catheter related infection

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    未经证实:在重症监护患者人群中,中心管路并发症仍然是一个问题。预防或治疗并发症的各种干预措施,如中心线相关的血流感染和闭塞,一直是最近研究的重点。尽管替代导管锁定解决方案已被证明对其他患者人群有效,其对重症监护的适用性尚不清楚.由于重症监护患者的高敏锐度,不确定它们的中心线是否在足够长的时间内保持锁定,以便替代锁定解决方案提供任何效果。
    未经评估:这种单中心,prospective,观察性研究旨在收集有关重症监护患者平均中心线管腔处于锁定状态的时间长度的信息。还跟踪了各种中心线并发症的基线率。
    UNASSIGNED:这项研究的结果表明,大多数中心线将至少有一个管腔锁定,平均其原位时间为36.6%。
    UNASSIGNED:预计该时间长度为替代锁定解决方案提供了足够的暴露量,从而可能在该患者人群中的中心线并发症中发挥作用。这项研究的结果可用于规划未来的多中心,随机对照试验研究了新型中央线锁定解决方案预防危重患者中央线并发症的功效。
    UNASSIGNED: Central line complications remain a problem in critical care patient populations. Various interventions to prevent or treat complications, such as central line-associated bloodstream infection and occlusion, have been the focus of recent research. Although alternative catheter locking solutions have been shown to be effective in other patient populations, their applicability to the critical care setting remains unclear. Due to the high acuity of critical care patients, it is uncertain whether their central lines remain locked for a duration long enough for alternative locking solutions to provide any effect.
    UNASSIGNED: This single-centre, prospective, observational study aimed to gather information about the length of time central line lumens remain in a locked state in the average critical care patient. Baseline rates of various central line complications were also tracked.
    UNASSIGNED: Results of this study indicate that the majority of central lines will have at least one lumen locked for an average of 36.6% of their time in situ.
    UNASSIGNED: It is anticipated that this length of time provides enough exposure for alternative locking solutions to potentially make a difference in central line complications in this patient population. Results of this study can be used for planning future multi-centre, randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of novel central line locking solutions to prevent central line complications in critically ill patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    最近,外周插入的中央导管(PICC)在急性和重症监护环境中变得普遍和有效。烧伤患者需要特殊考虑,因为插入部位有限,烧伤伤口,高凝血,高感染率和其他。然而,烧伤患者中PICC的安全性尚未得到很好的阐明,也未形成相关方案.本研究旨在调查烧伤患者PICC的血栓形成和感染情况。
    这是一项单中心回顾性研究和系统评价。纳入2018年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间发生PICC的所有烧伤患者。对Medline的系统搜索,PubMed,EMBASE和WebofScience从成立到2021年6月4日,遵循PRISMA指南。上肢静脉血栓形成(UEVT)和中线相关血流感染(CLABSI)是主要结果。
    共纳入78例患者中的85例成功的PICC。大多数患者为男性(79.5%),成人(80.8%)和火焰伤害(74.4%)。平均TBSA为50.3%,76.9%的患者TBSA超过30%。大多数PICC通过基底静脉穿刺一次(60.0%)并在损伤后不到30天(80.0%)插入(70.6%)。全线天数为2195天,平均线天数为25.8±18.3天。插入后21.2±17.3天,有6个PICC并发UEVT(7.1%)。UEVT患者的菌血症发生率和插入时间明显高于无UEVT患者。一名患者出现CLABSI,CLABSI率为1.2%,每1000行天数为0.5。六个PICC有导管定植。没有发现显著的危险因素。对涉及293例患者和319例PICC的5篇文章进行了系统评价。在烧伤人群中,UEVT的总发生率为3.2%,CLABSI为6.9%。
    烧伤患者的PICCs具有可接受的UEVT和CLABSI发生率,且具有相对较长的行持续时间。需要针对烧伤患者的标准化PICC指南,以进一步提高PICC的可行性和安全性。
    Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are becoming common and effective in acute and critical care settings recently. Burn patients need special considerations because of restricted insertion sites, burn wounds, hyper coagulation, high infection rates and others. However, the safety of PICCs in burn patients are not well elucidated and no related protocol has been formed. This study aims to investigate the thrombosis and infections of PICCs in burn patients.
    This was a single center retrospective study and a systematic review. All the burn patients with PICCs between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 were included. A systematic search of Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science was performed from inception to 4 June 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. Upper extremity vein thrombosis (UEVT) and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) were the main outcome.
    A total of 85 successful PICCs in 78 patients were included. Most patients were male (79.5%), adults(80.8%) and injured by flame(74.4%). The mean TBSA was 50.3% and 76.9% of patients had TBSA more than 30%. Most PICCs were punctured once (60.0%) and inserted less than 30 days after injury (80.0%) through basilar vein (70.6%). The overall line days were 2195 days and the mean line days was 25.8 ± 18.3 days. Six PICCs were complicated by UEVT (7.1%) in 21.2 ± 17.3 days after insertion. Patients with UEVT had significantly higher rate of bacteremia and later insertions than those without UEVT. One patient developed CLABSI and the CLABSI rate was 1.2% and 0.5 per 1000 line days. Six PICCs had catheter colonization. No significant risk factors were identified. Five articles involving 293 patients and 319 PICCs were ultimately evaluated in systematic review. The overall incidence of UEVT was 3.2% and CLABSI was 6.9% in burn populations.
    PICCs in burn patients had acceptable incidence of UEVT and CLABSI with relative long line durations. A standardized PICC guideline for burn patients is required to further improve the feasibility and safety of PICCs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    BACKGROUND: Reliable long-term central venous access device (CVAD) is essential for the management of pediatric patients with cancer or chronic diseases. However, there is no general consensus for optimal catheter tip location and vessel insertion site in children.
    OBJECTIVE: This single center study analyzes the risk of complications associated with long-term upper body CVAD and evaluates them with respect to catheter tip location as well as vessel insertion site.
    METHODS: Pediatric patients who received long-term upper body CVAD from January 2008 through April 2017 and underwent radiographic documentation of the tip location were retrospectively included in the study. Data on demographics, catheter tip location on chest x-ray, intraoperative vessel insertion sites and postoperative complications were analyzed. Catheter tip location was categorized as \"high\" (above the right mainstem bronchus), \"medium\" (at the level of the bronchus), and \"low\" (below the right mainstem bronchus). Distance to the carina was measured as well.
    RESULTS: A total of 396 patients, 74.7% suffering from cancer were included in our study (mean age 6.3 ± 0.3 years). Complications occurred in about one fourth of all patients. Catheter-related blood stream infections (BSI) (n = 40, 36.4%) were most prevalent, but catheter tip position or vessel insertion site had no impact on the risk of infections. Dislodgement (n = 27, 24.6%) and occlusion (n = 11, 10.0%) were more frequent in \"high\" positioned catheter tips. While there was one patient who developed arrhythmia, no case of cardiac perforation, and in particular, no catheter-related death was recorded in our series. The vessel insertion site seemed to have no influence on the complication frequency of CAVDs.
    CONCLUSIONS: The catheter tip position seems to have an impact on the catheter-related complication profile in children. To avoid complications, we recommend avoiding a \"high\" localization of the catheter tip above the right main bronchus. \"Low\" catheter tip placement was associated with the lowest dislocation rate. Given the overall low complication rate, insertion and use of CVADs in children can generally be considered as safe.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Nosocomial infections increase mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. Central venous line colonization is a major risk factor for the development of such infections. In adults and children, antibiotic and antimycotic impregnated catheters have been demonstrated to reduce colonization. However, recently published data showed no significant difference in bloodstream infection in neonates when an impregnated catheter was used. We investigated the effect of impregnation of percutaneously inserted micro-catheters (PICC) on colonization in preterm and sick term infants in our unit.
    METHODS: Neonates were randomly assigned to receive either a standard (S-PICC; n = 34) or antibiotic and antimycotic impregnated (IP-PICC; n = 37) PICC. Catheters were placed and removed according to a standard procedure and subsequently examined by roll-out culture. The primary outcome was the rate of colonization defined as >15 colony-forming-units/ml. Additional outcomes were catheter associated or systemic infections.
    RESULTS: The rate of colonization was lower in neonates who received an IP-PICC as compared to S-PICC (5.6% vs. 12.1% respectively; p = 0.42). However, the difference was not significant. In IP-PICC vs S-PICC, catheter related local infection (CRI) although lower was not statistically significant (2.9% vs. 6.1%; p = 0.60). We observed no difference in catheter related systemic infection (CR-SI) (0% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.48). The neonates whose catheters were colonized were predominantly of a lower gestational age (median 254/7, p = 0.05) and males (100%, p = 0.01). In addition, the median colony count in the colonized IP-PICC catheters was lower as compared to S- PICC group (53 vs 250, p = 0.06).
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of antibiotic and antimycotic impregnated PICC-lines in neonates tended to decrease colonization rates in neonates in our centers but this difference was not significant. Lower gestational age and male sex are risk factors for catheter colonization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    导管的使用与许多并发症有关,并且是重症监护病房(ICU)中发病率和死亡率的医源性来源。正在研究的导管(CertofixProtect)旨在降低导管相关感染的风险。该临床试验将比较CertofixProtect与普通Certofix导管的安全性和效率。
    在这项多中心试验中,我们将成人ICU患者的双腔中心静脉置管(≥5ds)随机分为抗菌中心静脉导管(CVC)组或普通CVC组.我们计划在中国招募12-16个医疗中心。我们的主要目标是评估抗微生物CVC在减少导管相关性血流感染(CRBSI)方面的有效性。全因死亡率,导管定植,导管相关血栓形成等导管相关并发症。主要结果是CRBSI的发生率。
    四川大学华西医院伦理委员会已批准本研究的伦理批准(2015年1月27日)。结果将发表在同行评审的期刊上,并在会议上发表。
    NCT02645682。
    Catheter use is associated with many complications and is an iatrogenic source of morbidity and mortality in intensive care units (ICU). The catheter being studied (Certofix Protect) was developed to reduce the risk of catheter related infections. This clinical trial will compare the safety and efficiency of Certofix Protect with that of an ordinary Certofix catheter.
    In this multicentre trial, we will randomly assigned dual lumen central venous catheterisation (≥5 ds) in patients in the adult ICU to the antimicrobial central venous catheter (CVC) group or the ordinary CVC group. We plan to recruit 12-16 medical centres in China. Our main objective is to assess the effectiveness of antimicrobial CVCs in reducing catheter related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), all cause mortality, catheter colonisation, catheter related thrombosis and other catheter related complications. The primary outcome is the incidence of CRBSI.
    The ethics committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University has granted ethics approval for this study (27 January 2015). The results will be published in peer reviewed journals and presented at conferences.
    NCT02645682.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号