UNASSIGNED: Carcinoid syndrome (CS) commonly results from neuroendocrine tumors. While active substances are recognized as the main causes of the typical symptoms such as diarrhea and skin flush, the cause-and-effect relationship between gut microbiota abundance and CS remains unclear.
UNASSIGNED: The Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) related to gut microbiota abundance and CS were obtained from the GWAS summary data. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used to assess the causal relationship between gut microbiota abundance and CS. Additionally, the MR-Egger, Weighted Median model, and Weighted model were employed as supplementary approaches. The heterogeneity function of the TwoSampleMR package was utilized to assess whether SNPs exhibit heterogeneity. The Egger intercept and Presso test were used to assess whether SNPs exhibit pleiotropy. The Leave-One-Out test was employed to evaluate the sensitivity of SNPs. The Steiger test was utilized to examine whether SNPs have a reverse causal relationship. A bidirectional mendelian randomization (MR) study was conducted to elucidate the inferred cause-and-effect relationship between gut microbiota abundance and CS.
UNASSIGNED: The IVW results indicated a causal relationship between 6 gut microbiota taxa and CS. Among the 6 gut microbiota taxa, the genus Anaerofilum (IVW OR: 0.3606, 95%CI: 0.1554-0.8367, p-value: 0.0175) exhibited a protective effect against CS. On the other hand, the family Coriobacteriaceae (IVW OR: 3.4572, 95%CI: 1.0571-11.3066, p-value: 0.0402), the genus Enterorhabdus (IVW OR: 4.2496, 95%CI: 1.3314-13.5640, p-value: 0.0146), the genus Ruminiclostridium6 (IVW OR: 4.0116, 95%CI: 1.2711-12.6604, p-value: 0.0178), the genus Veillonella (IVW OR: 3.7023, 95%CI: 1.0155-13.4980, p-value: 0.0473) and genus Holdemanella (IVW OR: 2.2400, 95%CI: 1.0376-4.8358, p-value: 0.0400) demonstrated a detrimental effect on CS. The CS was not found to have a reverse causal relationship with the above 6 gut microbiota taxa.
UNASSIGNED: Six microbiota taxa were found to have a causal relationship with CS, and further randomized controlled trials are needed for verification.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) and related carcinoid syndrome (CaS) has increased markedly in recent decades, and women appear to be more at risk than men. As per other tumors, gender may be relevant in influencing the clinical and prognostic characteristics of NEN-associated CS. However, specific data on carcinoid syndrome (CaS) are still lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gender differences in clinical presentation and outcome of CaS.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 144 CaS patients from 20 Italian high-volume centers was conducted. Clinical presentation, tumor characteristics, therapies, and outcomes (progression-free survival, PFS, overall survival, OS) were correlated to gender.
RESULTS: Ninety (62.5%) CaS patients were male. There was no gender difference in the site of primary tumor, tumor grade and clinical stage, as well as in treatments. Men were more frequently smokers (37.2%) and alcohol drinkers (17.8%) than women (9.5%, p = 0.002, and 3.7%, p = 0.004, respectively). Concerning clinical presentation, women showed higher median number of symptoms (p = 0.0007), more frequent abdominal pain, tachycardia, and psychiatric disorders than men (53.3% vs 70.4%, p = 0.044; 6.7% vs 31.5%, p = 0.001; 50.9% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.003, respectively). Lymph node metastases at diagnosis were more frequent in men than in women (80% vs 64.8%; p = 0.04), but no differences in terms of PFS (p = 0.51) and OS (p = 0.64) were found between gender.
CONCLUSIONS: In this Italian cohort, CaS was slightly more frequent in males than females. Gender-related differences emerged in the clinical presentation of CaS, as well as gender-specific risk factors for CaS development. A gender-driven clinical management of these patients should be advisable.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the small intestine (SI-NENs) are one of the most commonly recognized gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is the primary cause of death in patients with the carcinoid syndrome (CS). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate possible factors impacting upon overall survival (OS) in subjects with both neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) G1/G2 of the small intestine (SI-NET) and CHD. Enrolled in our study of 275 patients with confirmed G1/G2 SI-NET, were 28 (10%) individuals with CHD. Overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox-Mantel test was used to determine how OS varied between groups. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to conduct univariate analyses of predictive factors for OS and estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Of the 28 individuals with confirmed carcinoid heart disease, 12 (43%) were found to have NET G1 and 16 (57%) were found to have NET G2. Univariate analysis revealed that subjects with CHD and without resection of the primary tumor had a lower OS. Our retrospective study observed that patients who presented with CHD and without resection of primary tumor had worse prognosis of survival. These results suggest that primary tumors may need to be removed when feasible, but further research is needed. However, no solid recommendations can be issued on the basis of our single retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Inadequately controlled symptoms incur a substantial burden on patients with neuroendocrine tumors and carcinoid syndrome (CS). The effectiveness of telotristat ethyl (TE) with a somatostatin analog for uncontrolled CS diarrhea has been demonstrated in clinical trials and observational studies. TELEPRO-II was a prospective observational study evaluating TE\'s effectiveness in clinical practice over the first 3 months of treatment.
METHODS: Patients initiating TE in 2018 participated in an optional nurse support program reporting CS symptoms during interviews at baseline and 1, 2, and 3 months after TE initiation. Eligible patients received TE for ≥3 months and reported symptom burden at baseline and ≥1 follow-up visit within the first 3 months. Daily bowel movement (BM) frequency and flushing episodes were reported as events/episodes per day. Stool consistency, nausea severity, urgency severity, and abdominal pain were reported on a severity scale (1-10). Symptom changes were evaluated using paired-sample t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Analysis of symptoms based on achievement of <30% or ≥30% reduction in daily BM frequency was conducted using a cumulative distribution function.
RESULTS: A total of 684/1603 (43%) patients were eligible for analysis. At baseline, patients reported a mean of 6.3 BM/day, nausea severity of 8.4/10 and stool urgency of 8.2/10. Significant improvements in all CS symptoms were observed after 3 months of TE. Mean daily BMs were reduced 64% after 3 months of TE (mean reduction [SD], -3.99 [3.8]; P<0.0001). Most patients (74%, n=503) reported ≥30% reduction in daily BM frequency; these patients also reported improvements in other symptoms (76-87%). Patients with <30% reduction in daily BMs also reported improvements in nausea severity (62%, n=24), daily flushing episodes (66%, n=98), abdominal pain (50%, n=60), urgency severity (38%, n=64), and stool consistency (24%, n=44).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with TE in a real-world setting experienced significant, clinically meaningful improvements in CS symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To report healthcare resource use and associated costs in controlled versus uncontrolled carcinoid syndrome (CS) in patients with neuroendocrine tumours.
METHODS: A cross-sectional, non-interventional multicentre study was conducted with retrospective data analysis. Resource use was compared between two patient groups: those with controlled CS (> 12 months with no uncontrolled CS episodes) and uncontrolled CS (< 12 months since last uncontrolled episode). Patients were matched for age, sex, and origin and grade of tumour. When no matching patients were available, data from deceased patients were used. Information on healthcare resource use came from review of medical records, patient history and physician reports. Working capacity was assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment General Health questionnaire.
RESULTS: Twenty-six university hospitals in Spain participated, between July 2017 and April 2018. 137 patients were enrolled; 104 were analysed (2 groups of 52). Patients with uncontrolled CS had 10 times more emergency department (ED) visits (mean 1.0 vs 0.10 visits; P = 0.0167), were more likely to have a hospital admission (40.4% vs 19.2%; P = 0.0116) and had longer hospital stays (mean 7.87 vs 2.10 days; P = 0.0178) than those with controlled CS. This corresponded to higher annual hospitalisation costs (mean €5511.59 vs €1457.22; P = 0.028) and ED costs (€161.25 vs €14.85; P = 0.0236). The mean annual total healthcare costs were 60.0% higher in patients with uncontrolled than controlled CS (P = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: This study quantifies higher health resource use, and higher hospitalisation and ED costs in patients with uncontrolled CS. Better control of CS may result 3in lower medical costs.

Although 24-hour urinary 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (24u5HIAA) is a key biomarker in midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), it may be inaccurate and inconvenient.
We compared the diagnostic performances of 24u5HIAA, overnight urinary 5HIAA (Ou5HIAA), and plasmatic 5HIAA (p5HIAA) in midgut NETs.
This prospective, multicenter study included 80 patients with metastatic midgut NETs and 17 control patients with irritable bowel syndrome. 24u5HIAA, Ou5HIAA, and p5HIAA were measured in urine and plasma collected on 2 consecutive days following a specific recommended diet. Reproducibility of the biomarkers was evaluated by the Spearman test. Diagnostic performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Correlations with the main clinical features and declared observance to the specific diet were assessed using AUROC and logistic regression models.
The reproducibility of 24u5HIAA, Ou5HIAA, and p5HIAA were excellent (ρ = 0.916; 0.897; 0.978, respectively, P < .001) with significant discrimination between patients and controls (AUROC = 0.795, P < .001; 0.757, P = .001; 0.717, P = .005, respectively). All 3 markers were correlated with the presence of carcinoid syndrome (AUROC = 0.702, P = .006; 0.701, P = .006; 0.697, P = .007, respectively), carcinoid heart disease (AUROC = 0.896; 0.887; 0.923, P < .001, respectively, P < .001), and liver metastatic involvement greater than 30% (AUROC = 0.827; 0.807; 0.849, P < .001, respectively, P < .001), independent from other traditional prognostic factors. Biomarker levels were similar between patients with optimal or suboptimal diet observance.
Ou5HIAA and p5HIAA could be used as more convenient alternatives to 24u5HIAA in patients with metastatic midgut NETs. Prospective long-term studies with repeated dosages are needed.

The background to this study was that factors associated with carcinoid heart disease (CHD) and its impacts on overall survival (OS) are scantly investigated in patients (pts) with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). In terms of materials and methods, a retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted of factors associated with CHD in advanced NET pts with carcinoid syndrome (CS) and/or elevated urinary 5-hidroxyindole acetic acid (u5HIAA). CHD was defined as at least moderate right valve alterations. The results were the following: Among the 139 subjects included, the majority had a midgut NET (54.2%), 81.3% had CS, and 93% received somatostatin analogues. In a median follow-up of 39 months, 48 (34.5%) pts developed CHD, with a higher frequency in pts treated in public (77.2%) versus private settings (22.9%). In a multivariate logistic regression, unknown primary or colorectal NETs (Odds Ratio (OR) 4.35; p = 0.002), at least 50% liver involvement (OR 3.45; p = 0.005), and being treated in public settings (OR 4.76; p = 0.001) were associated with CHD. In a Cox multivariate regression, bone metastases (Hazard Ratio {HR} 2.8; p = 0.031), CHD (HR 2.63; p = 0.038), and a resection of the primary tumor (HR 0.33; p = 0.026) influenced the risk of death. The conclusions were the following: The incidence of CHD was higher in pts with a high hepatic tumor burden and in those treated in a public system. Delayed diagnosis and limited access to effective therapies negatively affected the lives of NET patients.

Octreotide SC depot is a novel, ready-to-use formulation administered via a thin needle. In a phase 1 study in healthy volunteers, this formulation provided higher bioavailability of octreotide with faster onset and stronger suppression of IGF-1 in healthy volunteers versus long-acting intramuscular (IM) octreotide. This phase 2 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of octreotide SC depot in patients with acromegaly and functioning NETs, previously treated with octreotide IM.
Adult patients with acromegaly or functioning NETs treated for ≥ 2 months with octreotide IM [10/20/30 mg every 4 weeks (q4w)] received the last dose of octreotide IM treatment in study period 0 and were randomized 28 days later to receive octreotide SC depot 10 mg q2w, or 20 mg q4w for 3 months (period 1). The primary objective was to characterize the PK profile of octreotide SC depot after each injection vs PK for octreotide IM (period 0).
Twelve patients were randomized to receive octreotide SC depot 10 mg q2w (acromegaly n = 3; NET n = 1) or 20 mg q4w (acromegaly n = 4; NET n = 4). Plasma levels of octreotide were higher with octreotide SC depot as compared to octreotide IM. Adverse events were reported in 6 and 8 patients during period 0 and period 1, respectively; most common in period 1 were gastrointestinal disorders.
Octreotide SC depot provided higher exposure (AUC) than octreotide IM, maintained biochemical control in patients with acromegaly and symptom control in patients with functioning NETs, and was well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with octreotide IM. CLINICALTRIALS.
NCT02299089.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify healthcare resource use (HRU) and costs in relation to carcinoid syndrome (CS) and carcinoid heart disease (CHD) in a real-world setting, and to provide perspective on treatment patterns.
METHODS: Patient data and HRU were collected retrospectively from three Swedish healthcare registers. Adult patients diagnosed with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) grade 1 or 2 and CS who purchased somatostatin analogs (SSAs), and experienced controlled (defined by SSAs use) and uncontrolled (defined by SSAs dose escalation) CS for ≥8 months during the study period were included. Patients diagnosed with CHD from the date of the GEP-NET diagnosis were included in the CHD study group.
RESULTS: Overall, total HRU cost increased with uncontrolled CS and CHD. Total resource cost was 15,500€/patient during controlled CS (8 months), rising to 21,700€/patient during uncontrolled CS (8 months), representing an increase of ∼40% (6200€/patient). Costs/patient were driven mainly by SSA use, tumor-related medical interventions and examinations. The total mean cost/year of disease was 1100€/patient without CHD, compared to 4600€/patient with CHD, a difference of 3500€/patient. Excluding SSA cost burden, the main drivers of increased cost in CHD patients were surgical interventions and echocardiography.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the treatment patterns and burden of uncontrolled CS symptoms and CHD using Swedish national register data. Increases in medical interventions and examinations HRU and increased SSA use suggest that SSA dose escalation alone may not effectively control the symptoms associated with uncontrolled CS, highlighting an unmet treatment need in this patient group.

Background: Development of carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is the major negative prognostic factor in patients with the carcinoid syndrome. The only effective treatment is valve replacement. However, the selection of candidates and determination of optimal timing remain unclear. Considerable variability in local screening and treatment strategies exist. Methods: In this single-centre study, we retrospectively analysed the diagnostic process and outcome of all CHD patients who underwent valve surgery between 2000 and 2016. We propose a new CHD screening and management algorithm. Results: All patients (n = 15), mean age 64 ± 7, underwent tricuspid valve surgery. In 14 of them (93%) an additional valve was replaced. In only a minority of patients (27%) CHD diagnosis was established by screening. Survival after 1, 3, 12 and 24 months was 93%, 80%, 53% and 33%, respectively. Causes of death included infections and critical illness immediately postoperatively, and tumour progression and right heart failure in the longer term. There was a trend (p = .099) towards better preoperative right ventricular function in the patients who survived more than 12 months postoperatively (TAPSE 20 mm ± 4) compared to those who died between 3 to 12 months after surgery (TAPSE 16 mm ± 1). The former group had a shorter mean interval from diagnosis of the carcinoid syndrome to cardiac diagnosis than the latter (13 vs. 105 months, p = .014). Conclusion: Mortality after valve replacement for CHD remains high. A probably underestimated cause is late referral for cardiac surgery. We propose a systematic, multidisciplinary approach to all carcinoid syndrome patients.