Yttrium Radioisotopes

钇放射性同位素
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肝细胞癌是肝硬化和非肝硬化患者死亡和发病的主要原因。大多数患者在诊断时适合局部和/或全身治疗。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定老年患者经动脉放射栓塞的疗效和安全性.
    方法:对2013年至2022年诊断为肝细胞癌的患者进行回顾性筛查。将患者分为2组:老年人(年龄>70岁)和年轻人(年龄<70岁)。根据实体瘤的反应评估标准评估经动脉放射栓塞反应。
    结果:年轻组包括90例患者,老年组56例。观察到老年组男性优势较少(P>.05)。乙型肝炎是两组中最常见的原因。关于肿瘤的形态学特征[肿瘤病灶(单个;62.2%和60.7%,分别)和最大肿瘤直径(6.9和6.55厘米,分别)],经动脉放射栓塞反应(51.1%和39.3%,分别),生存期(9个月和8.5个月),以及早期和晚期副作用(P>0.05)。未发现年龄是经动脉放射栓塞反应的有效因素(P>0.05)。
    结论:两组之间经动脉放射栓塞的安全性和有效性没有差异。此外,观察到年龄不是不良事件的预测因素.在虚弱组的老年患者中,应考虑到,在经动脉放射栓塞决定中,不应仅仅将年龄视为限制因素.
    OBJECTIVE:  Hepatocellular carcinoma is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients, and most patients are suitable for locoregional and/or systemic therapy at the time of diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization in elderly patients.
    METHODS:  Patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma between 2013 and 2022 were screened retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the elderly (age >70 years) and the young (age <70 years). Transarterial radioembolization response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.
    RESULTS:  Ninety patients were included in the young group, and 56 patients were in the elderly group. It was observed that male dominance was less in the elderly group (P > .05). Hepatitis B was the most common cause in both groups. There were no significant differences between groups with regard to morphological features of tumors [tumor focality (single; 62.2% and 60.7%, respectively) and maximal tumor diameter (6.9 and 6.55 cm, respectively)], transarterial radioembolization responses (51.1% and 39.3%, respectively), survival (9 and 8.5 months), and both early and late side effects (P > .05). Age was not found to be an effective factor in transarterial radioembolization response (P > .05).
    CONCLUSIONS:  No differences in the safety and efficacy of transarterial radioembolization were observed between the groups. In addition, it was observed that age was not a predictive factor for adverse events. In elderly patients in the frail group, it should be considered that age alone should not be seen as a limitation in the transarterial radioembolization decision.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Yttrium-90经动脉放射栓塞(90Y)可以安全有效地治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)。将90Y与免疫治疗相结合的临床试验旨在提高治疗反应率。短暂性90Y诱导的淋巴细胞减少对T细胞稳态和功能动力学的影响尚不清楚。
    方法:在第一周期90Y之前和影像学随访时收集BCLC-A-B期HCC患者的配对血液样本。流式细胞术和T细胞受体(TCR)测序用于监测90Y后T细胞亚群和TCR库的变化。使用mRECIST确定客观反应(OR)率,并定义为OR或非客观(NOR)。进展时间(TTP)定义为90年后6个月内进展为BCLC-C。
    结果:90Y诱导CD4+(P=0.049)和CD8+(P<0.001)向效应记忆(TEM)反应的变化,而与治疗反应率无关。90Y无应答者的特征在于初始CD4+细胞(P=0.019)和CD8+细胞中PD-1表达(P=0.003)的持续升高。TCR库的配对分析揭示了新抗原克隆型的可变诱导和现有克隆型的扩增,而与90Y反应无关。在患有OR的患者中,TCR克隆性的变化不影响TTP。然而,无OR患者的多克隆谱与治疗后6个月的TTP较短(P=0.005,HR10.8)和75%的疾病进展率相关.
    结论:90Y诱导从中枢记忆到效应记忆的群体转移,伴随着新抗原T细胞反应,而与治疗反应率无关。90Y后T细胞库的单克隆转移在第一周期NOR患者中具有优越的总体TTP和改善的TTP。
    Yttrium-90 (90Y) transarterial radioembolization can safely and effectively treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Clinical trials combining 90Y with immunotherapy are aimed at improving treatment response rates. The impact of transient 90Y-induced lymphopenia on T-cell homeostasis and functional dynamics is unknown. Paired blood specimens were collected prior to first-cycle 90Y and at imaging follow-up in patients with HCC Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages A-B. Flow cytometry and T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing were used to monitor changes in T-cell subsets and TCR repertoire following 90Y. Objective response (OR) rates were determined using modified RECIST and defined as either OR or nonobjective response. Time-to-progression (TTP) was defined as progression to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C within 6 months following 90Y. 90Y induced shifts in both CD4+ (P = 0.049) and CD8+ (P < 0.001) toward an effector memory T-cell response independent of treatment response rate. Nonresponders to 90Y were characterized by a sustained elevation in both naïve CD4+ cells (P = 0.019) and programmed cell death protein 1 expression in CD8+ cells (P = 0.003). Paired analysis of the TCR repertoire revealed a variable induction of neoantigen clonotypes and expansion of existing clonotypes independent of 90Y response. In patients with an OR, changes in TCR clonality did not influence TTP. However, polyclonal profiles in patients without an OR were associated with shorter TTP (P = 0.005; HR, 10.8) and 75% disease progression rates 6 months following treatment. 90Y induces a population shift from central to effector memory accompanied by neoantigen T-cell responses independent of treatment response rate. Monoclonal shifts in the post-90Y T-cell repertoire had superior overall TTP and improved TTP in patients with a first-cycle nonobjective response.
    UNASSIGNED: 90Y can safely treat HCC; however, it causes transient lymphopenia. In this article, 90Y stimulates a peripheral effector memory response independent of initial treatment response. TCR sequencing revealed that polyclonal profiles in patients without an OR to treatment were associated with rapid progression rates 6 months after 90Y.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨90Y-IsoPet™肿瘤内治疗犬软组织肉瘤的不同剂量学方面,对注射后凝胶的空间传播进行建模,根据临床目标体积评估吸收剂量,并评估剂量分布和治疗效果。&#xD;方法:在兽医健康中心用90Y-IsoPet™治疗软组织肉瘤的6例犬病例,在这项回顾性研究中分析了密苏里大学。这些狗接受了肿瘤内IsoPet™注射,遵循网格图案以在临床目标体积中实现接近均匀的剂量分布。使用蒙特卡洛工具包OpenTOPAS回顾性地进行了两种剂量测定方法:从注射后PET/CT扫描获得的基于成像的剂量测定,和程式化的基于体模的剂量测定从计划的注射点到总肿瘤体积建模。对于后者,引入具有可变西格玛的高斯参数以反映IsoPet™的空间扩展。使用剂量-体积直方图(DVH)和剂量均匀性比较了两种方法,允许注射后凝胶的空间扩散的最接近的sigma的近似。此外,我们比较了基于蒙特卡罗的剂量测定法和基于体素S值(VSV)的剂量测定法,以研究剂量测定法的差异.&#xD;结果:基于成像的剂量测定显示,在具有较高自吸收的肿瘤高密度区域中,蒙特卡罗和VSV计算之间存在差异。程式化的基于体模的剂量测定表明,随着sigma的增加,目标剂量更加均匀。90Y-IsoPet™注射后凝胶扩散的σ近似导致在所有病例中的中值σ约为0.44mm,以再现在蒙特卡罗计算中观察到的剂量异质性。&#xD;结论:结果表明,基于计划注射点的剂量建模可以作为犬软组织肉瘤的90Y-IsoPet™治疗中递送剂量的一阶近似值。剂量学评估突出了吸收剂量的不均匀性,尽管凝胶扩散,强调在治疗评估中考虑肿瘤剂量异质性的重要性。我们的发现表明,使用蒙特卡罗进行剂量计算似乎更适合这种类型的肿瘤,高密度区域可能在剂量学中起重要作用。
    Objective.To investigate different dosimetric aspects of90Y-IsoPet™ intratumoral therapy in canine soft tissue sarcomas, model the spatial spread of the gel post-injection, evaluate absorbed dose to clinical target volumes, and assess dose distributions and treatment efficacy.Approach.Six canine cases treated with90Y-IsoPet™ for soft tissue sarcoma at the Veterinary Health Center, University of Missouri are analyzed in this retrospective study. The dogs received intratumoral IsoPet™ injections, following a grid pattern to achieve a near-uniform dose distribution in the clinical target volume. Two dosimetry methods were performed retrospectively using the Monte Carlo toolkit OpenTOPAS: imaging-based dosimetry obtained from post-injection PET/CT scans, and stylized phantom-based dosimetry modeled from the planned injection points to the gross tumor volume. For the latter, a Gaussian parameter with variable sigma was introduced to reflect the spatial spread of IsoPet™. The two methods were compared using dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and dose homogeneity, allowing an approximation of the closest sigma for the spatial spread of the gel post-injection. In addition, we compared Monte Carlo-based dosimetry with voxel S-value (VSV)-based dosimetry to investigate the dosimetric differences.Main results.Imaging-based dosimetry showed differences between Monte Carlo and VSV calculations in tumor high-density areas with higher self-absorption. Stylized phantom-based dosimetry indicated a more homogeneous target dose with increasing sigma. The sigma approximation of the90Y-IsoPet™ post-injection gel spread resulted in a median sigma of approximately 0.44 mm across all cases to reproduce the dose heterogeneity observed in Monte Carlo calculations.Significance.The results indicate that dose modeling based on planned injection points can serve as a first-order approximation for the delivered dose in90Y-IsoPet™ therapy for canine soft tissue sarcomas. The dosimetry evaluation highlights the non-uniformity of absorbed doses despite the gel spread, emphasizing the importance of considering tumor dose heterogeneity in treatment evaluation. Our findings suggest that using Monte Carlo for dose calculation seems more suitable for this type of tumor where high-density areas might play an important role in dosimetry.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    1.1目的##xD;对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)常用于治疗前评价肝脏Y-90放射性栓塞的可行性。CECT提供肝脏和周围结构的详细成像,允许医疗保健提供者评估规模,location,以及治疗前肝脏肿瘤的特征。在这里,我们提出了一种将CECT图像转换为肿瘤和正常肝组织的预期剂量分布的方法。&#xD;&#xD;1.2方法&#xD;术前CECT用于通过从晚期动脉期中减去非造影CT来获得碘动脉期分布。使用Couinaud's方法选择靶向肿瘤周围的肝段。然后,将结果图像的分辨率降级,以匹配正电子发射断层扫描(PET)图像的分辨率,可以对治疗后的Y-90活性分布进行成像。然后以与PET图像相同的方式使用所得图像以使用局部沉积方法(LDM)计算剂量。来自三名患者的CECT图像用于回顾性测试该方法,并通过剂量体积直方图与基于Y-90PET的剂量分布进行比较。&#xD;&#xD;1.3主要结果&#xD;结果表明,预测和交付的Y-90剂量分布之间的一致性,平均剂量差异小于10%,剂量大于第98百分位数的10%(D2%)。&#xD;&#xD;1.4意义&#xD;CECT得出的Y-90放射性栓塞剂量分布的预测似乎有望作为医生评估治疗可行性的补充工具。这种剂量学预测方法可以提供更全面的治疗前评估-比CT图像上的肿瘤混浊的基本评估提供更大的见解。
    Objective.Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is commonly used in the pre-treatment evaluation of liver Y-90 radioembolization feasibility. CECT provides detailed imaging of the liver and surrounding structures, allowing healthcare providers to assess the size, location, and characteristics of liver tumors prior to the treatment. Here we propose a method for translating CECT images to an expected dose distribution for tumor(s) and normal liver tissue.Approach.A pre-procedure CECT is used to obtain an iodine arterial-phase distribution by subtracting the non-contrast CT from the late arterial phase. The liver segments surrounding the targeted tumor are selected using Couinaud\'s method. The resolution of the resulting images is then degraded to match the resolution of the positron emission tomography (PET) images, which can image the Y-90 activity distribution post-treatment. The resulting images are then used in the same way as PET images to compute doses using the local deposition method. CECT images from three patients were used to test this method retrospectively and were compared with Y-90 PET-based dose distributions through dose volume histograms.Main results.Results show a concordance between predicted and delivered Y-90 dose distributions with less than 10% difference in terms of mean dose, for doses greater than 10% of the 98th percentile (D2%).Significance.CECT-derived predictions of Y-90 radioembolization dose distributions seem promising as a supplementary tool for physicians when assessing treatment feasibility. This dosimetry prediction method could provide a more comprehensive pre-treatment evaluation-offering greater insights than a basic assessment of tumor opacification on CT images.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引入了新的90YSIR-Spheres交付套件(SIROSD小瓶和护罩),其物理形式与传统的V-Vial套件不同。这里,我们在新的SIROS试剂盒中建立了剂量校准仪设置和暴露速率-活性转换因子,以测定90YSIR-Spheres活性.方法:用剂量校准器和暴露率计对丙烯酸罩内8个初始90Y活性为1.2至6.6GBq的D-小瓶进行分析,直到活性衰减至约0.1GBq。确定了导致最低中值活动误差的剂量校准器设置和暴露率对活动的最佳拟合斜率。结果:在CRC-15R和CRC-55tR剂量校准仪上使用设置51×10可以直接准确可靠地估算SIROSD-vial90Y活性(误差在±0.5%以内),并在30cm处使用转换因子0.664±0.003GBq/(mR/h)(R2=0.985)间接地估算暴露率读数。结论:使用新的SIROS试剂盒进行90Y活性测定的剂量校准物设置和暴露速率-活性转换因子应从传统的V-Val参数更新,以避免大约10%的低估。
    A new 90Y SIR-Spheres delivery kit (SIROS D-vial and shield) has been introduced with a different physical form from the legacy V-Vial kit. Here, we establish the dose calibrator settings and exposure-rate-to-activity conversion factor to assay 90Y SIR-Spheres activity in the new SIROS kit. Methods: Eight D-vials with initial 90Y activities from 1.2 to 6.6 GBq within acrylic shields were assayed with dose calibrators and exposure-rate meters until activities decayed to approximately 0.1 GBq. The dose calibrator settings resulting in the lowest median activity errors and the best-fit slope of exposure rate versus activity were identified. Results: SIROS D-vial 90Y activity can be accurately and reliably estimated directly using setting 51 × 10 on both the CRC-15R and the CRC-55tR dose calibrators (errors within ±0.5%) and indirectly with an exposure-rate reading at 30 cm using conversion factor 0.664 ± 0.003 GBq/(mR/h) (R 2 = 0.985). Conclusion: Dose calibrator settings and exposure-rate-to-activity conversion factor for 90Y activity assays with new SIROS kit should be updated from legacy V-Vial parameters to avoid an approximately 10% underestimation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:评估经一线化疗(EPOCH)进展的转移性肝癌患者的经动脉放射栓塞(TARE)显示,使用钇90玻璃微球联合化疗(TARE/Chemo)治疗结直肠癌肝转移的效果优于化疗(Chemo)。进行了额外的探索性分析,以评估TARE/Chemo对疗效的影响,安全,后续治疗的时间,生活质量恶化的时间(QoL),并确定改善患者选择的标准。
    方法:分析了主要研究人群的QoL恶化时间。随后,进行了事后分析,以确定TARE/Chemo与Chemo改善了QoL恶化时间的亚组.无进展生存期(PFS),肝(h)PFS,后续治疗的时间,比较了两种治疗方法的安全性结局.
    结果:主要人群在治疗组之间的QoL恶化时间上没有显着差异;但是,在2个已确定的亚组中观察到显著性,即:A亚组(N=303)排除了两个治疗组的东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)1和基线CEA≥35ng/mL患者;B亚组(N=168)还排除了KRAS(Kirsten大鼠肉瘤)突变患者.在亚组A中,TARE/Chemo患者(N=143)与Chemo(N=160)相比表现出更好的结局:PFS(9.4vs.7.6个月,危险比(HR):0.64;单侧P=.0020),hPFS(10.8vs.7.6个月,HR:0.53;单侧P<.0001),QoL恶化的时间(5.7与3.9个月,HR:0.65;单侧P=.0063),和后续治疗的时间(21.2vs.10.5个月,HR:0.52;单侧P<0.0001)。B亚组患者在治疗组之间显示出相似但更大的显着差异。PFS中位数,hPFS,TARE/Chemo在两个亚组中与主要人群相比,QoL恶化的时间在数字上更长,B亚组差异最大,TARE/Chemo与单独化疗相比,两个亚组的CEA应答者百分比更高,ORR改善。在所有人群中,化疗的安全性(报告为事件发生率/100患者-年)更高。还报告了在主要人群中的其他功效分析。
    结论:谨慎选择患者,包括考虑预后因素ECOG,基线CEA,和KRAS状态,设定适合TARE/Chemo作为二线治疗的结直肠癌肝转移患者的结局预期(试验登记号:NCT01483027)。
    BACKGROUND: Evaluating transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma of the liver who have progressed on first-line chemotherapy (EPOCH) demonstrated superior outcomes using yttrium-90 glass microspheres plus chemotherapy (TARE/Chemo) vs chemotherapy (Chemo) to treat colorectal liver metastases. Additional exploratory analyses were undertaken to assess the impact of TARE/Chemo on efficacy, safety, time to subsequent therapy, time to deterioration in quality of life (QoL), and identify criteria for improved patient selection.
    METHODS: Time to deterioration in QoL was analyzed for the primary study population. Subsequently, a post hoc analysis was undertaken to identify subgroups for which time to deterioration in QoL was improved with TARE/Chemo vs Chemo. Progression-free survival (PFS), hepatic (h)PFS, time to subsequent therapy, and safety outcomes were compared between treatments.
    RESULTS: The primary population showed no significant difference in time to deterioration in QoL between treatment arms; however, significance was seen in 2 identified subgroups, namely: Subgroup A (N = 303) which excluded patients with both Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 1 and baseline CEA ≥ 35 ng/mL from both treatment arms; subgroup B (N = 168) additionally excluded patients with KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma) mutation. In subgroup A, TARE/Chemo patients (N = 143) demonstrated superior outcomes vs Chemo (N = 160): PFS (9.4 vs. 7.6 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.64; 1-sided P = .0020), hPFS (10.8 vs. 7.6 months, HR: 0.53; 1-sided P < .0001), time to deterioration in QoL (5.7 vs. 3.9 months, HR: 0.65; 1-sided P = .0063), and time to subsequent therapy (21.2 vs. 10.5 months, HR: 0.52; 1-sided P < .0001). Subgroup B patients showed similar but larger significant differences between treatment arms. Median PFS, hPFS, and time to deterioration in QoL were numerically greater for TARE/Chemo in both subgroups vs the primary population, with the greatest magnitude of difference in subgroup B. Both subgroups exhibited higher percentage of CEA responders and improved ORR with TARE/Chemo vs chemo alone. Safety (reported as event rate/100 patient-years) was higher with Chemo in all populations. Additional efficacy analyses in the primary population are also reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: Careful patient selection, including consideration of the prognostic factors ECOG, baseline CEA, and KRAS status, sets outcome expectations in patients with colorectal liver metastases suitable for TARE/Chemo as second-line treatment (Trial Registry Number: NCT01483027).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肝细胞癌(HCC)的经动脉放射栓塞(TARE)是在包括输注放射性标记的大聚集白蛋白的标测血管造影后进行的,以评估非目标栓塞和肺分流。本案例系列的目的是评估没有初始程序的单会话TARE的安全性和可行性。
    方法:介绍了一个单机构病例系列,包括16例连续手术,对15例18例肿瘤患者进行了玻璃微球的单疗程TARE手术。出于计划目的,假定肺分流分数(LSF)为5%。
    结果:67%(10/15)的患者为男性,中位年龄为72岁。中位肿瘤大小为2.5cm(IQR2.0-3.2cm)。18个靶向肿瘤中的16个在单次TARE之前未治疗。技术成功率为88%(14/16)。由于术中发现,两名患者最终未接受一次TARE。平均给药活性为2.0GBq,根据治疗前解剖成像,平均MIRD剂量为464Gy,根据锥形束CT,平均MIRD剂量为800Gy。没有放射性肺炎病例。基于SPECT计算的术后平均肺剂量为4.9Gy(范围3.1-9.3)。
    结论:使用Y-90玻璃微球进行单次TARE的初步经验,无需术前作图血管造影术和肺分流术评估表明,对于某些小(<5cm)HCC患者,这是一种可行且安全的治疗选择。
    方法:第4级案例系列。
    OBJECTIVE: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is performed after a mapping angiogram involving infusion of radiolabeled macroaggregated albumin to assess for non-target embolization and pulmonary shunting. The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-session TARE without the initial procedure.
    METHODS: A single-institution case series of 16 consecutive procedures on 15 patients with 18 tumors who underwent an attempted single-session TARE procedures with glass microspheres are presented. A lung shunt fraction (LSF) of 5% was assumed for planning purposes.
    RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent (10/15) of patients were male with a median age of 72 years. Median tumor size was 2.5 cm (IQR 2.0-3.2 cm). Sixteen of the 18 targeted tumors were untreated prior to the single-session TARE. Rate of technical success was 88% (14/16). Two patients did not ultimately receive a single-session TARE due to intraprocedural findings. The mean administered activity was 2.0 GBq, and the mean MIRD dose was 464 Gy based on pre-treatment anatomic imaging and 800 Gy based on cone-beam CT. There were no cases of radiation pneumonitis. Mean post-procedural calculated lung dose was 4.9 Gy (range 3.1-9.3) based on SPECT.
    CONCLUSIONS: An initial experience with single-session TARE using Y-90 glass microspheres without pre-procedural mapping angiography and lung shunt estimation demonstrates that it is a feasible and safe treatment option for select patients with small (< 5 cm) HCC.
    METHODS: Level 4 case series.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Historical Article
    在1980年代,放射性标记的细胞有助于了解血液肿瘤的病理学。在1990年代,临床前试验评估了使用单克隆抗体(MoAbs)的放射性标记免疫疗法,例如用碘-131(Bexxar)或钇-90(Zevalin)标记的抗CD20药物.由于放射性标记的Moabs的安全和持久的反应,美国食品和药物管理局在2000年代批准了这些药物。尽管放射免疫疗法的漫长旅程,其应用最近有所减少。这篇综述将讨论放射免疫疗法的历史时间表,关于优势和困难的辩论,探索试验。我们将研究血液肿瘤学中放射性配体治疗的未来方向,考虑可能成为下一个与治疗无关的趋势的新兴分子。
    In the1980s, radiolabeled cells helped understand the pathology of hemato-oncology. In the 1990s, preclinical trials evaluated radiolabeled immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) such as anti-CD20 agents labeled with Iodine-131 (Bexxar) or Yttrium-90 (Zevalin). Due to the safe and durable responses of radiolabeled MoAbs, the Food and Drug Administration approved these agents in the 2000s. Despite radioimmunotherapy\'s long journey, its application has recently decreased. This review will discuss the historical timeline of radioimmunotherapy, debate on advantages and difficulties, and explore trials. We will examine future directions of radioligand therapy in hemato-oncology, considering emerging molecules that may become the next theragnostic trend.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号