行了全面搜索,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆于2017年2月,遵循系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。研究选择,数据提取,方法学质量评价由2名独立研究者进行.标记的合理性是基于关于标记的出版物的数量(超过3),合并样本量(超过100),研究的偏倚风险和统计意义。包括82项研究,检查循环(n=40),生物力学(n=27),和遗传标记(n=7)和标记的组合(n=8)。扩张风险增加的因素包括:AAA直径(9项研究;n=1938;低偏倚风险),衣原体肺炎(4项研究;n=311;中等偏倚风险),S-弹性蛋白肽(3项研究;n=205;中等偏倚风险),氟脱氧葡萄糖摄取(3项研究;n=104;中等偏倚风险),和腔内血栓大小(5项研究;n=758;中等偏倚风险)。破裂风险增加的因素包括:峰值壁应力(9项研究;n=579;中等偏倚风险)和AAA直径(8项研究;n=354;中等偏倚风险)。由于临床和方法学异质性,未进行荟萃分析。
    我们确定了5个对AAA生长具有预后价值的潜在标志物和2个对破裂具有预后价值的标志物。在解释这些数据时,我们必须认识到,结论是基于小样本量和临床和方法学异质性。强烈敦促前瞻性和方法学辅音研究进一步研究这些潜在的标志物。
    The natural course of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is growth and rupture if left untreated. Numerous markers have been investigated; however, none are broadly acknowledged. Our aim was to identify potential prognostic markers for AAA growth and rupture.
    Potential circulating, biomechanical, and genetic markers were studied. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in February 2017, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment were conducted by 2 independent researchers. Plausibility of markers was based on the amount of publications regarding the marker (more than 3), pooled sample size (more than 100), bias risk and statistical significance of the studies. Eighty-two studies were included, which examined circulating (n=40), biomechanical (n=27), and genetic markers (n=7) and combinations of markers (n=8). Factors with an increased expansion risk included: AAA diameter (9 studies; n=1938; low bias risk), chlamydophila pneumonia (4 studies; n=311; medium bias risk), S-elastin peptides (3 studies; n=205; medium bias risk), fluorodeoxyglucose uptake (3 studies; n=104; medium bias risk), and intraluminal thrombus size (5 studies; n=758; medium bias risk). Factors with an increased rupture risk rupture included: peak wall stress (9 studies; n=579; medium bias risk) and AAA diameter (8 studies; n=354; medium bias risk). No meta-analysis was conducted because of clinical and methodological heterogeneity.
    We identified 5 potential markers with a prognostic value for AAA growth and 2 for rupture. While interpreting these data, one must realize that conclusions are based on small sample sizes and clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Prospective and methodological consonant studies are strongly urged to further study these potential markers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号