背景:大米,它是世界上一半以上人口的主食,对致病真菌非常敏感,稻瘟病菌。然而,普通野生稻(Oryzarufipogon),这是亚洲栽培稻的祖先(O.sativa),具有作为抗米曲霉的遗传来源的巨大潜力。最近的研究表明,水稻的驯化改变了其与共生丛枝菌根的关系。尚未记录菌根居住的野生和国内水稻对米曲霉感染的比较反应。
结果:在当前的研究中,用丛枝菌根(AM)真菌(AMF)根瘤菌定植的野生和栽培水稻的根用于比较这两个物种对米曲霉感染的转录组反应。表型分析表明,用R.intraradices定殖野生和栽培稻提高了两种基因型对米曲霉的抗性。野生AM稻,然而,对米曲霉的抗性比栽培的AM水稻更强,以及野生稻的非菌根。转录组分析表明,调节野生和栽培AM稻对米曲霉入侵的反应的机制存在显着差异。响应病原体,野生AM稻中比栽培AM稻中更多的基因表达发生变化。野生和栽培AM水稻均对米曲霉表现出共同的反应,其中包括与生长素和水杨酸途径相关的基因;所有这些在发病相关的蛋白质合成中起重要作用。在野生AM稻中,次级代谢和生物应激相关分析表明,茉莉酸合成相关的α-亚麻酸途径,酚类和萜类途径,以及酚类和萜类合成相关的甲羟戊酸(MVA)途径受病原体的影响更大。响应米曲霉,与这些途径相关的基因在野生AM稻中比在栽培AM稻中更明显地富集。另一方面,与“油菜素类固醇生物合成”相关的基因在栽培AM水稻中更加丰富。
结论:AMFR.Intraradices定植的水稻植株比非AMF定植的植株对米曲霉表现出更大的抗性。当前研究的结果表明,作物驯化对宿主通过AMF根定植获得的益处的潜在影响,并提供有关潜在分子机制的新信息。此外,这项研究的结果也可以帮助制定AMF(S)种植水稻时的应用指南。
BACKGROUND: Rice, which serves as a staple food for more than half of the world\'s population, is very susceptible to the pathogenic fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae. However, common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon), which is the ancestor of Asian cultivated rice (O. sativa), has significant potential as a genetic source of resistance to M. oryzae. Recent studies have shown that the domestication of rice has altered its relationship to symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizae. A comparative response of wild and domestic rice inhabited by mycorrhizae to infection by M. oryzae has not been documented.
RESULTS: In the current
study, roots of wild and cultivated rice colonized with the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus (AMF) Rhizoglomus intraradices were used to compare the transcriptomic responses of the two species to infection by M. oryzae. Phenotypic analysis indicated that the colonization of wild and cultivated rice with R. intraradices improved the resistance of both genotypes to M. oryzae. Wild AM rice, however, was more resistant to M. oryzae than the cultivated AM rice, as well as nonmycorrhizal roots of wild rice. Transcriptome analysis indicated that the mechanisms regulating the responses of wild and cultivated AM rice to M. oryzae invasion were significantly different. The expression of a greater number of genes was changed in wild AM rice than in cultivated AM rice in response to the pathogen. Both wild and cultivated AM rice exhibited a shared response to M. oryzae which included genes related to the auxin and salicylic acid pathways; all of these play important roles in pathogenesis-related protein synthesis. In wild AM rice, secondary metabolic and biotic stress-related analyses indicated that the jasmonic acid synthesis-related α-linolenic acid pathway, the phenolic and terpenoid pathways, as well as the phenolic and terpenoid syntheses-related mevalonate (MVA) pathway were more affected by the pathogen. Genes related to these pathways were more significantly enriched in wild AM rice than in cultivated AM rice in response to M. oryzae. On the other hand, genes associated with the \'brassinosteroid biosynthesis\' were more enriched in cultivated AM rice.
CONCLUSIONS: The AMF R. intraradices-colonized rice plants exhibited greater resistance to M. oryzae than non-AMF-colonized plants. The findings of the current
study demonstrate the potential effects of crop domestication on the benefits received by the host via root colonization with AMF(s), and provide new information on the underlying molecular mechanisms. In addition, results of this
study can also help develop guidelines for the applications of AMF(s) when planting rice.