Traumatic brain injury leads to glutamate release, which overstimulates N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, leading to neurotoxicity and cytotoxic edema. NMDA receptor antagonists may offer neuroprotection by blocking this pathway. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of NMDA receptor antagonists for traumatic brain injury-induced brain edema in rodent models. This systematic review followed Cochrane Handbook guidelines and registered its protocol in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023440934). Here, we included controlled rodent animal models comparing NMDA antagonist use with a placebo treatment. Outcome measures included the reduction of cerebral edema, Neurobehavioral Severity Scale, and adverse effects. The search strategy used Medical Subject Headings terms related to traumatic brain injury and NMDA receptor antagonists. The Collaborative Approach to Meta Analysis and Review of Animal Experimental Studies (CAMARADES) checklist and Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation\'s (SYRCLE\'s) tools were used to measure the quality and bias of included studies. The synthesis of results was presented in a meta-analysis of standard mean difference. Sixteen studies were included, with the predominant drugs being ifenprodil, MK-801, magnesium, and HU-211. The subjects consisted of Sprague-Dawley or Sabra rats. The analysis showed a significant reduction in brain edema with NMDA antagonist treatment (Standardized mean difference [SMD] - 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.59 to - 0.74, p < 0.01), despite high heterogeneity (I2 = 72%). Neurobehavioral Severity Scale also significantly improved (mean difference - 3.32, 95% CI - 4.36 to - 2.28, p < 0.01) in animals receiving NMDA antagonists. Administration within 1 h after injury showed a modest enhancement in reducing brain edema compared with the baseline (SMD - 1.23, 95% CI - 1.69 to - 0.77, p < 0.01). Studies met standards for animal welfare and model appropriateness. Although baseline comparability and selective reporting bias were generally addressed, key biases such as randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding were often unreported. Overall, NMDA antagonists exhibit promising efficacy in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. Notably, our systematic review consistently demonstrated a significant reduction in brain edema with compounds including HU-211 and NPS 150.

BACKGROUND: Intraventricular meningioma (IVM) is a rare subtype of intracranial meningioma, accounting for 9.8 to 14% of all intraventricular tumors. Currently, there is no clear consensus on which patients with IVM should receive conservative treatment, surgery, or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This research aims to analyze the outcomes, including survival and recurrence rates of patients who undergo SRS for IVM as a primary or adjuvant treatment.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase till June 5th 2023. Screening and data extraction were performed by two independent authors. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the tumor control proportion of IVM cases treated with SRS. Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was performed for the progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients in the follow-up time. All analyses were performed using the R programming language.
RESULTS: Out of the overall 132 records, 14 were included in our study, of which only 7 had enough data for the meta-analysis. The tumor control proportion was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.69-0.98) in patients who underwent SRS for primary IVM. The overall tumor control in both primary and adjuvant cases was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.34-0.99). the heterogeneity was not significant in both meta-analyses (P = 0.73 and P = 0.92, respectively). Post-SRS perifocal edema occurred in 16 out of 71 cases (0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.56), with no significant heterogeneity (P = 0.32). IPD meta-analysis showed a PFS of 94.70% in a 2-year follow-up. Log-rank test showed better PFS in primary SRS compared to adjuvant SRS (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, patients with IVM can achieve high rates of tumor control with a low risk of complications when treated with SRS, regardless of whether they have received prior treatment. Although SRS could be a promising first-line treatment option for asymptomatic IVM, its efficacy in symptomatic patients and its comparison with resection require further investigation.

This meta-analysis aimed to describe the efficacy of bumetanide in improving infarct volume, brain edema, and behavioral outcomes in animal models of cerebral ischemia. Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to February 2024 (INPLASY:202430023). Data on the animal species, stroke model, drug dose, time of treatment, method of administration, study quality, and outcomes were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis. The combined standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random- or fixed-effects models. Thirteen eligible studies involving >200 animals fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analyses demonstrated that bumetanide treatment significantly reduced cerebral infarct volume (SMD: -0.42; 95% CI: -0.75, -0.09; p < 0.01; n = 186 animals) and consistently relieved brain edema (SMD: -1.39; 95% CI: -2.06, -0.72; p < 0.01; n = 64 animals). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that bumetanide treatment reduced infarct volume in transient but not permanent cerebral ischemia models. When administered after the stroke, it was more effective than treatment initiation before the stroke. Eight studies assessed the effect of bumetanide on behavioral function and the results showed that bumetanide treatment significantly improved neurobehavioral deficits (SMD: -2.35; 95% CI: -2.72, -1.97; p < 0.01; n = 250 animals). We conclude that bumetanide appears to be effective in reducing infarct volume and brain edema and improving behavioral recovery in animal models of cerebral ischemia. This mechanism needs to be confirmed through further investigation.

In human stroke, brain swelling is an important predictor of neurological outcome and mortality, yet treatments to reduce or prevent brain swelling are extremely limited, due in part to an inadequate understanding of mechanisms. In preclinical studies on cerebroprotection in animal models of stroke, historically, the focus has been on reducing infarct size, and in most studies, a reduction in infarct size has been associated with a corresponding reduction in brain swelling. Unfortunately, such findings on brain swelling have little translational value for treating brain swelling in patients with stroke. This is because, in humans, brain swelling usually becomes evident, either symptomatically or radiologically, days after the infarct size has stabilized, requiring that the prevention or treatment of brain swelling target mechanism(s) that are independent of a reduction in infarct size. In this problematizing review, we highlight the often-neglected concept that brain edema and brain swelling are not simply secondary, correlative phenomena of stroke but distinct pathological entities with unique molecular and cellular mechanisms that are worthy of direct targeting. We outline the advances in approaches for the study of brain swelling that are independent of a reduction in infarct size. Although straightforward, the approaches reviewed in this study have important translational relevance for identifying novel treatment targets for post-ischemic brain swelling.

The leukodystrophy megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy with subcortical cysts (MLC) is characterized by infantile-onset macrocephaly and chronic edema of the brain white matter. With delayed onset, patients typically experience motor problems, epilepsy and slow cognitive decline. No treatment is available. Classic MLC is caused by bi-allelic recessive pathogenic variants in MLC1 or GLIALCAM (also called HEPACAM). Heterozygous dominant pathogenic variants in GLIALCAM lead to remitting MLC, where patients show a similar phenotype in early life, followed by normalization of white matter edema and no clinical regression. Rare patients with heterozygous dominant variants in GPRC5B and classic MLC were recently described. In addition, two siblings with bi-allelic recessive variants in AQP4 and remitting MLC have been identified. The last systematic overview of variants linked to MLC dates back to 2006. We provide an updated overview of published and novel variants. We report on genetic variants from 508 patients with MLC as confirmed by MRI diagnosis (258 from our database and 250 extracted from 64 published reports). We describe 151 unique MLC1 variants, 29 GLIALCAM variants, 2 GPRC5B variants and 1 AQP4 variant observed in these MLC patients. We include experiments confirming pathogenicity for some variants, discuss particularly notable variants, and provide an overview of recent scientific and clinical insight in the pathophysiology of MLC.

Ischemic stroke significantly contributes to high mortality and disability rates. Cerebral edema is a common consequence of ischemic stroke and can lead to aggravation or even death. Current treatment strategies are limited to decompressive craniectomy and the intravascular administration of hypertonic drugs, which have significant side effects. Acetazolamide (ACZ) plays a therapeutic role in cerebral edema by inhibiting aquaporin-4 (AQP-4) and improving collateral circulation. This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis and systematic review of ACZ therapy for ischemic stroke and evaluate its efficacy in animal models.
We searched Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database until April 2023 for studies on ACZ in ischemic animal models. The quality of the animal trials was assessed using the Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Stroke.
After screening 376 articles, only 5 studies were included. We found that ACZ reduced brain edema in cerebral ischemia 24 hours after onset (standard mean difference, -2.00; 95% confidence interval, -3.57 to -0.43, P = 0.01). ACZ also inhibited AQP-4 expression 24 hours after onset (standard mean difference-1.46; 95% confidence interval, -2.01 to -0.91, P < 0.001). Brain edema and AQP-4 expression also showed a declining trend on the third day after onset, although there were not enough data to support this. The effect of ACZ on brain ischemia in animals\' neurological function is uncertain because of the limited research data.
ACZ inhibited AQP-4 and alleviated brain edema after ischemic stroke in the early stages but seemingly could not improve the neurological function.

UNASSIGNED: Chiropractic cervical spinal manipulations have several complications and can result in vascular injury, including traumatic dissection of the vertebral arteries. A 43-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency department after performing a self-chiropractic spinal manipulation. She experienced headache and vomiting and was unresponsive with severe hypertension at the time of hospital admission. Clinical computerized tomography angiography showed narrowing of the right vertebral artery but was inconclusive for dissection or thrombosis. At autopsy, subacute dissection of the right vertebral artery was identified along with cerebral edema and herniation. A small peripheral pulmonary thromboembolism in the right lung was also seen. Neuropathology consultation confirmed the presence of diffuse cerebral edema and acute hypoxic-ischemic changes, with multifocal acute subarachnoid and intraparenchymal hemorrhage of the brain and spinal cord. This case presents a unique circumstance of a fatal vertebral artery dissection after self-chiropractic manipulation that, to the best of our knowledge, has not been previously described in the medical literature.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a clinical and radiological entity characterized by nonspecific symptomatology (eg, headache, visual disturbances, encephalopathy, and seizures) and classically cortical and subcortical vasogenic edema predominantly affecting the parietooccipital region. PRES etiologies are usually dichotomized into toxic PRES (eg, antineoplastic drugs, illicit drugs) and clinical condition-associated PRES (eg, acute hypertension, dysimmune disorders). Although the pathophysiology of PRES remains elusive, 2 main pathogenic hypotheses have been suggested: cerebral hyperperfusion due to acute hypertension and cerebral hypoperfusion related to endothelial dysfunction. Research into the pathogenesis of PRES has emerged through the development of animal models in the last decade. The motivation for developing a suitable PRES model is 2-fold: to fill in knowledge gaps of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved, and to open new perspectives for clinical assessment of pharmacological targets to improve therapeutic management of PRES. All current models of PRES have a hypertensive background, on which other triggers (acute hypertension, inflammatory, drug toxicity) have been added to address specific facets of PRES (eg, seizures). The initial model consisted in inducing a reduced uterine perfusion pressure that mimics preeclampsia, a leading cause of PRES. More recently, a model of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats on high-salt diet, originally developed for hypertensive small vessel disease and vascular cognitive impairment, has been studied in PRES. This review aims to discuss, depending on the research objective, the benefits and limitations of current experimental approaches and thus to define the desirable characteristics for studying the pathophysiology of PRES and developing new therapies.

暂无摘要。

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a common autoimmune disease with various symptoms involving multiple organs. Neuropsychological manifestations are various and generally serious. Leukoencephalopathy is particularly rare but life-threatening in patients with SLE. Results: Here, we describe the case of a young woman who developed a subacute onset intracranial hypertension, papillar edema on fundus examination, diffuse cerebral edema on brain CT scan, and diffuse leukoencephalopathy on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The immunological workup was positive for antinuclear antibodies, anti-DNA and anti-extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) antibodies. She was ultimately diagnosed with SLE and experienced significant improvement after treatment with high dose of corticosteroids, acetazolamide, and immunosuppressant. We additionally review the previously reported cases of SLE with diffuse cerebral edema and leukoencephalopathy with a focus on the possible pathophysiological mechanisms of such association. Conclusions: We highlight, through this case report and the literature review, the importance of considering SLE in patients with cerebral edema and diffuse leukoencephalopathy and treating it aggressively.