barostat

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:使用胃内气球作为减肥程序的兴趣日益增加,然而,潜在的机制仍不清楚。在啮齿动物中,胃胀最近被证明可以刺激肠促胰岛素激素胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)的分泌,但是胃胀对GLP-1和其他肠促胰岛素激素的影响,葡萄糖依赖性促胰岛素多肽(GIP),在人类中是未知的。我们做了一个随机的,控制,交叉研究,以评估胃胀的影响,在健康个体中使用胃“barostat”对肠促胰岛素激素进行诱导。
    方法:8名健康参与者(2名女性,6男,平均年龄69.3±1.2岁,和体重指数23.5±0.8kg/m2)分别在四次接受十二指肠内输注(i)0.9%盐水或(ii)以3kcal/min的速率输送的葡萄糖时进行了研究,没有,压力设定为高于胃内最小膨胀压力8mmHg的胃内气球。
    结果:十二指肠内盐水或葡萄糖输注后,有或没有胃扩张的血浆GLP-1无差异(生理盐水和葡萄糖输注P=1.00).有或没有胃扩张的血浆GIP也没有差异(生理盐水输注P=1.00,葡萄糖输注P=0.99)。
    结论:我们得出结论,单独或在小肠葡萄糖暴露期间,在健康人中不显著刺激肠促胰岛素激素分泌。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    To evaluate the effect of gastric distension, induced using a gastric \'barostat\', on the secretion of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in the presence and absence of small intestinal nutrients in healthy individuals.
    Eight healthy participants (two females, six males, mean age 69.3 ± 1.2 years, body mass index 23.5 ± 0.8 kg/m2 ) were each studied on four occasions when they received an intraduodenal infusion of either (i) 0.9% saline or (ii) glucose delivered at a rate of 3 kcal/min both with, and without, an intragastric balloon with the pressure set to 8 mmHg above the intragastric minimum distending pressure.
    Following intraduodenal saline or glucose infusion, there was no difference in plasma GLP-1 with or without gastric distension (P = 1.00 for both saline and glucose infusions). There was also no difference in plasma GIP with or without gastric distension (P = 1.00 for saline infusion and P = .99 for glucose infusion).
    Gastric distension, either alone or during small intestinal glucose exposure, does not stimulate incretin hormone secretion significantly in healthy humans.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:腹泻型肠易激综合征(IBS-D)影响高达4%的普通人群。症状包括频繁,松散,或者有急迫性的水汪汪的大便,导致生活质量显著下降,工作效率下降。昂丹司琼,5HT3受体拮抗剂,作为止吐药有超过20年的良好安全记录,尚未广泛用于IBS-D的治疗。它有,然而,被证明可以减缓结肠运输,并且在一个小的随机中,安慰剂对照,交叉试点研究,IBS-D患者受益
    方法:本试验为III期,平行组,随机化,双盲,多中心,安慰剂对照试验,进行嵌入式机理研究。符合IBS-D罗马IV标准的参与者(n=400)将从门诊和初级保健诊所以及社交媒体招募,接受昂丹司琼(剂量滴定至每天24mg)或安慰剂12周。在整个审判过程中,参与者将记录他们最严重的腹痛,最紧急的,大便频率,和每天的粪便稠度。主要终点是每组中“响应者”的比例,使用食品和药物管理局(FDA)的建议。次要终点包括疼痛强度,大便稠度,频率,和紧迫性。情绪和生活质量也将被评估。机制评估将包括整个肠道运输,基线和第8周和第11周之间的粪便类胰蛋白酶和粪便胆汁酸浓度。一组参与者还将使用压力调节器进行敏感性评估(n=80),和/或高分辨率结肠测压(n=40),以评估左结肠的运动模式和昂丹司琼的影响。
    结论:TRITON试验旨在评估昂丹司琼在多个中心的作用。通过定义昂丹司琼的作用机制,我们希望更好地识别可能有反应的IBS-D患者。
    背景:ISRCTN,ISRCTN17508514,2017年10月2日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) affects up to 4% of the general population. Symptoms include frequent, loose, or watery stools with associated urgency, resulting in marked reduction of quality of life and loss of work productivity. Ondansetron, a 5HT3 receptor antagonist, has had an excellent safety record for over 20 years as an antiemetic, yet is not widely used in the treatment of IBS-D. It has, however, been shown to slow colonic transit and in a small randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over pilot study, benefited patients with IBS-D.
    METHODS: This trial is a phase III, parallel group, randomised, double-blind, multi-centre, placebo-controlled trial, with embedded mechanistic studies. Participants (n = 400) meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS-D will be recruited from outpatient and primary care clinics and by social media to receive either ondansetron (dose titrated up to 24 mg daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. Throughout the trial, participants will record their worst abdominal pain, worst urgency, stool frequency, and stool consistency on a daily basis. The primary endpoint is the proportion of \"responders\" in each group, using Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations. Secondary endpoints include pain intensity, stool consistency, frequency, and urgency. Mood and quality of life will also be assessed. Mechanistic assessments will include whole gut transit, faecal tryptase and faecal bile acid concentrations at baseline and between weeks 8 and 11. A subgroup of participants will also undergo assessment of sensitivity (n = 80) using the barostat, and/or high-resolution colonic manometry (n = 40) to assess motor patterns in the left colon and the impact of ondansetron.
    CONCLUSIONS: The TRITON trial aims to assess the effect of ondansetron across multiple centres. By defining ondansetron\'s mechanisms of action we hope to better identify patients with IBS-D who are likely to respond.
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN, ISRCTN17508514 , Registered on 2 October 2017.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Management of chronic constipation with refractory symptoms can be challenging. Although new drugs and behavioral treat-ments have improved outcome, when they fail, there is little guidance on what to do next. At this juncture, typically most doc-tors may refer for surgical intervention although total colectomy is associated with morbidity including complications such as recurrent bacterial overgrowth. Recently, colonic manometry with sensory/tone/compliance assessment with a barostat study has been shown to be useful. Technical challenges aside, adequate preparation, and appropriate equipment and knowledge of co-lonic physiology are keys for a successful procedure. The test itself appears to be safe with little complications. Currently, colon-ic manometry is usually performed with a 6-8 solid state or water-perfused sensor probe, although high-resolution fiber-optic colonic manometry with better spatiotemporal resolutions may become available in the near future. For a test that has evolved over 3 decades, normal physiology and abnormal findings for common phenotypes of chronic constipation, especially slow transit constipation, have been well characterized only recently largely through the advent of prolonged 24-hour ambulatory colonic manometry studies. Even though the test has been largely restricted to specialized laboratories at the moment, emerg-ing new technologies and indications may facilitate its wider use in the near future.(J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014;20:547-552).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by heterogeneous pathophysiology and low response to treatment. Up to 60% of IBS patients suffers from visceral hypersensitivity, which is associated with symptom severity and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Recently, positive effects of probiotics in IBS have been reported, but overall the response was modest. We performed a study in IBS patients, characterized by visceral hypersensitivity measured with the rectal barostat, aiming to assess the effect of 6 weeks of multispecies probiotic mix on visceral pain perception.
    METHODS: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in forty Rome III IBS patients with visceral hypersensitivity. Prior to intake, patients kept a 2-week symptom diary and underwent a rectal barostat measurement. When hypersensitivity was confirmed, participation was allowed and patients received a multispecies probiotic with in vitro proven potential beneficial effects on mechanisms contributing to visceral hypersensitivity (six different probiotic strains; 10(9)  cfu/g), or a placebo product of one sachet (5 g) per day for 6 weeks. At the end of the intervention period, visceroperception and symptoms were reassessed.
    RESULTS: Thirty-five patients completed the trial. The percentage of patients with visceral hypersensitivity decreased significantly in the probiotic and placebo group (76.5% and 71.4%, respectively; N.S. between groups). Improvement in pain scores and mean symptom score did not differ between the probiotic and placebo group.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this placebo-controlled trial in IBS patients with visceral hypersensitivity, no significant effect of a multispecies probiotic on viscerperception was observed. The study has been registered in the US National Library of Medicine (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00702026).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号