audiology

听力学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:失聪或听力困难(DHH)的儿童有言语和语言延迟的风险。来自较低社会经济背景的DHH儿童的语言结果更差,部分原因是在获得专门的言语语言治疗方面存在差异。远程治疗可能有助于改善获得这种专业护理的机会,并缩小这种语言差距。将不同的DHH儿童纳入前瞻性随机临床试验一直具有挑战性,但对于解决差异和追求听力健康公平是必要的。利益相关者关于研究设计元素决策的输入,包括比较组,掩蔽,评估和补偿,设计包容性研究是必要的。我们设计了一个包容性的,解决儿科听力健康差异的公平比较有效性试验。该研究的具体目的是确定获得和利用言语远程治疗在解决DHH低收入儿童的语言差异方面的效果。
    方法:在利益相关者输入和试点数据收集之后,我们设计了一项随机临床试验和并行纵向队列试验,在美国4家三级儿童医院进行.参与者将包括210名0-27个月的DHH儿童。其中140个孩子将来自低收入家庭,他们将被随机分配1:1接受常规治疗,而不是常规治疗,并获得补充的言语语言远程治疗。将同时招募70名来自高收入家庭的儿童作为比较队列。主要结果测量将是学前语言量表听觉理解子量表标准分数,加上额外的演讲,语言,听力和生活质量验证指标作为次要结局.
    背景:这项研究得到了参与研究的机构审查委员会的批准:加州大学,旧金山(19-28356)拉迪儿童医院(804651)和西雅图儿童医院(STUDY00003750)。注册儿童的父母将为他们的孩子的参与提供书面知情同意书。参与整个研究设计的专业和家长利益相关者团体将通过出版物以及国家和区域组织促进研究结果的传播和实施。
    背景:NCT04928209。
    BACKGROUND: Children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) are at risk for speech and language delay. Language outcomes are worse in DHH children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, due in part to disparities in access to specialised speech-language therapy. Teletherapy may help improve access to this specialised care and close this language gap. Inclusion of diverse DHH children in prospective randomised clinical trials has been challenging but is necessary to address disparities and pursue hearing health equity. Stakeholder input regarding decisions on study design elements, including comparator groups, masking, assessments and compensation, is necessary to design inclusive studies. We have designed an inclusive, equitable comparativeness effectiveness trial to address disparities in paediatric hearing health. The specific aims of the study are to determine the effect of access to and utilisation of speech-language teletherapy in addressing language disparities in low-income children who are DHH.
    METHODS: After stakeholder input and pilot data collection, we designed a randomised clinical trial and concurrent longitudinal cohort trial to be conducted at four tertiary children\'s hospitals in the USA. Participants will include 210 DHH children aged 0-27 months. 140 of these children will be from lower income households, who will be randomised 1:1 to receive usual care versus usual care plus access to supplemental speech-language teletherapy. 70 children from higher income households will be simultaneously recruited as a comparison cohort. Primary outcome measure will be the Preschool Language Scales Auditory Comprehension subscale standard score, with additional speech, language, hearing and quality of life validated measures as secondary outcomes.
    BACKGROUND: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the participating sites: the University of California, San Francisco (19-28356), Rady Children\'s Hospital (804651) and Seattle Children\'s Hospital (STUDY00003750). Parents of enrolled children will provide written informed consent for their child\'s participation. Professional and parent stakeholder groups that have been involved throughout the study design will facilitate dissemination and implementation of study findings via publication and through national and regional organisations.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04928209.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:关于青少年农村人群听力损失的研究趋势有限,目前的证据表明,扩展高频测听可以作为检测亚临床听力损失的敏感工具。此外,当前的研究强调了在科学中代表不同种族人口的重要性。这项研究旨在确定哥伦比亚农村地区非洲裔哥伦比亚青少年通过常规纯音(0.25-8kHz)和扩展高频(EHF)(9-20kHz)测听法获得的听力损失的患病率。
    方法:观察性,横断面研究。
    方法:230名13-17岁的非洲裔哥伦比亚青少年在卡塔赫纳农村人口中就读高中,哥伦比亚。
    方法:耳镜检查,在2021年2月至3月期间进行了常规(0.25-8kHz)和EHF(9-20kHz)测听测试.社会人口统计学和相关因素问卷也用于评估与EHF听力损失相关的可能因素。
    方法:使用常规和EHF测听法对获得性听力损失的患病率,以及与听力损失相关的因素。
    结果:在符合资格标准的230名青少年中,133人(57.82%)为女性。平均年龄为15.22岁(SD:1.62)。用常规测听法评估的至少一只耳朵的听力损失患病率为21.30%,用EHF测听法评估的听力损失患病率为14.78%。耳镜检查的主要异常结果包括:新鼓膜(1.30%),肌硬化(0.87%)和单体疤痕(0.43%)。通过逻辑回归发现的与EHF听力损失的较高概率相关的因素是年龄较大(患病率比(PR):1.45;95%CI1.16至1.80),每月参加“Picó”四次或更多次(PR:6.63;95%CI2.16至20.30),每月参加酒吧三次以上(PR:1.14;95%CI1.03至1.59)和自我报告听力困难(PR:1.24;95%CI1.22至4.05)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,获得性听力损失在农村年轻人群中已经普遍存在。
    OBJECTIVE: Research trends concerning hearing loss within teen rural populations are limited and current evidence suggests that extended high-frequency audiometry can be a sensitive tool to detect subclinical hearing loss. Moreover, current research emphasises the importance of representing different ethnic populations in science. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of acquired hearing loss through conventional pure-tone (0.25-8 kHz) and extended high frequency (EHF) (9-20 kHz) audiometry in Afro-Colombian adolescents from a rural area in Colombia.
    METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional study.
    METHODS: 230 Afro-Colombian adolescents aged 13-17 years who attended high school in a rural population from Cartagena, Colombia.
    METHODS: Otoscopic examination, conventional (0.25-8 kHz) and EHF (9-20 kHz) audiometry tests were performed during February-March 2021. Sociodemographic and associated factor questionnaires were also applied to assess probable factors associated with EHF hearing loss.
    METHODS: Prevalence of acquired hearing loss using conventional and EHF audiometry, and factors associated with hearing loss.
    RESULTS: Of 230 adolescents who met the eligibility criteria, 133 (57.82%) were female. The mean age was 15.22 years (SD: 1.62). The prevalence of hearing loss in at least one ear assessed with conventional audiometry was 21.30% and with EHF audiometry 14.78%. The main abnormal otoscopic findings included: neotympanum (1.30%), myringosclerosis (0.87%) and monomeric scars (0.43%). Factors associated with a higher probability of EHF hearing loss found through logistic regression were older age (prevalence ratio (PR): 1.45; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.80), attending the \'Picó\' four or more times a month (PR: 6.63; 95% CI 2.16 to 20.30), attending bars more than three times a month (PR: 1.14; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.59) and self-reported hearing difficulties (PR: 1.24; 95% CI 1.22 to 4.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that acquired hearing loss is already widespread among this young rural population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探索经验,目前的方法,医疗保健专业人员(HCP)照顾成人创伤性脑损伤(TBI)有关音频前庭后果的意见和认识。
    方法:横断面在线调查研究。
    方法:有照顾成人TBI经验的HCP,他们不是耳鼻喉(耳鼻喉)专家或听力学家。
    方法:该研究于2022年5月至2022年12月进行。在线调查包括16个关于临床经验的英语和土耳其语封闭和开放文本问题,TBI后音频前庭后果的当前方法和认识。使用SPSSV.28分析了对封闭问题的回答频率和变量之间的关联。在MicrosoftExcel中汇总了开放文本响应。
    结果:来自17个行业和14个国家的70个HCP参加了会议,大部分来自英国(42.9%)。HCP表示,“某些”到“所有”患者都有听觉问题,例如“无法理解噪声中的语音”(66%),\'耳鸣\'(64%),“高音”(57%)和平衡问题,例如“头晕”(79%)和“眩晕”(67%)。通常,HCP询问患者在预约时的平衡状态,以及当他们观察到头晕和/或平衡障碍时,他们使用筛查测试,最常见的是手指到鼻子(53%)。对于听觉障碍,HCP首选TBI患者转诊听力学/耳鼻喉科服务。然而,6%的HCP认为转诊时可以忽略音频前庭疾病,因为TBI患者患有许多障碍。此外,44%的人会向患有听力损失的TBI患者建议助听器“如果他们愿意使用”而不是“肯定”。
    结论:照顾TBI患者的HCP观察到许多音频前庭损伤。HCPs对这些损伤的评估和干预意见和认识各不相同。然而,非专家HCP可能没有意识到TBI后未经治疗的音频前庭损伤的负面后果。因此,制定一个简单的筛查框架和转诊的音频-前庭损伤适应症可能有助于非听力学专家定期就诊这些患者.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences, current approaches, opinions and awareness of healthcare professionals (HCPs) caring for adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) regarding the audio-vestibular consequences.
    METHODS: Cross-sectional online survey study.
    METHODS: HCPs with experience of caring for adults with TBI, who were not ENT (ear nose throat) specialists or audiologists.
    METHODS: The study was conducted from May 2022 to December 2022. The online survey consisted of 16 closed and open-text questions in English and Turkish about clinical experience, current approaches and awareness of audio-vestibular consequences following TBI. Frequencies of responses to closed questions and associations between variables were analysed using SPSS V.28. Open-text responses were summarised in Microsoft Excel.
    RESULTS: Seventy HCPs participated from 17 professions and 14 countries, with the majority from the UK (42.9%). HCPs stated that \'some\' to \'all\' of their patients had auditory problems such as \'inability to understand speech-in-noise\' (66%), \'tinnitus\' (64%), \'hyperacusis\' (57%) and balance problems such as \'dizziness\' (79%) and \'vertigo\' (67%). Usually, HCPs asked about the balance status of patients at appointments and when they observed dizziness and/or balance disorder they used screening tests, most commonly finger-to-nose (53%). For auditory impairments, HCPs preferred referring patients with TBI to audiology/ENT services. However, 6% of HCPs felt that audio-vestibular conditions could be ignored on referral because patients with TBI struggled with many impairments. Additionally, 44% would suggest hearing aids to patients with TBI with hearing loss \'if they would like to use\' rather than \'definitely\'.
    CONCLUSIONS: Many audio-vestibular impairments are observed by HCPs caring for patients with TBI. The assessment and intervention opinions and awareness of HCPs for these impairments vary. However, non-expert HCPs may not be aware of negative consequences of untreated audio-vestibular impairments following TBI. Therefore, developing a simple framework for screening and indications of audio-vestibular impairments for referral may be helpful for non-audiological specialists regularly seeing these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用智能手机耳镜检查和基于平板电脑的测听技术通过经过训练的听力学家提供耳朵和听力服务的途径创新可能会提高服务效率。耳鼻喉科综合社区耳部服务(结合社区听力学管理,远程耳鼻喉科审查和新技术)进行了试点。我们旨在评估实体的效率和安全性。
    方法:实体是以社区为基础和听力学家为主导的途径。有耳科症状的患者自行转诊。进行了智能手机耳镜检查和基于平板电脑的听力图。两名耳科医师根据视频耳镜检查审查了社区中听力学家做出的所有决定,听力测试和图表审查。在由顾问领导的医院耳科诊所(HOC)就诊的前50名连续新患者的数据,在2021年8月1日至2021年12月31日期间收集了听力学家主导的医院高级听力学诊断(AAD)或鉴定诊所。通过图表回顾和问卷调查收集数据,比较三种途径的效率,患者满意度,技术实用性和安全性。
    结果:医院的耳科医师在远程审查后没有修改听力学主导的决定。在80%的病例中,对具有病史的视频耳镜进行远程检查足以进行诊断。加上听力测试和标准化病史,诊断率提高到98%。患者满意度评分显示100%服务推荐。每个病人的费用,每次访问,AAD分别为83.36英镑、99.07英镑和69.72英镑,HOC或实体,分别。
    结论:实体提供了安全的耳朵和听力服务,患者评价很高。32%的医院耳科患者有资格享受这项服务。对那些病人来说,与HOC相比,ENITCES的成本效益高20%,可将诊所就诊次数减少多达60%。
    BACKGROUND: Pathway innovation using smartphone otoscopy and tablet-based audiometry technologies to deliver ear and hearing services via trained audiologists may improve efficiency of the service. An ENT-integrated-community-ear service (ENTICES-combining community audiology management, remote ENT review and novel technologies) was piloted. We aimed to assess the efficiency and safety of ENTICES.
    METHODS: ENTICES was a community-based and audiologist-led pathway. Patients with otological symptoms were self-referred to this service. Smartphone otoscopy and tablet-based audiograms were performed. Two otologists reviewed all decisions made in the community by audiologists based on video-otoscopy, hearing tests and chart reviews. Data on the first 50 consecutive new patients attending either consultant-led hospital otology clinics (HOC), audiologist-led hospital advanced audiology diagnostics (AAD) or ENTICES clinics were collected between 1 August 2021 and 31 December 2021. Data were collected through chart reviews and questionnaires to compare the three pathways with respect to efficiency, patient satisfaction, technology utility and safety.
    RESULTS: No audiology-led ENTICES decisions were amended by hospital otologists following remote review. Remote review of video-otoscopy with history was sufficient for a diagnosis in 80% of cases. Adding hearing tests and standardised history increased the diagnostic yield to 98%. Patient satisfaction scores showed 100% service recommendation. The cost per patient, per visit, was £83.36, £99.07 and £69.72 for AAD, HOC or ENTICES, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: ENTICES provides a safe ear and hearing service that patients rated highly. Thirty-two per cent of hospital otology patients were eligible for this service. For those patients, ENTICES is 20% more cost-effective and can reduce the number of clinic visits by up to 60% compared with HOC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:耳鸣诊断由于极其复杂的发病机制而在耳鼻咽喉科中提出了挑战,缺乏有效的客观化方法,和因素影响的诊断。目前在临床实践中缺乏可解释的耳鸣辅助诊断工具。
    目的:本研究旨在使用可解释的人工智能(AI)方法开发诊断模型,以解决耳鸣诊断中准确性低的问题。
    方法:在本研究中,通过将临床医学知识与电子病历相结合,开发了一种基于知识图的耳鸣诊断方法。将1267例患者的电子病历数据与传统中医临床医学知识相结合,构建耳鸣知识图谱。随后,重量被引入,基于互信息值测量知识图中的患者相似度。最后,提出了一种协作邻居算法,对患者相似性进行评分以获得推荐诊断。我们进行了2组实验和1个案例推导,以探索我们模型的有效性,并将模型与最先进的图算法和其他可解释的机器学习模型进行了比较。
    结果:实验结果表明,该方法达到了99.4%的准确性,98.5%灵敏度,99.6%的特异性,精度98.7%,98.6%F1得分,在253名测试患者中,推断5种耳鸣亚型的受试者工作特征曲线下的面积为99%。此外,它表现出良好的可解释性。知识图的拓扑结构提供了透明度,可以解释患者之间相似的原因。
    结论:该方法为医生提供了一种可靠且可解释的诊断工具,有望提高耳鸣诊断的准确性。
    BACKGROUND: Tinnitus diagnosis poses a challenge in otolaryngology owing to an extremely complex pathogenesis, lack of effective objectification methods, and factor-affected diagnosis. There is currently a lack of explainable auxiliary diagnostic tools for tinnitus in clinical practice.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop a diagnostic model using an explainable artificial intelligence (AI) method to address the issue of low accuracy in tinnitus diagnosis.
    METHODS: In this study, a knowledge graph-based tinnitus diagnostic method was developed by combining clinical medical knowledge with electronic medical records. Electronic medical record data from 1267 patients were integrated with traditional Chinese clinical medical knowledge to construct a tinnitus knowledge graph. Subsequently, weights were introduced, which measured patient similarity in the knowledge graph based on mutual information values. Finally, a collaborative neighbor algorithm was proposed, which scored patient similarity to obtain the recommended diagnosis. We conducted 2 group experiments and 1 case derivation to explore the effectiveness of our models and compared the models with state-of-the-art graph algorithms and other explainable machine learning models.
    RESULTS: The experimental results indicate that the method achieved 99.4% accuracy, 98.5% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, 98.7% precision, 98.6% F1-score, and 99% area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the inference of 5 tinnitus subtypes among 253 test patients. Additionally, it demonstrated good interpretability. The topological structure of knowledge graphs provides transparency that can explain the reasons for the similarity between patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: This method provides doctors with a reliable and explainable diagnostic tool that is expected to improve tinnitus diagnosis accuracy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨早产儿发生感音神经性听力损害(SNHI)的风险,以及该风险在多大程度上归因于围产期发病率和治疗。
    方法:基于人群的队列研究,使用来自多个全国注册管理机构的数据。
    方法:1999-2014年挪威出生队列,截至2019年的SNHI数据。
    方法:60023名活产早产儿,分为中度晚期早产(MLP)婴儿(32-36周),极早产儿(VP)(28-31周)和极早产儿(EP)(22-27周),和一个参考组,研究期间所有869797名足月出生婴儿。
    方法:由选定的ICD-10代码定义的SNHI,在出生后至少5年观察期记录。
    结果:早产队列中SNHI的总体患病率为1.4%,而参照组为0.7%。在MLP婴儿中,SNHI的调整风险比(95%CIs)为1.7(1.5-1.8),VP婴儿为3.3(2.8-3.9),EP婴儿为7.6(6.3-9.1)。在EP婴儿中,如果出生在22-23周时,胎龄降低与SNHI的风险比急剧增加相关,达到14.8(7.7-28.7).在VP和MLP婴儿中,机械通气和抗生素治疗与SNHI风险增加的相关性最强,但未接受这些治疗的婴儿风险仍然增加.在EP婴儿中,颅内出血增加了SNHI的高风险。我们在早产儿中没有发现迟发性或迟发性SNHI的迹象。
    结论:早产是SNHI的独立危险因素。侵入性治疗和合并症增加了风险,主要在妊娠28周后出生的婴儿中。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk for sensorineural hearing impairment (SNHI) in preterm infants, and to what extent the risk is attributed to perinatal morbidities and therapies.
    METHODS: Population-based cohort study using data from several nationwide registries.
    METHODS: Norwegian birth cohort 1999-2014, with data on SNHI until 2019.
    METHODS: 60 023 live-born preterm infants, divided in moderate-late preterm (MLP) infants (32-36 weeks), very preterm (VP) infants (28-31 weeks) and extremely preterm (EP) infants (22-27 weeks), and a reference group with all 869 797 term-born infants from the study period.
    METHODS: SNHI defined by selected ICD-10 codes, recorded during minimum 5-year observation period after birth.
    RESULTS: The overall SNHI prevalence in the preterm cohort was 1.4% compared with 0.7% in the reference group. The adjusted risk ratios (95% CIs) for SNHI were 1.7 (1.5-1.8) in MLP infants, 3.3 (2.8-3.9) in VP infants and 7.6 (6.3-9.1) in EP infants. Among EP infants, decreasing gestational age was associated with a steep increase in the risk ratio of SNHI reaching 14.8 (7.7-28.7) if born at 22-23 weeks gestation. Among the VP and MLP infants, mechanical ventilation and antibiotic therapy had strongest association with increased risk of SNHI, but infants not receiving these therapies remained at increased risk. Among EP infants intracranial haemorrhage increased the already high risk for SNHI. We found no signs of delayed or late-onset SNHI in preterm infants.
    CONCLUSIONS: Preterm birth is an independent risk factor for SNHI. Invasive therapies and comorbidities increase the risk, predominantly in infants born after 28 weeks gestation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    <b><br>简介:</b>特发性感音神经性听力损失超过30分贝(dB)或更多,在至少三个连续的听力频率上发作少于3天,被称为突发性感音神经性听力损失(ISSNHL),并被称为ENT(耳、鼻子,和喉咙)紧急情况。当病人的听力突然恶化,他们变得困惑,焦虑,和担心。突发性感觉神经性听力损失的主要治疗方法之一是鼓室内类固醇。鼓室内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)改善内耳毛细胞,这增强了听力。</br><b><br>目的:</b>旨在证明鼓内注射PRP在ISSNHL治疗中的安全性和有效性,与鼓内注射类固醇相比。</br><b><br>方法:</b>研究组由100名患者组成,这些患者在30天内经历了ISSNHL,没有耳蜗后病变,MRI扫描阴性。50名患者接受了6次鼓室类固醇注射,而其余50例患者间隔1周接受2次鼓室内注射PRP。</br><b><br>结果:</b>共39例PRP注射患者2周后听力改善25分贝,2个月后听力改善30分贝,2周后改善了26%的言语歧视,2个月后改善了28%。31名患者的鼓室内注射类固醇注意到他们的听力改善18分贝2周后和22分贝2个月后,2周后改善了21%的言语歧视,2个月后改善了24%。</br><b><br>结论:</b>PRP对于治疗ISSNHL是安全有效的,成本低,没有全身副作用,就像口服类固醇一样。因此,这样的研究应该继续下去。</br>.
    <b><br>Introduction:</b> Idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss of 30 decibels (dB) or more over at least three contiguous audiometric frequencies with an onset of less than 3 days is referred to as sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and is known as an ENT (ear, nose, and throat) emergency. When a patient\'s hearing suddenly deteriorates, they become confused, anxious, and worried. One of the primary therapies for sudden sensorineural hearing loss is intratympanic steroids. Intratympanic injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) improve inner ear hair cells, which enhances hearing.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> To show the safety and efficacy of intratympanic PRP injection in the management of ISSNHL in comparison with intratympanic steroid injection.</br> <b><br>Methods:</b> The study group was comprised of 100 patients who had experienced ISSNHL within 30 days with no retrocochlear pathology, as demonstrated by a negative MRI scan. 50 patients received 6 intratympanic steroid injections, while the remaining 50 patients received 2 intratympanic injections of PRP at a 1-week interval.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> A total of 39 patients with PRP injection noted an improvement in their hearing of 25 db after 2 weeks and of 30 db after 2 months, with improved speech discrimination of 26% after 2 weeks and of 28% after 2 months. 31 patients with intratympanic steroid injection noted an improvement in their hearing of 18 db after 2 weeks and of 22 db after 2 months, with improved speech discrimination of 21% after 2 weeks and of 24% after 2 months.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> PRP appears safe and efficient for the treatment of ISSNHL, with a low cost and no systemic side effects, as with oral steroids. Therefore, such research should be continued.</br>.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:听力损失是一种慢性健康状况,随着年龄的增长而急剧上升。人们应对和应对健康状况的方式受到他们执行疾病和治疗相关工作的能力的影响。目的是探索听力损失的累积负担以及为减轻负担而调动的资源。
    方法:采用定性设计,对通过听力学服务和非临床服务招募的参与者进行半结构化访谈(在线或面对面)。比如唇读课。采访了46名年龄在16至96岁之间的听力损失参与者。绑架的方法,由May等人告知。治疗理论的负担,用于分析数据。
    结果:疾病负担涉及参与者努力了解他们的听力损失,从事情感工作以响应声音的变化,社交互动和身份认同,并应对与他人沟通所需的日常挫折。放弃和不确定性是治疗负担的特征;参与者从事情感工作以适应听力技术,并应对听力可能如何进步的不确定性。为了减轻负担,参与者利用内部资源(心理,健康素养,认知)和外部资源(社会支持,金融,信息,technology).
    结论:听力损失的工作量在很大程度上取决于患者,并不总是可见的。我们的工作表明,需要通过实施以生活世界为主导的护理来扩大听力学护理的方法,以家庭为中心的护理和同伴支持,为听力损失者提供支持。
    我们与通过阿斯顿大学招募的有听力损失经历的公众成员协商开发了该项目,并与听力学服务的志愿者联系。我们还咨询了更有可能受听力损失影响的成年人,包括有学习障碍的成年人,居住护理的老年人和来自南亚的人(孟加拉国,印度和巴基斯坦社区)。这些人评论了研究的目的,面试时间表和参与者招聘实践。我们的合著者之一(经验专家)为主题的开发和解释以及最终手稿的准备做出了贡献。
    BACKGROUND: Hearing loss is a chronic health condition that rises sharply with age. The way people respond to and cope with health conditions is influenced by their capacity to perform illness and treatment-related work. The aim was to explore the cumulative burdens of living with hearing loss and the resources mobilised to ease the burdens.
    METHODS: A qualitative design was used with semi-structured interviews (online or in-person) with participants recruited through audiology services and nonclinical services, such as lip-reading classes. Forty-six participants with hearing loss aged between 16 and 96 years were interviewed. An abductive approach, informed by May et al.\'s burden of treatment theory, was used to analyse the data.
    RESULTS: The illness burden involved participants working to make sense of their hearing loss, engaging in emotional work in response to changes in sound, social interactions and identity and coping with the daily frustrations required to communicate with others. Abandonment and uncertainty characterised the treatment burden; participants engaged in emotional work to adjust to hearing technology and deal with the uncertainty of how their hearing might progress. To ameliorate the burdens, participants drew on internal resources (psychological, health literacy, cognitive) and external resources (social support, financial, information, technology).
    CONCLUSIONS: The workload of hearing loss appears largely devolved to the patient and is not always visible. Our work indicates the need to widen approaches in audiological care through the implementation of lifeworld-led care, family-centred care and peer support to build support for those with hearing loss.
    UNASSIGNED: We developed the project in consultation with members of the public who have lived experience of hearing loss recruited through Aston University and volunteer links to audiology services. We also consulted people more likely to be affected by hearing loss adults including adults with learning disabilities, older adults in residential care and people from South Asia (Bangladeshi, Indian and Pakistani communities). These individuals commented on the study aims, interview schedule and participant recruitment practices. One of our co-authors (expert by experience) contributed to the development and interpretation of themes and preparation of the final manuscript.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人工智能(AI)聊天机器人,如ChatGPT-4,已经显示出在医学的各个方面的巨大应用潜力,包括医学教育,临床实践,和研究。
    本研究旨在评估ChatGPT-4在2023年台湾听力学家资格考试中的表现,从而初步探索AI聊天机器人在听力学和听力保健服务领域的潜在效用。
    ChatGPT-4的任务是为2023年台湾听力学家资格考试提供答案和推理。考试包括六个科目:(1)基础听觉科学,(2)行为听力学,(3)电生理听力学,(4)听力装置的原理和实践,(5)听觉和平衡系统的健康和康复,(6)听觉和言语交流障碍(包括职业道德)。每科包括50道选择题,除了行为听力学,有49个问题,共计299个问题。
    6个科目的正确回答率如下:基础听觉科学为88%,行为听力学占63%,58%用于电生理听力学,72%用于听力设备的原理和实践,80%用于听觉和平衡系统的健康和康复,86%为听觉和言语交流障碍(包括职业道德)。299个问题的总体准确率为75%,超过了所有科目的平均准确率为60%的考试及格标准。对ChatGPT-4的回答的全面审查表明,不正确的答案主要是由于信息错误。
    ChatGPT-4在台湾听力学家资格考试中表现出强劲的表现,展示有效的逻辑推理技能。我们的结果表明,随着信息准确性的提高,ChatGPT-4的性能可以进一步提高。这项研究表明,人工智能聊天机器人在听力学和听力护理服务中的应用具有巨大潜力。
    UNASSIGNED: Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, such as ChatGPT-4, have shown immense potential for application across various aspects of medicine, including medical education, clinical practice, and research.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of ChatGPT-4 in the 2023 Taiwan Audiologist Qualification Examination, thereby preliminarily exploring the potential utility of AI chatbots in the fields of audiology and hearing care services.
    UNASSIGNED: ChatGPT-4 was tasked to provide answers and reasoning for the 2023 Taiwan Audiologist Qualification Examination. The examination encompassed six subjects: (1) basic auditory science, (2) behavioral audiology, (3) electrophysiological audiology, (4) principles and practice of hearing devices, (5) health and rehabilitation of the auditory and balance systems, and (6) auditory and speech communication disorders (including professional ethics). Each subject included 50 multiple-choice questions, with the exception of behavioral audiology, which had 49 questions, amounting to a total of 299 questions.
    UNASSIGNED: The correct answer rates across the 6 subjects were as follows: 88% for basic auditory science, 63% for behavioral audiology, 58% for electrophysiological audiology, 72% for principles and practice of hearing devices, 80% for health and rehabilitation of the auditory and balance systems, and 86% for auditory and speech communication disorders (including professional ethics). The overall accuracy rate for the 299 questions was 75%, which surpasses the examination\'s passing criteria of an average 60% accuracy rate across all subjects. A comprehensive review of ChatGPT-4\'s responses indicated that incorrect answers were predominantly due to information errors.
    UNASSIGNED: ChatGPT-4 demonstrated a robust performance in the Taiwan Audiologist Qualification Examination, showcasing effective logical reasoning skills. Our results suggest that with enhanced information accuracy, ChatGPT-4\'s performance could be further improved. This study indicates significant potential for the application of AI chatbots in audiology and hearing care services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号