Plexiform neurofibroma (PF) is a rare benign variant belonging to a subtype of neurofibromatosis type 1 that forms bulging or deforming masses arising from the peripheral nerve sheath. These masses involve surrounding connective tissue or dermal layers, leading to multiple cutaneous changes and certain characteristic appearances. It is these appearances that aid in the diagnosis of PF. We have encountered two distinct patients diagnosed with this disorder. While one patient was clinically and pathologically confirmed for PF, the other had no characteristic cutaneous changes. The diagnosis was made with postoperative histopathology and confirmed with an immunohistochemical examination. There are various modalities in the management of PFs, with surgery being a mainstay in the treatment of disfiguring large PFs, especially in resource-restrained settings. In view of high recurrence rates, postoperative clinical follow-up is a must. This paper describes these patients\' typical and atypical clinical presentation and subsequent management.

OBJECTIVE: Pathogenic LZTR1 variants cause schwannomatosis and dominant/recessive Noonan syndrome (NS). We aim to establish an association between heterozygous loss-of-function (LoF) LZTR1 alleles and isolated multiple café-au-lait macules (CaLMs).
METHODS: 849 unrelated participants with multiple CaLMs, lacking pathogenic/likely pathogenic NF1 and SPRED1 variants, underwent RASopathy gene panel sequencing. Data on 125 individuals with heterozygous LZTR1 variants were collected for characterizing their clinical features and the associated molecular spectrum. In vitro functional assessment was performed on a representative panel of missense variants and small in-frame deletions.
RESULTS: Analysis revealed heterozygous LZTR1 variants in 6.0% (51/849) of participants, exceeding the general population prevalence. LZTR1-related CaLMs varied in number, displayed sharp or irregular borders, and were generally isolated, but occasionally associated with features recurring in RASopathies. In two families, CaLMs and schwannomas co-occurred. The molecular spectrum mainly consisted of truncating variants, indicating LoF. These variants substantially overlapped with those occurring in schwannomatosis and recessive NS. Functional characterization showed accelerated protein degradation or mislocalization, and failure to downregulate MAPK signaling.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings expand the phenotypic variability associated with LZTR1 variants, which, in addition to conferring susceptibility to schwannomatosis and causing dominant and recessive NS, occur in individuals with isolated multiple CaLMs.

BACKGROUND: Piebaldism is a rare, autosomal dominant, and congenital pigmentary disorder characterized by stable depigmentation of the skin and white forelock. Mutations in KIT or SLUG genes result in piebaldism. Most individuals with piebaldism have a family history of the disorder.
METHODS: In this paper, we report a case of piebaldism with café-au-lait macules resulting from a novel mutation of KIT gene c.1982C > T (p.Thr661Ile) in a three-generation Chinese family. The whole-exome sequencing, mitochondrial gene 3000X, and bioinformatics tools were used to identify the mutation in this new-found pedigree. In addition, we searched the databases of \"Punmed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, CMJD, WANFANG MED ONLINE\", reviewed 88 cases of piebaldism caused by KIT gene mutation, and summarized the relationship between clinical phenotype and genotype of piebaldism through logistic regression and other statistical methods.
RESULTS: The proband and her affected mother carried a heterozygous c.1982C > T missense mutation (p.Thr661Ile) on KIT gene. Bioinformatics analysis hinted that it had potential pathogenicity. The data showed that piebaldism patients with cafè-au-lait macules had KIT mutations almost located in the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain and were mostly related to the severe clinical phenotype of piebaldism.
CONCLUSIONS: The new heterozygous c.1982C > T missense mutation on KIT caused piebaldism with café-au-lait macules in this Chinese family. This study provides a new reference index for clinicians to judge the severity of clinical phenotypes of piebaldism, broadens the understanding of the correlation between clinical phenotypes and genotypes of piebaldism, and provides reference of genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis for affected families.

UNASSIGNED: Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) is a rare autosomal recessive disease carrying an increased risk of cancers (paediatric tumours of central nervous system, haematolymphoid malignancies along with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer(s), which are usually seen in the second and third decades), leading to syndromic presentation. Causal mutations are detected in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, including MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 that are also known for their established role in Lynch syndrome. We describe a case of CMMRD with an earlier (first decade of life) presentation of mediastinal acute lymphoblastic lymphoma and colorectal malignancy.
UNASSIGNED: A 5-year-old boy presented with respiratory complaints, bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy, multiple café-au-lait macules (CALMs) on the lower back and history of parental consanguinity with the death of three sisters due to brain tumour within 6 months of diagnosis. Computerised tomographic scan chest revealed a huge mediastinal mass. The patient underwent a trucut biopsy of the mass. The results were significant for a pre-T-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma. Suspicion of CMMRD was raised based on a combination of factors described above. A panel of MMR proteins was applied on the biopsy tissue that revealed loss of nuclear expression of MLH1 and PMS2 immunostaining in tumour cells with positive external controls. While on maintenance therapy for lymphoma, about a year later, the patient developed subacute intestinal obstruction due to a stenosing polypoidal circumferential tumour in the mid-sigmoid colon found on flexible sigmoidoscopy that was followed by endoscopic biopsies and insertion of a fully covered self-expanding metallic adult biliary stent with a diameter of 10 mm and length of 6 cm leading to immediate relief of obstruction. Biopsies revealed adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. Metastatic tumour deposits were seen in the omentum, anterior abdominal wall and the left peritoneal wall.
UNASSIGNED: Earlier (first decade) presentation of GI malignancy warrants that an earlier screening through radiological scans for any possible tumours and MMR protein expression analysis (loss in tumour plus normal non-tumour cells) are essential in patients having CALMs and family history of paediatric tumours.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a neurocutaneous condition with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. This congenital disease is characterized by a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations and degree of severity. This case report describes a female patient in her early 20s who presented with a complaint of lumbosciatica-like pain evolving for several months. The condition initially escaped the attention of clinicians until a lumbar computed tomography scan and spinal magnetic resonance imaging were performed. The patient was then transferred to the general surgery department, where a clinical diagnosis of NF1 was established. The clinical manifestations were specific for this disease, including café-au-lait macules, plexiform neurofibroma, and a history of neurofibromatosis in her mother. The patient underwent surgical resection of the neurofibroma, which resulted in a favorable outcome. However, 2 years later, a new mass attached to the second lumbar spinal nerve was revealed by a follow-up computed tomography scan. Long-term and close follow-up of NF1 is required because of the high risk of malignancy and recurrence in NF1 patients.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is usually delayed in children without a family history. We aimed to define the prevalence and characteristics of prevalent skin manifestations in NF1 compared to the general population, which continue to be excluded from the diagnostic criteria for NF1.
METHODS: Case-control study, matched by age groups, in which 108 patients with a diagnosis of NF1 and 137 healthy controls were included.
RESULTS: The prevalence of nevus anemicus (NA) (P<.001) and juvenile xanthogranulomas (JXG) (P<.001) was significantly higher in the population affected by NF1 than in the control population. A specificity of 99.27% (confidence interval): 95.4-99.96%] and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 98.80% [92.54-99.94%] were estimated for NA and a specificity of 99.27% [95.4-99.96%] and a PPV of 92.86% [64.17-99.63%] for JXG in the diagnosis of NF1 in children who present 6 or more Café-au-lait macules. Statistically significant differences were also evidenced in the distribution by phototypes (P=.025) and in relation to generalized itching with no other cause (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: NA and JXG are relevant clinical findings for the diagnosis of NF1, especially during the first years of life. We consider that its inclusion among the diagnostic criteria of the disease should be evaluated.

BACKGROUND: Conventional high fluence Q-switched (HFQS) Alexandrite 755-nm are widely used in clinical café-au-lait macules (CALMs) treatment. There have been recent concerns regarding the efficacy and safety of low fluence Q-switched (LFQS) Nd: YAG 1064-nm lasers.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the conventional HFQS and LFQS laser in the treatment of CALMs.
METHODS: Within 3 months, 20 patients underwent prospective self-controlled split-lesion treatments with HFQS once or twice depending on the recovery rate, and with LFQS six times biweekly. Then the more effective laser was selected for continued treatments. Efficacy outcomes were evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS) biweekly during the comparative trail. Recovery process, side effects and recurrence were recorded during the trial and follow-up visit. Patient and physician preferences for laser selection were also recorded.
RESULTS: The average VAS scores of areas treated with HFQS and LFQS were 2.92 ± 0.86 and 2.93 ± 1.13, respectively (p > 0.05). The most significant efficacy change of LFQS was after the fourth laser treatment (VAS score: 1.82-2.37, p < 0.001). 11 lesions treated with LFQS and 7 with HFQS achieved an optimal treatment response (3.67 ≤ VAS ≤ 4). Three patients relapsed on one side (one on LFQS, two on HFQS) and five on both sides. Adverse effects included temporary hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, uneven pigmentation, and mottled hypopigmentation. Doctors thought 80% of patients were suitable for LFQS. 70% of patients preferred LFQS posttreatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy difference between the LFQS 1064-nm laser and HFQS 755-nm laser in treating CALMs in a 3-month comparative trial was statistically insignificant. LFQS is preferred by doctors and patients and is likely to help more patients achieve treatment efficacy than the HFQS within a short time, with fewer temporary adverse reactions, and a more even pigmentation. But it can cause mottled hypopigmentation. The LFQS had obvious lesion clearance after the fourth treatment.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is usually delayed in children without a family history. We aimed to define the prevalence and characteristics of prevalent skin manifestations in NF1 compared to the general population, which continue to be excluded from the diagnostic criteria for NF1.
METHODS: Case-control study, matched by age groups, in which 108 patients with a diagnosis of NF1 and 137 healthy controls were included.
RESULTS: The prevalence of nevus anemicus (NA) (p<0.001) and juvenile xanthogranulomas (JXG) (p<0.001) was significantly higher in the population affected by NF1 than in the control population. A specificity of 99.27% [confidence interval (CI): 95.4-99.96%] and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 98.80% [92.54-99.94%] were estimated for NA and a specificity of 99.27% [95.4-99.96%] and a PPV of 92.86% [64.17-99.63%] for JXG in the diagnosis of NF1 in children who present 6 or more Café-au-lait macules. Statistically significant differences were also evidenced in the distribution by phototypes (p 0.025) and in relation to generalized itching with no other cause (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: NA and JXG are relevant clinical findings for the diagnosis of NF1, especially during the first years of life. We consider that its inclusion among the diagnostic criteria of the disease should be evaluated.

To evaluate sociodemographic and medical predictors of patient return to a neurofibromatosis subspecialty clinic.
Data were collected from the Washington University Neurofibromatosis Clinical Program electronic medical records. A total of 713 subjects with initial visits to the Washington University Neurofibromatosis Clinical Program between July 1, 2005 and December 18, 2020 were included. Variables collected included sex, race, ethnicity, age, date of first visit, place of residence, diagnosis, insurance payer, physician recommendation for return, and subject return. Return rates for each demographic group were calculated. Bivariate analyses were performed to inform variable inclusion in the model, and a binary logistic regression model was calculated to predict subject return.
The overall return rate was 76%. The binary logistic regression model was statistically significant (χ29 = 131.094; P < .001) and showed that subjects who self-identified as Black and/or African American, presented with or received a diagnosis of café-au-lait macules at their initial visit, were from a rural area, were older, or who lived farther from the Washington University Neurofibromatosis Clinical Program were less likely to return to clinic.
These findings support the implementation of tailored communication and monitoring interventions to improve the care for children with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Disorders of hyperpigmentation are common and, depending on the extent and location of involvement, can affect the quality of life and pose a significant psychologic burden for patients. Given the similarities in presentation of the various causes of hyperpigmentation, it is often difficult to elucidate the etiology of these conditions, which is important to guide management. Furthermore, certain disorders, such as lichen planus pigmentosus and ashy dermatosis, have similar clinical and/or histologic presentations, and their classification as distinct entities has been debated upon, leading to additional confusion. In this review, the authors selected commonly encountered disorders of hyperpigmentation of the skin, subdivided into epidermal, dermal, or mixed epidermal-dermal disorders based on the location of pigment deposition, along with disorders of hyperpigmentation of the mucosa and nails. Melanocytic nevi, genetic disorders, and systemic causes of hyperpigmentation were largely excluded and considered to be outside the scope of this review. We discussed the pathogenesis of hyperpigmentation as well as the clinical and histologic features of these conditions, along with challenges encountered in their diagnosis and classification. The second article in this 2-part continuing medical education series focuses on the medical and procedural treatments of hyperpigmentation.