cholangitis

胆管炎
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2018年东京指南(TG2018)是一种用于推荐AC临床管理的评分系统。然而,这样的评分系统必须纳入急性胆管炎(AC)的各种临床结局.在基于急诊科(ED)的环境中,在非常需要效率和实用性的地方,临床医生可能会发现各种参数的应用具有挑战性.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和血尿素氮与白蛋白比率(BAR)是用于评估疾病严重程度的相对常见的生物标志物。这项研究评估了ED中测量的TG2018评分的潜在价值,以预测各种临床结果。此外,该研究还将TG2018评分与NLR和BAR评分进行了比较,以证明其有用性.方法:这项回顾性观察研究是在ED中进行的。总的来说,502例AC患者在2016年1月至2021年12月期间就诊。主要终点是评估ED中测量的TG2018评分系统是否是重症监护的预测因子,长期住院(≥14天),入院期间经皮肝穿刺胆道引流(PTBD),气管插管(ETI)。结果:分析包括81名需要重症监护的患者,111需要长期住院(≥14天),49在住院期间需要PTBD,和14在住院期间需要ETI。对于TG2018评分,使用(1)作为参考的校正OR(aOR)为(3)与(1)相比为23.169(95%CI:9.788-54.844)。TG2018需要重症监护的AUC为0.850(95%CI:0.815-0.881),临界值>2。对于任何标志物,长期住院的AUC不超过0.7。对于任何标志物,PTBD的AUC也不超过0.7.对于BAR,ETI的AUC最高,为0.870(95%CI:0.837-0.899),临界值>5.2。结论:在ED中测量的TG2018评分有助于预测AC的各种临床结局。其他新的标记,如BAR和NLR也相关,但是他们的解释力很弱。
    Introduction: The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG2018) is a scoring system used to recommend the clinical management of AC. However, such a scoring system must incorporate a variety of clinical outcomes of acute cholangitis (AC). In an emergency department (ED)-based setting, where efficiency and practicality are highly desired, clinicians may find the application of various parameters challenging. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and blood urea nitrogen-to-albumin ratio (BAR) are relatively common biomarkers used to assess disease severity. This study evaluated the potential value of TG2018 scores measured in an ED to predict a variety of clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the study also compared TG2018 scores with NLR and BAR scores to demonstrate their usefulness. Methods: This retrospective observational study was performed in an ED. In total, 502 patients with AC visited the ED between January 2016 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was to evaluate whether the TG2018 scoring system measured in the ED was a predictor of intensive care, long-term hospital stays (≥14 days), percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) during admission care, and endotracheal intubation (ETI). Results: The analysis included 81 patients requiring intensive care, 111 requiring long-term hospital stays (≥14 days), 49 requiring PTBD during hospitalization, and 14 requiring ETI during hospitalization. For the TG2018 score, the adjusted OR (aOR) using (1) as a reference was 23.169 (95% CI: 9.788-54.844) for (3) compared to (1). The AUC of the TG2018 for the need for intensive care was 0.850 (95% CI: 0.815-0.881) with a cutoff of >2. The AUC for long-term hospital stays did not exceed 0.7 for any of the markers. the AUC for PTBD also did not exceed 0.7 for any of the markers. The AUC for ETI was the highest for BAR at 0.870 (95% CI: 0.837-0.899) with a cutoff value of >5.2. Conclusions: The TG2018 score measured in the ED helps predict various clinical outcomes of AC. Other novel markers such as BAR and NLR are also associated, but their explanatory power is weak.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    目的:这项研究的目的是在一项多机构回顾性研究中阐明急性胆管炎(AC)的临床特征,并验证TG18对各种类型胆管炎的诊断性能。
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了2020年在16个东京指南18(TG18)核心会议机构中的1079例AC患者。其中,胆道重建后相关AC(PBR-AC),支架相关AC(S-AC)和普通AC(C-AC)分别为228、307和544。比较了每种AC的特性,并评估了各自的TG18诊断性能。
    结果:与C-AC组相比,PBR-AC组表现出明显温和的胆汁淤滞。使用TG18标准,PBR-AC组确诊率明显低于C-AC组(59.6%vs.79.6%,p<.001),因为TG18影像学发现的患病率显着降低,胆汁淤滞较轻。在S-AC组中,胆汁淤积也较温和,但明确诊断率明显高于C-AC组(95.1%).PBR-AC与C-AC相比,短暂的肝衰减差异(THAD)和血栓形成的发生率更高。当将这些项目新添加到TG18诊断影像学发现中时,PBR-AC的最终诊断率(59.6%-78.1%)和总队列(79.6%-85.3%)显着提高。
    结论:使用TG18对PBR-AC的诊断率较低,但在TG成像标准中加入THAD和pneumobilia可能会提高TG诊断性能.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical characteristics of acute cholangitis (AC) after bilioenteric anastomosis and stent-related AC in a multi-institutional retrospective study, and validate the TG18 diagnostic performance for various type of cholangitis.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1079 AC patients during 2020, at 16 Tokyo Guidelines 18 (TG 18) Core Meeting institutions. Of these, the post-biliary reconstruction associated AC (PBR-AC), stent-associated AC (S-AC) and common AC (C-AC) were 228, 307, and 544, respectively. The characteristics of each AC were compared, and the TG18 diagnostic performance of each was evaluated.
    RESULTS: The PBR-AC group showed significantly milder biliary stasis compared to the C-AC group. Using TG18 criteria, definitive diagnosis rate in the PBR-AC group was significantly lower than that in the C-AC group (59.6% vs. 79.6%, p < .001) because of significantly lower prevalence of TG 18 imaging findings and milder bile stasis. In the S-AC group, the bile stasis was also milder, but definitive-diagnostic rate was significantly higher (95.1%) compared to the C-AC group. The incidence of transient hepatic attenuation difference (THAD) and pneumobilia were more frequent in PBR-AC than that in C-AC. The definitive-diagnostic rate of PBR-AC (59.6%-78.1%) and total cohort (79.6%-85.3%) were significantly improved when newly adding these items to TG18 diagnostic imaging findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic rate of PBR-AC using TG18 is low, but adding THAD and pneumobilia to TG imaging criteria may improve TG diagnostic performance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究根据2018年东京指南评估了不同实验室指标对急性胆管炎(AC)严重程度的预测价值。
    目的:我们从2016年6月至2021年5月连续纳入诊断为AC的患者。血清降钙素原(PCT)和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平,白细胞计数,中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率,并根据AC的严重程度比较血小板淋巴细胞比率(PLR)。
    结果:总计,293名患者参加了这项研究(轻度,n=172;中等,n=68;严重,n=53)。在接收机工作特性分析中,CRP是区分轻度和中度AC的最佳生物标志物(曲线下面积[AUC]0.66,95%置信区间[CI]0.58-0.74)。PCT是区分轻度和重度AC的最佳生物标志物(AUC0.80,95%CI0.74-0.86)。117例(39.93%)进行血培养,其中53人(45.30%)有阳性结果。关于血培养阳性,PLR最具预测性(AUC0.85,95%CI0.78-0.92)。
    结论:PCT可作为重度AC的可靠预测指标。CRP最能预测中度AC,而PLR最能预测血培养阳性。
    This study evaluated the predictive value of different laboratory indicators for the severity of acute cholangitis (AC) according to the 2018 Tokyo Guidelines.
    We enrolled consecutive patients with a diagnosis of AC from June 2016 to May 2021. Serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, white blood cell counts, the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were compared according to the severity of AC.
    In total, 293 patients were enrolled in this study (mild, n = 172; moderate, n = 68; severe, n = 53). In receiver operating characteristic analyses, CRP was the best biomarker for differentiating mild and moderate AC (area under the curve [AUC] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.74). PCT was the best biomarker for differentiating mild and severe AC (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.86). Blood culture was performed in 117 patients (39.93%), 53 of whom (45.30%) had positive results. Regarding blood culture positivity, PLR was most predictive (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.92).
    PCT can be used as a reliable predictor of severe AC. CRP was most predictive of moderate AC, whereas PLR was most predictive of blood culture positivity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胆源性急性胰腺炎(AP)的临床表现与目前用于诊断胆管炎(AC)和胆囊炎(CC)的2018年东京指南之间存在值得注意的重叠。这可能导致大量抗生素和内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的过度使用。
    目的:我们旨在根据2018年东京指南(TG18)在胆道AP患者队列中评估AC/CC的入院患病率,以及它与抗生素使用的关联,ERCP和临床相关终点。
    方法:我们对匈牙利胰腺研究组2195例AP病例的前瞻性多中心登记进行了二次分析。我们根据TG18的确定AC/CC的入院履行情况,对胆道病例(n=944)进行了分组和比较。除了使用抗生素,我们评估死亡率,AC/CC/AP严重性,ERCP表现和住院时间。我们还进行了文献综述,讨论了AP背景下TG18的每个标准。
    结果:27.8%的胆道AP病例对AC和CC均符合TG18,仅CC为22.5%,仅AC为20.8%。抗生素使用率很高(77.4%)。约2/3的AC/CC病例为轻度,10%左右严重。轻度和中度AC/CC患者的死亡率低于1%,但在严重病例中相当高(AC和CC中为12.8%和21.2%)。在89.3%的AC病例中进行了ERCP,胆总管结石占41.1%。
    结论:大约70%的胆道AP患者满足AC/CC的TG18,与抗生素使用率高有关。假定轻度或中度AC/CC的死亡率较低。每个实验室和临床标准通常符合胆道AP,单一影像学发现也是非特异性的-需要AP特异性诊断标准,因为AC/CC的患病率可能被大大高估。测试抗生素使用的随机试验也是必要的。
    There is a noteworthy overlap between the clinical picture of biliary acute pancreatitis (AP) and the 2018 Tokyo guidelines currently used for the diagnosis of cholangitis (AC) and cholecystitis (CC). This can lead to significant antibiotic and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) overuse.
    We aimed to assess the on-admission prevalence of AC/CC according to the 2018 Tokyo guidelines (TG18) in a cohort of biliary AP patients, and its association with antibiotic use, ERCP and clinically relevant endpoints.
    We conducted a secondary analysis of the Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group\'s prospective multicenter registry of 2195 AP cases. We grouped and compared biliary cases (n = 944) based on the on-admission fulfillment of definite AC/CC according to TG18. Aside from antibiotic use, we evaluated mortality, AC/CC/AP severity, ERCP performance and length of hospitalization. We also conducted a literature review discussing each criteria of the TG18 in the context of AP.
    27.8% of biliary AP cases fulfilled TG18 for both AC and CC, 22.5% for CC only and 20.8% for AC only. Antibiotic use was high (77.4%). About 2/3 of the AC/CC cases were mild, around 10% severe. Mortality was below 1% in mild and moderate AC/CC patients, but considerably higher in severe cases (12.8% and 21.2% in AC and CC). ERCP was performed in 89.3% of AC cases, common bile duct stones were found in 41.1%.
    Around 70% of biliary AP patients fulfilled the TG18 for AC/CC, associated with a high rate of antibiotic use. Mortality in presumed mild or moderate AC/CC is low. Each of the laboratory and clinical criteria are commonly fulfilled in biliary AP, single imaging findings are also unspecific-AP specific diagnostic criteria are needed, as the prevalence of AC/CC are likely greatly overestimated. Randomized trials testing antibiotic use are also warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    There are limited drug options in the field of primary biliary cholangitis, so there is a great clinical need. In recent years, research and development of PBC treatment medications have been active domestically and internationally, and clinical trials have been conducted on multiple drugs with distinct targets. Therefore, on February 13, 2023, the State Drug Administration issued the \"Technical Guidelines for Clinical Trials of Drugs for the Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis\" in order to guide and standardize the clinical trials of drugs for the treatment of PBC. This article briefly summarizes the key points of the guiding principles, focuses on the difficulties of clinical evaluation of drugs, discusses the key elements of clinical trials such as the selection of test populations and efficacy endpoints, and introduces the determination process through literature searches and expert discussion methods combined with reviewer experience and scientific considerations.
    原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)治疗领域药物选择有限,存在较大的临床需求。近年来,国内外PBC治疗药物研发活跃,有多个不同靶点的药物正在开展临床试验。为指导和规范PBC治疗药物临床试验,国家药品监督管理局于2023年2月13日发布了《原发性胆汁性胆管炎治疗药物临床试验技术指导原则》。现简要介绍指导原则的要点,围绕药物临床评价难点,通过文献检索和组织专家讨论等方法,结合审评经验,探讨了受试人群和有效性终点选择等临床试验关键要素,介绍了其确定过程和科学考量。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    目的:缩短常见感染性疾病的抗生素治疗时间(DAT)可能是解决抗菌药物耐药性的有效策略。较短的DAT已被证明对社区获得性肺炎(CAP)安全有效,蜂窝织炎,和胆管炎.
    方法:在一项回顾性多中心质量控制研究中,770例CAP住院患者的医疗记录,蜂窝织炎,我们随机选择了2017-2018年期间瑞士三家三级医院的胆管炎.根据国际和当地指南评估抗生素治疗持续时间的适当性。
    结果:271、260和239例CAP患者的记录,蜂窝织炎,包括胆管炎,分别。中位数DAT为7天(四分位数间距[IQR]6-9),十天(IQR8-13),和9天(IQR6-13)在CAP,蜂窝织炎,和胆管炎,分别。在32%和37%的CAP患者中观察到DAT比当地和国际指南建议的时间长。23%和70%的蜂窝织炎患者,33%和37%的胆管炎患者,分别。血培养阳性(比值比[OR]=2.42(95%置信区间[CI]1.33-4.34]),传染病咨询(OR=1.79[95%CI1.05-2.78]),肾功能受损(估计肾小球滤过率每增加1ml/min/1.73m2,OR=0.99[95%CI0.98~1.00])和入院时更高的炎症程度(C反应蛋白每增加10mg/L,OR=1.0[95%CI1.001~1.005])与超过国际指南建议的DAT独立相关.
    结论:在大部分社区获得性感染的患者中,DAT超过了建议。
    Shortening the duration of antibiotic therapy (DAT) for common infectious diseases may be an effective strategy to tackle antimicrobial resistance. Shorter DAT has been proven safe and effective for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), cellulitis, and cholangitis.
    In a retrospective multicentre quality-control study, medical records of 770 patients hospitalized with CAP, cellulitis, and cholangitis at three tertiary care hospitals in Switzerland during 2017-2018 were randomly selected. Appropriateness of antibiotic treatment duration was assessed according to international and local guidelines.
    Records of 271, 260, and 239 patients with CAP, cellulitis, and cholangitis were included, respectively. Median DAT was seven days (interquartile range [IQR] 6-9), ten days (IQR 8-13), and nine days (IQR 6-13) in CAP, cellulitis, and cholangitis, respectively. DAT longer than recommended by local and international guidelines was observed in 32% and 37% of CAP patients, 23% and 70% of cellulitis patients, and 33% and 37% of cholangitis patients, respectively. Positive blood cultures (odds ratio [OR] = 2.42 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-4.34]), infectious diseases consultation (OR = 1.79 [95% CI 1.05-2.78]), impaired renal function (OR = 0.99 [95% CI 0.98-1.00] per 1 ml/min / 1.73 m2 increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate) and a higher degree of inflammation on admission (OR = 1.0 [95% CI 1.001-1.005] per 10 mg/L increase in C-reactive protein) were independently associated with a DAT longer than recommended in international guidelines.
    DAT exceeded recommendations in a significant proportion of patients with mostly community-acquired infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2018年东京指南(TG18)根据急性胆管炎(AC)的严重程度建议紧急内镜胆道引流。因此,我们评估了不同年龄组急诊内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的安全性和死亡率获益.
    方法:使用国际疾病分类-10(ICD-10)代码,我们从全国住院患者样本中抽取了成年AC患者。使用TG18定义胆管炎严重程度来识别患有严重和非严重(轻度或中度)AC的患者。年龄类别为18-64、65-79和80及以上。适当时使用多元线性或逻辑回归。我们用了Stata,版本14.2,将双侧p<0.05视为具有统计学意义的分析。
    结果:在137100名患者中,非重度胆管炎患者93365例(68.09%),重度胆管炎患者43735例(31.91%).紧急ERCP(24小时内)导致所有年龄组严重和非严重AC的死亡率降低。括约肌切开术后出血在≥80岁的患者中更为常见,而ERCP术后急性胆囊炎在65~79岁的患者中更为常见.ERCP术后胰腺炎的发生率,胆管穿孔,十二指肠穿孔在各年龄组之间没有差异。此外,不同年龄组急诊ERCP患者的镇静相关并发症发生率无差异.
    结论:本研究显示了不同年龄段AC患者的紧急ERCP死亡率获益,并描述了不同年龄段患者进行紧急ERCP的安全性。因此,我们建议按照TG18指南进行紧急ERCP,无论年龄大小.
    BACKGROUND: The 2018 Tokyo Guidelines (TG18) recommend urgent endoscopic biliary drainage based on acute cholangitis (AC) severity. Therefore, we evaluated the safety and mortality benefits of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in different age groups.
    METHODS: Using International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) codes, we sampled adult AC patients from National Inpatient Sample. TG18 definition of cholangitis severity was used to identify patients with severe and nonsevere (mild or moderate) AC. Age categories were 18-64, 65-79, and 80 and above. Multivariate linear or logistic regression was used as appropriate. We used Stata, version 14.2, to perform analyses considering two-sided p < .05 as statistically significant.
    RESULTS: Among 137 100 patients, there were 93 365 (68.09%) patients with nonsevere cholangitis and 43 735 (31.91%) patients with severe cholangitis. Urgent ERCP (within 24 h) resulted in decreased mortality in all age groups for both severe and nonsevere AC. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding was more common in patients ≥80 years of age, whereas post-ERCP acute cholecystitis was more common in patients 65-79 years. The rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis, bile duct perforation, and duodenal perforation did not differ among the age groups. In addition, there were no differences in the rate of sedation-related complications between different age groups who underwent urgent ERCP.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the mortality benefit from urgent ERCP for AC in different age groups and describes the safety of performing urgent ERCP in patients of various ages. Therefore, we recommend that urgent ERCP be performed according to the TG18 guidelines regardless of age.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    In 2015, the Chinese Society of Hepatology and Chinese Society of Gastroenterology issued a consensus on the diagnosis and management of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). In the past years, more clinical studies have been reported in the field of PBC. To provide guidance to the clinical diagnosis and management of patients with PBC, the Chinese Society of Hepatology invited a panel of experts to assess the new clinical evidence and formulated the current guidelines which comprises 26 clinical recommendations.
    2015年中华医学会肝病学分会和中华医学会消化病学分会制定了我国第一个原发性胆汁性胆管炎(primary biliary cholangitis,PBC)的专家共识。近年来国内外有关研究为PBC的诊断和治疗提供了新的临床证据。中华医学会肝病学分会组织有关专家,在评估最新国内外临床研究证据的基础上,制订了包括26条推荐意见的本指南,旨在为临床医师诊断和治疗PBC提供指导和参考意见。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    识别可能患有CDL的患者是一个重要的临床难题,因为内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP),不良事件的风险为5-7%。这项研究的目的是比较2010年和2019年ASGE标准的诊断测试性能,以帮助对可疑CDL患者进行风险分层。
    从2013年至2019年连续评估可能的CDL患者从手术中确定,内窥镜,和放射学数据库在一个单一的学术中心。纳入标准包括所有因怀疑CDL而接受ERCP和/或胆囊切除术及术中胆管造影(IOC)的患者。我们从两个指南中计算了标准的诊断测试性能,并使用接收器操作员曲线比较了它们的区别。使用单变量和多变量分析来确定最强的成分预测因子。
    1098名患者[年龄57.9±19.0岁,包括62.8%(690)F]。66.3%(728)的患者在ERCP和/或IOC上发现CDL。在使用2019年指南时,灵敏度,特异性,PPV,NPV,精度分别为65.8、78.9、86.3、54.1和70.4%,分别。使用2010年的指导方针,灵敏度,特异性,PPV,NPV,精度分别为50.5、78.9、82.5、44.8和60.1%,分别。使用2019年指南[0.726(0.695,0.758)]的高风险标准的AUC高于2010年指南[0.647(0.614,0.681)]。提供增加辨别的关键区别是在任何成像模式上都包含结石,灵敏度从29.1%提高到55.0%。不包括成像或胆管炎的CDL,在多变量分析中,CBD扩张是CDL的最强个体预测因子(OR3.70,CI2.80,4.89).
    与2010年相比,2019年的高风险标准提高了诊断测试性能,但仍然表现不佳。侵入性较小的测试,例如EUS或MRCP,在ERCP之前,对于怀疑有CDL的患者应考虑。
    Identifying patients likely to have CDL is an important clinical dilemma because endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), carries a 5-7% risk of adverse events. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic test performance of the 2010 and 2019 ASGE criteria used to help risk stratify patients with suspected CDL.
    Consecutive patients evaluated for possible CDL from 2013 to 2019 were identified from surgical, endoscopic, and radiologic databases at a single academic center. Inclusion criteria included all patients who underwent ERCP and/or cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) for suspected CDL. We calculated the diagnostic test performance of criteria from both guidelines and compared their discrimination using the receiver operator curve. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to identify the strongest component predictors.
    1098 patients [age 57.9 ± 19.0 years, 62.8% (690) F] were included. 66.3% (728) were found to have CDL on ERCP and/or IOC. When using the 2019 guidelines, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy are 65.8, 78.9, 86.3, 54.1, and 70.4%, respectively. Using the 2010 guidelines, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy are 50.5, 78.9, 82.5, 44.8, and 60.1%, respectively. The AUC for high-risk criteria using the 2019 guidelines [0.726 (0.695, 0.758)] was greater than for the 2010 guidelines [0.647 (0.614, 0.681)]. The key difference providing the increased discrimination was the inclusion of stones on any imaging modality, which increased the sensitivity to 55.0% from 29.1%. Not including CDL on imaging or cholangitis, a dilated CBD was the strongest individual predictor of CDL on multivariate analysis (OR 3.70, CI 2.80, 4.89).
    Compared to 2010, the 2019 high-risk criterion improves diagnostic test performance, but still performs suboptimally. Less invasive tests, such as EUS or MRCP, should be considered in patients with suspected CDL prior to ERCP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号