bendamustine

苯达莫司汀
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Parsaclisib,一种有效和高度选择性的磷酸肌醇3-激酶δ抑制剂,已在复发性/难治性(R/R)B细胞淋巴瘤中显示出临床活性。1CITADEL-112期(NCT03424122)研究评估了parsaclisib与研究者选择的护理标准(SOC;利妥昔单抗[治疗A],利妥昔单抗加苯达莫司汀[治疗B],或依鲁替尼[治疗C])治疗50例R/RB细胞淋巴瘤患者。最常见的治疗引起的不良事件包括中性粒细胞减少症(62.5%,50.0%,治疗A的50.0%的患者,B,C,分别);治疗A中的腹泻(37.5%)和贫血(31.3%);腹痛,虚弱,腹泻,治疗B中的恶心(各33.3%);治疗C中的丙氨酸和天冬氨酸转氨酶增加(各37.5%)。治疗A中的13例患者(81.3%)观察到客观反应,治疗B中10例(55.6%),和8(50.0%)在治疗C.Parsaclisb联合SOC疗法在R/RB细胞淋巴瘤患者中具有预期的安全性和有希望的疗效。
    Parsaclisib, a potent and highly selective phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ inhibitor, has shown clinical activity in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphoma. The phase 1 CITADEL-112 (NCT03424122) study assessed safety and efficacy of parsaclisib in combination with investigator choice standard of care (SOC; rituximab [Treatment A], rituximab plus bendamustine [Treatment B], or ibrutinib [Treatment C]) in 50 patients with R/R B-cell lymphoma. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included neutropenia (62.5%, 50.0%, and 50.0% of patients in Treatments A, B, and C, respectively); diarrhea (37.5%) and anemia (31.3%) in Treatment A; abdominal pain, asthenia, diarrhea, and nausea (each 33.3%) in Treatment B; and increased alanine and aspartate aminotransferase (each 37.5%) in Treatment C. Objective responses were observed in 13 patients (81.3%) in Treatment A, 10 (55.6%) in Treatment B, and 8 (50.0%) in Treatment C. Parsaclisib combined with SOC therapies had an expected safety profile and promising efficacy in patients with R/R B-cell lymphomas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    诱导治疗后18[F]-氟-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖(18F-FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)-CT确定的反应可以预测滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)的无进展生存期(PFS)。然而,很少有前瞻性研究探讨二线治疗后PET的意义.我们进行了一项前瞻性多中心II期试验(W-JHSNHL01),在首次复发时苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗(BR)治疗FL。这项研究旨在评估治疗结束(EOT)-PET对预测首次复发的FL患者PFS的有用性。EOT-PET检查从最后一个BR周期开始的6到8周之间进行。主要终点为1年PFS。关键次要终点是总有效率(ORR),完全反应率(CRR),和1年总生存期(OS)。纳入了75名患者,8例排除在分析之外.ORR为86.6%,CRR为59.7%。75例患者的1年PFS为88.9%(95%置信区间[CI]80.7-94.3%),1年OS为97.3%(95%CI89.6-99.3%)。EOT-PET阳性患者(n=9)的一年PFS明显低于PET阴性患者(n=58)(77.8%vs.93.1%;p=0.02)。我们证实,二线BR治疗后的EOT-PET可以预测首次复发的FL患者的早期进展。
    Response determined by 18[F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-CT after induction therapy can predict progression-free survival (PFS) in follicular lymphoma (FL). However, little prospective research has examined the significance of PET after second-line therapy. We conducted a prospective multicenter phase II trial (W-JHS NHL01) of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) without rituximab maintenance for FL in first relapse. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of end-of-treatment (EOT)-PET for predicting PFS in FL patients in first relapse. EOT-PET examinations were performed between 6 and 8 weeks from the start of the last BR cycle. The primary endpoint was 1-year PFS. Key secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), and 1-year overall survival (OS). Seventy-five patients were enrolled, and 8 were excluded from analysis. ORR was 86.6% and CRR was 59.7%. One-year PFS was 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80.7-94.3%) and 1-year OS in 75 patients was 97.3% (95% CI 89.6-99.3%). One-year PFS was significantly inferior in EOT-PET-positive patients (n = 9) compared with PET-negative patients (n = 58) (77.8% vs. 93.1%; p = 0.02). We confirmed that EOT-PET after second-line BR therapy could predict early progression in FL patients in first relapse.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨青年未经治疗的套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)的最佳治疗方法,我们比较了R-CHOP/R-DHAP(利妥昔单抗,环磷酰胺,阿霉素,长春新碱和泼尼松/利妥昔单抗,地塞米松,阿糖胞苷和顺铂)和R-BAP(利妥昔单抗,苯达莫司汀,阿糖胞苷,和泼尼松)加BTK(布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶)抑制剂治疗新诊断患者。本研究评估了2014年1月1日至2023年6月1日郑州大学第一附属医院收治的83例新诊断的MCL青年患者(≤65岁),使用R-CHOP/R-DHAP或R-BAP联合BTK抑制剂。83例患者的中位年龄为60(42-65)岁,男64例,女19例;59例采用R-CHOP/R-DHAP方案化疗,24例接受R-BAP联合BTK抑制剂方案治疗。83例患者中位随访时间为17个月(2-86个月),未达到中位PFS(无进展生存期)时间.R-BAP组的CRR(完全缓解率)高于R-CHOP/R-DHAP组(87.5%vs.54.2%,P=0.005)。两组之间的ORR(总体反应率)没有显着差异(ORR:91.7%vs.84.7%,P=0.497)。R-BAP组的无进展生存期(PFS)长于R-CHOP/R-DHAP组(P=0.013),而OS在两组间无显著差异(P=0.499)。两组中最常见的不良反应是血液毒性,与R-CHOP/R-DHAP组相比,R-BAP组的3-4级淋巴细胞减少和3-4级血小板减少的发生率更高(P=0.015和P=0.039)。男性(HR=4.257,P=0.013),LDH(乳酸脱氢酶)≥245U/L(HR=3.221,P=0.012),多形囊样(HR=2.802,P=0.043)和R-CHOP/R-DHAP方案(HR=7.704,P=0.047)是影响PFS的独立危险因素。Ki67≥30%(HR=8.539,P=0.005)是OS的独立危险因素。R-BAP与BTK抑制剂联合一线治疗可改善年轻套细胞淋巴瘤患者的CRR和延长PFS,不良事件可耐受。
    To explore the optimal treatment for young patients with untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), we compared the efficacy and safety of R-CHOP/R-DHAP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone/rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine and cisplatin) and R-BAP (rituximab, bendamustine, cytarabine, and prednisone) plus BTK (Bruton\'s tyrosine kinase) inhibitors in newly diagnosed patients. Eighty-three young patients (≤ 65 years old) with newly diagnosed MCL admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 1, 2014, to June 1, 2023, using R-CHOP/R-DHAP or R-BAP plus BTK inhibitor were assessed in this study. The median age at presentation was 60 (42-65) years in 83 patients, including 64 males and 19 females; 59 were treated with R-CHOP/R-DHAP regimen chemotherapy, and 24 were treated with R-BAP in combination with the BTK inhibitor regimen. The median follow-up was 17 months (2-86 months) in 83 patients, and the median PFS (progression-free survival) time was not reached. The CRR (complete response rate) of the R-BAP group was higher than that of the R-CHOP/R-DHAP group (87.5% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.005). The ORR (overall response rate) was not significantly different between the two groups (ORR: 91.7% vs. 84.7%, P = 0.497). The PFS (progression-free survival) of the R-BAP group was longer than that of the R-CHOP/R-DHAP group (P = 0.013), whereas OS was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.499). The most common adverse effect in both groups was hematotoxicity, with a higher incidence of grade 3-4 lymphopenia and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in the R-BAP group than in the R-CHOP/R-DHAP group (P = 0.015 and P = 0.039). Male sex (HR = 4.257, P = 0.013), LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) ≥ 245 U/L (HR = 3.221, P = 0.012), pleomorphic-blastoid (HR = 2.802, P = 0.043) and R-CHOP/R-DHAP regimen (HR = 7.704, P = 0.047) were independent risk factors for PFS. Ki67 ≥ 30% (HR = 8.539, P = 0.005) was an independent risk factor for OS. First-line treatment with R-BAP in combination with BTK inhibitor improved CRR and prolonged PFS in young patients with mantle cell lymphoma and adverse events were tolerable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中国慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者的发病率和死亡率最近有所增加。这项研究对一线治疗策略伊布替尼(IB)或苯达莫司汀(BE)加利妥昔单抗(RI)进行了长期经济学评估,以治疗先前未经治疗的无del(17p)/TP53突变的CLL老年患者。
    方法:根据大型临床数据,随机试验,包括四种疾病状态的马尔可夫模型(无事件生存,治疗失败,治疗后失败,和死亡)用于估算10年期间从一线IB策略与BE加RI策略获得的每个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本。所有成本均根据中国消费者价格指数调整为2022年的值,所有费用和健康结果均按5%的年增长率进行折扣.进行敏感性分析以确认基本情况结果的稳健性。
    结果:与一线BE加RI策略相比,一线IB处理实现了1.17个额外的QALYs,但在10年内,每位患者的费用递减为88,046.78美元(按2022年美元估算).因此,与BE+RI策略相比,IB一线治疗似乎具有绝对优势.灵敏度分析证实了这些结果的稳健性。
    结论:对于65岁或以上无del(17p)/TP53突变的CLL患者,与一线BE加RI治疗策略相比,一线IB治疗绝对具有成本效益。因此,强烈建议中国卫生部门为这些CLL患者选择前一种策略.
    BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality rates of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in China have recently increased. This study performed a long-term economic evaluation of the first-line treatment strategies ibrutinib (IB) or bendamustine (BE) plus rituximab (RI) for previously untreated older patients with CLL without the del(17p)/TP53 mutation in China.
    METHODS: Based on clinical data from large, randomized trials, a Markov model including four disease states (event-free survival, treatment failure, post-treatment failure, and death) was used to estimate the incremental costs per quality adjusted-life year (QALY) gained from the first-line IB strategy versus the BE plus RI strategy over a 10-year period. All costs were adjusted to 2022 values based on the Chinese Consumer Price Index, and all costs and health outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 5%. Sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm the robustness of base-case results.
    RESULTS: Compared to the first-line BE plus RI strategy, first-line IB treatment achieved 1.17 additional QALYs, but was accompanied by $88,046.78 (estimated in 2022 US dollars) in decremental costs per patient over 10 years. Thus, first-line treatment with IB appeared to have absolute dominance compared to the BE plus RI strategy. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these results.
    CONCLUSIONS: The first-line treatment with IB is absolutely cost-effective compared to the first-line BE plus RI treatment strategy for 65 or older patients with CLL without the del (17p)/TP53 mutation from the Chinese payer perspective. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that Chinese health authorities select the former strategy for these CLL patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在BEAM方案中替换卡莫司汀(BCNU)(BCNU,依托泊苷,阿糖胞苷,在自体干细胞移植(ASCT)之前,美法仑)与苯达莫司汀(BendaEAM)在淋巴瘤中是可行的。然而,缺乏随机试验。这里,我们提出了解决这个主题的第一次审判。
    这个多中心,随机化,在奥地利和瑞士的4个血液学中心进行的2期研究(BEB试验)比较了复发性淋巴瘤患者的BEAM和BendaEAM.两种方案均在ASCT前静脉注射,根据标准方案在BEAM中(第-6天300mg/m2BCNU),在BendaEAM,在第-7天和第-6天给予200mg/m2苯达莫司汀替换BCNU。符合条件的患者年龄为18-75岁,患有套细胞淋巴瘤,弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤,或滤泡性淋巴瘤在第一次或第二次缓解或化疗敏感复发。研究的主要终点是评估苯达莫司汀替代BCNU是否能降低肺毒性,定义为ASCT后三个月肺对一氧化碳的扩散能力降低至少20%。在意向治疗的基础上进行数据分析。这项研究在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT02278796,并已完成。
    在2015年4月20日至2018年11月28日之间,有108名患者入选;其中53名被随机分配接受BendaEAM(36名男性,17名女性)和55名接受BEAM(39名男性,16女)。所有患者移植迅速。两组之间的肺毒性没有差异(BendaEAM:n=8,19.5%;BEAM:n=11,25.6%;风险差异=-6.1%:95%置信区间:-23.9%至11.7%)。两组的急性毒性至少为3级(BendaEAM:35.8%,梁:30.9%)。总生存率(BendaEAM:92.5%,BEAM:89.1%)和完全缓解(BendaEAM:76.7%,BEAM:74.3%)1年后(中位随访:369天)相似。没有观察到生活质量的差异。
    两种方案在生存率和缓解率方面的结果相似。需要进行第3阶段非劣效性研究,以调查BendaEAM是否可以被视为BEAM的替代品。
    Mundipharma。
    UNASSIGNED: Replacement of carmustine (BCNU) in the BEAM regimen (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) with bendamustine (BendaEAM) before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is feasible in lymphoma. However, randomised trials are lacking. Here, we present the first trial addressing this topic.
    UNASSIGNED: This multicentre, randomised, phase 2 study (BEB-trial) conducted at four haematological centres in Austria and Switzerland compares BEAM with BendaEAM in patients with relapsed lymphoma. Both regimens were administered intravenously before ASCT, in BEAM according to the standard protocol (300 mg/m2 BCNU on day -6), in BendaEAM, BCNU was replaced by 200 mg/m2 bendamustine given on days -7 and -6. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years and had mantle cell lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, or follicular lymphoma in first or second remission or chemosensitive relapse. The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate whether replacement of BCNU by bendamustine reduces lung toxicity, defined as a decrease of the diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide by at least 20% at three months after ASCT. Data analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02278796, and is complete.
    UNASSIGNED: Between April 20, 2015, and November 28, 2018, 108 patients were enrolled; of whom 53 were randomly assigned to receive BendaEAM (36 male, 17 female) and 55 to receive BEAM (39 male, 16 female). All patients engrafted rapidly. Lung toxicity did not differ between groups (BendaEAM: n = 8, 19.5%; BEAM: n = 11, 25.6%; risk difference = -6.1%: 95% confidence interval: -23.9% to 11.7%). Acute toxicities of at least grade 3 were comparable in both groups (BendaEAM: 35.8%, BEAM: 30.9%). Overall survival (BendaEAM: 92.5%, BEAM: 89.1%) and complete remission (BendaEAM: 76.7%, BEAM: 74.3%) after 1 year (median follow-up: 369 days) were similar. No difference in quality of life was observed.
    UNASSIGNED: Results were similar for both regimens in terms of survival and response rates. A phase 3 non-inferiority study is required to investigate whether BendaEAM can be considered as an alternative to BEAM.
    UNASSIGNED: Mundipharma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    Objectives: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bendamustine in combination with rituximab (BR regimen) for the treatment of newly diagnosed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin\'s lymphoma (B-iNHL) and elderly mantle cell lymphoma (eMCL) . Methods: From December 1, 2020 to September 10, 2022, a multi-center prospective study was conducted across ten Grade A tertiary hospitals in Shandong Province, China. The BR regimen was administered to evaluate its efficacy and safety in newly diagnosed B-iNHL and eMCL patients, and all completed at least four cycles of induction therapy. Results: The 72 enrolled patients with B-iNHL or MCL were aged 24-74 years, with a median age of 55 years. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scores of 0-1 were observed in 76.4% of patients, while 23.6% had scores of 2. Disease distribution included follicular lymphoma (FL) (51.4% ), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) (33.3% ), eMCL (11.1% ), and the unknown subtype (4.2% ). According to the Ann Arbor staging system, 16.7% and 65.3% of patients were diagnosed with stage Ⅲ and stage Ⅳ lymphomas, respectively. Following four cycles of BR induction therapy, the overall response rate was 98.6%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 83.3% and a partial response (PR) rate of 15.3%. Only one eMCL patient experienced disease progression during treatment, and only one FL patient experienced a relapse. Even when evaluated using CT alone, the CR rate was 63.9%, considering the differences between PET/CT and CT assessments. The median follow-up duration was 11 months (range: 4-22), with a PFS rate of 96.8% and an OS rate of 100.0%. The main hematologic adverse reactions included grade 3-4 leukopenia (27.8%, with febrile neutropenia observed in 8.3% of patients), grade 3-4 lymphopenia (23.6% ), grade 3-4 anemia (5.6% ), and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (4.2% ). The main non-hematologic adverse reactions such as fatigue, nausea/vomiting, rash, and infections occurred in less than 20.0% of patients. Conclusion: Within the scope of this clinical trial conducted in China, the BR regimen demonstrated efficacy and safety in treating newly diagnosed B-iNHL and eMCL patients.
    目的: 评价国产苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗一线治疗惰性B细胞淋巴瘤(B-iNHL)和老年套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)的有效性和安全性。 方法: 于2020年12月1日至2022年9月10日在山东省内10家三甲医院多中心前瞻性研究国产苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗治疗初诊B-iNHL和老年MCL患者的疗效和安全性,所有患者均已完成至少4个周期诱导治疗。 结果: 共入组B-iNHL与年MCL患者72例,中位年龄为55(24~74)岁,美国东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分(ECOG评分)0~1分者占76.4%,ECOG 2分者占23.6%。滤泡淋巴瘤(FL)占51.4%,边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL)占33.3%,老年MCL占11.1%,不能分类占4.2%。Ann Arbor分期:Ⅲ期占16.7%、Ⅳ期占65.3%。4个周期诱导治疗后,总有效率为98.6%,其中完全缓解(CR)率为83.3%,部分缓解(PR)率为15.3%。仅1例MCL患者治疗中进展,1例FL患者复发。考虑到PET/CT评估与CT评估的差异,即使按照CT评估,其CR率为63.9%。中位随访11(4~22)个月,无进展生存(PFS)率为96.8%,总生存(OS)率为100.0%。主要血液学不良反应包括:3~4级白细胞减少(27.8%,其中8.3%的患者出现粒细胞缺乏伴发热),3~4级淋巴细胞减少(23.6%),3~4级贫血(5.6%)及3~4级血小板减少(4.2%)。非血液学不良反应主要为乏力、恶心/呕吐、皮疹、感染,发生率均低于20.0%。 结论: 国产苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗一线治疗B-iNHL和老年MCL患者安全有效。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:复发/难治性髓外骨髓瘤(RREMM)是一种罕见且侵袭性的多发性骨髓瘤亚型,其定义为骨髓外的浆细胞增殖。RREMM的治疗选择有限,预后普遍不利。这项研究旨在评估苯达莫司汀的有效性,泊马度胺,和地塞米松(BPD)方案在RREMM患者中的应用。
    方法:我们对11例接受BPD治疗的RREMM患者进行了回顾性调查。主要终点是无进展生存期。研究的次要终点是2年生存率和总有效率(ORR)。我们分析了患者的社会人口统计学和临床特征。
    结果:患者的平均年龄为62岁。他们有四个先前治疗线的中位数,8例患者之前接受过自体干细胞移植.八个BPD治疗周期后,ORR为54%,有一个非常好的部分反应(VGPR),五个部分响应(PR),三种进行性疾病(PD),和两种稳定的疾病(SD)。中位随访时间为15个月,两年PFS率为71.3%,两年生存率为81.8%。
    结论:BPD方案在RREMM患者中具有良好的疗效,产生良好的ORR和存活率。为了证实这些发现,并为该患者组探索其他治疗方案,需要更大的前瞻性研究。
    OBJECTIVE: Relapsed/refractory extramedullary myeloma (RREMM) is an uncommon and aggressive subtype of multiple myeloma defined by plasma cell proliferation outside the bone marrow. Therapeutic options for RREMM are limited, and the prognosis is generally unfavorable. This research aimed to assess the effectiveness of the bendamustine, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (BPD) regimen in patients with RREMM.
    METHODS: We carried out a retrospective investigation of 11 RREMM patients who underwent BPD treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The secondary endpoints of the study were two-year survival and overall response rate (ORR). We analyzed the sociodemographic and clinical features of the patients.
    RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 62 years. They had a median of four prior treatment lines, and eight patients had previously received autologous stem-cell transplantation. After eight BPD treatment cycles, the ORR stood at 54%, with one very good partial response (VGPR), five partial responses (PR), three progressive diseases (PD), and two stable diseases (SD). The median follow-up was 15 months, with a two-year PFS rate of 71.3% and a two-year survival rate of 81.8%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The BPD regimen demonstrated promising effectiveness in RREMM patients, yielding favorable ORR and survival rates. To corroborate these findings and explore additional treatment alternatives for this patient group, larger prospective studies are required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    无痛性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(iNHL)和套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)的疾病结果变异性可能与影响免疫和炎症反应的基因中的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)有关。我们调查了可能对接受苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗(BR)的患者具有预后作用的SNP。对所有样本进行IL-2基因分型(rs2069762),IL-10(rs1800890,rs10494879),VEGFA(rs3025039),IL-8(rs4073),CFH(rs1065489)和MTHFR(rs1801131)SNP通过使用TaqManSNP基因分型测定的等位基因区分测定。我们报告了79例接受BR的iNHL和MCL患者的长期随访分析。总有效率为97.5%(CR率为70.9%)。经过63个月的中位随访,未达到中位PFS和OS.我们报告了IL-2中的SNP(rs2069762)与降低的PFS和OS(p<0.0001)之间的显着关联。我们建议细胞因子SNP在疾病结果中的作用,而SNP似乎与长期毒性或继发性恶性肿瘤无关。
    The variability in disease outcome for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHL) and mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) could be related to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes that affect immune and inflammatory response. We investigated SNPs that could have a prognostic role for patients receiving bendamustine and rituximab (BR). All samples were genotyped for the IL-2 (rs2069762), IL-10 (rs1800890, rs10494879), VEGFA (rs3025039), IL-8 (rs4073), CFH (rs1065489) and MTHFR (rs1801131) SNPs by allelic discrimination assays using TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays. We report a long-term follow-up analysis of 79 iNHL and MCL patients that received BR. Overall response rate was 97.5% (CR rate 70.9%). After a median follow-up of 63 months, median PFS and OS were not reached. We report a significant association between SNP in IL-2 (rs2069762) and reduced PFS and OS (p<.0001). We suggest a role for cytokine SNPs in disease outcome, while SNPs seem not related to long-term toxicity or secondary malignancies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    GABRIELL是一项II期单臂研究,旨在评估奥比妥珠单抗联合苯达莫司汀治疗复发性/难治性(R/R)慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的疗效和安全性。72例活动性疾病患者接受了长达6个28天周期的治疗。总有效率为78.6%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为26个月,随访结束时(36个月)未达到总生存期(OS)。无法检测到的残余疾病(≤0.01%;骨髓中的36.4%和外周血中的53.4%)与明显更长的PFS和OS相关(vs.>0.01)。常见的≥3级不良事件(76.4%)为中性粒细胞减少(58.3%),血小板减少症(26.4%)和发热性中性粒细胞减少症(11.1%)。TP53中断是反应的唯一独立预测因素(危险比;HR:0.228)。未突变的免疫球蛋白重链可变区(HR:16.061)是PFS的负面预后因素。总之,奥比妥珠单抗联合苯达莫司汀是R/RCLL的一种积极且普遍耐受的治疗方法.
    GABRIELL was a phase II single-arm study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab plus bendamustine for relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Seventy-two patients with active disease received treatment for up to six 28-day cycles. Overall response rate was 78.6% with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 26 months, and overall survival (OS) not reached at the end of follow-up (36 months). Undetectable measurable residual disease (≤0.01%; 36.4% in bone marrow and 53.4% in peripheral blood) correlated with a significantly longer PFS and OS (vs. >0.01). Common grade ≥3 adverse events (76.4%) were neutropenia (58.3%), thrombocytopenia (26.4%) and febrile neutropenia (11.1%). TP53 disruption was the only independent predictive factor for response (Hazard ratio; HR: 0.228). Unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (HR: 16.061) was a negative prognostic factor for PFS. In conclusion, the combination of obinutuzumab plus bendamustine is an active and generally adequately-tolerated treatment for R/R CLL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号