cholangitis

胆管炎
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    内镜碎石术和选择性胆囊切除术,其次是内镜逆行胰胆管造影术,是胆总管(CBD)结石(CBDS)和胆结石患者的一线治疗方法。然而,这种方法在患者等待手术时,会带来急性胆囊炎和复发性胆管炎的风险。我们旨在确定择期胆囊切除术等待时间内的急性胆囊炎和胆管炎危险因素。
    这项研究包括151例CBDS合并胆结石患者,他们在2019年1月至2021年10月期间在两个三级护理中心进行首次内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后90天内接受了胆囊切除术。
    胆道事件的发生率(急性胆囊炎,急性胆管炎,或需要非计划胰胆管造影术的任何并发症)为28%(43例)。在单变量和多变量分析中,作为首次治疗CBDS的手术桥梁的塑料支架置入是等待手术期间胆道事件的独立危险因素(比值比4.25,p=0.002).在塑料支架置入者中进行的一项亚组分析显示,CBD直径≤10mm是急性胆囊炎的独立危险因素(比值比4.32;p=0.027);CBD直径≥11mm是急性胆管炎和非计划再次内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的独立危险因素(比值比5.66;p=0.01)。
    选择性胆囊切除术前放置CBDS的塑料支架会增加等待选择性胆囊切除术期间发生急性胆囊炎或急性胆管炎的风险。
    UNASSIGNED: Endoscopic lithotripsy and elective cholecystectomy, followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, are the first-line treatments for patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones (CBDS) and gallstones. However, this approach entails acute cholecystitis and recurrent cholangitis risk while patients await surgery. We aimed to identify acute cholecystitis and cholangitis risk factors during the waiting time for elective cholecystectomy.
    UNASSIGNED: This study comprised 151 patients with CBDS combined with gallstones who underwent cholecystectomy within 90 days of the first endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at two tertiary care centers between January 2019 and October 2021.
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of biliary tract events (acute cholecystitis, acute cholangitis, or any complications requiring unplanned cholangiopancreatography) was 28% (43 cases). In univariate and multivariate analyses, plastic stent placement as a bridge to surgery for the first treatment of CBDS was an independent risk factor for biliary tract events during the waiting time for surgery (odds ratio 4.25, p = 0.002). A subgroup analysis among those with plastic stent placement revealed a CBD diameter of ≤ 10 mm as an independent risk factor for acute cholecystitis (odds ratio 4.32; p = 0.027); a CBD diameter ≥ 11 mm was an independent risk factor for acute cholangitis and unplanned re-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (odds ratio 5.66; p = 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: Plastic stent placement for CBDS before elective cholecystectomy increases the risk of acute cholecystitis or acute cholangitis during the waiting time for elective cholecystectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在重症监护病房(ICU)由胆总管结石引起的严重急性胆管炎(SAC)的无辐射一期床边内镜取石和胆道引流尚未报道。在这里,我们介绍这种干预的初步经验。紧急进行无辐射床旁数字胆管镜辅助一期内镜取石和胆道引流。回顾性分析30例患者的临床结果和随访数据。入住ICU与内镜介入治疗的时间间隔为7.6±4.7(2-18)h,癫痫发作和内镜干预之间的时间为35.5±14.5(5-48)h。取得了100%的技术成功。除了一个轻度胰腺炎,无其他并发症发生。患者对内窥镜干预表现出良好的反应,这反映在疾病严重程度和实验室检查结果的改善上。ICU住院时间和总住院时间分别为8.7±4.9(2-23)天和14.5±7.4(5-39)天,分别。3例患者发生院内死亡。根据6个月的随访,两名患者死于肺炎和急性心肌梗死。无SAC和/或胆道结石残留。与传统的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术相比,当前的干预措施显示出良好的结果。我们的研究为胆总管结石引起的SAC提供了一种新颖的床旁内窥镜干预方法。
    Radiation-free one-stage bedside endoscopic stone removal and biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis (SAC) caused by choledocholithiasis in intensive care unit (ICU) has not been reported. Herein, we introduce our preliminary experience of such intervention. Radiation-free bedside digital cholangioscope-assisted one-stage endoscopic stone removal and biliary drainage was performed in an urgent manner. Data on clinical outcomes and follow-up from thirty patients were retrospectively analyzed. Time interval was 7.6 ± 4.7 (2-18) h between ICU admission and endoscopic intervention, and was 35.5 ± 14.5 (5-48) h between the seizure and endoscopic intervention. A 100% technical success was achieved. Except for one mild pancreatitis, no other complication occurred. Patients showed good responses to endoscopic interventions, which were reflected by ameliorated disease severities and laboratory findings. Time lengths of ICU stay and total in-hospital stay were 8.7 ± 4.9 (2-23) days and 14.5 ± 7.4 (5-39) days, respectively. In-hospital mortality occurred in three patients. According to a 6-month follow-up, two patients died of pneumonia and acute myocardial infarction. No SAC and/or biliary stone residual occurred. The current intervention demonstrated favorable results compared to traditional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Our study provides a novel bedside endoscopic intervention method for SAC caused by choledocholithiasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)的基础治疗是熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)。但是许多患者表现出不完全的反应,导致疾病进展。GLOBE和UK-PBC评分等风险预测模型有望对患者进行分层和管理。我们旨在独立评估这些风险评分对美国前瞻性队列中UDCA反应的预测准确性。方法:我们在美国肝脏中心进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,在一年的随访中监测UDCA治疗的PBC患者。我们评估了GLOBE和UK-PBC评分对UDCA治疗反应的预测疗效,将它们与巴黎II标准进行比较。使用单变量和多变量分析评估疗效,然后通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析进行预后性能评估。结果:我们评估了136例接受UDCA治疗的PBC患者。根据巴黎二号标准,患者被分为UDCA完全缓解和无缓解组.GLOBE评分确定无反应率为18%(p=0.205),与巴黎II标准的20%(p=0.014)相比。多变量分析,根据年龄和生化指标进行调整,结果显示,GLOBE和UK-PBC评分均与治疗反应密切相关(p<0.001)。GLOBE评分的ROC曲线下面积为0.87(95%CI0.83-0.95),UK-PBC风险评分为0.94(95%CI0.86-0.99)。结论:我们的研究表明,GLOBE和UK-PBC评分可有效预测PBC患者的UDCA治疗反应。早期识别有不完全反应风险的患者可以改善治疗策略,并识别可能需要二线治疗的患者。
    Background: The cornerstone treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), but many patients exhibit an incomplete response, leading to disease progression. Risk prediction models like the GLOBE and UK-PBC scores hold promise for patient stratification and management. We aimed to independently assess the predictive accuracy of these risk scores for UDCA response in a prospective U.S. cohort. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study at a U.S. liver center, monitoring UDCA-treated PBC patients over a one-year follow-up. We evaluated the predictive efficacy of the GLOBE and UK-PBC scores for UDCA treatment response, comparing them to the Paris II criteria. Efficacy was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses, followed by prognostic performance evaluation via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: We evaluated 136 PBC patients undergoing UDCA therapy. Based on the Paris II criteria, patients were categorized into UDCA full-response and non-response groups. The GLOBE score identified a non-responder rate of 18% (p = 0.205), compared to 20% (p = 0.014) with the Paris II criteria. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for age and biochemical markers, showed that both the GLOBE and UK-PBC scores were strongly associated with treatment response (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.95) for the GLOBE score and 0.94 (95% CI 0.86-0.99) for the UK-PBC risk score. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that GLOBE and UK-PBC scores effectively predict UDCA treatment response in PBC patients. The early identification of patients at risk of an incomplete response could improve treatment strategies and identify patients who may need second-line therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝胆筋膜病有两个阶段,每个都需要特定的管理方法。三氯多巴唑已广泛有效地治疗了临床筋膜结石和胆道期内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的两个阶段。我们旨在描述肝胆筋膜瘤的表现,并强调ERCP在治疗中的作用。
    该回顾性队列包括2013年1月至2022年12月期间诊断为临床肝胆筋膜病的患者。人口统计数据,临床表现,实验室和放射学调查,治疗,从62例参与者的记录中收集内窥镜检查报告.患者分为两组:急性肝期和慢性胆道期。
    36名患者处于胆道期,26人处于肝期。所有患者都来自农村地区,女性占主导地位(76%)。在92%的急性病例和58%的慢性胆道病例中检测到嗜酸性粒细胞增多。在慢性胆道病例中,肝脏生化物质的水平,包括丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT),天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST),γ-谷氨酰转移酶(GGT),和胆红素,分别在189±76、127±47、268±77和2.4±0.7的水平较高,与急性肝病例相比,35.6±8.2、32.7±4.3、69.2±45.45和0.58±0.01。相应的P值分别为0.003、0.001、<0.001和<0.001。三氯多唑可有效治愈93.5%的患者,并在34例(94.4%)的胆道系统中从胆道系统中抽出吸虫的胆道期病例中与ERCP联合使用。3例(8.8%)被诊断为ERCP术后胰腺炎。没有一个病人出血,穿孔,或需要胆道支架置入术.
    临床筋膜吸收症可表现为急性肝期或慢性胆道期。嗜酸粒细胞增多在肝期更为明显,而ALT,AST,GGT,胆汁期胆红素较高。三氯多唑在肝期有效,在胆期与ERCP联合有效。ERCP对解除胆道梗阻和治疗胆道筋膜积是非常有效的。
    UNASSIGNED: Hepatobiliary fascioliasis has two phases, each requiring specific management approaches. Triclabendazole has been widely effective in treating the two phases of clinical fascioliasis and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the biliary phase. We aimed to characterize presentations of hepatobiliary fascioliasis and highlight the role of ERCP in management.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort includes patients diagnosed with clinical hepatobiliary fascioliasis between January 2013 and December 2022. Demographic data, clinical presentation, laboratory and radiological investigations, treatment, and endoscopy reports were collected from the records of 62 participants. Patients were divided into two groups: acute hepatic and chronic biliary phases.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-six patients were in the biliary phase, and 26 were in the hepatic phase. All patients were from rural areas, and females were predominant (76%). Hypereosinophilia was detected in 92% of acute cases and 58% of chronic biliary cases. In chronic biliary cases, the levels of liver biochemicals, including alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), and bilirubin, were higher at levels of 189 ± 76, 127 ± 47, 268 ± 77, and 2.4 ± 0.7 respectively, compared to acute hepatic cases, 35.6 ± 8.2, 32.7 ± 4.3, 69.2 ± 45.45, and 0.58 ± 0.01. The corresponding P-values were 0.003, 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively. Triclabendazole effectively cured 93.5% of patients and was used in combination with ERCP in biliary-phase cases where the fluke was extracted from the biliary system in 34 patients (94.4%). Three patients (8.8%) were diagnosed with post-ERCP pancreatitis. None of the patients experienced bleeding, perforation, or required biliary stenting.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical fascioliasis could manifest in acute hepatic or chronic biliary phases. Hypereosinophilia was more evident in the hepatic phases, while ALT, AST, GGT, and bilirubin were higher in the biliary phase. Triclabendazole is effective in the hepatic phase and when combined with ERCP in the biliary phase. ERCP is highly effective for relieving obstruction and treating biliary fascioliasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在比较急性胆管炎胆囊切除术与延迟入院的结果。
    方法:使用2011-2020年全国再入院数据库来确定接受胆囊切除术的急性胆管炎的成年患者。根据手术时机定义研究队列。多变量回归和Royston-Parmar时间调整分析用于评估胆囊切除术时机和结果的相关性。
    结果:在65,753名患者中,82.0%接受了指数手术,18.0%接受了延迟入院手术。调整后,延迟手术与死亡率显著增加相关(AOR1.67[95%CI1.10-2.54]),并发症(1.25[1.13-1.40]),胆管损伤修复(1.66[1.15-2.41]),转换为开放(1.69[1.48-1.93]),和30天再入院(3.52[3.21-3.86])。延迟队列相对于指数的住院费用增加了14,200美元。
    结论:急性胆管炎延迟胆囊切除术与术后不良结局显著相关,提示索引胆囊切除术可能是安全的。
    BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare outcomes between cholecystectomy on index versus delayed admission for acute cholangitis.
    METHODS: The 2011-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify adult patients admitted for acute cholangitis who underwent cholecystectomy. Study cohorts were defined based on timing of surgery. Multivariable regressions and Royston-Parmar time-adjusted analysis were used to evaluate the association of cholecystectomy timing and outcomes.
    RESULTS: Of 65,753 patients, 82.0 ​% received surgery on Index and 18.0 ​% on Delayed admissions. Following adjustment, Delayed operation was associated with significantly increased odds of mortality (AOR 1.67 [95 ​% CI 1.10-2.54]), complications (1.25 [1.13-1.40]), repair of bile duct injury (1.66 [1.15-2.41]), conversion to open (1.69 [1.48-1.93]), and 30-day readmission (3.52 [3.21-3.86]). The Delayed cohort experienced a +$14,200 increment in hospitalization costs relative to Index.
    CONCLUSIONS: Delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholangitis is significantly associated with adverse postoperative outcomes, suggesting that index cholecystectomy may be safe to perform.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性胆管炎(AC)的标准治疗持续时间包括胆道引流后4-7天的抗菌治疗;然而,最近的研究表明,≤2-3天就足够了。然而,临床实践通常取决于体温作为停止抗菌治疗的标准。因此,在这项研究中,我们评估了AC患者是否可以通过≤7天的抗菌治疗获得成功的结果,即使发烧,假设感染源得到有效控制。我们进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,涉及AC患者,根据《2018年东京指南》定义的任何原因,成功进行胆道引流并完成≤7天抗菌治疗的患者.在完成抗菌治疗前24小时内,根据患者的体温将患者分为发热组和发热组。主要结果是临床治愈率,定义为在胆道引流后第14天没有出现初始症状,到第30天没有复发或死亡。次要结果是3个月的复发率。使用具有治疗加权的逆概率的逻辑回归。总的来说,408名患者被选中,其中40人(9.8%)发热。两组在临床治愈率和3个月复发率方面无明显差异。值得注意的是,限于抗生素治疗持续时间≤3天的患者的亚组在这些结局上也没有差异.因此,我们的结果表明,在最初计划的治疗期内停用抗生素足以成功引流AC。无论患者在终止妊娠前的24小时内的发烧状态如何。
    The standard treatment duration for acute cholangitis (AC) involves a 4-7-day antimicrobial treatment post-biliary drainage; however, recent studies have suggested that a ≤ 2-3 days is sufficient. However, clinical practice frequently depends on body temperature as a criterion for discontinuing antimicrobial treatment. Therefore, in this study, we assessed whether patients with AC can achieve successful outcomes with a ≤ 7-day antimicrobial treatment, even with a fever, assuming the infection source is effectively controlled. We conducted a single-center retrospective study involving patients with AC, defined following the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 for any cause, who underwent successful biliary drainage and completed a ≤ 7-day antimicrobial treatment. Patients were categorized into the febrile and afebrile groups based on their body temperature within 24 h before completing antimicrobial treatment. The primary outcome was the clinical cure rate, defined as no initial presenting symptoms by day 14 post-biliary drainage without recurrence or death by day 30. The secondary outcome was a 3-month recurrence rate. Logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used. Overall, 408 patients were selected, among whom 40 (9.8%) were febrile. The two groups showed no significant differences in the clinical cure and 3-month recurrence rates. Notably, the subgroups limited to patients with a ≤ 3-day antibiotic treatment duration also showed no differences in these outcomes. Therefore, our results suggest that discontinuing antibiotics within the initially planned treatment period was sufficient for successful drainage cases of AC, regardless of the patient\'s fever status during the 24 h leading up to termination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    复发性急性胆管炎(RAC)是一种相对罕见的实体,存在严重的管理困难。我们介绍了RAC患者的情况,该患者在采用新型治疗方法后发作次数减少。
    一名93岁的男性,在2019年6月因发冷而没有发烧而入院,颤抖,上腹部腹痛和中度黄疸。腹部超声和CT扫描均显示肝内和肝外导管扩张直至乳头,没有证据表明该水平的肿块。进行了内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP),并清除了大量的胆汁污泥。大肠杆菌被确定为几个发作的原因。一些分离物显示产生超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)。进行了乳头切开术,并植入了塑料假体和金属假体。几个月后,由于胆管炎的持续发作,进行了胆道旁路手术。当慢性抑制性抗生素治疗随后开始预防新的胆管炎发作失败时,决定从健康供体进行粪便微生物群移植,并暂停慢性抑制治疗。从那以后,在超过10个月的临床随访中,她没有出现新的RAC发作.在胃肠道中产生BLEE的大肠杆菌不能被根除。
    某些肠细菌如大肠杆菌对胆道的慢性定植已被鉴定为RAC病例中的相关致病因素。FMT可能是改善RAC患者临床病程的有希望的工具。
    UNASSIGNED: Recurrent acute cholangitis (RAC) is a relatively uncommon entity that presents significant management difficulties. We present the case of a patient with RAC in whom the number of episodes was reduced after a novel therapeutic procedure.
    UNASSIGNED: A 93-year-old male who in June 2019 was admitted for chills without fever, shivering, epigastric abdominal pain and moderate jaundice. Both abdominal ultrasound and CT scan showed intrahepatic and extrahepatic duct dilatation up to the papilla with no evidence of mass at that level. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed and abundant biliary sludge was removed. E. coli was identified as the cause of several of the episodes. Some isolates were shown to produce extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL). Papillotomy was performed and plastic prosthesis and later a metallic prosthesis were implanted. Several months later a surgical bypass of the biliary tract was performed due to persistent episodes of cholangitis. When the chronic suppressive antibiotic treatment subsequently instituted to prevent new episodes of cholangitis failed, it was decided to perform a fecal microbiota transplant from a healthy donor and to suspend the chronic suppressive treatment. Since then, she has not presented new episodes of RAC for more than 10 months of clinical follow-up. BLEE-producing E. coli in the gastrointestinal tract could not be eradicated.
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic colonization of the biliary tract by certain enterobacteria such as E. coli has been identified as a relevant pathogenic factor in cases of RAC. FMT may be a promising tool to improve the clinical course of patients with RAC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多药耐药革兰氏阴性感染的患病率,特别是碳青霉烯类耐药菌株,已经成为一个重要的全球健康问题。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)已成为一种有希望的治疗选择。然而,关于其在儿童中的功效和安全性的数据很少,需要进一步调查。我们从2019年2月至2022年1月在西班牙一家三级医院进行了描述性病例系列。包括经CZA治疗的确诊或疑似多重耐药革兰氏阴性感染的儿科患者(<16岁)。临床和微生物学特征,治疗方法,并对结果进行了检查。18名儿童接受了CZA治疗。都有复杂的慢性病,最常见的基础主要疾病是肝移植(n=8)和胆道闭锁(n=4)。他们接受CZA的主要感染类型是由产生OXA-48的肺炎克雷伯菌引起或怀疑引起的腹腔内感染。CZA一般耐受性良好。在开始CZA治疗的第一个月内,两名患者死亡,其中一例与感染的致命结果直接相关。一些患者由于反复感染而需要反复治疗,然而,没有发现耐药性的发展。总之,CZA的使用显示出有效性和安全性,而缺乏耐药性的发展凸显了CZA作为抗OXA-48产生感染的主要治疗选择的潜力。
    The prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections, particularly carbapenem-resistant strains, has become a significant global health concern. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) has emerged as a promising treatment option. However, data on its efficacy and safety in children are scarce, necessitating further investigation. We conducted a descriptive case series at a tertiary hospital in Spain from February 2019 to January 2022. Pediatric patients (<16 years) treated with CZA for confirmed or suspected multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections were included. The clinical and microbiological characteristics, treatment approaches, and outcomes were examined. Eighteen children received CZA treatment. All had complex chronic conditions, with the most frequent underlying main diseases being liver transplantation (n = 8) and biliary atresia (n = 4). The predominant type of infection for which they received CZA was intra-abdominal infection caused or suspected to be caused by OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. CZA was generally well tolerated. Within the first month of starting CZA therapy, two patients died, with one case directly linked to the infection\'s fatal outcome. Some patients needed repeated courses of therapy due to recurrent infections, yet no resistance development was noted. In summary, the use of CZA showed effectiveness and safety, while the lack of resistance development highlights CZA\'s potential as a primary treatment option against OXA-48-producing infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胆道蛔虫病,由于蛔虫对胆道系统的侵扰,是儿童胆道阻塞的一个罕见但重要的原因。在这个案例报告中,我们介绍了一个出现上行性胆管炎症状和体征的儿童的临床和放射学发现,接着是胆道蛔虫病.双管标志,典型的胆道蛔虫病,在实时腹部超声检查中可视化。
    Biliary ascariasis, resulting from the infestation of the biliary system by the roundworm Ascaris lumbricoides, is a rare but important cause of biliary blockage in children. In this case report, we present the clinical and radiological findings of a child who presented with symptoms and signs of ascending cholangitis, which followed biliary ascariasis. Double tube sign, typical for biliary ascariasis, was visualized on real time abdominal ultrasound examination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估胆总管肠造口术后继发性肝胆管结石的结局和并发症,以指导适当的治疗。
    方法:该研究分析了卫生部2017年全国调查的127名患者,劳工,和福利。2023年队列研究评估了残余结石,复发,胆管炎,胆管癌,和预后。
    结果:中位随访时间为48个月。球囊内镜辅助内镜逆行胆管造影(BE-ERC)是最常见的治疗方法,84.4%的患者实现结石完全清除。解剖性肝切除术是最常见的手术。残余结石的预测因素为结石数量≥10(比值比[OR],7.480;p=.028)和石头直径≥10mm(OR,5.280;p=.020)。随访期间结石复发的预测因素是胆道狭窄(风险比[HR],3.580;p=0.005)和胆管炎(HR,2.700;p=.037)。随访期间胆管炎的预测因素是胆道狭窄(HR,5.016;p=.006)和扩张(HR,3.560;p=.029)。任何治疗肝胆管结石的方法都能减少胆管炎的发生(HR,0.168;p=.042)。球囊扩张联合支架置入≥3个月可改善57.1%患者的胆道狭窄。
    结论:本研究推荐BE-ERC作为继发性肝胆管结石的首选治疗方法。结石的清除和胆道狭窄的缓解和扩张对预防治疗后结石复发和胆管炎至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and complications of secondary hepatolithiasis following choledochoenterostomy to guide suitable management.
    METHODS: The study analyzed 127 patients from a 2017 national survey conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. The 2023 cohort study assessed residual stones, recurrences, cholangitis, cholangiocarcinoma, and prognosis.
    RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 48 months. Balloon endoscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (BE-ERC) was the most common treatment, achieving complete stone clearance in 84.4% of patients. Anatomical hepatectomy was the most common surgery. Predictors of residual stones were stone number ≥10 (odds ratio [OR], 7.480; p = .028) and stone diameter ≥10 mm (OR, 5.280; p = .020). Predictors of stone recurrence during follow-up were biliary strictures (hazard ratio [HR], 3.580; p = .005) and cholangitis (HR, 2.700; p = .037). Predictors of cholangitis during follow-up were biliary stricture (HR, 5.016; p = .006) and dilatation (HR, 3.560; p = .029). Any treatment for hepatolithiasis reduced cholangitis occurrence (HR, 0.168; p = .042). Balloon dilation combined with stenting for ≥3 months improved biliary strictures in 57.1% of patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study recommends BE-ERC as the first-choice treatment for secondary hepatolithiasis. Stone removal and relief of biliary strictures and dilatation are crucial to prevent stone recurrence and cholangitis after treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号