BACKGROUND: Due to its ability to provide stable fixation and permit early mobilization, volar plating has become the recommended technique for the surgical stabilization of distal radius fractures. The extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon may be injured or ruptured as a result of undetected screw penetration or drill plunging. During surgery, it is critical to detect any potential screw penetration so that it can be corrected.
METHODS: A 32-year-old woman presented six weeks post-distal radius plating with an inability to extend her left thumb. Clinical examination revealed loss of extension at the interphalangeal joint, stiff wrist, tender point over the dorsal aspect of the wrist, and an intact sensory nerve function.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) both revealed no evidence of tendon rupture or EPL tendon movement. X-rays revealed the distal epiphyseal screws penetrating the far cortex. Intraoperatively, the EPL tendon was found to be impinged by a screw. The tendon was released, tenolysis was performed, and the distal screws were shortened.
CONCLUSIONS: In order to assess screw penetration into the far cortex, volar plating for distal radius fractures should be performed using intraoperative imaging views such as lateral, 45-degree supination, 45-degree pronation, dorsal tangential, and skyline views. Timely interventions after distal radius fracture fixation preserve tendon function, and early detection of tendon compromise is essential to preventing additional damage.

Volar locking plates (VLP) have been widely used recently to treat distal radius fractures and are considered the gold standard. One of the most common complications of distal radius fracture surgery is flexor pollicis longus rupture, which may also occur in other tendons. Here, we report a case of isolated rupture of the flexor digitorum profundus to the index finger after VLP fixation of a distal radial fracture. Only a few cases of this have been reported in the literature. In previously reported cases, the cause of tendon rupture was repetitive mechanical stress due to implant protrusion. In our case, the plate was placed too distally; however, soft tissue completely covered the distal part of the plate. There was obvious synovitis within the carpal tunnel; therefore, pressure within the carpal tunnel may have increased. The cause of rupture in our case was thought to be a combination of direct mechanical stress and poor circulation due to inadequate VLP fixation.

UNASSIGNED: Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures in adults. Because of the prevalence of these injuries, patients may present with a repeat distal radius fracture on the same wrist through the site of a malunion. We clinically refer to this as an acute on chronic distal radius fracture. In this setting, the restoration of acceptable alignment can be challenging. There is little guidance in the literature for the management of these fractures. We report our experience with acute on chronic distal radius fractures. The secondary fracture plane was used to correct the prior deformity, and the construct was fixated with a fixed angle volar locking plate.
UNASSIGNED: Records of patients with malunion of the distal radius who experienced an acute fracture of the ipsilateral distal radius were reviewed. Inclusion required treatment with open reduction internal fixation using a distal fragment first technique and a volar locking plate through the extended flexor carpi radialis approach. Clinical outcomes and complications were collected.
UNASSIGNED: Across 13 patients, the mean follow-up term was 13 months (range, 6-40 months). Radiographic union was noted in all patients. The mean visual analog scale score for pain was 1.8, and the mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 21.9. There were no recorded complications.
UNASSIGNED: Our results and described technique provide reproducible guidance for the management of acute on chronic distal radius fractures. These cases can be managed using the secondary fracture plane, a distal fragment first technique, and a volar locking plate to correct the preexisting deformity.
UNASSIGNED: Therapeutic IV.

Madelung deformity is a congenital disorder with the malformation of anterior ulnar bowing of radius and a dorsally protruding ulnar head caused by premature growth disturbance at the medial volar aspect of the distal radius. This report describes a bilateral idiopathic Madelung deformity in a 17-year-old woman treated successfully using reverse wedge osteotomy of the distal radius in a symptomatic left wrist. Reverse wedge osteotomy can orient the radial joint surface while correcting the whole radius length by reversely putting the wedge bone removed from the distal metaphysis of radius, the base of which is cut from the surplus of the radial and dorsal cortical bone in the hypotrophic portion. We corrected the palmar subluxation of the carpus, restored her good function, and relieved her wrist pain.

A 68-year-old man with a right distal radius fracture treated with volar locking plate fixation previously was unable to flex his right thumb and four fingers without experiencing any adverse event. The flexor pollicis longus was reconstructed with a tendon graft using the lengthened flexor digitorum superficialis. The flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) of the ring finger was reconstructed with a tendon graft using the palmaris longus. The FDP of the index and little fingers was reconstructed using the interconnected tendon graft to the ring finger. Postoperatively, active flexion of all fingers and thumb was restored; however, he was unable to grasp thin objects because of the absence of full finger flexion. This is the first case wherein all nine flexor tendons being involved after volar locking plate fixation for a distal radius end fracture. We demonstrated a reconstructive procedure for long-standing multiple flexor tendon rupture after volar locking plate fixation.

We describe a 59-year-old man who had nonunion of a right distal radius fracture after volar locking plate fixation. He underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a volar locking plate system for a dorsally displaced, unstable distal radius fracture at a previous hospital 5 months ago. Radiographs of the injured wrist showed nonunion of the distal radius with 1.5-mm ulnar minus variance. Radiographs of the unaffected wrist showed 3.5-mm ulnar plus variance. Intraoperative findings of surgical revision showed an unstable nonunion; thus, debridement of the nonunion, autogenous inlay bone grafting, and internal fixation using another type of volar locking plate system were performed. Healing of the re-operative site was confirmed radiographically 3 months postoperatively. We considered that volar locking plate fixation with excessive distraction of the fracture may lead to nonunion.

Treatment with a variable angle locking plate can, in theory, maintain near anatomic reduction of intra-articular distal radius fractures, but it is unknown to what extent reduction is maintained as measured by computed tomography. We assessed changes in radiographic fracture position 1 year post-operatively. We included 73 patients of whom 66 patients (90%) had radiographs available for review at 1 year post-operatively. We found a small (less than 2 mm or 2°) but statistically significant change in several measures. Accounting for inter-observer variability, this is probably within measurement error. We found no difference in change in fracture position or range of motion, grip strength or patient-reported outcome between the use of one or two distal rows of screws. Our results show that minimal changes in reduction can be expected after volar plate fixation in most patients. We recommend using only one screw row routinely, limiting costs, surgical time and the risk of misplacement of screws.
METHODS: IV.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fracture (DRF) is a common injury and various treatment modalities including open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with volar locking plate are available. More recently, a non-invasive external fixator has been used.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare the use of a non-invasive external fixator with early dynamisation for DRF against ORIF with volar locking plate control group.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with closed DRF were included in a prospective case-controlled study. Patients were assigned to non-invasive external fixator or ORIF. Minimum follow-up was two years. Follow-up was at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 26 and at one and two-year post-operatively. The outcome measures included demographic details, injury mechanism, AO fracture type, risk factors, body mass index (BMI), ulnar styloid fracture and dorsal comminution, radiographs, grip strength and DASH score.
RESULTS: Consecutive 50 patients were treated either with non-invasive external fixator (25/50) or with ORIF (25/50) and the mean age of the two groups was 53 years (SD 17.1) and 49 years (SD 19.5), respectively. Demographics were matched in two groups. In the non-invasive external fixator group, there were 10 AO Type-A, 5 Type-B and 10 Type-C fractures. The ORIF group included 8 Type-A, 6 Type-B and 11 Type-C fractures. The mean DASH score at three-months and one-year post-injury in non-invasive fixator group was 12.2 (SD 3.1) and 3.5 (SD 0.7), respectively, significantly greater than those of ORIF group 14.5 (SD 5.6) and 11.2 (SD 4.4), respectively (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: DRF treated with non-invasive external fixator can give functional results superior to ORIF at three-months and the trend is maintained at one and two-year post-operatively.