animal-assisted interventions

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿童癌症给患者及其家庭带来了沉重的负担。总体生存率的最新进展日益引起人们对长期生活质量的关注。长期以来,人们一直认为动物辅助活动(AAAs)可以减轻儿科患者及其在医院环境中的负担。然而,他们在住院儿科肿瘤的使用一直是一个敏感的问题,主要是由于对感染的恐惧,导致缺乏研究。这项研究提供了有关可行性的数据,安全,以及单个德国中心的AAAs的功效。
    方法:在2018年至2022年之间,60例被诊断为恶性肿瘤并正在接受治疗的患者(中位年龄=10.3岁)接受了干预犬的探访(总探访次数=100)。根据医院政策对患者进行感染筛查,根据症状进行额外的微生物检测。对狗进行了人类病原体和人畜共患疾病的筛查。从第一次就诊前两个月到最后一次就诊后两个月分析微生物数据和住院情况。接受在医院,无论是否有计划的动物辅助干预以及干预前后的状态压力,使用经过验证的视觉模拟量表(0-10)进行测量。
    结果:患者受益于AAAs,显示出对住院的接受度增加(中位数:7.25vs.4.50,P<0.001)和访问后一小时与访问前一小时相比,中位状态压力等级降低(1.00vs.4.25,P<0.001)。干预没有导致感染数量增加或计划外住院,没有发现人畜共患病。犬的所有微生物筛选试验均为阴性。
    结论:在儿科肿瘤学住院患者中与探视犬的AAAs是可行且安全的。虽然他们有希望提高病人的健康,需要进一步的前瞻性研究.补充文件2(MP4240076KB)。
    BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer entails a heavy burden for patients and their families. Recent advances in overall survival rates have increasingly brought long-term quality of life into focus. Animal-assisted activities (AAAs) have long been hypothesized to alleviate the burden on pediatric patients and their peers in the hospital setting. However, their use in inpatient pediatric oncology has been a sensitive issue mainly due to the fear of infections, resulting in a lack of studies. This study presents data on the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of AAAs from a single German center.
    METHODS: Between 2018 and 2022, 60 patients (median age = 10.3 years) diagnosed with malignancy and undergoing treatment were visited by an intervention dog (total visits = 100). Patients were screened for infections as per hospital policy, with additional microbiological testing performed based on symptoms. The dog was screened for human pathogens and zoonoses. Microbial data and hospitalizations were analyzed from two months prior to the first visit until two months after the last visit. Acceptance of being in the hospital, both with and without planned animal-assisted interventions and pre- and post-intervention state stress, were measured using a validated visual analogue scale (0-10).
    RESULTS: Patients benefited from AAAs, showing increased acceptance of being in the hospital (median: 7.25 vs. 4.50, P < 0.001) and decreased median state stress ratings one hour after the visit compared to one hour before the visit (1.00 vs. 4.25, P < 0.001). The intervention did not result in an increased number of infections or unplanned hospitalizations, and no zoonoses were detected. All microbial screening tests of the dog were negative.
    CONCLUSIONS: AAAs with visiting dogs in inpatient pediatric oncology are feasible and safe. Although they hold promise for enhancing patients\' well-being, further prospective studies are needed. Supplementary file 2 (MP4 240076 KB).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鉴于对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的补充治疗策略的兴趣日益增加,本研究旨在全面分析动物辅助活动和治疗(AAAT)对各种ASD症状的影响.
    对数据库的细致搜索,包括Scopus和PubMed,为ASD收集AAAT的相关研究。这一过程导致选择了45项研究,包括1,212名参与者。然后对所选择的研究进行荟萃分析以评估AAAT在减轻核心ASD症状中的功效。
    荟萃分析显示,由于AAAT,一些核心ASD症状得到了显着改善。值得注意的是,社会交往有所改善(MD=-4.96,95%CI[-7.49,-2.44]),易怒(MD=-2.38,95%CI[-4.06,-0.71]),多动症(MD=-4.03,95%CI[-6.17,-1.89]),和不同的单词使用技能(MD=20.48,95%CI[7.41,33.55])。然而,社会意识(MD=-1.63,95%CI[-4.07,0.81]),社会认知(MD=-3.60,95%CI[-9.36,2.17]),社交行为(MD=-0.73,95%CI[-2.55,1.09]),社会动机(MD=-1.21,95%CI[-2.56,0.13]),嗜睡(MD=-1.12,95%CI[-3.92,1.68]),和定型行为(MD=-0.23,95%CI[-1.27,0.80])没有显著改善。
    该研究证明了AAAT在改善ASD某些核心症状方面的潜力,比如社交,烦躁,多动症,和单词使用技巧。然而,AAAT在其他ASD症状领域的有效性仍不确定。该研究受到缺乏长期随访数据和现有研究中存在高风险偏倚的限制。因此,虽然研究结果表明了AAAT在特定领域的前景,建议谨慎在所有ASD症状中推广其疗效。
    UNASSIGNED: Given the rising interest in complementary therapeutic strategies for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), this research aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the impact of animal-assisted activities and therapies (AAAT) on various ASD symptoms.
    UNASSIGNED: A meticulous search of databases, including Scopus and PubMed, was conducted to gather relevant research on AAAT for ASD. This process led to the selection of 45 studies encompassing 1,212 participants. The chosen studies were then subjected to a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of AAAT in alleviating core ASD symptoms.
    UNASSIGNED: The meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in several core ASD symptoms due to AAAT. Notably, there were improvements in social communication (MD = -4.96, 95% CI [-7.49, -2.44]), irritability (MD = -2.38, 95% CI [-4.06, -0.71]), hyperactivity (MD = -4.03, 95% CI [-6.17, -1.89]), and different word usage skills (MD = 20.48, 95% CI [7.41, 33.55]). However, social awareness (MD = -1.63, 95% CI [-4.07, 0.81]), social cognition (MD = -3.60, 95% CI [-9.36, 2.17]), social mannerisms (MD = -0.73, 95% CI [-2.55, 1.09]), social motivation (MD = -1.21, 95% CI [-2.56, 0.13]), lethargy (MD = -1.12, 95% CI [-3.92, 1.68]), and stereotypical behaviors (MD = -0.23, 95% CI [-1.27, 0.80]) did not significantly improve.
    UNASSIGNED: The study demonstrates the potential of AAAT in improving certain core symptoms of ASD, such as social communication, irritability, hyperactivity, and word usage skills. However, the effectiveness of AAAT in other ASD symptom domains remains uncertain. The research is limited by the absence of long-term follow-up data and a high risk of bias in existing studies. Therefore, while the findings indicate the promise of AAAT in specific areas, caution is advised in generalizing its efficacy across all ASD symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:狗辅助治疗(DAT)是一种体验式干预,以促进心理,物理,以及儿童和成人的社会功能。在轻度智力障碍或临界智力功能(MID-BIF)的成年人中,仅对DAT进行了很少的研究。这项研究的目的是探索MID-BIF患者在精神卫生保健机构接受DAT的经验。(2)方法:7名患者完成了13至15个疗程的DAT。在完成计划的两周内,他们接受了半结构化采访。使用解释现象学分析对访谈的笔录进行了分析。此外,患者亲属和DAT治疗师接受了采访,并与每位患者的治疗团队进行了焦点小组讨论。(3)结果:患者体验以阳性为主。与狗的身体接触使他们平静下来。这只狗为他们提供了情感支持,并帮助他们在治疗内外以及他们居住的环境中进行接触。患者还喜欢DAT专注于狗而不是他们的问题的事实,治疗是经验性的,并且使用了积极的方法,而且,在治疗期间,他们觉得自己不是病人,而是人类。DAT是精神卫生保健机构中MID-BIF患者的一种有前途的治疗方法,但需要对其有效性和成本效益以及在临床实践中实施DAT的方法进行更多研究,以做出更明确的陈述。
    (1) Background: Dog-assisted therapy (DAT) is an experiential intervention to promote psychological, physical, and social functioning in children and adults. Only few studies have been conducted on DAT in adults with a mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning (MID-BIF). The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of patients with MID-BIF undergoing DAT in a mental health care facility. (2) Method: Seven patients completed 13 to 15 sessions of DAT. Within two weeks of completing the program, they were interviewed using a semi-structured interview. The transcripts of the interviews were analysed using interpretational phenomenological analysis. In addition, the patients\' relatives and the DAT therapist were interviewed, and a focus group discussion took place with each patient\'s treatment team. (3) Results: The patients\' experiences were predominantly positive. Physical contact with the dog calmed them down. The dog offered them emotional support and helped them to make contact inside and outside the therapy and the setting where they lived. The patients also liked the fact that DAT focused on the dog rather than their problems, that the therapy was experiential and using a positive approach, and that, during the therapy, they did not feel like a patient but a human being. DAT is a promising therapy for patients with MID-BIF in mental health care facilities, but more research into its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and ways to implement DAT in clinical practice is needed to make more definitive statements.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:在过去的十年中,兔子的受欢迎程度有所增加,并成为欧盟第三大最常见的伴侣动物。兔子在动物辅助干预(AAIs)中的参与正在增加。确保AAI中动物的福祉非常重要。尽管参与AAI的人们的需求和优势越来越明显,动物的需求没有明确定义,因此,这是一个伟大的调查领域。用于AAI的动物需要定期运输,这本身可能是压力的来源。(2)方法:以非侵入性方式测量由运输引起的兔子的压力:从粪便中确定皮质醇水平,基于他们的细分产品。研究涉及18只动物。家兔每两天经历30分钟的运输,持续两周(共六次),同时收集了126个样品。(3)结果:兔子可以首次处理运输程序,但随后无论提供何种处理方法,粪便样本中的应激激素代谢产物都会增加(干草,胡萝卜和苹果)在马车上。(4)结论:那些使用兔子进行动物辅助干预的主人需要考虑到运输本身对动物来说是一种紧张的经历。
    (1) Background: the popularity of rabbits has increased during the last decade and become the third most common companion animal in the EU. Rabbits\' participation in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAIs) is growing. It is highly important to ensure the well-being of the animals in AAIs. Whereas the needs and the advantages of people involved in AAI are becoming more and more evident, the needs of animals are not clearly defined, therefore, it is a great field of inquiry. Animals who are used for AAI need to be transported regularly, which itself might be a source of stress. (2) Methods: the stress of rabbits-caused by transportation-was measured in a non-invasive way: cortisol levels were determined from feces, based on their breakdown products. Eighteen animals were involved in the study. Rabbits experienced a 30 min transportation every second day for two weeks (altogether six times) while 126 samples were collected. (3) Results: rabbits could handle the transportation procedure the first time but subsequently the stress hormone metabolites in feces samples increased regardless of the offered treatments (hay, carrot and apple) during the carriage. (4) Conclusions: those owners who use rabbits for Animal-Assisted Interventions need to take into account that transportation itself is a stressful experience for the animals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:大学校园环境独特而复杂,随着时间的推移,学生和工作人员的压力和焦虑水平越来越高。国际上用于缓解压力和焦虑的一种干预措施是动物辅助干预(AAI)。这项研究旨在在实施之前探索澳大利亚大学生和工作人员对AAI的看法。
    方法:本研究采用解释性混合方法。学生参与者是通过大学主题网站上的帖子和社交媒体招募的。大学工作人员参与者是通过经理或部门通讯的电子邮件招募的。数据是通过在线匿名调查和随后的半结构化访谈收集的。定量数据分析采用SPSS,定性数据分析采用专题分析。
    结果:数据包括344份调查回复和45份半结构化访谈。调查答复表明,绝大多数参与者认为AAI可以促进校园健康。这是由于参与者认为AAI可以在校园中获得的好处范围(例如减轻压力和焦虑,提供休息工作或学习的机会,社会效益,并改善大学环境)。在采访中,参与者建议AAI可以为积极的大学环境做出贡献,并帮助促进校园中的其他服务;前提是它认为那些对参与不感兴趣的人。如果可持续地实施,AAI有可能为教职员工和学生创造积极的大学环境,通过潜在地减少大学社区目前正在经历的高压力和焦虑率。AAI还可以帮助提高人们对校园其他卫生服务的认识,进一步促进积极的心理健康和福祉。
    OBJECTIVE: The university campus environment is unique and complex, with students and staff members experiencing increasing levels of stress and anxiety over time. One intervention being used internationally to alleviate stress and anxiety is an Animal Assisted Intervention (AAI). This research aimed to explore Australian university students\' and staff members\' perspectives on an AAI prior to implementation.
    METHODS: This study used an explanatory mixed methods approach. Student participants were recruited through posts on a university\'s subject sites and via social media. University staff member participants were recruited through emails from managers or department newsletters. Data were collected through an online anonymous survey and subsequent semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed with SPSS and qualitative data were analysed via thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: Data included 344 survey responses and 45 semi-structured interviews. Survey responses indicated a large majority of participants believe an AAI could promote health on campus. This was due to the range of benefits participants felt an AAI could have on campus (such as reducing stress and anxiety, providing opportunities for a break from work or study, social benefits, and enhancing the university environment). In interviews, participants suggested an AAI could contribute towards a positive university environment and help promote other services on campus; provided it considers those not interested in participating. SO WHAT?: If implemented sustainably, an AAI has potential to contribute towards a positive university environment for both staff and students, by potentially reducing the high rates of stress and anxiety the university community are currently experiencing. An AAI could also help to raise awareness of other health services on campus, further contributing towards promoting positive mental health and wellbeing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,在监狱中提供犬辅助干预措施(CAI)方面取得了全球进展.然而,这些计划主要集中在对所涉及的狗的好处,而不是对参与者的影响。这项前瞻性研究的作者一直在对治疗犬进行CAI程序,称为PAWSitive支持,自2016年以来在加拿大联邦监狱。计划主持人的想法和对监狱工作人员的采访表明,该计划,特别是治疗犬,提供了一个独特的和集成的舒适来源,支持,对参与者的爱。这些好处与监狱以外的CAI计划中看到的好处是一致的。监狱环境的独特之处似乎是参与者与工作人员关系的改善。治疗犬帮助参与者体验舒适,从而表达他们的情绪。这似乎有助于他们认可监狱系统内的支持,特别是与工作人员建立信任。此外,这些狗在监狱里创造了一种爱的感觉,被解释为被照顾的感觉,这对这个人群来说是罕见的。作者认为,在监狱中整合治疗犬干预可能是一种新颖的减少伤害的策略,以解决与监狱化和相关的心理健康问题有关的问题。包括物质使用。这种考虑可以为法医精神病学领域提供独特的见解,为患者提供富有同情心的护理。
    In recent years, there has been a global advancement in the offering of canine-assisted interventions (CAI) in prisons. However, these programs have focused primarily on the benefits to the dogs involved and not on the impact on the participants. The authors of this perspective study have been running a CAI program with therapy dogs, called PAWSitive Support, in a Canadian federal prison since 2016. Thoughts from the program facilitators and interviews with prison staff indicate that the program, and specifically the therapy dogs, provides a unique and integrated source of comfort, support, and love for participants. These benefits are consistent with those seen in CAI programs outside of prisons. Unique to the prison setting appears to be an improvement in participant-staff relations. The therapy dogs have helped participants to experience comfort and consequently express their emotions. This seems to contribute to their recognition of support within the prison system and specifically developing trust with staff. Additionally, the dogs have helped to create an experience of the feeling of love within the prison, interpreted as the feeling of being cared for, which is rare for this population. The authors suggest that the integration of a therapy dog intervention in prison could be a novel harm reduction strategy to address issues related to prisonization and associated mental health concerns, including substance use. This consideration can offer unique insight into the field of forensic psychiatry about providing compassionate care to patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    假设狗辅助治疗可以降低自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童和唐氏综合症(DS)儿童的压力,在生理水平上可能是可见的。在这项研究中,我们对20例DS或ASD患儿的心率变异性(HRV)和唾液皮质醇进行了每周6次犬辅助治疗的开始和结束时的测量.我们发现在单个疗程中皮质醇水平下降,但六个疗程(六周)后没有整体效果。狗辅助治疗对HRV增加的影响无法证实。这项研究是第一个使用生理测量来测试DAT效果的研究之一。
    Dog-assisted therapy is hypothesized to lower stress in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and children with Down syndrome (DS), which may be visible on a physiological level. In this study, we measured heart rate variability (HRV) and salivary cortisol of 20 children with DS or ASD at the beginning and end of six weekly sessions of dog-assisted therapy. We found a decrease of cortisol levels during single sessions, but no overall effect after six sessions (six weeks). The effect of dog-assisted therapy on the increase of HRV could not be confirmed. This study is one of the first to use physiological measurements to test the effects of DAT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:宠物具有显著的健康益处,从降低心血管风险到焦虑和创伤后应激改善。在重症监护病房(ICU)中,由于担心危重患者的健康风险,因此不经常进行动物辅助干预(AAI),因为存在人畜共患病的假设风险。
    目的:本系统综述旨在收集和总结关于ICUAAI的现有证据。审查的问题是:“AAI是否改善了ICU收治的危重病患者的临床结局?”和“人畜共患感染是预后不良的原因吗?”
    方法:在2023年1月5日搜索了以下数据库:Cochrane中央对照试验登记册(CENTRAL),EMBASE,和PubMed。所有对照研究(随机对照,准实验,和观察性研究)被包括在内。系统审查方案已在国际前瞻性系统审查登记册(CRD42022344539)上注册。
    结果:共检索到1302篇论文,1262在重复删除后。其中,只有34人被评估为合格,只有6人被纳入定性综合.在所有研究中,狗是用于AAI的动物,共有118例病例和128例对照。研究有很高的变异性,没有人使用增加的生存率或人畜共患风险作为结果。
    结论:关于AAI在ICU环境中的有效性的证据很少,并且没有关于其安全性的数据。在ICU中使用AAI必须被认为是实验性的,并遵循相关法规,直到获得更多数据为止。鉴于对以患者为中心的结果的潜在积极影响,高质量研究的研究工作似乎是合理的。
    BACKGROUND: Pets offer significant health benefits, from decreased cardiovascular risks to anxiety and post-traumatic stress improvements. Animal-assisted interventions (AAI) are not frequently practiced in the intensive care unit (ICU) for fear of health risk for critical patients because there is a hypothetical risk of zoonoses.
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to collect and summarize available evidence about AAI in the ICU. The Review questions were \"Do AAI improve the clinical outcome of Critically Ill Patients admitted to ICUs?\" and \"Are the zoonotic infections the cause of negative prognosis?\".
    METHODS: The following databases were searched on 5 January 2023: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, and PubMed. All controlled studies (randomized controlled, quasi-experimental, and observational studies) were included. The systematic review protocol has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (CRD42022344539).
    RESULTS: A total of 1302 papers were retrieved, 1262 after the duplicate remotion. Of these, only 34 were assessed for eligibility and only 6 were included in the qualitative synthesis. In all the studies included the dog was the animal used for the AAI with a total of 118 cases and 128 controls. Studies have high variability, and no one has used increased survival or zoonotic risk as outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: The evidence on the effectiveness of AAIs in ICU settings is scarce and no data are available on their safety. AAIs use in the ICU must be considered experimental and follow the related regulation until further data will be available. Given the potential positive impact on patient-centered outcomes, a research effort for high-quality studies seems to be justified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    狗可以为人类提供一系列的身体,心理和社会效益。虽然越来越多的科学证据表明对人类有益,人们不太关注对犬类健康的影响,狗的福利和道德考虑。动物福利的重要性日益得到承认,指出《渥太华宪章》应扩大到包括非人类动物的福利,以支持促进人类健康。治疗犬计划在包括医院在内的各种环境中提供,老年护理设施和心理健康服务,强调它们在人类健康结果中发挥的重要作用。研究表明,在参与人与动物相互作用的人类和其他动物中,存在压力的生物标志物。这篇综述旨在评估人与动物的相互作用对参与为人类健康提供支持的治疗犬的影响。虽然具有挑战性,最重要的是确保,在一个福利的框架内,治疗犬的福利包括在内,因为这是未来可持续发展的关键因素。由于缺乏保护参与这些计划的狗的健康的准则和标准,我们发现了一系列问题。将《渥太华宪章》扩展到包括非人类动物的福利,并通过“一个福利”方法加以利用,将促进动物和人类健康超越目前的界限。
    Dogs may provide humans with a range of physical, mental and social benefits. Whilst there is growing scientific evidence of benefits to humans, there has been less focus on the impact to canine health, welfare and ethical considerations for the dogs. The importance of animal welfare is increasingly acknowledged, indicating that the Ottawa Charter should be extended to include the welfare of non-human animals supporting the promotion of human health. Therapy dog programmes are delivered across a variety of settings including hospitals, aged care facilities and mental health services, highlighting the important role they play in human health outcomes. Research has shown that that there are biomarkers for stress in humans and other animals engaged in human-animal interactions. This review aims to assess the impact of human-animal interactions on therapy dogs engaged in providing support to human health. While challenging, it is paramount to ensure that, within the framework of One Welfare, the welfare of therapy dogs is included, as it is a key factor for future sustainability. We identified a range of concerns due to the lack of guidelines and standards to protect the wellbeing of the dogs engaged in these programmes. Extension of the Ottawa Charter to include the welfare of non-human animals with leveraging through a One Welfare approach would promote animal and human health beyond current boundaries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    动物辅助干预(AAI)代表了综合医学的表达,根据一个健康的方法。事实上,在医院实施动物辅助疗法和动物辅助活动,康复中心,等。AAI的功效是基于种间相互作用,会受到不同因素的影响,比如动物和处理器的角色,选择合适的动物种类,适当的动物教育协议,处理者和动物之间的关系,动物之间的相互关系,病人,和工作团队的成员。AAI为患者带来许多好处,但可能使他们暴露于人畜共患病原体传播。因此,积极的动物福利,作为避免人畜共患病事件或传播的预防性药物,是对人类和动物健康和福祉有影响的相关方面。这篇综述旨在总结当前已发表的关于AAI中病原体发生的知识,并根据AAI参与者的健康和安全讨论它们的相关性。此外,本综述将有助于通过仔细的益处/挑战分析来定义AAI的最新水平,并根据“一个健康”方法对未来可能的发展进行讨论。
    Animal-assisted interventions (AAI)s represent the expression of integrated medicine, according to the One Health approach. Actually, animal-assisted therapies and animal-assisted activities are implemented in hospitals, rehabilitation centers, etc. The efficacy of AAIs is based on interspecific interactions and would be impacted by different factors, such as the characters of both the animal and the handler, a suitable selection of animal species, an appropriate animal educational protocol, the relationship between the handler and the animal, and mutual relationship among the animal, the patients, and members of the working team. AAIs produce many advantages for the patients but could expose them to zoonotic-pathogens transmission. Therefore, positive animal welfare, as preventative medicine to avoid incidents or transmission of zoonosis, is a relevant aspect with implications for human and animal health and wellbeing. This review aims to summarize the current published knowledge regarding the occurrence of pathogens in AAIs and to discuss their relevance in light of health and safety in AAIs participants. In addition, this review will contribute to defining the state of the art of AAIs through a careful benefits/challenges analysis and offers discussion points on the possible future developments according to the One Health approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号