暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

In the present narrative review, we discuss the characteristics and differences between the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guidelines in terms on their recommendations/suggestions for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii infections.
Treatment of severe infections caused by nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB) is posing both novel hopes and novel challenges to physicians worldwide, and both the IDSA and the ESCMID have recently updated/released their guidelines or guidance documents, based on different philosophies and providing recommendations for the treatment of NF-GNB infections. In order to correctly exploit recent advances in the treatment of such infections, IDSA and ESCMID approaches should be viewed as complementary and evolving, and should not preclude further revision based on accumulating evidence on the use of novel β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations.
A joint consideration of both philosophies should leave the door opened for the wise use of novel agents, ultimately building precious experience on their use that could favorably influence future guidelines revisions.

Intravenous β-lactam antibiotics remain a cornerstone in the management of bacterial infections due to their broad spectrum of activity and excellent tolerability. β-lactams are well established to display time-dependent bactericidal activity, where reductions in bacterial burden are directly associated with the time that free drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen during the dosing interval. In an effort to take advantage of these bactericidal characteristics, prolonged (extended and continuous) infusions (PIs) can be applied during the administration of intravenous β-lactams to increase time above the MIC. PI dosing regimens have been implemented worldwide, but implementation is inconsistent. We report consensus therapeutic recommendations for the use of PI β-lactams developed by an expert international panel with representation from clinical pharmacy and medicine. This consensus guideline provides recommendations regarding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets, therapeutic drug-monitoring considerations, and the use of PI β-lactam therapy in the following patient populations: severely ill and nonseverely ill adult patients, pediatric patients, and obese patients. These recommendations provide the first consensus guidance for the use of β-lactam therapy administered as PIs and have been reviewed and endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC), the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF), the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP).

Intravenous β-lactam antibiotics remain a cornerstone in the management of bacterial infections due to their broad spectrum of activity and excellent tolerability. β-lactams are well established to display time-dependent bactericidal activity, where reductions in bacterial burden are directly associated with the time that free drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen during the dosing interval. In an effort to take advantage of these bactericidal characteristics, prolonged (extended and continuous) infusions (PI) can be applied during the administration of intravenous β-lactams to increase time above the MIC. PI dosing regimens have been implemented worldwide, but implementation is inconsistent. We report consensus therapeutic recommendations for the use of β-lactam PI developed by an expert international panel with representation from clinical pharmacy and medicine. This consensus guideline provides recommendations regarding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets, therapeutic drug monitoring considerations, and the use of PI β-lactam therapy in the following patient populations: severely ill and nonseverely ill adult patients, pediatric patients, and obese patients. These recommendations provide the first consensus guidance for the use of β-lactam therapy administered as PIs and have been reviewed and endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC), the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF), the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP).

A guideline identifying when inpatients with penicillin or cephalosporin antibiotic allergy labels (PCAAL) can receive β-lactam antibiotics increased β-lactam receipt at a large northeastern US health care system.
To report outcomes of implementing a similar guideline and electronic order set (OS) at an independent academic health care system.
Penicillin/cephalosporin receipt (percentage of inpatients receiving full doses) and alternative antibiotic use (days of therapy per 1000 patient-days [DOT/1000PD]) were compared over 3 periods before (February 1, 2017, to January 31, 2018) and after guideline implementation (February 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019), and after OS implementation (February 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020) among inpatients with PCAAL admitted on medical services with access to guideline/OS and education (Medical-PCAAL, n = 8721), surgical services with access to guideline/OS without education (Surgical-PCAAL, n = 5069), and obstetrics/gynecology services without interventions (Ob/Gyn-PCAAL, n = 798) and inpatients without PCAAL admitted on the same services (Medical-No-PCAAL, n = 50,840; Surgical-No-PCAAL, n = 29,845; Ob/Gyn-No-PCAAL, n = 6109). χ2 tests were used to compare categorical variables, and analysis of variance was used to compare continuous and interrupted time series analyses (ITSA) to investigate the guideline/OS implementation effect on penicillin/cephalosporin receipt.
In the Medical-PCAAL group, penicillin/cephalosporin receipt increased (58%-68%, P < .001), specifically for cefazolin (8%-11%, P = .02) and third- to fifth-generation cephalosporins (43%-48%, P = .04), and aztreonam use decreased (12 DOT/1000PD, P = .03). In the Medical-No-PCAAL group, penicillin/cephalosporin receipt increased (88%-90%, P = .004), specifically for penicillin (40%-44%, P < .001), without changes in aztreonam use. Significant changes were not observed in these outcomes on surgical or obstetrics/gynecology services. Per ITSA, guideline/OS implementation was associated with increased penicillin/cephalosporin receipt in the Medical-PCAAL group only.
Guideline and OS implementation was associated with improved antibiotic stewardship on inpatient services that also received allergy education.

OBJECTIVE: Prudent handling of reported antibiotic allergies is an important aspect of antibiotic stewardship. The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) constituted a multidisciplinary expert committee to provide evidence-based recommendations for bedside decision-making in antibiotic therapy in patients that report an antibiotic allergy.
METHODS: The guideline committee generated 12 key questions, most of which were population, intervention, comparison, and outcome questions relevant to both children and adults with suspected antibiotic allergies. For each question, a systematic literature search was performed and reviewed for the best available evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The quality of evidence was graded from very low to high, and recommendations were formulated in structured discussions as strong or weak.
RESULTS: Sixty recommendations were provided for suspected allergy to β-lactam antibiotics (BLAs) and non-β-lactam antibiotics. Owing to the absence of randomized controlled trials in this field, the underlying evidence was predominantly graded as low or very low. Available data support that a detailed allergy history should always be performed and critically appraised. When cross-allergy between BLA groups is not to be expected due to the absence of molecular similarity of the side chains, the patient can be safely exposed to the alternative BLA. An exception to this rule is severe delayed-type reactions in which re-exposure to a BLA should only be considered after consultation with a multidisciplinary team.
CONCLUSIONS: Accumulated scientific data now support a more liberal approach that better balances the benefits of treatment with first choice and usually smaller spectrum antibiotics with appropriate avoidance of antibiotics in case of a truly high risk of a (severe) allergic reaction. In The Netherlands, a formal guideline was developed that provides recommendations for the approach toward suspected allergy to BLA and frequently used non-β-lactam antibiotics, thereby strongly supporting antimicrobial stewardship.

The Standards of Care Committee of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) and a committee of experts and key stakeholders have developed this guideline for the evaluation and testing of patients with an unsubstantiated label of penicillin allergy. The guideline is intended for UK clinicians who are not trained in allergy or immunology, but who wish to develop a penicillin allergy de-labelling service for their patients. It is intended to supplement the BSACI 2015 guideline \"Management of allergy to penicillin and other beta-lactams\" and therefore does not detail the epidemiology or aetiology of penicillin allergy, as this is covered extensively in the 2015 guideline (1). The guideline is intended for use only in patients with a label of penicillin allergy and does not apply to other beta-lactam allergies. The recommendations include a checklist to identify patients at low risk of allergy and a framework for the conduct of drug provocation testing by non-allergists. There are separate sections for adults and paediatrics within the guideline, in recognition of the common differences in reported allergy history and likelihood of true allergy.

To describe current resistance to the β-lactams empirically recommended in the guidelines in bloodstream infection (BSI) episodes caused by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB).
Retrospective, multicentre cohort study of the last 50 BSI episodes in haematological patients across 14 university hospitals in Spain. Rates of inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (IEAT) and impact on mortality were evaluated.
Of the 700 BSI episodes, 308 (44%) were caused by GNB, mainly Escherichia coli (141; 20.1%), Klebsiella spp. (56; 8%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (48; 6.9%). Among GNB BSI episodes, 80 (26%) were caused by MDR isolates. In those caused by Enterobacterales, 25.8% were ESBL producers and 3.5% were carbapenemase producers. Among P. aeruginosa BSI episodes, 18.8% were caused by MDR isolates. Overall, 34.7% of the isolated GNB were resistant to at least one of the three β-lactams recommended in febrile neutropenia guidelines (cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem). Despite extensive compliance with guideline recommendations (91.6%), 16.6% of BSI episodes caused by GNB received IEAT, which was more frequent among MDR GNB isolates (46.3% versus 6.1%; P < 0.001). Thirty day mortality was 14.6%, reaching 21.6% in patients receiving IEAT.
Current resistance to empirical β-lactams recommended in febrile neutropenia guidelines is exceedingly high and IEAT rates are greater than desired. There is an urgent need to adapt guidelines to current epidemiology and better identify patients with a high risk of developing MDR GNB infection.

The study purpose was to assess adherence to a local surgical prophylaxis guideline in patients with reported penicillin allergies, which recommends cephalosporins as first-line prophylaxis.
Adult patients with penicillin allergies admitted for a surgical procedure from July 2020 to June 2021 were retrospectively screened, and the first surgery per admission was included. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeries using β-lactam prophylaxis. Additional outcomes included prophylaxis timing, hypersensitivity reactions, acute kidney injury, infectious complications, duration of stay, and 30-day mortality or readmission.
Among 597 procedures, 504 patients (84.4%) received a β-lactam for surgical prophylaxis, including 494 (82.3%) who received a cephalosporin. Patients in the non-β-lactam group were more likely to have a type I IgE-mediated penicillin allergy (48.4% vs 31.7%, P = .002); however, the majority with type I reactions still received β-lactams (78.0%), including in the setting of anaphylaxis or angioedema to penicillin (67.7%). Zero allergic reactions to prophylaxis antibiotics were reported in either group, and there were no significant differences in the proportion of patients receiving drugs associated with the management of allergic reactions. Receipt of non-β-lactams was associated with inappropriate prophylaxis timing (9.7% vs 3.2%, P = .005) and postprocedural acute kidney injury (7.5% vs 0.6%, P < .001). All other outcomes were nonsignificant between the groups.
Among surgical patients with a documented penicillin allergy, most received cephalosporin prophylaxis as recommended by institutional guidelines, with zero allergic reactions. Receipt of non-β-lactam prophylaxis was associated with worsened outcomes. Cephalosporin prophylaxis should be preferred for surgical patients, including in the setting of true penicillin allergy.