cholecystectomy

胆囊切除术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:半胱氨酸蛋白酶caspase-1(Casp1)在前细胞因子向活性细胞因子(CYTs)的转化中起着至关重要的作用。这项工作的目的是确定114例胆囊切除术患者的Casp1血液水平,并评估其与其他CYT和数字评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分的关联。术后。
    方法:Casp1和7个CYTs的血液水平(IL-18,IL-18BP,IL-1ra,IL-6,IL-10,IL-1β,和IL-8)在三个时间点进行测量;术前,手术后立即,114例胆石症(Chole)患者术后6小时。
    结果:Casp1血液水平与术后24小时NRS疼痛评分相关(p=0.016)。此外,Caspl血液水平与IL-18血液水平显著相关(p<0.001)。
    结论:这是第一份评估Chole患者Casp1血液水平与其他CYTs相关性的报告。这些发现证实了Casp1血液水平和NRS疼痛评分之间的显著相关性。此外,本研究提供了初步证据,提示抑制Casp1的活性可能通过Casp1/pro-Il-18途径降低术后急性期免疫应答.
    OBJECTIVE: Cysteine protease caspase-1 (Casp1) plays a crucial role in the conversion of pro-cytokines to active cytokines (CYTs). The purpose of this work was to determine Casp1 blood levels in a cohort of 114 cholecystectomy patients and assess their association with other CYTs and numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores, postoperatively.
    METHODS: Blood levels of Casp1 and seven CYTs (IL-18, IL-18BP, IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-10, IL-1β, and IL-8) were measured at three time points; before operation, immediately after operation, and six hours after operation in 114 patients with cholelithiasis (Chole).
    RESULTS: Casp1 blood levels correlated with NRS pain scores at 24 h following surgery (p=0.016). In addition, Casp1 blood levels correlated significantly to IL-18 blood levels (p<0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to evaluate Casp1 blood levels in Chole patients in correlation with other CYTs. The findings confirm a significant correlation between Casp1 blood levels and NRS pain scores. Moreover, this study provides initial evidence suggesting that inhibition of the activity of Casp1 may reduce postsurgical acute phase immune response possibly through the Casp1/pro-Il-18 pathway.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肠道热是由伤寒沙门氏菌引起的(S.伤寒)和副伤寒A,B,它仍然是世界范围内发病率和死亡率的重要原因。在高度流行的地区,儿童受到不成比例的影响,和抗菌素耐药性减少了治疗选择。据估计,2-5%的肠热患者发展为慢性无症状感染。这些携带者可能充当感染的宿主;因此,携带者的前瞻性识别和治疗对于疾病的长期控制至关重要.我们旨在发现接受胆囊切除术的患者中伤寒沙门氏菌携带者的频率。我们还比较了培养与qPCR检测伤寒沙门氏菌的检测限,对使用这项研究确定的载体进行了地理空间分析,并评估了抗Vi和抗YncE在识别慢性伤寒携带中的准确性。
    方法:我们在巴基斯坦的两个中心进行了一项横断面研究。对胆囊样本进行定量PCR(qPCR),并通过ELISA分析血清样品中针对YncE和Vi的IgG。我们还绘制了qPCR结果阳性的人的居住位置。
    结果:在988名参与者中,3.4%的人有qPCR阳性的胆囊样本(23株伤寒沙门氏菌和11株副伤寒沙门氏菌)。胆结石比胆汁和胆囊组织更可能是qPCR阳性。与qPCR阴性对照相比,抗Vi和YncE显着相关(r=0.78p<0.0001),并且在携带者中升高,除了在副伤寒A中的抗Vi反应,但是这些抗原在从qPCR阴性对照中鉴定载体时的辨别值很低。
    结论:在这项研究中观察到的伤寒携带者的高患病率表明,需要进一步的研究来获得信息,这些信息将有助于以优于目前的方式控制未来的伤寒暴发。
    BACKGROUND: Enteric fever is caused by Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi (S. Typhi) and Paratyphi A, B, and C. It continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In highly endemic areas, children are disproportionately affected, and antimicrobial resistance reduces therapeutic options. It is estimated that 2-5% of enteric fever patients develop chronic asymptomatic infection. These carriers may act as reservoirs of infection; therefore, the prospective identification and treatment of carriers are critical for long-term disease control. We aimed to find the frequency of Salmonella Typhi carriers in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. We also compared the detection limit of culturing versus qPCR in detecting S. Typhi, performed a geospatial analysis of the carriers identified using this study, and evaluated the accuracy of anti-Vi and anti-YncE in identifying chronic typhoid carriage.
    METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study in two centers in Pakistan. Gallbladder specimens were subjected to quantitative PCR (qPCR) and serum samples were analyzed for IgG against YncE and Vi by ELISA. We also mapped the residential location of those with a positive qPCR result.
    RESULTS: Out of 988 participants, 3.4% had qPCR-positive gallbladder samples (23 S. Typhi and 11 S. Paratyphi). Gallstones were more likely to be qPCR positive than bile and gallbladder tissue. Anti-Vi and YncE were significantly correlated (r = 0.78 p<0.0001) and elevated among carriers as compared to qPCR negative controls, except for anti-Vi response in Paratyphi A. But the discriminatory values of these antigens in identifying carriers from qPCR negative controls were low.
    CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of typhoid carriers observed in this study suggests that further studies are required to gain information that will help in controlling future typhoid outbreaks in a superior manner than they are currently being managed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有或没有术中胆管造影(IOC)的胆囊切除术是胆石症的公认治疗方法。多达11.6%的胆囊切除术在IOC上有偶然的胆总管(CBD)结石,而25.3%的未诊断出的CBD结石将出现危及生命的并发症。这些将需要在初次胆囊切除术后进行额外的干预,进一步加剧了医疗系统的紧张。我们试图通过评估其预测值来检查IOC在正常LFTs患者中的作用,打算治疗未诊断的CBD结石,因此改善这些问题。
    从2019年10月至2020年12月接受胆囊切除术且LFT正常的所有患者均为前瞻性入组。国际奥委会已经完成,进行ERCP以填充缺陷,如果ERCP与IOC一致,则记录为“真阳性”。如果ERCP阴性,则记录“假阳性”。随访2周后,将“真阴性”分配给正常IOC和LFT。对LFT异常的患者进行ERCP检查,并记录为“假阴性”。灵敏度,特异性,并计算预测值。
    共分析了180例患者。IOC显示85.5%的特异性和88.1%的NPV和73.7%的AUC。阳性预测值和灵敏度分别为56.5%和61.9%。
    常规IOC是一种特定的诊断工具,具有良好的阴性预测值。当LFT正常时,排除CBD结石的存在是有用的。它不会显着延长住院时间或胆囊切除术的持续时间,从而减少未发现的保留结石的发生率并有效预防其并发症。
    UNASSIGNED: Cholecystectomy with or without intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) is an accepted treatment for cholelithiasis. Up to 11.6 % of cholecystectomies have incidental common bile duct (CBD) stones on IOC and 25.3 % of undiagnosed CBD stones will develop life-threatening complications. These will require additional intervention after primary cholecystectomy, further straining the healthcare system. We seek to examine the role of IOC in patients with normal LFTs by evaluating its predictive values, intending to treat undiagnosed CBD stones and therefore ameliorate these issues.
    UNASSIGNED: All patients who underwent cholecystectomies with normal LFTs from October 2019 to December 2020 were prospectively enrolled. IOC was done, ERCPs were performed for filling defects and documented as \"true positive\" if ERCP was congruent with the IOC. \"False positives\" were recorded if ERCP was negative. \"True negative\" was assigned to normal IOC and LFT after 2 weeks of follow-up. Those with abnormal LFTs were subjected to ERCP and documented as \"false negative\". Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 180 patients were analysed. IOC showed a specificity of 85.5 % and a NPV of 88.1 % with an AUC of 73.7 %. The positive predictive value and sensitivity were 56.5 and 61.9 % respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Routine IOC is a specific diagnostic tool with good negative predictive value. It is useful to exclude the presence of CBD stones when LFT is normal. It does not significantly prolong the length of hospitalization or duration of the cholecystectomy hence reducing the incidence of undetected retained stones and preventing its complications effectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在急性梗阻性胆总管(CBD)结石的胆囊切除术(ChE)(“ERC-first”)前内镜逆行胆道造影是治疗的金标准。ChE期间十二指肠乳头的术中顺行球囊扩张,CBD结石冲洗至十二指肠(“ABD-在ChE期间”)可能是另一种“一站式”治疗选择。然而,从未对“ABD-during-ChE”技术和“ERC-first”方法的结果进行比较。
    方法:回顾性病例对照研究,对患有阻塞性CBD结石(<8mm)而没有严重胰腺炎或胆管炎的患者进行了传统的“ERC-first”方法与“ABD-during-ChE”技术。主要终点是从诊断到完成CBD结石清除并进行ChE的总体综合并发症指数(CCI®)。
    结果:共纳入70例患者(“ERCfirst”和“ABD-during-ChE”组各35例)。两个研究组之间在人口统计学和疾病特异性特征方面没有统计学上的显着差异。然而,'ERC-first'组与'ABD-during-ChE'组相比,总体CCI®增加无显著差异(14.4±15.4对9.8±11.1,p=0.225).值得注意的是,6种主要并发症(Clavien-Dindo分类≥IIIa)发生在“ERC-first”组,而“ABD-during-ChE”组发生2种(17%对6%,p=0.136)。此外,发现从诊断到胆管完全清除和进行ChE的干预措施明显更多,总体时间更长,当比较“ERC-first”组和“ABD-during-ChE”组时(3.7±0.8对1.1±0.4,p<0.001;160.5±228.6天对12.0±18.0天,p<0.001)。
    结论:患有小于8毫米的急性阻塞性CBD结石的患者,与“ERC-first”方法相比,“ABD-during-ChE”技术显著减少了干预措施,并缩短了从诊断到彻底清除胆管和进行ChE的总体治疗时间.这伴随着“ABD-during-ChE”组中干预相关并发症减少的强烈趋势。
    BACKGROUND: In acute obstructive common bile duct (CBD) stones endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for CBD stone removal before cholecystectomy (ChE) (\'ERC-first\') is the gold standard of treatment. Intraoperative antegrade balloon dilatation of the duodenal papilla during ChE with flushing of CBD stones to the duodenum (\'ABD-during-ChE\') may be an alternative \'one-stop-shop\' treatment option. However, a comparison of outcomes of the \'ABD-during-ChE\' technique and the\'ERC-first\' approach has never been performed.
    METHODS: Retrospective case control matched study of patients suffering from obstructive CBD stones (< 8 mm) without severe pancreatitis or cholangitis that underwent the traditional \'ERC-first\' approach versus the \'ABD-during-ChE\' technique. Primary endpoint was the overall Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) from diagnosis to complete CBD stone removal and performed ChE.
    RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included (35 patients each in the \'ERC first\'- and \'ABD-during-ChE\'-group). There were no statistical significant differences in terms of demographics and disease specific characteristics between the two study groups. However, there was a not significant difference towards an increased overall CCI® in the \'ERC-first\' group versus the \'ABD-during-ChE\' group (14.4 ± 15.4 versus 9.8 ± 11.1, p = 0.225). Of note, six major complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ IIIa) occurred in the \'ERC-first\' group versus two in the \'ABD-during-ChE\' group (17% versus 6%, p = 0.136). In addition, significantly more interventions and a longer overall time from diagnosis to complete clearance of bile ducts and performed ChE was found, when comparing the \'ERC-first\' group and the \'ABD-during-ChE\' group (3.7 ± 0.8 versus 1.1 ± 0.4, p < 0.001; 160.5 ± 228.6 days versus 12.0 ± 18.0 days, p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients suffering from acute obstructive CBD stones smaller than 8 mm, compared to the \'ERC-first\' approach, the \'ABD-during-ChE\' technique resulted in significantly less interventions and reduced overall treatment time from diagnosis to complete clearance of bile ducts and performed ChE. This comes together with a strong trend of less intervention related complications in the \'ABD-during-ChE\' group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as a rescue therapy in the recovery room.
    METHODS: This single-center historical cohort study included patients who received either ESPB or intravenous meperidine for pain management in the recovery room. Patients\' numeric rating scale (NRS) scores and opoid consumptions were evaluated.
    RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were included in the statistical analysis. Sixty-two (57%) patients received ESPB postoperatively (pESPB) and 46 (43%) patients were managed with IV meperidine boluses only (IV). The cumulative meperidine doses administered were 0 (0-40) and 30 (10-80) mg for the pESPB and IV groups, respectively (p < 0.001). NRS scores of group pESPB were significantly lower than those of Group IV on T30 and T60.
    CONCLUSIONS: ESPB reduces the frequency of opioid administration and the amount of opioids administered in the early post-operative period. When post-operative rescue therapy is required, it should be considered before opioids.
    OBJECTIVE: Evaluar el efecto del bloqueo del plano erector espinal (ESPB) como terapia de rescate en la sala de recuperación.
    UNASSIGNED: Este estudio de cohortes histórico de un solo centro incluyó a pacientes que recibieron ESPB o meperidina intravenosa para el tratamiento del dolor en la sala de recuperación. Se evaluaron las puntuaciones de la escala de calificación numérica (NRS) de los pacientes y los consumos de opiáceos.
    RESULTS: En el análisis estadístico se incluyeron 108 pacientes. Recibieron ESPB 62 (57%) pacientes y los otros 46 (43%) fueron manejados solo con bolos de meperidina intravenosa. Las dosis acumuladas de meperidina administradas fueron 0 (0-40) y 30 (10-80) mg para los grupos de ESPB y de meperidina sola, respectivamente (p < 0.001). Las puntuaciones de dolor del grupo ESPB fueron significativamente más bajas que las del grupo de meperidina sola en T30 y T60.
    CONCLUSIONS: El ESPB reduce la frecuencia de administración de opiáceos y la cantidad de estos administrada en el posoperatorio temprano. Cuando se requiera terapia de rescate posoperatoria, se debe considerar antes que los opiáceos.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于疑似急性酒精性胰腺炎患者胆结石的发生率和临床相关性的数据缺乏,并且对于最大程度地降低复发性急性胰腺炎的风险至关重要。这项研究的目的是评估假定的急性酒精性胰腺炎患者胆结石的发生率和急性胰腺炎的相关复发率。
    方法:在2008年至2019年之间,有23家医院前瞻性招募了急性胰腺炎患者。被诊断为首次急性酒精性胰腺炎的患者被纳入本研究。术语胆结石用于描述在成像过程中发现的胆石症或胆泥的存在。主要结果是3年随访期间胰腺炎复发。
    结果:总共334名患者符合入选条件,其中316人被纳入随访分析。胆结石评估,无论是在索引入院期间还是在随访期间,334例患者中有306例(91.6%)。54例患者(17.6%)检出胆结石,检测的中位时间为6周(四分位距0-42周)。随访期间,316例患者中有121例(38.3%)发生复发性急性胰腺炎,与无胆结石患者相比,胆结石患者的发病率明显更高(分别为59%和34.2%;P<0.001),而更多的胆结石患者在首次复发时停止饮酒(分别为41%和24%;P=0.020).对19例胆结石患者(36%)进行了胆囊切除术。与未接受治疗或未接受治疗的患者相比,胆囊切除术组患者的复发率较低(分别为5/19和19/34;P=0.038)。
    结论:在诊断为急性酒精性胰腺炎的患者中,每5例患者中就有1例出现胆结石。胆结石与较高的复发性胰腺炎相关,在接受胆囊切除术时,该比率降低。
    BACKGROUND: Data on the incidence and clinical relevance of gallstones in patients with suspected acute alcoholic pancreatitis are lacking and are essential to minimize the risk of recurrent acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of gallstones and the associated rate of recurrent acute pancreatitis in patients with presumed acute alcoholic pancreatitis.
    METHODS: Between 2008 and 2019, 23 hospitals prospectively enrolled patients with acute pancreatitis. Those diagnosed with their first episode of presumed acute alcoholic pancreatitis were included in this study. The term gallstones was used to describe the presence of cholelithiasis or biliary sludge found during imaging. The primary outcome was pancreatitis recurrence during 3 years of follow-up.
    RESULTS: A total of 334 patients were eligible for inclusion, of whom 316 were included in the follow-up analysis. Gallstone evaluation, either during the index admission or during follow-up, was performed for 306 of 334 patients (91.6%). Gallstones were detected in 54 patients (17.6%), with a median time to detection of 6 (interquartile range 0-42) weeks. During follow-up, recurrent acute pancreatitis occurred in 121 of 316 patients (38.3%), with a significantly higher incidence rate for patients with gallstones compared with patients without gallstones (59% versus 34.2% respectively; P < 0.001), while more patients with gallstones had stopped drinking alcohol at the time of their first recurrence (41% versus 24% respectively; P = 0.020). Cholecystectomy was performed for 19 patients with gallstones (36%). The recurrence rate was lower for patients in the cholecystectomy group compared with patients who did receive inadequate treatment or no treatment (5/19 versus 19/34 respectively; P = 0.038).
    CONCLUSIONS: Gallstones were found in almost one in every five patients diagnosed with acute alcoholic pancreatitis. Gallstones were associated with a higher rate of recurrent pancreatitis, while undergoing cholecystectomy was associated with a reduction in this rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胆囊息肉(GPs)中肿瘤性息肉的患病率随着年龄的增长而急剧增加,并且与胆囊癌(GBC)有关。本研究旨在根据不同年龄患者的术前超声特征预测肿瘤息肉并提供合适的治疗策略。
    方法:根据世界卫生组织的年龄分类,将2015年1月至2019年12月在中国11家三级医院行胆囊切除术的1523例全科医生患者分为青壮年组(n=622),中年组(n=665)和老年组(n=236)。基于Logistic回归模型筛选出的独立风险变量在不同年龄组建立线性评分模型。ROC下面积(AUC)评价线性评分模型的预测能力,长直径和短直径的GP。
    结果:肿瘤性息肉的独立危险因素包括息肉的数量,息肉大小(长直径),年轻人和老年人群体的眼底,而息肉的数量,息肉大小(长直径),和息肉大小(短直径)在中年组。在不同年龄段,其线性评分模型的AUC值高于长径和短径GPs的AUC值(均P<0.05),Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验表明,线性评分模型的预测精度高于长径和短径的GPs(均P>0.05)。
    结论:年轻人的线性评分模型,中老年组可根据术前超声特征有效区分肿瘤性息肉和非肿瘤性息肉。
    BACKGROUND: The prevalence of neoplastic polyps in gallbladder polyps (GPs) increases sharply with age and is associated with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). This study aims to predict neoplastic polyps and provide appropriate treatment strategies based on preoperative ultrasound features in patients with different age level.
    METHODS: According to the age classification of WHO, 1523 patients with GPs who underwent cholecystectomy from January 2015 to December 2019 at 11 tertiary hospitals in China were divided into young adults group (n=622), middle-aged group (n=665) and elderly group (n=236). Linear scoring models were established based on independent risk variables screened by the Logistic regression model in different age groups. The area under ROC (AUC) to evaluate the predictive ability of linear scoring models, long- and short- diameter of GPs.
    RESULTS: Independent risk factors for neoplastic polyps included the number of polyps, polyp size (long diameter), and fundus in the young adults and elderly groups, while the number of polyps, polyp size (long diameter), and polyp size (short diameter) in the middle-aged groups. In different age groups, the AUCs of its linear scoring model were higher than the AUCs of the long- and short- diameter of GPs for differentiating neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps (all P<0.05), and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test showed that the prediction accuracy of the linear scoring models was higher than the long- and short- diameter of GPs (all P>0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The linear scoring models of the young adults, middle-aged and elderly groups can effectively distinguish neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps based on preoperative ultrasound features.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:没有研究评估胆石症(Chole)患者三维腹腔镜胆囊切除术(3D-LC)后的长期生活质量(QoL)。
    方法:将200例Chole患者随机分为3D-LC或小型开腹胆囊切除术(MC)组。RAND-36调查是在随机化之前进行的,术后四周和五年。
    结果:3D-LC组和MC组术后5年RAND-36评分相似。MC和3D-LC组联合分析,社会功能(SF,p=0.007),心理健康(MH,p=0.001),物理角色(RP,p<0.001)和身体疼痛(BP,p<0.001)结构域显著增加。与芬兰参考RAND-36(FRR)得分相比,在MH领域,五年的分数显着增加,而四个RAND-36域;物理功能(PF),一般健康(GH),RP,与FRR评分相比,BP仍然明显较低。
    结论:显示3D-LC和MC患者的长期结果相对相似。有趣的是,在五年的随访中,五个RAND-36域增加了,而四个RAND-36域仍低于FRR分数,这可能表明在长期随访中胆囊切除术后可能出现新症状。
    OBJECTIVE: There are no studies assessing the long-term quality of life (QoL) following three-dimensional laparoscopy cholecystectomy (3D-LC) in patients with cholelithiasis (Chole).
    METHODS: A cohort of 200 patients with Chole were randomized into 3D-LC or minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) groups. RAND-36 survey was performed before randomization, four weeks and five years postoperatively.
    RESULTS: Similar postoperative five years RAND-36 scores were reported in the 3D-LC and MC groups. The MC and 3D-LC groups combined analysis, social functioning (SF, p=0.007), mental health (MH, p=0.001), role physical (RP, p<0.001) and bodily pain (BP, p<0.001) domains increased significantly. In comparison to the Finnish reference RAND-36 (FRR) scores, the scores at five years increased significantly in the MH domain, while four RAND-36 domains; Physical functioning (PF), general health (GH), RP, BP remained significantly lower in comparison to the FRR scores.
    CONCLUSIONS: A relatively similar long-term outcome in the 3D-LC and MC patients is shown. Interestingly, five RAND-36 domains increased during five years follow-up, while four RAND-36 domains remained lower than FRR scores, which may indicate onset of possible new symptoms following cholecystectomy in long-term follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在Sars-Cov-2危机期间,用于急诊手术服务的部分资源暂时重新分配给了重症COVID-19患者的护理,保留了对大部分不可推迟的疾病的即时治疗.此外,由于担心感染或阻碍对重症COVID-19患者的治疗,许多人推迟寻求急诊治疗。这种情况可能会改变一些常见外科手术的护理标准和相对结果。我们的目的是强调在COVID-19爆发之前和期间接受急性胆囊炎治疗的患者手术结果的任何差异。
    这是一项前瞻性收集的数据库的回顾性研究,该数据库包括2019年3月至2021年2月在卢加诺地区医院接受急性胆囊炎治疗的所有连续患者。一家为普外科患者提供无COVID服务的医院。患者分为COVID-19爆发前和后组。我们收集了全面的临床特征和术后结果。
    我们纳入了124名患者,其中60例和64例分别在COVID-19爆发之前和之后进行手术。两组患者的临床特征相似(年龄,性别,身体质量指数,ASA得分,和合并症)。疫情后患者入院时间比疫情前患者晚0.7天(3.8±6.0天与3.1±4.1天,p=0.453)。手术时间,恢复室时间,并发症,两组之间的再手术结果相似。更多患者在爆发后接受术后抗生素治疗(63.3%vs.37.5%,p=0.004)和更长的时间(6.9±5.1天与4.5±3.9天,p=0.020)。在手术标本中没有发现明显的组织病理学差异。
    尽管更频繁的抗生素治疗表明最终炎症局部状况恶化,我们的结果显示,在COVID-19大流行之前和期间接受急性胆囊炎治疗的患者的结局相似.当地的COVID管理部门,重新分配资源,保持无COVID的医院是为患者提供高标准治疗的关键。
    UNASSIGNED: During the Sars-Cov-2 crisis, some of the resources committed to emergency surgery services were transiently reallocated to the care of patients with severe COVID-19, preserving immediate treatment of mostly non-deferrable conditions. Moreover, the fear of contracting infections or hindering the treatment of critical COVID-19 patients has caused many individuals to defer seeking emergency care. This situation has then possibly modified the standard of care of some common surgical conditions and the relative outcomes. Our aims was to highlight any difference in surgical outcomes in patients treated for acute cholecystitis before and during the COVID-19 outbreak.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective study on a prospectively collected database that included all consecutive patients treated for acute cholecystitis from March 2019 to February 2021 at the Lugano Regional Hospital, a COVID-free hospital for general surgery patients. Patients were divided into pre-and post-COVID-19 outbreak groups. We collected thorough clinical characteristics and intra-and postoperative outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 124 patients, of which 60 and 64 were operated on before and after the COVID-19 outbreak respectively. The two groups resulted similar in terms of patients\' clinical characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, ASA score, and comorbidities). Patients in the post-outbreak period were admitted to the hospital 0.7 days later than patients in the pre-outbreak period (3.8 ± 6.0 days vs. 3.1 ± 4.1 days, p = 0.453). Operative time, recovery room time, complications, and reoperations resulted similar between groups. More patients in the post-outbreak period received postoperative antibiotic therapy (63.3% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.004) and for a longer time (6.9 ± 5.1 days vs. 4.5 ± 3.9 days, p = 0.020). No significant histopathological difference was found in operatory specimens.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite more frequent antibiotic therapy that suggests eventually worse inflammatory local status, our results showed similar outcomes for patients treated for acute cholecystitis before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The local COVID management, reallocating resources, and keeping COVID-free hospitals was key to offering patients a high standard of treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肾移植(KT)前患者无症状胆囊结石的治疗和随访策略尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在阐明KT胆囊切除术前在预防胆道和手术并发症方面的作用.
    方法:本研究回顾性分析了2005年1月至2022年7月在单个三级中心等待KT的2,295名KT接受者和3,443名患者。主要结果是KT受者胆道和胆囊切除术后并发症的发生率。采用FirthLogistic回归模型评估胆道并发症的危险因素。
    结果:总体而言,543名等待KT的患者和230名KT接受者被发现患有胆道结石。在KT收件人中,16例(7%)在KT前接受了胆囊切除术,而其他人则选择观察他们的胆道结石。KT胆囊切除术前患者未出现任何胆道并发症,20例(9.3%)选择观察结石的患者出现并发症.与KT后接受胆囊切除术的患者相比,KT前接受胆囊切除术的患者发生的胆囊切除术后并发症较少(6.3%)(38.8%,P=0.042),包括根据Clavien-Dindo分类减少致命的术后并发症。多颗结石(赔率比[OR],3.09;95%置信区间[CI],1.07-8.90;P=0.036),胆囊壁增厚(OR,5.39;95%CI,1.65-17.63;P=0.005),胆结石>1cm(OR5.12,95%CI:1.92-13.69,P=0.001)是胆道并发症的独立危险因素。在等待KT的患者中,随访期间23例(4.2%)行胆囊切除术,导致一次胆囊切除术后并发症。
    结论:KT和随后的胆囊切除术后胆结石相关的胆道并发症与更严重的并发症和更差的治疗结果相关。因此,当KT候选人有胆道并发症的危险因素时,对于无症状胆囊结石症,可考虑先发制人胆囊切除术以降低进一步手术风险.
    BACKGROUND: Treatment and follow-up strategies for silent gallbladder stones in patients before kidney transplantation (KT) remain unknown. Therefore, the authors aimed to elucidate the role of pre-KT cholecystectomy in preventing biliary and surgical complications.
    METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 2295 KT recipients and 3443 patients waiting for KT at a single tertiary center from January 2005 to July 2022. The primary outcomes were the incidences of biliary and postcholecystectomy complications in KT recipients. Firth\'s logistic regression model was used to assess the risk factors for biliary complications.
    RESULTS: Overall, 543 patients awaiting KT and 230 KT recipients were found to have biliary stones. Among the KT recipients, 16 (7%) underwent cholecystectomy before KT, while others chose to observe their biliary stones. Pre-KT cholecystectomy patients did not experience any biliary complications, and 20 (9.3%) patients who chose to observe their stones experienced complications. Those who underwent cholecystectomy before KT developed fewer postcholecystectomy complications (6.3%) compared with those who underwent cholecystectomy after KT (38.8%, P =0.042), including reduced occurrences of fatal postoperative complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. Multiple stones [odds ratio (OR), 3.09; 95% CI: 1.07-8.90; P =0.036), thickening of the gallbladder wall (OR, 5.39; 95% CI: 1.65-17.63; P =0.005), and gallstones >1 cm in size (OR 5.12, 95% CI: 1.92-13.69, P =0.001) were independent risk factors for biliary complications. Among patients awaiting KT, 23 (4.2%) underwent cholecystectomy during the follow-up, resulting in one postcholecystectomy complication.
    CONCLUSIONS: Gallstone-related biliary complications following KT and subsequent cholecystectomy was associated with more serious complications and worse treatment outcomes. Therefore, when KT candidates had risk factor for biliary complications, pre-emptive cholecystectomy for asymptomatic cholecystolithiasis could be considered to reduce further surgical risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号