OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this experimental study were to compare the quantitative and qualitative visibility of in-stent restenosis between conventional-resolution CT (CRCT) and ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) and to investigate the effects of the image reconstruction techniques on the visualization of in-stent restenosis.
METHODS: A vessel tube with non-calcified plaque in a 3.0-mm stent was scanned by using CRCT and U-HRCT at 4 stent directions (0, 30, 60, and 90 degrees) to the through-plane direction. Hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR); model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR); deep-learning-based reconstruction (DLR) were used as reconstruction methods. The lumen size was assessed using the full width at half maximum method, and image quality was visually evaluated using 4-point scale.
RESULTS: U-HRCT had the significantly wider lumen sizes and narrower stent strut thickness than CRCT in three types of the reconstruction methods (P < 0.01). The lumen sizes for U-HRCT with 90 degrees were narrower than those with the other angle directions regardless of the reconstruction methods. Visual score was significantly higher for U-HRCT than CRCT (3.2 ± 0.7 vs 2.0 ± 0.4, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: U-HRCT quantitatively and qualitatively provided better visualization of in-stent restenosis compared to CRCT. Image quality of U-HRCT may be affected by stent angle.

The point-of-care strip assay for the detection of the schistosome Circulating Cathodic Antigen (POC-CCA) in urine has shown to be a user-friendly and sensitive alternative to stool microscopy for the diagnosis of Schistosoma mansoni infections. However, visual scoring of the test is by definition observer dependent and leads to discussion about the qualitative interpretation, in particular in low intensity infections when test lines tend to be weak. In order to standardise visual scoring, an innovative approach for semi-quantitative interpretation of the POC-CCA cassettes, called G-scores, was developed and evaluated. Urines (n = 110) from a S. mansoni endemic area were used to evaluate this new approach. Test lines of the POC-CCA were visually compared against the G-scores, i.e. a series of artificial cassettes containing inkjet-printed strips of different intensities in order to grade the POC-CCA test line on a scale of 1 to 10. A significant positive correlation (Spearman 0.660, p < 0.001) was observed between G-scores and eggs per gram of faeces. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the usefulness of the G-scores for standardising the visual scoring of the POC-CCA urine strip assay. Several research groups have already indicated an interest in the G-scores for their field work. Further distribution of the cassettes, in particular when provided in combination with reference standards, will assist the wider schistosomiasis community in dealing with issues like batch-to-batch differences and interpretation of trace readings.