Given the important role of patient-ventilator assessments in ensuring the safety and efficacy of mechanical ventilation, a team of respiratory therapists and a librarian used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to make the following recommendations: (1) We recommend assessment of plateau pressure to ensure lung-protective ventilator settings (strong recommendation, high certainty); (2) We recommend an assessment of tidal volume (VT) to ensure lung-protective ventilation (4-8 mL/kg/predicted body weight) (strong recommendation, high certainty); (3) We recommend documenting VT as mL/kg predicted body weight (strong recommendation, high certainty); (4) We recommend an assessment of PEEP and auto-PEEP (strong recommendation, high certainty); (5) We suggest assessing driving pressure to prevent ventilator-induced injury (conditional recommendation, low certainty); (6) We suggest assessing FIO2 to ensure normoxemia (conditional recommendation, very low certainty); (7) We suggest telemonitoring to supplement direct bedside assessment in settings with limited resources (conditional recommendation, low certainty); (8) We suggest direct bedside assessment rather than telemonitoring when resources are adequate (conditional recommendation, low certainty); (9) We suggest assessing adequate humidification for patients receiving noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and invasive mechanical ventilation (conditional recommendation, very low certainty); (10) We suggest assessing the appropriateness of the humidification device during NIV and invasive mechanical ventilation (conditional recommendation, low certainty); (11) We recommend that the skin surrounding artificial airways and NIV interfaces be assessed (strong recommendation, high certainty); (12) We suggest assessing the dressing used for tracheostomy tubes and NIV interfaces (conditional recommendation, low certainty); (13) We recommend assessing the pressure inside the cuff of artificial airways using a manometer (strong recommendation, high certainty); (14) We recommend that continuous cuff pressure assessment should not be implemented to decrease the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (strong recommendation, high certainty); and (15) We suggest assessing the proper placement and securement of artificial airways (conditional recommendation, very low certainty).

BACKGROUND: Infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) experience high morbidity and mortality due to pulmonary arterial hypertension and hypoplasia. Mechanical ventilation is a central component of CDH management. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of a standardized clinical practice guideline (implemented in January 2012) on ventilator management for infants with CDH, and associate management changes with short-term outcomes, specifically extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization and survival to discharge.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective pre-post study of 103 CDH infants admitted from January 2007-July 2021, divided pre- (n = 40) and post-guideline (n = 63). Clinical outcomes, ventilator settings, and blood gas values in the first 7 days of mechanical ventilation were compared between the pre- and post-guideline cohorts.
RESULTS: Post-guideline, ECMO utilization decreased (11% vs 38%, p = 0.001) and survival to discharge improved (92% vs 68%, p = 0.001). More post-guideline patients remained on conventional mechanical ventilation without need for escalation to high-frequency ventilation or ECMO, and had higher pressures and PaCO2 with lower FiO2 and PaO2 (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Standardized ventilator management optimizing pressures for adequate lung expansion and minimizing oxygen toxicity improves outcomes for infants with CDH.
METHODS: III.

The spring 2020 surge of COVID-19 unprecedentedly strained ventilator supply in New York City, with many hospitals nearly exhausting available ventilators and subsequently seriously considering enacting crisis standards of care and implementing New York State Ventilator Allocation Guidelines (NYVAG). However, there is little evidence as to how NYVAG would perform if implemented.
To evaluate the performance and potential improvement of NYVAG during a surge of patients with respect to the length of rationing, overall mortality, and worsening health disparities.
This cohort study included intubated patients in a single health system in New York City from March through July 2020. A total of 20 000 simulations were conducted of ventilator triage (10 000 following NYVAG and 10 000 following a proposed improved NYVAG) during a crisis period, defined as the point at which the prepandemic ventilator supply was 95% utilized.
The NYVAG protocol for triage ventilators.
Comparison of observed survival rates with simulations of scenarios requiring NYVAG ventilator rationing.
The total cohort included 1671 patients; of these, 674 intubated patients (mean [SD] age, 63.7 [13.8] years; 465 male [69.9%]) were included in the crisis period, with 571 (84.7%) testing positive for COVID-19. Simulated ventilator rationing occurred for 163.9 patients over 15.0 days, 44.4% (95% CI, 38.3%-50.0%) of whom would have survived if provided a ventilator while only 34.8% (95% CI, 28.5%-40.0%) of those newly intubated patients receiving a reallocated ventilator survived. While triage categorization at the time of intubation exhibited partial prognostic differentiation, 94.8% of all ventilator rationing occurred after a time trial. Within this subset, 43.1% were intubated for 7 or more days with a favorable SOFA score that had not improved. An estimated 60.6% of these patients would have survived if sustained on a ventilator. Revising triage subcategorization, proposed improved NYVAG, would have improved this alarming ventilator allocation inefficiency (25.3% [95% CI, 22.1%-28.4%] of those selected for ventilator rationing would have survived if provided a ventilator). NYVAG ventilator rationing did not exacerbate existing health disparities.
In this cohort study of intubated patients experiencing simulated ventilator rationing during the apex of the New York City COVID-19 2020 surge, NYVAG diverted ventilators from patients with a higher chance of survival to those with a lower chance of survival. Future efforts should be focused on triage subcategorization, which improved this triage inefficiency, and ventilator rationing after a time trial, when most ventilator rationing occurred.

Intermittent abdominal pressure ventilator (IAPV) use started in the 1930s for ventilatory assistance with muscular dystrophy patients. Later, the device was perfected and expanded for other neuromuscular disorders (NMD). In recent years, the morbidity and mortality tracheotomies and trach tubes related renewed the interest around IAPV. However, there are no guidelines for its use. This study aimed to establish a consensus among physicians involved in its practice to provide IAPV suggestions for the treatment of patients with NMD.
A 3-step modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus. Fourteen respiratory physicians and one psychiatrist with strong experience in IAPV use and/or who published manuscripts on the topic participated in the panel. A systematic review of the literature was carried out according to the PRISMA to identify existing evidence on IAPV for patients with neuromuscular disorders.
In the first round, 34 statements were circulated. Panel members marked \'agree\' or \'disagree\' for each statement and provided comments. The agreement was reached after the second voting session for all 34 statements.
Panel members agreed and IAPV indications, parameter settings (including procedure protocol), potential limitations, contraindications, complications, monitoring, and follow-up are described. This is the first expert consensus on IAPV.

暂无摘要。

Rationale: Pediatric-specific ventilator liberation guidelines are lacking despite the many studies exploring elements of extubation readiness testing. The lack of clinical practice guidelines has led to significant and unnecessary variation in methods used to assess pediatric patients\' readiness for extubation. Methods: Twenty-six international experts comprised a multiprofessional panel to establish pediatrics-specific ventilator liberation clinical practice guidelines, focusing on acutely hospitalized children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours. Eleven key questions were identified and first prioritized using the Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations and Evidence. A systematic review was conducted for questions that did not meet an a priori threshold of ⩾80% agreement, with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodologies applied to develop the guidelines. The panel evaluated the evidence and drafted and voted on the recommendations. Measurements and Main Results: Three questions related to systematic screening using an extubation readiness testing bundle and a spontaneous breathing trial as part of the bundle met Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations criteria of ⩾80% agreement. For the remaining eight questions, five systematic reviews yielded 12 recommendations related to the methods and duration of spontaneous breathing trials, measures of respiratory muscle strength, assessment of risk of postextubation upper airway obstruction and its prevention, use of postextubation noninvasive respiratory support, and sedation. Most recommendations were conditional and based on low to very low certainty of evidence. Conclusions: This clinical practice guideline provides a conceptual framework with evidence-based recommendations for best practices related to pediatric ventilator liberation.

暂无摘要。

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected millions and resulted in a considerable strain on healthcare systems around the world. Intensive care units (ICUs) are reported to be affected the most because significant percentage of ICU patients requires respiratory support through mechanical ventilation (MV).
This study aims to examine the staffing levels and compliance with a ventilator care bundle in a single city in Pakistan.
A cross-sectional survey of 14 ICUs including medical and surgical ICUs was conducted through a self-structured questionnaire including a standardized ventilator care bundle. We assessed the compliance of ICU staff to ventilator care bundle and calculated the correlation between staffing patterns with compliance to this bundle.
The unit response rate was 64% (7/11 hospitals). Across these seven hospitals, there were 14 functional ICUs (7 surgical and 7 medical). The Mean (SD) numbers of beds and ventilators were 8.14 (3.39) and 5.78 (3.68) while the average patient-to-nurse and patient-to-doctor ratio was 3: 1 and 5:1 respectively. The median ventilator care bundle compliance score was 26 (IQR = 21-28) out of 30, while in medical and surgical ICUs, median scores were 24 (IQR = 19-26) and 28 (IQR = 23-30) respectively. The perceived least compliant component was head elevation in ventilated patients. Correlation analysis revealed that 24 h a day, 7 days a week onsite cover of Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support certified staff was positively correlated with the ventilator care bundle score (rs  = 0.654, p value = .011). Similarly, 24-h cover of senior ICU nurses was significantly correlated with the application of chlorhexidine oral care (rs  = 0.676, p value = .008) while routine subglottic aspiration was correlated with the number of doctors (rs  = 0.636, p value = .014).
Our study suggests that ICUs in Peshawar are not well staffed in comparison with international standards and the compliance of ICUs with the ventilator care bundle is suboptimal. We found only a few aspects of ventilator care bundle compliance were related to nursing and medical staffing levels.
Critical care staffs at most of the medical ICUs in Peshawar are not compliant with the standard guidelines for patients on mechanical ventilation. Moreover, the staffing levels at these ICUs are not in accordance with international standards. However, this study suggests that staffing levels may not be the only cause of non-compliance with standard mechanical ventilator guidelines. There is an urgent need to design and implement a program that can enhance and monitor the quality of nursing care provided to mechanically ventilated patients. Lastly, nurse staffing of ICUs in Pakistan must be increased to enable high quality care and more doctors should be trained in critical care.

To model performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score-based ventilator allocation guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic.
A retrospective cohort study design was used. Study sites included 3 New York City hospitals in a single academic medical center. We included a random sample (205) of adult patients who were intubated (1002) from March 25, 2020, till April 29, 2020. Protocol criteria adapted from the New York State\'s 2015 guidelines were applied to determine which patients would have had mechanical ventilation withheld or withdrawn.
117 (57%) patients would have been identified for ventilator withdrawal or withholding based on the triage guidelines. Of those 117 patients, 28 (24%) survived hospitalization. Overall, 65 (32%) patients survived to discharge.
Triage protocols aim to maximize survival by redirecting ventilators to those most likely to survive. Over 50% of this sample would have been identified as candidates for ventilator exclusion. Clinical judgment would therefore still be needed in ventilator reallocation, thus re-introducing bias and moral distress. This data suggests limited utility for SOFA score-based ventilator rationing. It raises the question of whether there is sufficient ethical justification to impose a life-ending decision based on a SOFA scoring method on some patients in order to offer potential benefit to a modest number of others.

Artificial airway suctioning is a key component of airway management and a core skill for clinicians charged with assuring airway patency. Suctioning of the artificial airway is a common procedure performed worldwide on a daily basis. As such, it is imperative that clinicians are familiar with the most-effective and efficient methods to perform the procedure. We conducted a systematic review to assist in the development of evidence-based recommendations that pertain to the care of patients with artificial airways. From our systematic review, we developed guidelines and recommendations that addressed questions related to the indications, complications, timing, duration, and methods of artificial airway suctioning. By using a modified version of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, the following recommendations for suctioning were developed for neonatal, pediatric, and adult patients with an artificial airway: (1) breath sounds, visual secretions in the artificial airway, and a sawtooth pattern on the ventilator waveform are indicators for suctioning pediatric and adult patients, and an acute increase in airway resistance may be an indicator for suctioning in neonates; (2) as-needed only, rather than scheduled, suctioning is sufficient for neonatal and pediatric patients; (3) both closed and open suction systems may be used to safely and effectively remove secretions from the artificial airway of adult patients; (4) preoxygenation should be performed before suctioning in pediatric and adult patients; (5) the use of normal saline solution should generally be avoided during suctioning; (6) during open suctioning, sterile technique should be used; (7) suction catheters should occlude < 70% of the endotracheal tube lumen in neonates and < 50% in pediatric and adult patients, and suction pressure should be kept below -120 mm Hg in neonatal and pediatric patients and -200 mm Hg in adult patients; (8) suction should be applied for a maximum of 15 s per suctioning procedure; (9) deep suctioning should only be used when shallow suctioning is ineffective; (10) routine bronchoscopy for secretion removal is not recommended; and (11) devices used to clear endotracheal tubes may be used when airway resistance is increased due to secretion accumulation.