UNASSIGNED: Evidence characterizing a starting angle of radiofrequency (RF) cannula insertion during radiofrequency neurotomy is lacking. Using computerized tomography (CT), this retrospective observational study attempts to establish a starting angle for RF cannula placement parallel to the transverse process (TP) at the junction of the superior articular process (SAP) near the targeted medial branch.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective observational study utilized lumbar spine CT scans performed on adult cancer patients from January 2016 to May 2021 ​at a single center. No significant lumbar pathology was present on the included CT studies. For each patient, medial branches were assumed to lie at the junction of the right and left TP and SAP at each lumbar level. The angle of insertion from each segment\'s \"squared\" superior end plate needed for RF cannula placement parallel to the surface of the TP next to the SAP was calculated.
UNASSIGNED: Images obtained from fifty patients were analyzed. Mean angle of insertion for L1 was 20.15 ​± ​1.82°, L2 was 20.95 ​± ​2.07°, L3 was 25.54 ​± ​1.76°, L4 was 31.01 ​± ​1.83°, and L5 was 40.74 ​± ​1.86°.
UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrates variations in inserting angle for RF cannula placement parallel to the surface of the transverse process at each lumbar level. To our knowledge, there are no studies in the current literature that have described an entry angle for RF cannula positioning parallel to lumbar medial branches using CT images.

BACKGROUND: Posterolateral decompression and fusion with internal fixation is a commonly used surgical approach for treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). This study aims to evaluate the impact of preserving a portion of the unilateral facet joint during decompression on surgical outcomes and long-term recovery in patients.
METHODS: This study analyzed 73 patients with DLSS accompanied by bilateral lower limb neurological symptoms who underwent single-level L4/5 posterolateral decompression and fusion surgery from January 2022 to March 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the type of surgery received: Group A comprised 31 patients who underwent neural decompression without facet joint preservation, while Group B consisted of 42 patients who underwent neural decompression with preservation of partial facet joints on one side. Regular follow-up evaluations were conducted, including clinical and radiological assessments immediately postoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months thereafter. Key patient information was documented through retrospective chart reviews.
RESULTS: Most patients in both groups experienced favorable surgical outcomes. However, four cases encountered complications. Notably, during follow-up, Group B demonstrated superior 1-year postoperative interbody fusion outcomes (P < 0.05), along with a trend towards less interbody cage subsidence and slower postoperative intervertebral disc height loss. Additionally, Group B showed significantly reduced postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Under strict adherence to surgical indications, the posterior lateral lumbar fusion surgery, which preserves partial facet joint unilaterally during neural decompression, can offer greater benefits to patients.

OBJECTIVE: The paraspinal muscles play an essential role in the stabilization of the lumbar spine. Lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy has been linked to chronic back pain and degenerative processes within the spinal motion segment. However, the relationship between the different paraspinal muscle groups and facet joint osteoarthritis (FJOA) has not been fully explored.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, the authors analyzed adult patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery between December 2014 and March 2023 for degenerative spinal conditions and had preoperative MRI and CT scans. The fatty infiltration (FI) and functional cross-sectional area (fCSA) of the psoas, erector spinae, and multifidus muscles were assessed on axial T2-weighted MR images at the level of the upper endplate of L4 based on established studies and calculated using custom-made software. Intervertebral disc degeneration at each lumbar level was evaluated using the Pfirrmann grading system. The grades from each level were summed to report the cumulative lumbar Pfirrmann grade. Weishaupt classification (0-3) was used to assess FJOA at all lumbar levels (L1 to S1) on preoperative CT scans. The total lumbar FJOA score was determined by adding the Weishaupt grades of both sides at all 5 levels. Correlation and linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between FJOA and paraspinal muscle parameters.
RESULTS: A total of 225 patients (49.7% female) with a median age of 61 (IQR 54-70) years and a median BMI of 28.3 (IQR 25.1-33.1) kg/m2 were included. After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, and the cumulative lumbar Pfirrmann grade, only multifidus muscle fCSA (estimate -4.69, 95% CI -6.91 to -2.46; p < 0.001) and FI (estimate 0.64, 95% CI 0.33-0.94; p < 0.001) were independently predicted by the total FJOA score. A similar relation was seen with individual Weishaupt grades of each lumbar level after controlling for age, sex, BMI, and the Pfirrmann grade of the corresponding level.
CONCLUSIONS: Atrophy of the multifidus muscle is significantly associated with FJOA in the lumbar spine. The absence of such correlation for the erector spinae and psoas muscles highlights the unique link between multifidus muscle quality and the degeneration of the spinal motion segment. Further research is necessary to establish the causal link and the clinical implications of these findings.

BACKGROUND: Most ball-in-socket artificial lumbar disc implanted in the spine result in increased hypermobility of the operative level and overloading of the facet joint.
METHODS: A finite element model was established and validated for the lumbar spine (L1-L5). The structure of the Mobidisc prosthesis was modified, resulting in the development of two new intervertebral disc prostheses, Movcore and Mcopro. The prostheses were implanted into the L3/L4 level to simulate total disc replacement, and the biomechanical properties of the lumbar spine model were analyzed after the operation.
RESULTS: Following the implantation of the prostheses, the mobility of operative level, peak stress of lumbar spine models, and peak stress of facet joint increased. The performance of mobility was found to be more similar between Movcore and Mobidisc. The mobility and facet joint peak stress of the Mcopro model decreased progressively with an increase in the Young\'s modulus of the artificial annulus during flexion, extension, and lateral bending. Among all the models, the Mcopro50 model had the mobility closest to the intact model. It showed a 3% decrease in flexion, equal range of motion in extension, a 9% increase in left lateral bending, a 7% increase in right lateral bending, and a 3% decrease in axial rotation.
CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of the new intervertebral disc prostheses, Movcore and Mcopro, has been established. The Mcopro prosthesis, which features an artificial annular structure, offers significant advantages in terms of reduced mobility of the operative level and peak stress of facet joint.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Lumbar medial branch blocks (MBB) are some of the most commonly performed pain procedures in the United States. Diagnostic MBBs are performed to confirm if the generator of low back pain is the facet joint. However, with diagnostic injections, false positive blocks may occur.
OBJECTIVE:   Our prospective observational study aims to investigate the effects of midazolam sedation on patients\' perceived intensity of pain relief following lumbar MBB.
METHODS: This is a single-center multi-site prospective observational study registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04453449).
METHODS: The study was approved by the Henry Ford Health System Institutional Review Board (IRB) in June 2020 (IRB# 14010) and registered on clinicaltrials.gov in July 2020 (NCT04453449). This manuscript adheres to the applicable EQUATOR STROBE guidelines for an observational cohort study.
METHODS: Patients that underwent MBB without sedation were compared to sedated patients. Patients were asked to complete the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline, one day after their diagnostic blocks, as well as 4 weeks and 8 weeks after their lumbar radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The primary outcome is the difference between baseline NRS pain scores and the lowest reported score in the 8 hours following MBB. For patients who proceed to RFA, the frequency of false positive blocks was evaluated. A patient was considered to have a false positive block when they failed to achieve 50% pain relief from RFA after 2 successful sequential MBBs.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the NRS pain score change between the sedated and non-sedated groups for diagnostic block one (P = 0.167) and diagnostic block 2 (P = 0.6145). There was no significant difference of false positive rates between non-sedation and sedation patients at 4-weeks post-RFA (P = 0.7178) and at 8-weeks post-RFA (P = 1.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Some of the limitations of this study include its nonrandomized design, patient self-reported pain scores, as well as the small variability in the injection technique of proceduralists and in the anatomical location of the injection site.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that midazolam did not change patients\' perceived intensity of pain following MBB, as well as false positive rates after RFA. Larger studies are required to draw definitive conclusions.

BACKGROUND: The comparative effectiveness of decompression plus lumbar facet arthroplasty versus decompression plus instrumented lumbar spinal fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis is unknown.
METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial, we assigned patients who had single-level lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis to undergo decompression plus lumbar facet arthroplasty (arthroplasty group) or decompression plus fusion (fusion group). The primary outcome was a predetermined composite clinical success score. Secondary outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), Short Form (SF)-12, radiographic parameters, surgical variables, and complications.
RESULTS: A total of 321 adult patients were randomized in a 2:1 fashion, with 219 patients assigned to undergo facet arthroplasty and 102 patients assigned to undergo fusion. Of these, 113 patients (51.6%) in the arthroplasty group and 47 (46.1%) in the fusion group who had either reached 24 months of postoperative follow-up or were deemed early clinical failures were included in the primary outcome analysis. The arthroplasty group had a higher proportion of patients who achieved composite clinical success than did the fusion group (73.5% versus 25.5%; p < 0.001), equating to a between-group difference of 47.9% (95% confidence interval, 33.0% to 62.8%). The arthroplasty group outperformed the fusion group in most patient-reported outcome measures (including the ODI, VAS back pain, and all ZCQ component scores) at 24 months postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups in surgical variables or complications, except that the fusion group had a higher rate of developing symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis, lumbar facet arthroplasty was associated with a higher rate of composite clinical success than fusion was at 24 months postoperatively.
METHODS: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This study aimed to quantify the change in pressure on the cage during compression manipulation in lumbar interbody fusion. While the procedure involves applying compression between pedicle screws to press the cage against the endplate, the exact compression force remains elusive. We hypothesize that an intact facet joint might serve as a fulcrum, potentially reducing cage pressure.
Pressure on the intervertebral disc cage was measured during compression manipulation in 4 donor cadavers undergoing lumbar interbody fusion. Unilateral facetectomy models with both normal and parallel compression and bilateral facetectomy models were included. A transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with a built-in load cell measured the compression force.
Pressure data from 14 discs indicated a consistent precompression pressure average of 68.16 N. Following compression, pressures increased to 125.99 N and 140.84 N for normal and parallel compression postunilateral facetectomy, respectively, and to 154.58 N and 150.46 N for bilateral models. A strong linear correlation (correlation coefficient: 0.967, P < 0.0001) between precompression and postcompression pressures emphasized the necessity of sufficient precompression pressure for achieving desired postcompression outcomes. None of the data showed a decrease in compression force to the cage with the compression maneuver.
Both normal and parallel compression maneuvers effectively increased the pressure on the cage, irrespective of the facet joint resection status. Compression manipulation consistently enhanced compressive force on the cage. However, when baseline pressure is low, the manipulation might not yield significant increases in compression force. This underlines the essential role of meticulous precompression preparation in enhancing surgical outcomes.

To understand lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV)-associated degenerative pathologies and their correlation to low back pain and radicular pain.
Whole-spine magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated for disc degeneration using Pfirrmann grading, end plate changes using total end plate score (TEPS), and facet tropism in patients with low back pain and radicular pain, and their association with LSTV was analyzed.
In group 1, LSTV was seen in 15% of patients with 83% of these patients having sacralization. Disc degeneration was seen in 58%, 51%, and 63% of patients at levels C, B, and A, respectively; patients with sacralization had significant degeneration at all 3 levels. Similarly, the total end plate score and facet tropism were significantly higher in patients with sacralization. Facet tropism was observed in 31%, 40%, and 35% of patients with no -LSTV, patients with sacralization, and patients with lumbarization, respectively. In group 2, LSTV was seen in 17% of patients with sacralization accounting for 82%. Disc degeneration was seen in 44%, 36%, and 54% patients at levels C, B, and A, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the mean total end plate score between groups. Facet tropism was identified in 89% and 81% of patients with sacralization and patients with lumbarization, respectively, compared with only 19% of patients with no LSTV.
Patients with low back pain had a higher incidence of sacralization with corresponding disc degeneration, facet tropism ,and end plate changes. In patients with radicular pain, lumbarization was associated only with facet tropism. These findings may aid clinicians in prognostication and patient counseling.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block and compare with the conventional physical therapy in chronic low back pain (LBP).
METHODS: This prospective case-controlled study included patients with chronic LBP. Their clinical and demographic data were obtained, and they were divided into two groups for conventional physical therapy and ESP blocks. Prior to treatment, on the first day, the second week, and the third month, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were evaluated.
RESULTS: The study included 43 patients, 21 in the ESP block group and 22 in the conventional physical therapy group. The VAS in movement was higher in the ESP block group at baseline (p = 0.047). On the first day after the treatments, the ESP block group showed lower resting (p < 0.001) and movement (p = 0.001) VAS values than the conventional physical therapy group. At the end of 3 months, both groups had improved VAS and ODI scores (all p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: US-guided ESP block might be considered a successful, safe, and technically simple alternative treatment in patients with chronic LBP to control pain and reduce the cost of physical therapy and lost workdays.