目的:冠状动脉钙化(CAC)表明存在冠状动脉疾病。可以在出于非心脏原因进行的胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)上发现CAC。非门控胸部CT的系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估CAC的临床影响和患病率。
方法:在在线数据库中搜索评估患病率的文章,人口特征,非门控胸部CT偶然CAC的准确性和预后。采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析。
结果:共纳入108项研究(113,406例患者)(38%为女性)。CAC的患病率范围为2.7%至100%(合并患病率为52%,95%置信区间[CI]46-58%)。CAC患者年龄较大(汇总标准化平均差0.88,95%CI0.65-1.11,p<0.001),并且更可能是男性(合并比值比[OR]1.95,95%CI1.55-2.45,p<0.001),糖尿病患者(合并OR2.63,95%CI1.95-3.54,p<0.001),高胆固醇血症(合并OR2.28,95%CI1.33-3.93,p<0.01)和高血压(合并OR3.89,95%CI2.26-6.70,p<0.001),但不是更高的体重指数或吸烟。CAC的非门控CT评估与心电图门控CT具有极好的一致性(合并相关系数0.96,95%CI0.92-0.98,p<0.001)。在51,582名患者中,随访51.6±27.4个月,CAC患者的全因死亡率(合并相对危险度[RR]2.13,95%CI1.57~2.90,p=0.004)和主要不良心血管事件(合并RR2.91,95%CI2.26~3.93,p<0.001)增加.当CT上出现CAC时,在18.6%至93%的报告中报告。
结论:CAC是一种常见的,但是漏报了,在非门控CT上的发现具有重要的预后意义。
结论:冠状动脉钙是心血管疾病的重要预后指标。可以在非门控胸部CT上进行评估,这是一个普遍报道不足的发现。这代表了一个重要的人群,其中有可能错失生活方式改变建议和预防性治疗的机会。这项研究旨在强调在非门控胸部CT上报告偶然冠状动脉钙的重要性。
结论:•冠状动脉钙化是非门控胸部CT的常见发现,与门控CT相比,可以可靠地识别。•胸部CT显示的冠状动脉钙化与全因死亡和主要不良心血管事件的风险增加相关。•冠状动脉钙化经常未在非门控胸部CT上报告。
OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery calcifications (CACs) indicate the presence of coronary artery disease. CAC can be found on thoracic computed tomography (CT) conducted for non-cardiac reasons. This systematic
review and meta-analysis of non-gated thoracic CT aims to assess the clinical impact and prevalence of CAC.
METHODS: Online databases were searched for articles assessing prevalence, demographic characteristics, accuracy and prognosis of incidental CAC on non-gated thoracic CT. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model.
RESULTS: A total of 108 studies (113,406 patients) were included (38% female). Prevalence of CAC ranged from 2.7 to 100% (pooled prevalence 52%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 46-58%). Patients with CAC were older (pooled standardised mean difference 0.88, 95% CI 0.65-1.11, p < 0.001), and more likely to be male (pooled odds ratio [OR] 1.95, 95% CI 1.55-2.45, p < 0.001), with diabetes (pooled OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.95-3.54, p < 0.001), hypercholesterolaemia (pooled OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.33-3.93, p < 0.01) and hypertension (pooled OR 3.89, 95% CI 2.26-6.70, p < 0.001), but not higher body mass index or smoking. Non-gated CT assessment of CAC had excellent agreement with electrocardiogram-gated CT (pooled correlation coefficient 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, p < 0.001). In 51,582 patients, followed-up for 51.6 ± 27.4 months, patients with CAC had increased all cause mortality (pooled relative risk [RR] 2.13, 95% CI 1.57-2.90, p = 0.004) and major adverse cardiovascular events (pooled RR 2.91, 95% CI 2.26-3.93, p < 0.001). When CAC was present on CT, it was reported in between 18.6% and 93% of reports.
CONCLUSIONS: CAC is a common, but underreported, finding on non-gated CT with important prognostic implications.
CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery calcium is an important prognostic indicator of cardiovascular disease. It can be assessed on non-gated thoracic CT and is a commonly underreported finding. This represents a significant population where there is a potential missed opportunity for lifestyle modification recommendations and preventative therapies. This study aims to highlight the importance of reporting incidental coronary artery calcium on non-gated thoracic CT.
CONCLUSIONS: • Coronary artery calcification is a common finding on non-gated thoracic CT and can be reliably identified compared to gated-CT. • Coronary artery calcification on thoracic CT is associated with an increased risk of all cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascsular events. • Coronary artery calcification is frequently not reported on non-gated thoracic CT.