central venous catheterization

中心静脉导管插入术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于模拟的培训(SBT)对于复杂的医疗程序至关重要,例如超声引导的中心静脉导管插入术(US-IJCVC),医生的经验水平会影响发生并发症的可能性。动态触觉机器人训练器(DHRT)的开发是为了培训CVC中的居民,作为对人体模型训练器的改进,然而,DHRT和人体模型培训师都只提供CVC的一个特定部分的培训,针插入。因此,CVCSBT将受益于更全面的培训。创建了DHRT的扩展版本,DHRT+,提供有关CVC其他步骤的实践培训和自动反馈。DHRT+包括一个完整的CVC医疗套件,假静脉通道,和个性化的,反应接口。当一起使用时,DHRT和DHRT+系统提供关于CVC的针头插入和导管放置的全面培训。与单独进行DHRT的训练相比,本研究评估了DHRT对居民自我效能感和CVC技能增益的影响。
    方法:47名住院医师完成了DHRT培训,59名住院医师接受了DHRT和DHRT+综合培训。每位居民在接受模拟器培训之前和之后都填写了中心线自我效能感(CLSE)调查。经过模拟训练,每位居民对人体模型进行了一次完整的CVC,同时由专家评估员进行观察,并在US-IJCVC检查表上进行评分.
    结果:对于US-IJCVC清单上的两项,“口头同意”和“通过导管吸血”,DHRT+组明显优于单纯DHRT组。两组训练前后的自我效能感均有显著改善。然而,接受的培训类型是CLSE项目“以适当的顺序使用适当的设备”的重要预测因子,以及接受DHRT+额外培训的综合训练组的“用缝线固定导管并应用敷料”,显示出更高的训练后自我效能。
    结论:将综合培训整合到SBT中有可能改善US-IJCVC教育,以提高学习收益和自我效能感。
    BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training (SBT) is vital to complex medical procedures such as ultrasound guided central venous catheterization (US-IJCVC), where the experience level of the physician impacts the likelihood of incurring complications. The Dynamic Haptic Robotic Trainer (DHRT) was developed to train residents in CVC as an improvement over manikin trainers, however, the DHRT and manikin trainer both only provide training on one specific portion of CVC, needle insertion. As such, CVC SBT would benefit from more comprehensive training. An extended version of the DHRT was created, the DHRT + , to provide hands-on training and automated feedback on additional steps of CVC. The DHRT + includes a full CVC medical kit, a false vein channel, and a personalized, reactive interface. When used together, the DHRT and DHRT + systems provide comprehensive training on needle insertion and catheter placement for CVC. This study evaluates the impact of the DHRT + on resident self-efficacy and CVC skill gains as compared to training on the DHRT alone.
    METHODS: Forty-seven medical residents completed training on the DHRT and 59 residents received comprehensive training on the DHRT and the DHRT + . Each resident filled out a central line self-efficacy (CLSE) survey before and after undergoing training on the simulators. After simulation training, each resident did one full CVC on a manikin while being observed by an expert rater and graded on a US-IJCVC checklist.
    RESULTS: For two items on the US-IJCVC checklist, \"verbalizing consent\" and \"aspirating blood through the catheter\", the DHRT + group performed significantly better than the DHRT only group. Both training groups showed significant improvements in self-efficacy from before to after training. However, type of training received was a significant predictor for CLSE items \"using the proper equipment in the proper order\", and \"securing the catheter with suture and applying dressing\" with the comprehensive training group that received additional training on the DHRT + showing higher post training self-efficacy.
    CONCLUSIONS: The integration of comprehensive training into SBT has the potential to improve US-IJCVC education for both learning gains and self-efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中央血管的导管插入术可能与早期和晚期有关,潜在的致命并发症。必须采取积极的方法来减少不良事件的频率和程度。最近,GAVeCeLT提出了一项名为SICA-PED(即在儿科患者中安全插入中央通道)的方案,其中包括7项循证策略.
    通过单中心前瞻性观察研究,作者希望巩固这些方案在新生儿中的有效性和安全性.在一系列104个新生儿中,应用方案的七个步骤(1)RaCeVA静脉的术前超声研究,(2)正确的无菌技术,(3)超声引导静脉穿刺,(4)术中导管尖端定位与TTE(ECHOTIP)和(iECG)腔内心电图,(5)合理的选择植入出口与RAVESTO隧道技术,(6)无缝线锚固,(7)使用胶水和透明半透膜保护出口点。作者在点(6)中包括了进一步的预防措施,皮下锚固系统增加了导管翼的反固定,我们将其称为6PlusPoint。
    所有需要植入选择性我们引导的中心静脉通路的婴儿均纳入研究。104个植入的中心静脉导管均未出现早期并发症(意外动脉穿刺,PNX,原发性错位);罕见的晚期并发症,如瘀斑,CRBSI,观察到出口部位感染或移位,未观察到导管相关的血栓形成现象。CRBSI导管相关性感染率为2.47×1000天导管病例。
    这项前瞻性研究的结果加强了SICA-Ped方案的可行性和有效性。证明了基于证据的七步植入策略的系统应用提高了成功率,尽量减少早期和晚期并发症,这增加了患者的安全性。
    UNASSIGNED: Catheterization of central vessels can be associated with early and late, potentially fatal complications. A proactive approach is imperative to reduce the frequency and magnitude of adverse events. Recently, the GAVeCeLT has proposed a protocol called SICA-PED (i.e. Safe Insertion of Central Access in Pediatric patients) and includes seven evidence-based strategies.
    UNASSIGNED: Through a single-center prospective observational study, the authors wanted to consolidate the efficacy and safety of these protocol in newborns. In a series of 104 newborns, the seven steps of the protocol were applied (1) pre-procedural ultrasound study of the RaCeVA veins, (2) correct aseptic technique, (3) ultrasound-guided venipuncture, (4) intraprocedural localization of the tip of the catheter with TTE (ECHO TIP) and (iECG) intracavitary electrocardiogram, (5) reasoned choice of the implant exit site with the RAVESTO Tunneling technique, (6) anchoring without stitches, and (7) exit point protection with the use of glue and transparent semipermeable membrane. The authors have included a further precaution in point (6) the subcutaneous anchoring system has added the counter-fixation of the catheter wings that we will call 6Plus Point.
    UNASSIGNED: All infants requiring implantation of elective us-guided central venous access were enrolled in the study. None of the 104 implanted central venous catheters experienced early complications (accidental arterial puncture, PNX, primary malposition); rare late complications such as ecchymosis, CRBSI, exit site infection or dislodgement were observed, No catheter-related thrombotic phenomena were observed. The CRBSI catheter-related infection rate was 2.47 × 1000 days catheter cases.
    UNASSIGNED: The results of this prospective study strengthen the feasibility and efficacy of the SICA-Ped Protocol. Demonstrating that the systematic application of the evidence-based seven-step implantation strategy increases the success rate, minimizes early and late complications, which result in increased patient safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经外周插入的中央导管在中央静脉进入装置中起着越来越重要的作用。然而,在特定情况下,例如慢性肾脏病患者的中央导管插入术,应仔细考虑这些装置的使用.在评估透析患者放置的可行性时,透析治疗前后循环容积变化的关系,以及上肢深静脉大小的潜在变化,应该考虑。
    上肢静脉,特别是基本静脉或臂静脉,在透析治疗前后进行鉴定和测量。还收集了透析治疗期间的患者数据和体重减轻数据。进行线性回归分析以评估变量之间的相关性。
    整个样品的静脉尺寸的平均变化为+0.17±0.43mm。去除的平均体积为2.2±0.8升。在第1亚组(液体体积损失<2000毫升)中,透析后,人群的静脉大小有所减小.在第2亚组(液体体积损失2000毫升)中,透析后,人群的静脉大小有所增加。
    应在透析疗程结束后对液体排出量小于2000ml的透析患者进行上臂血管通路放置。相反,在液体排出量超过2000毫升的透析患者中,观察到静脉大小显着增加,当静脉较小时,应在透析前进行血管通路置入.此外,应该注意的是,在慢性肾脏病患者中,应尽可能保留上肢的静脉系统,以防止潜在的动静脉瘘形成中的血栓形成和狭窄。
    UNASSIGNED: Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters play an increasingly important role in Central Venous Access Devices. However, the use of these devices should be carefully considered in specific situations such as central catheterisation in patients with chronic kidney disease. When evaluating the feasibility of placement for a patient undergoing dialysis, the relationship between changes in circulating volume before and after dialysis treatment, and potential variations in the size of deep veins in the upper limbs, should be considered.
    UNASSIGNED: Upper limb veins, specifically the basilic or brachial veins, were identified and measured before and after dialysis treatment. Patient data and weight loss data during dialysis treatment were also collected. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the correlation between the variables.
    UNASSIGNED: The average variation in vein size for the entire sample was +0.17 ± 0.43 mm. The mean volume removed was 2.2 ± 0.8 l. In subgroup 1 (fluid volume loss <2000 ml), the population experienced a decrease in the measured vein size after dialysis. In subgroup 2 (fluid volume loss ⩾2000 ml), the population experienced an increase in the measured vein size after dialysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Upper arm vascular access placement in dialysed patients with fluid removal of less than 2000 ml should be performed after the dialysis session. Conversely, in dialysed patients with fluid removal of more than 2000 ml, where a significant increase in vein size was observed, vascular access placement should be performed before the dialysis session when the veins are smaller. Additionally, it should be noted that in patients with chronic kidney disease, the venous system of the upper limbs should be preserved as much as possible to prevent thrombosis and stenosis in potential arteriovenous fistula creation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    这项前瞻性观察性研究使用经食道超声心动图研究了中心静脉导管通过右颈内静脉的最佳插入深度。气管插管后,麻醉师在病人的食道中插入了一个食道超声心动图探针。研究人员用超声心动图将导管尖端放置在cristaterminalis上边缘上方2cm处,它被定义为最佳点。我们测量了导管的插入长度。使用测得的最佳深度和一些患者参数进行Pearson相关性测试。我们提出了将导管放置在最佳位置的新公式。共有89名受试者参加了该试验。测量的最佳深度与患者身高参数之间的相关系数最高(0.703,p<0.001)。我们做了一个新的公式\'高度(厘米)/10-1.5厘米\'。该公式对最优区的准确率为71.9%(95%置信区间;62.4-81.4%),当我们比较时,这是以前的公式或指南中最高的。总之,经食管超声心动图评估中心静脉导管尖端,我们可以做一个新的公式\'高度(厘米)/10-1.5\',这似乎比以前的其他指导方针更好。
    This prospective observational study investigated the optimal insertion depth of the central venous catheter through the right internal jugular vein using transesophageal echocardiography. After tracheal intubation, the anesthesiologist inserted a probe for esophageal echocardiography into the patient\'s esophagus. The investigators placed the catheter tip 2 cm above the superior edge of the crista terminalis with echocardiography, which was defined as the optimal point. We measured the inserted length of the catheter. Pearson correlation tests were performed with the measured optimal depth and some patient parameters. We made a new formula for placing the catheter at the optimal position. A total of 89 subjects were enrolled in this trial. The correlation coefficient between the measured optimal depth and the patient\'s parameters was the highest for patient height (0.703, p < 0.001). We made a new formula of \'height (cm)/10 - 1.5 cm\'. The accuracy rate of this formula for the optimal zone was 71.9% (95% confidence interval; 62.4 - 81.4%), which was the highest among the previous formulas or guidelines when we compared. In conclusion, the central venous catheter tip was evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography, and we could make a new formula of \'height (cm)/10 - 1.5\', which seemed to be better than other previous guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:中央插入的中央导管(CICC)在现代医疗保健中是必不可少的,但不幸的是,伴随着并发症。导管相关血栓形成是一种众所周知的并发症,据报道在5-30%的CICC患者中发生。很少有研究报告在引入实时超声插入引导作为临床实践后导管相关血栓形成的发生率。这项研究旨在证明与CICC相关的静脉壁的任何病理宏观或微观变化。
    方法:该研究获得了瑞典伦理审查机构的批准,并在一家大型大学医院进行。该研究包括12例接受尸检的短期MCI患者。对插入导管的血管进行宏观和微观检查。
    结果:总计,包括7例女性患者和5例男性患者,中位年龄为70岁(四分位距63~76岁).除了一个例外,所有患者在CICC期间接受常规血栓预防.大多数insertedCICC为9.5French(54%),并插入颈内静脉(92%)。CICC的中位时间为7天(四分位距1.8-20)。尸检时,在所有病例中均观察到血栓(100%),宏观和微观,连接到CICC的远端部分和/或相邻的血管壁。在所有病例中均可见血管壁中的炎症变化,8例(67%)出现不同程度的纤维化。
    结论:这项尸检研究表明,导管相关的血栓形成与邻近的炎症和纤维化血管壁增厚非常普遍,尽管导管使用时间有限。这些发现的后果很重要,因为血栓可能导致肺栓塞,并可能导致导管相关感染,并且由于炎性和纤维化血管壁增厚可能演变成慢性静脉狭窄。此外,这些发现令人担忧,asCICC在现代医疗保健中是不可或缺的,并发症可能被作为CICC插入指征的一般疾病所掩盖.
    Centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) are indispensable in modern healthcare, but unfortunately, come with complications. Catheter-related thrombosis is a well-known complication reported to occur in 5-30% of patients with CICC. There is a paucity of studies that report the incidence of catheter-related thrombosis after the introduction of real-time ultrasound insertion guidance as clinical practice. This study aimed to demonstrate any pathological macro- or microscopic changes in the vein wall associated with CICCs.
    The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority and was conducted at a large university hospital. The study included 12 patients with a short-term CICC who were subject to autopsies. Vessels with inserted catheters were macroscopically and microscopically examined.
    In total, seven female and five male patients with a median age of 70 (interquartile range 63-76) were included. With one exception, all patients received routine thromboprophylaxis throughout the period with CICC. Most inserted CICCs were 9.5 French (54%) and were inserted in the internal jugular vein (92%). The median time with CICC was seven days (interquartile range 1.8-20). At autopsy, thrombi were observed in all cases (100%), macroscopically and microscopically, attached to the distal portion of the CICC and/or the adjacent vessel wall. Inflammatory changes in the vessel walls were seen in all cases, and varying degrees of fibrosis were demonstrated in eight cases (67%).
    This autopsy study demonstrated that catheter-related thrombus formation with adjacent inflammatory and fibrotic vessel wall thickening was very common, despite a limited period of catheter use. The consequences of these findings are important, as thrombi may cause pulmonary embolism and possibly lead to catheter-related infections, and since inflammatory and fibrotic vessel wall thickening may evolve into chronic venous stenosis. Furthermore, the findings are a cause of concern, as CICCs are indispensable in modern healthcare and complications may be masked by the general disease that was the indication for CICC insertion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    为了确定透析患者中心静脉导管(CVC)的尖端位置,指南建议在导管插入后使用胸部X线照相术(CXR)确定,没有透视。然而,一些研究人员提出,经胸超声心动图(TTE)可以替代CXR,但这并没有被广泛采用。这项研究旨在确定上述两种方法中哪一种更适合定位CVC的尖端位置。这项前瞻性研究包括2021年3月至2022年12月在我们医院接受血液透析的160名患者。通过颈内静脉插入CVC后,我们使用经胸超声心动图和CXR来确定CVC的尖端,并将结果与计算机断层扫描(CT)的结果进行比较。在定位CVC尖端的TTE和CXR之间的比较中,我们获得了三个主要发现。(1)与CXR相比,TTE与误诊病例较少。(2)TTE提供更高的灵敏度(位置2的灵敏度相似),特异性,阳性/阴性预测值,和精度比CXR。(3)比较TTE和CXR的接收机工作特性曲线时,前者的曲线下面积(95%置信区间)较大.此外,我们在解剖学上发现:经食管经胸超声心动图显示的“高回声三角”相当于上腔静脉进入右心房。TTE比CXR更适合作为CVC头端定位的首次检查,因为它提高了诊断准确性并减少了X射线辐射损伤。
    To determine the tip position of the central venous catheter (CVC) in patients with dialysis, the guidelines recommend that it be determined using chest radiography (CXR) after catheterization, without fluoroscopy. However, some researchers have proposed that transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can replace CXR, but this has not been widely adopted. This study aimed to determine which of the two aforementioned methods is more suitable for locating the tip position of the CVC. This prospective study included 160 patients who underwent hemodialysis at our hospital from March 2021 to December 2022. After inserting the CVC through the internal jugular vein, we used transthoracic echocardiography and CXR to determine the tip of the CVC and compared the results with those of computed tomography (CT). In the comparison between TTE and CXR for locating the CVC tip, we obtained three main findings. (1) TTE was associated with fewer misdiagnosed cases than CXR. (2) TTE provided higher sensitivity (similar sensitivity in position 2), specificity, positive/negative predictive values, and accuracy than CXR. (3) When comparing the receiver operating characteristic curves of TTE and CXR, the area under the curve (95% confidence interval) for the former was larger. Additionally, we made anatomical discoveries: the \"hyperechoic triangle\" recognized by TTE was equivalent to the entrance of the superior vena cava into the right atrium shown by transesophageal transthoracic echocardiography. TTE is more suitable than CXR as the first examination for CVC tip localization, as it improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces X-ray radiation damage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:重症监护患者通常需要中心静脉插管(CVC)。我们假设实时双平面超声引导下的CVC将提高首次穿刺成功率并减少机械并发症。这项研究的目的是比较超声引导的CVC的单平面和实时双平面方法的成功率和安全性。
    方法:从2022年10月至2023年3月,256名需要CVC的重症患者被随机分为单平面(n=128)或双平面(n=128)超声引导插管组。成功率,穿刺次数,程序持续时间,导管插入相关并发症的发生率,并记录操作员的信心评分。
    结果:所有256名参与者(男性163[64%],女性93[36%];平均年龄69±19[范围13-104岁]),包括182名和74名接受颈内静脉插管(IJVC)和股静脉插管(FVC)的患者,分别。双平面组首次穿刺成功的发生率高于单平面组(91.6%vs.74.7%;相对风险(RR),1.226;95%置信区间(CI),1.069-1.405;IJVC的P=0.002,90.9%与68.3%;RR,1.331;95%CI,1.053-1.684;FVC的P=0.019)。双平面组还与较高的首次穿刺单程导管插入成功率(87.4%vs.69.0%和90.9%与68.3%),更少的非期望穿刺(1[1-1(1-2)]与1[1-2(1-4)]和1[1-1(1-3)]vs.1[1-2(1-4)]),更短的插管时间(205s[162-283(66-1,526)]vs.311s[243-401(136-1,223)]和228s[193-306(66-1,669)]vs.340s[246-499(130-944)]),和较少的直接并发症(10.5%vs.28.7%和9.1%与IJVC和FVC均为34.1%)(均P<0.05)。
    结论:对于危重患者,超声引导的CVC实时双平面成像比单平面方法具有优势。
    背景:该前瞻性RCT已在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2200064843)注册。2022年10月19日注册。
    Critical care patients often require central venous cannulation (CVC). We hypothesized that real-time biplane ultrasound-guided CVC would improve first-puncture success rate and reduce mechanical complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the success rate and safety of single-plane and real-time biplane approaches for ultrasound-guided CVC.
    From October 2022 to March 2023, 256 participants with critical illness requiring CVC were randomized to either the single-plane (n = 128) or biplane (n = 128) ultrasound-guided cannulation groups. The success rate, number of punctures, procedure duration, incidence of catheterization-related complications, and confidence score of operators were documented.
    The central vein was successfully cannulated in all 256 participants (163 [64%] man and 93 [36%] women; mean age 69 ± 19 [range 13-104 years]), including 182 and 74 who underwent internal jugular vein cannulation (IJVC) and femoral vein cannulation (FVC), respectively. The incidence of successful puncture on the first attempt was higher in the biplane group than that in the single-plane group (91.6% vs. 74.7%; relative risk (RR), 1.226; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.069-1.405; P = 0.002 for the IJVC and 90.9% vs. 68.3%; RR, 1.331; 95% CI, 1.053-1.684; P = 0.019 for the FVC). The biplane group was also associated with a higher first-puncture single-pass catheterization success rate (87.4% vs. 69.0% and 90.9% vs. 68.3%), fewer undesired punctures (1[1-1(1-2)] vs. 1[1-2(1-4)] and 1[1-1(1-3)] vs. 1[1-2(1-4)]), shorter cannulation time (205 s [162-283 (66-1,526)] vs. 311 s [243-401 (136-1,223)] and 228 s [193-306 (66-1,669)] vs. 340 s [246-499 (130-944)]), and fewer immediate complications (10.5% vs. 28.7% and 9.1% vs. 34.1%) for both IJVC and FVC (all P < 0.05).
    Real-time biplane imaging of ultrasound-guided CVCs offers advantages over the single-plane approach for critically ill patients.
    This prospective RCT was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200064843). Registered 19 October 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:在儿童中插入中心静脉导管后的最佳疼痛管理仍不清楚。
    目的:本研究旨在评估选择性锁骨上神经阻滞对接受hikman导管或化学瓶插入的儿科患者术后镇痛的影响。
    方法:将50名年龄3-18岁的患者随机分为两组,每组25人:一组接受超声引导的选择性锁骨上神经阻滞,0.1mL/kg的0.5%罗哌卡因(SSCNB组),另一组未接受神经阻滞(对照组)。主要结果是术后10至30分钟之间测量的Wong-Baker面部疼痛量表评分。次要结果包括术后1、3和24h的疼痛评分,阻滞相关并发症,在麻醉后监护室的停留时间,术后镇痛消耗,以及术后24h首次使用镇痛药的时间。
    结果:与对照组相比,SSCNB组在恢复室30分钟内的最严重疼痛评分明显较低(6[5-7]vs.3[2-4];中位数差异,-3;95%CI,-4至-1;p<.001)。SSCNB组术后1、3和24h的疼痛评分也明显降低。SSCNB组术后对阿片类和非阿片类镇痛药的需求显着降低(36.0%vs.0%;p=.002和44.0%与16.0%;平均差,-28%;95%CI,分别为-56至0.19;p=0.033),而其他次要结局两组间无显著差异.
    结论:超声引导下的SSCNB是治疗接受Hickman导管或化疗的儿童术后疼痛的有效方法,在手术后24小时内减少对镇痛药的需要。
    Optimal pain management after insertion of a central venous catheter in children remains unclear.
    This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a selective supraclavicular nerve block on postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing hickman catheter or chemoport insertion.
    Fifty patients aged 3-18 years scheduled for elective Hickman or chemoport insertion were randomized into two groups of 25 each: one group received an ultrasound-guided selective supraclavicular nerve block with 0.1 mL/kg of 0.5% ropivacaine (SSCNB group), and the other group did not receive a nerve block (control group). The primary outcome was the postoperative Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale score measured between 10 and 30 min after surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at 1, 3, and 24 h after the surgery, block-related complications, length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit, postoperative analgesic consumption, and time to first analgesic use 24 h after surgery.
    The worst pain score within 30 min in the recovery room was significantly lower in the SSCNB group compared to the control group (6 [5-7] vs. 3 [2-4]; median difference, -3; 95% CI, -4 to -1; p < .001). Pain scores at 1, 3, and 24 h after surgery were also significantly lower in the SSCNB group. The need for both opioid and non-opioid analgesics in the postoperative period was significantly lower in the SSCNB group (36.0% vs. 0%; p = .002 and 44.0% vs. 16.0%; mean difference, -28%; 95% CI, -56 to 0.19; p = .033, respectively), while other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups.
    Ultrasound-guided SSCNB is an effective method for managing postoperative pain in children undergoing Hickman catheter or chemoport insertion, reducing the need for analgesics within 24 h after surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确保安全的中心静脉导管尖端放置很重要。多种技术可用于估计锁骨下和颈内入路的导管插入长度。然而,确定腋路插入长度的方法尚未得到验证.这项可行性研究的目的是评估一种用于计算要插入的导管长度的简单方法,并评估其是否能准确预测正确的尖端放置。
    共评估了102例需要术前中心静脉置管的患者,其中60例成功进行了腋窝静脉(AxV)插管。使用以下公式计算插入长度:(2/3*AB)Y(A:胸片[CXR]上的锁骨长度,B:CXR上胸骨头和隆突之间的垂直距离,Y:在超声波上从皮肤到AxV的垂直距离)。术后CXR用于评估准确的尖端放置(隆突上方2厘米至下方0.5厘米)。该研究的主要结果是当插入的导管的长度由先前描述的公式预测时,根据导管尖端的正确位置,中心静脉导管(CVC)的成功放置率。
    在83.33%的病例中观察到最佳放置。在女性(P值=0.03)和较短的患者(P值=0.01)中观察到更高的准确率。Bland-Altman的情节描述了高度的一致性。
    使用使用CXR和超声的公式允许在83.33%的病例中将CVC尖端成功放置在所需位置。
    UNASSIGNED: Ensuring safe central venous catheter tip placement is important. Multiple techniques are available to estimate the length of catheter insertion for subclavian and internal jugular approaches. However, the methods to determine the length of insertion for the axillary route have not been validated. The purpose of this feasibility study was to evaluate a simple method for the calculation of catheter length to be inserted and assess whether it accurately predicts the correct tip placement.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 102 patients requiring preoperative central venous cannulation were evaluated, out of which 60 had successful axillary vein (AxV) cannulation. The length of insertion was calculated using the formula: (2/3* A + B) +Y (A: Clavicular length on chest radiograph [CXR], B: Vertical distance between the sternal head and carina on CXR, Y: Perpendicular distance from the skin to the AxV on ultrasound). A postoperative CXR was used to assess the accurate tip placement (2 cm above the carina to 0.5 cm below it). The primary outcome of the study was the rate of successful placement of the central venous catheter (CVC) in terms of the correct position of the tip of the catheter when the length of the catheter inserted was predicted by the formula described previously.
    UNASSIGNED: Optimal placement was observed in 83.33% of the cases. A higher rate of accuracy was seen in the females (P value = 0.03) and shorter patients (P value = 0.01). A Bland-Altman plot depicted a high degree of agreement.
    UNASSIGNED: Use of the formula using a CXR and ultrasound allowed P successful placement of the CVC tip at the desired location in 83.33% of the cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价超声造影(CEUS)对血液透析(HD)患者导管相关性右头臂静脉(RBV)和上腔静脉(SVC)阻塞的诊断价值。
    方法:从2021年6月1日至2022年12月31日,我们招募了80例使用或正在使用中心静脉导管作为血管通路的HD患者。我们评估了常规超声和CEUS对识别RBV和SVC阻塞的诊断功效,并将其与数字减影血管造影(DSA)进行了比较。在分层分析中,SVC分为上段和下段。总的来说,我们分析了240个中心静脉段,包括RBV。
    结果:在DSA可视化的RBV和SVC中,常规超声和超声造影可以显示67.92和100%的静脉段,分别;然而,RBV和SVC的长度和直径小于DSA记录的长度和直径(P<.001)。超声造影对导管相关性中心静脉阻塞的诊断效果优于常规超声,具有更高的灵敏度(83.95比41.98%),特异性(89.94vs53.46%),准确度(87.92vs49.58%),和F1得分(82.42vs49.64%)。CEUS与DSA表现出良好的一致性(κ=0.732)。在分层分析中,CEUS还显示出更高的灵敏度(83.93,83.33和84.62%,分别)与DSA(分别为κ=0.635、0.655和0.673)比常规超声检查更好地检测RBV以及SVC的上段和下段。
    结论:CEUS在诊断导管相关性RBV和SVC阻塞方面具有较高的敏感性和特异性。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for detecting catheter-related right brachiocephalic vein (RBV) and superior vena cava (SVC) obstructions in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD).
    METHODS: From June 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022, we enrolled 80 patients undergoing HD who had used or were using a central venous catheter as vascular access. We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of conventional ultrasonography and CEUS for identifying RBV and SVC obstructions and compared them with that of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). In the stratified analysis, the SVC was divided into the upper and lower segments. In total, we analyzed 240 central venous segments, including the RBV.
    RESULTS: Among the RBV and SVC visualized by DSA, conventional ultrasonography and CEUS could visualize 67.92 and 100% of the vein segments, respectively; however, the lengths and diameters of the RBV and SVC were smaller than those recorded with DSA (P < .001). The diagnostic efficacy of CEUS for detecting catheter-related central venous obstruction was better than that of conventional ultrasonography, with a higher sensitivity (83.95 vs 41.98%), specificity (89.94 vs 53.46%), accuracy (87.92 vs 49.58%), and F1 score (82.42 vs 49.64%). CEUS showed good agreement (κ = 0.732) with DSA. In the stratified analyses, CEUS also showed higher sensitivity (83.93, 83.33, and 84.62%, respectively) and better agreement with DSA (κ = 0.635, 0.655, and 0.673, respectively) than conventional ultrasonography for detecting the RBV and the upper and lower segments of the SVC.
    CONCLUSIONS: CEUS had high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing catheter-related RBV and SVC obstructions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号