UNASSIGNED: An intramuscular abscess of the subscapularis is a rare phenomenon but important pathology for surgeons to be aware of because clinical deterioration can be rapid and diagnosis difficult. The presentation often mimics other common shoulder pathologies with subacute shoulder pain and stiffness. Early diagnosis, antibiotics and surgical drainage are critical to reduce the spread and joint destruction.
UNASSIGNED: A search of PubMed and Google Scholar databases identified cases of subscapular intramuscular abscess. Data collected about each case included patient demographics, presentation, pathology, surgical treatment and outcome. The authors report one additional subscapular abscess case.
UNASSIGNED: Data from 17 cases of subscapular abscess were found, 16 in the literature and one case described by the authors. Sixteen of 17 cases (94.1%) presented with shoulder pain and reduced range of motion worsening over a mean of 6.7 days prior to presentation. Surgical approaches utilised included a posterior inferomedial approach, deltoid-pectoral approach and one posterior inferolateral approach.
UNASSIGNED: From the limited data available regarding subscapular intramuscular abscess, the authors make the following recommendations: (1) Empirical antibiotics covering Staphylococcus aureus +/- methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, (2) drainage is indicated in all cases; and (3) tendon-sparing approaches can access an abscess in most locations within the subscapular space.

Complications associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery using a synthetic non-absorbable mesh are uncommon (<5%) but may be severe and may hugely diminish the quality of life of some women. In drawing up these multidisciplinary clinical practice recommendations, the French National Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de santé, HAS) conducted an exhaustive review of the literature concerning the diagnosis, prevention, and management of complications associated with POP surgery using a synthetic mesh. Each recommendation for practice was allocated a grade (A,B or C; or expert opinion (EO)), which depends on the level of evidence (clinical practice guidelines).
UNASSIGNED: Each patient must be informed concerning the risks associated with POP surgery (EO).
UNASSIGNED: Vaginal infiltration using a vasoconstrictive solution is not recommended during POP surgery by the vaginal route (grade C). The placement of vaginal packing is not recommended following POP surgery by the vaginal route (grade C). During laparoscopic sacral colpopexy, when the promontory seems highly dangerous or when severe adhesions prevent access to the anterior vertebral ligament, alternative surgical techniques should be discussed per operatively, including colpopexy by lateral mesh laparoscopic suspension, uterosacral ligament suspension, open abdominal mesh surgery, or surgery by the vaginal route (EO).
UNASSIGNED: When a bladder injury is diagnosed, bladder repair by suturing is recommended, using a slow resorption suture thread, plus monitoring of the permeability of the ureters (before and after bladder repair) when the injury is located at the level of the trigone (EO). When a bladder injury is diagnosed, after bladder repair, a prosthetic mesh (polypropylene or polyester material) can be placed between the repaired bladder and the vagina, if the quality of the suturing is good. The recommended duration of bladder catheterization following bladder repair in this context of POP mesh surgery is from 5 to 10 days (EO).
UNASSIGNED: After ureteral repair, it is possible to continue sacral colpopexy and place the mesh if it is located away from the ureteral repair (EO).
UNASSIGNED: Regardless of the approach, when a rectal injury occurs, a posterior mesh should not be placed between the rectum and the vagina wall (EO). Concerning the anterior mesh, it is recommended to use a macroporous monofilament polypropylene mesh (EO). A polyester mesh is not recommended in this situation (EO).
UNASSIGNED: After vaginal wall repair, an anterior or a posterior microporous polypropylene mesh can be placed, if the quality of the repair is found to be satisfactory (EO). A polyester mesh should not be used after vaginal wall repair (EO).
UNASSIGNED: Regardless of the surgical approach, intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended (aminopenicillin + beta-lactamase inhibitor: 30 min before skin incision +/- repeated after 2 h if surgery lasts longer) (EO). When spondylodiscitis is diagnosed following sacral colpopexy, treatment should be discussed by a multidisciplinary group, including especially spine specialists (rheumatologists, orthopedists, neurosurgeons) and infectious disease specialists (EO). When a pelvic abscess occurs following synthetic mesh sacral colpopexy, it is recommended to carry out complete mesh removal as soon as possible, combined with collection of intraoperative bacteriological samples, drainage of the collection and targeted antibiotic therapy (EO). Non-surgical conservative management with antibiotic therapy may be an option (EO) in certain conditions (absence of signs of sepsis, macroporous monofilament polypropylene type 1 mesh, prior microbiological documentation and multidisciplinary consultation for the choice of type and duration of antibiotic therapy), associated with close monitoring of the patient.
UNASSIGNED: Peritoneal closure is recommended after placement of a synthetic mesh by the abdominal approach (EO).
UNASSIGNED: Preoperative urodynamics is recommended in women presenting with urinary symptoms (bladder outlet obstruction symptoms, overactive bladder syndrome or incontinence) (EO). It is recommended to remove the bladder catheter at the end of the procedure or within 48 h after POP surgery (grade B). Bladder emptying and post-void residual should be checked following POP surgery, before discharge (EO). When postoperative urine retention occurs after POP surgery, it is recommended to carry out indwelling catheterization and to prefer intermittent self-catheterization (EO).
UNASSIGNED: Before POP surgery, the patient should be asked about risk factors for prolonged and chronic postoperative pain (pain sensitization, allodynia, chronic pelvic or non-pelvic pain) (EO). Concerning the prevention of postoperative pain, it is recommended to carry out a pre-, per- and postoperative multimodal pain treatment (grade B). The use of ketamine intraoperatively is recommended for the prevention of chronic postoperative pelvic pain, especially for patients with risk factors (preoperative painful sensitization, allodynia, chronic pelvic or non-pelvic pain) (EO). Postoperative prescription of opioids should be limited in quantity and duration (grade C). When acute neuropathic pain (sciatalgia or pudendal neuralgia) resistant to level I and II analgesics occurs following sacrospinous fixation, a reintervention is recommended for suspension suture removal (EO). When chronic postoperative pain occurs after POP surgery, it is recommended to systematically seek arguments in favor of neuropathic pain with the DN4 questionnaire (EO). When chronic postoperative pelvic pain occurs after POP surgery, central sensitization should be identified since it requires a consultation in a chronic pain department (EO). Concerning myofascial pain syndrome (clinical pain condition associated with increased muscle tension caused by myofascial trigger points), when chronic postoperative pain occurs after POP surgery, it is recommended to examine the levator ani, piriformis and obturator internus muscles, so as to identify trigger points on the pathway of the synthetic mesh (EO). Pelvic floor muscle training with muscle relaxation is recommended when myofascial pain syndrome is associated with chronic postoperative pain following POP surgery (EO). After failure of pelvic floor muscle training (3 months), it is recommended to discuss surgical removal of the synthetic mesh, during a multidisciplinary discussion group meeting (EO). Partial removal of synthetic mesh is indicated when a trigger point is located on the pathway of the mesh (EO). Total removal of synthetic mesh should be discussed during a multidisciplinary discussion group meeting when diffuse (no trigger point) chronic postoperative pain occurs following POP surgery, with or without central sensitization or neuropathic pain syndromes (EO).
UNASSIGNED: When de novo postoperative dyspareunia occurs after POP surgery, surgical removal of the mesh should be discussed (EO).
UNASSIGNED: To reduce the risk of vaginal mesh exposure, when hysterectomy is required during sacral colpopexy, subtotal hysterectomy is recommended (grade C). When asymptomatic vaginal macroporous monofilament polypropylene mesh exposure occurs, systematic imaging is not recommended. When vaginal polyester mesh exposure occurs, pelvic +/- lumbar MRI (EO) should be used to look for an abscess or spondylodiscitis, given the greater risk of infection associated with this type of material. When asymptomatic vaginal mesh exposure of less than 1 cm2 occurs in a woman with no sexual intercourse, the patient should be offered observation (no treatment) or local estrogen therapy (EO). However, if the patient wishes, partial excision of the mesh can be offered. When asymptomatic vaginal mesh exposure of more than 1 cm2 occurs or if the woman has sexual intercourse, or if it is a polyester prosthesis, partial mesh excision, either immediately or after local estrogen therapy, should be offered (EO). When symptomatic vaginal mesh exposure occurs, but without infectious complications, surgical removal of the exposed part of the mesh by the vaginal route is recommended (EO), and not systematic complete excision of the mesh. Following sacral colpopexy, complete removal of the mesh (by laparoscopy or laparotomy) is only required in the presence of an abscess or spondylodiscitis (EO). When vaginal mesh exposure recurs after a first reoperation, the patient should be treated by an experienced team specialized in this type of complication (EO).
UNASSIGNED: For women presenting with vaginal exposure to non-absorbable suture thread following POP surgery with mesh reinforcement, the suture thread should be removed by the vaginal route (EO). Removal of the surrounding mesh is only recommended when vaginal mesh exposure or associated abscess is diagnosed.
UNASSIGNED: When bladder mesh exposure occurs, removal of the exposed part of the mesh is recommended (grade B). Both alternatives (total or partial mesh removal) should be discussed with the patient and should be debated during a multidisciplinary discussion group meeting (EO).

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) Guideline Development Group (GDG) was to produce high-quality, evidence-based guidelines for the management of cryptoglandular anal fistula with input from a multidisciplinary group and using transparent, reproducible methodology.
METHODS: Previously published methodology in guideline development by the ESCP has been replicated in this project. The guideline development process followed the requirements of the AGREE-S tool kit. Six phases can be identified in the methodology. Phase one sets the scope of the guideline, which addresses the diagnostic and therapeutic management of perianal abscess and cryptoglandular anal fistula in adult patients presenting to secondary care. The target population for this guideline are healthcare practitioners in secondary care and patients interested in understanding the clinical evidence available for various surgical interventions for anal fistula. Phase two involved formulation of the GDG. The GDG consisted of 21 coloproctologists, three research fellows, a radiologist and a methodologist. Stakeholders were chosen for their clinical and academic involvement in the management of anal fistula as well as being representative of the geographical variation among the ESCP membership. Five patients were recruited from patient groups to review the draft guideline. These patients attended two virtual meetings to discuss the evidence and suggest amendments. In phase three, patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes questions were formulated by the GDG. The GDG ratified 250 questions and chose 45 for inclusion in the guideline. In phase four, critical and important outcomes were confirmed for inclusion. Important outcomes were pain and wound healing. Critical outcomes were fistula healing, fistula recurrence and incontinence. These outcomes formed part of the inclusion criteria for the literature search. In phase five, a literature search was performed of MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Embase (Ovid) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews by eight teams of the GDG. Data were extracted and submitted for review by the GDG in a draft guideline. The most recent systematic reviews were prioritized for inclusion. Studies published since the most recent systematic review were included in our analysis by conducting a new meta-analysis using Review manager. In phase six, recommendations were formulated, using grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations, in three virtual meetings of the GDG.
RESULTS: In seven sections covering the diagnostic and therapeutic management of perianal abscess and cryptoglandular anal fistula, there are 42 recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: This is an up-to-date international guideline on the management of cryptoglandular anal fistula using methodology prescribed by the AGREE enterprise.

In low-income countries (LIC), the management of bone infections is a huge challenge. A high number of patients are in the pediatric age group. Children and adolescents exhibit good bone healing potential offering treatment options that mainly rely on the biological response of the infected bone. The purpose of this article is to highlight treatment options for these patients in LIC, which is based on clinical cases that illustrate the principles of the treatment, focusing on bone reaction and healing potential. First, identification of emergency cases is of importance. Sepsis of the patient due to bone infections is a life-threatening disease that requires immediate surgical attention with abscess incision. It should be tailored to the surgeon\'s experience and local conditions to avoid unwanted complications, such as excessive bleeding, fracture or bone loss. In non-septic patients, uncomplicated cases should be distinguished from complicated cases as the first might often require only abscess incision, particularly in small children, without any other major surgical intervention. Biomechanical stability and bone formation capacity, soft tissue conditions and joint involvement are decisive factors differentiating uncomplicated from complicated cases. Central treatment column is the immobilization of the infected bone with simple methods, such as plaster of Paris, braces or external fixation. This is intended to provide sufficient stability to allow for new bone formation that subsequently downsizes the infection site and that can bridge previously infected non-union sites or bone defects. In most cases, antibiotic treatment is not performed as antibiotics are not available or affordable. Severe soft tissue defects remain a major challenge as microvascular surgical experience is often required for reliable coverage, for which referral to one of the very few specialized centers is recommended. Major bone defects should also be treated in centers with sufficient expertise for bone reconstruction procedures. Regular follow-ups are important to ensure healing and to avoid aggravation of the disease. Encouraging success rates can be achieved by these treatment principles. However, it should not be forgotten that poverty in these countries, including limited access to health care, remains one of the world\'s most important problems.

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic and recurrent inflammatory dermatosis characterized by the presence of inflammatory nodules and abscesses in the apocrine gland-rich areas that may progress to suppurative fistulas and scars. Despite being considered one of the dermatological conditions with the greatest impact on patient quality of life, it is often underdiagnosed. Hidradenitis suppurativa, especially in its severe forms, is associated with numerous comorbidities, so a holistic and multidisciplinary perspective is crucial for the management of these patients. The therapeutic approach is complex and challenging. The medical treatment options are diverse and must be adapted to clinical presentation and disease severity. Surgical therapy should be considered as an adjuvant to medical treatment, particularly in refractory cases and in the presence of scars or anatomical and/or functional mutilation. These recommendations reflect the main aspects of the management of the patient with hidradenitis suppurativa and are addressed to all healthcare professionals who take part in their follow-up.
A hidradenite supurativa é uma dermatose inflamatória crónica e recorrente que se caracteriza pela presença de nódulos inflamatórios e abcessos nas áreas ricas em glândulas apócrinas, que podem evoluir para fístulas supurativas e cicatrizes. Apesar de ser considerada uma das patologias dermatológicas com maior impacto na qualidade de vida dos doentes, é frequentemente subdiagnosticada. A hidradenite supurativa, sobretudo nas suas formas mais graves, associa-se a diversas comorbilidades, pelo que é fundamental adotar uma perspetiva holística e multidisciplinar na gestão destes doentes. A abordagem terapêutica é complexa e desafiante. A terapêutica médica é multifacetada e deve ser adaptada à apresentação clínica e gravidade da doença. A terapêutica cirúrgica deverá ser equacionada como adjuvante à terapêutica médica, em particular nos casos refratários e perante cicatrizes ou mutilação anatómica e/ou funcional. As presentes recomendações pretendem reunir os principais aspetos da abordagem ao doente com hidradenite supurativa e destinam-se a todos os profissionais de saúde envolvidos no seu acompanhamento.

Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended for children for the first 4 to 6 months of life, with complementary foods added thereafter. It is the most ecological way of protecting the child\'s and mother\'s health. Training of health professionals is required to avoid transmitting inconsistent information in 3 areas: 1) implementing these 3 predictors: safe skin-to-skin, first breastfeed, and rooming-in 24/7; 2) teaching and monitoring: i) early signs of waking and feeding rhythms, ii) positioning and latching, and iii) signs of effective transfer; and 3) referring women to specialized support services if difficulties arise (eg, inadequate milk production, pain, cracked nipples, engorgement). Breastfeeding should continue during mastitis or an abscess. Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration is beneficial in treating an abscess. Précis: Information is provided to enable health professionals to better support breastfeeding and help women with the most common difficulties, thus promoting breastfeeding initiation and duration.

BACKGROUND: Since our last publication of algorithms for the management of perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn\'s disease, researchers have proposed a treat to target strategy systematic combotherapy for anal lesions, and indications for stem cell injection. In the absence robust publications, the Société Nationale Française de Coloproctologie (French National Society of Coloproctology [SNFCP]) wished to establish a group consensus using the Delphi method.
METHODS: From October 2020 to January 2021, a scientific committee and panel of gastroenterologists and surgeons established answers which were submitted to the members of the SNFCP during a national conference in November 2020. Three questions were clarified and reformulated, and then submitted during a third and final round of consultation of members of the SNFCP.
RESULTS: The target was defined as being the response obtained in every domain (symptoms, physical and radiological evaluation) which could be considered satisfactory, without the need to intensify therapeutic management. By consensus, the time required for clinical evaluation of the efficacy of treatment was 6 months. A response on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should include the absence of a collection of 10 mm or more in size at 6 months, and a frank decrease or complete disappearance of hyperintensity in T1 and T2 sequences of the main tract at 12 months. Systematic association of an immunosuppressant with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors did not reach the consensus level for adalimumab (50%), but just did for infliximab (70%). The majority of the respondents considered failure of one, or even two lines of different biotherapies to be potential indications for injection of stem cells.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings reinforce the importance of composite targets including MRI evaluation, and underscore the need for precise timing of evaluation. Combotherapy is only recommended with infliximab. Injection of stem cells is a second- or third-line option.

暂无摘要。

Despite the current therapeutic options for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, surgery is still frequently required in the emergency setting, although the number of cases performed seems to have decreased in recent years. The World Society of Emergency Surgery decided to debate in a consensus conference of experts, the main pertinent issues around the management of inflammatory bowel disease in the emergent situation, with the need to provide focused guidelines for acute care and emergency surgeons.
A group of experienced surgeons and gastroenterologists were nominated to develop the topics assigned and answer the questions addressed by the Steering Committee of the project. Each expert followed a precise analysis and grading of the studies selected for review. Statements and recommendations were discussed and voted at the Consensus Conference of the 6th World Society of Emergency Surgery held in Nijmegen (The Netherlands) in June 2019.
Complicated inflammatory bowel disease requires a multidisciplinary approach because of the complexity of this patient group and disease spectrum in the emergency setting, with the aim of obtaining safe surgery with good functional outcomes and a decreasing stoma rate where appropriate.

BACKGROUND: Tonsillectomy is a common surgical procedure performed chiefly for recurrent tonsillitis. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidance Network (SIGN) introduced guidelines in 1998 to improve patient selection for tonsillectomy and reduce the potential harm to patients from surgical complications such as haemorrhage. Since the introduction of the guidance, the number of admissions for tonsillitis and its complications has increased. National Hospital Episode Statistics over a 20-year period were analysed to assess the trends in tonsillectomy, post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage, tonsillitis and its complications with reference to the guidance, procedures of limited clinical value and the associated costs and benefits.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted via PubMed and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant research. Hospital Episode Statistics data were interrogated and relevant data compared over time to assess trends related to the implementation of national guidance.
RESULTS: Over the period analysed, the incidence of deep neck space infections has increased almost five-fold, mediastinitis ten-fold and peritonsillar abscess by 1.7-fold compared with prior to SIGN guidance. Following procedures of limited clinical value implementation, the incidence of deep neck space infections has increased 2.4-fold, mediastinitis 4.1-fold and peritonsillar abscess 1.4-fold compared with immediately prior to clinical commissioning group rationing. The rate of tonsillectomy and associated haemorrhage (1-2%) has remained relatively constant at 46,299 (1999) compared with 49,447 (2009) and 49,141 (2016), despite an increase in the population of England by seven million over the 20-year period.
CONCLUSIONS: The rise in admissions for tonsillitis and its complications appears to correspond closely to the date of SIGN guidance and clinical commissioning group rationing of tonsillectomy and is on the background of a rise in the population of the UK. The move towards daycase tonsillectomy has reduced bed occupancy after surgery but this has been counteracted by an increase in admissions for tonsillitis and deep neck space infections, sometimes requiring lengthy intensive care stays and a protracted course of rehabilitation. The total cost of treating the complications of tonsillitis in England in 2017 is estimated to be around £73 million. The cost of tonsillectomy and treating post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage is £56 million by comparison. The total cost per annum for tonsillectomy prior to the introduction of SIGN guidance was estimated at £71 million with tonsillitis and its complications accounting for a further £8 million.