METHODS: Forty-seven medical residents completed training on the DHRT and 59 residents received comprehensive training on the DHRT and the DHRT + . Each resident filled out a central line self-efficacy (CLSE) survey before and after undergoing training on the simulators. After simulation training, each resident did one full CVC on a manikin while being observed by an expert rater and graded on a US-IJCVC checklist.
RESULTS: For two items on the US-IJCVC checklist, \"verbalizing consent\" and \"aspirating blood through the catheter\", the DHRT + group performed significantly better than the DHRT only group. Both training groups showed significant improvements in self-efficacy from before to after training. However, type of training received was a significant predictor for CLSE items \"using the proper equipment in the proper order\", and \"securing the catheter with suture and applying dressing\" with the comprehensive training group that received additional training on the DHRT + showing higher post training self-efficacy.
CONCLUSIONS: The integration of comprehensive training into SBT has the potential to improve US-IJCVC education for both learning gains and self-efficacy.
方法:47名住院医师完成了DHRT培训,59名住院医师接受了DHRT和DHRT+综合培训。每位居民在接受模拟器培训之前和之后都填写了中心线自我效能感(CLSE)调查。经过模拟训练,每位居民对人体模型进行了一次完整的CVC,同时由专家评估员进行观察,并在US-IJCVC检查表上进行评分.
结果:对于US-IJCVC清单上的两项,“口头同意”和“通过导管吸血”,DHRT+组明显优于单纯DHRT组。两组训练前后的自我效能感均有显著改善。然而,接受的培训类型是CLSE项目“以适当的顺序使用适当的设备”的重要预测因子,以及接受DHRT+额外培训的综合训练组的“用缝线固定导管并应用敷料”,显示出更高的训练后自我效能。
结论:将综合培训整合到SBT中有可能改善US-IJCVC教育,以提高学习收益和自我效能感。