Vasectomy is the most commonly performed urologic procedure in the United States and is a highly effective form of male contraception. The introduction of guidelines by urological societies has standardized vasectomy care. Providers should be awadre of the rationale behind these guidelines, as well as key differences among them. While few major changes to vasectomy technique have been adopted over the past 40 years, new, reversible vasal occlusive technologies may affect delivery of male contraceptive care in the future. Here, we perform a comparative review of vasectomy guidelines from six urological societies worldwide. In addition, we report on the status of several experimental vasal occlusion methods that may be available in the next decade.

BACKGROUND: The American Urological Association Vasectomy Guidelines published in 2012 defined vasectomy success as either azoospermia or rare nonmotile sperm (≤100,000 nonmotile sperm/ml). We sought to characterize nationwide practice patterns surrounding vasectomy followup before and after publication of the guidelines.
METHODS: Data were collected using the MarketScan® database. We identified men 18 to 64 years old undergoing vasectomy between 2007 and 2015 with at least 12 months of followup to track post-vasectomy semen analysis claims. Demographic data including age, vasectomy provider type and regionality were also queried. We compared the likelihood of men obtaining multiple post-vasectomy semen analyses before vs after the guidelines release with multivariate logistic regression. Linear regression was used examine time to first post-vasectomy semen analysis association with observed post-vasectomy semen analysis frequency trends.
RESULTS: We identified a total of 87,201 patients who underwent vasectomy between 2007 and 2015 and had at least 1 post-vasectomy semen analysis claim. Men undergoing vasectomy in the post-guideline years of 2013 to 2015 were at lower risk for requiring any repeat post-vasectomy semen analysis (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.66-0.71) and less likely to have had ≥3 post-vasectomy semen analyses (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.88) than those in the pre-guideline (2007 to 2012) cohort. Mean time to first post-vasectomy semen analysis was shorter in men who submitted multiple analyses (p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Within a nationally representative patient cohort, men required fewer repeat post-vasectomy semen analyses after publication of the 2012 guidelines. Further research on patient and provider characteristics affecting variations in vasectomy followup patterns and guideline adherence is needed.

Except for condom use, vasectomy is the only approved form of male contraception. The American Urological Association published guidelines on vasectomy in 2012, which clearly outlined patient counseling, vasectomy techniques to maximize successful occlusion, and postvasectomy care. However, there are certainly areas of further improvement to be addressed. Vasectomy is severely underutilized compared with tubal ligation for sterilization, likely due to lack of patient awareness. Although the majority of vasectomies are performed in the office with local anesthesia, some patients are still routinely prescribed narcotics for postprocedural pain, despite the well-described opioid pandemic. Finally, although patients are counseled on the necessity of a postvasectomy semen analysis to confirm sterility prior to the discontinuation of alternative contraceptives, more than 50% of men do not complete this test. Therefore, alternative strategies must be pursued to improve patient compliance.

BACKGROUND: Following vasectomy, azoospermia may not be achieved and rare non-motile sperm (RNMS) may persist in the semen. International guidelines vary in management of this finding. Giving \'special clearance\' enables vasectomy to be considered a success despite the presence of RNMS. The latest 2016 British guidelines require two centrifuged semen samples with RNMS in order to give special clearance. We investigate the impact of these latest recommendations.
METHODS: Retrospectively, patients who underwent vasectomy between 2014 and 2018 were assessed. The patient sample was divided into two groups, pre- and post-implementation of the new guidelines. The primary outcome measures were (i) total number of post-operative semen samples submitted, (ii) post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) outcomes, and (iii) the numbers issued special clearance.
RESULTS: Implementation of the updated guidelines increased detection of RNMS from 18% to 27% (p <0.01) and increased use of repeat testing. In the two year period prior to implementation, no patients required special clearance, however, once implemented, it was offered to 10 patients. Furthermore, there was a 5-fold increase in PVSA processing costs. The first post-vasectomy semen sample demonstrated azoospermia or RNMS in 97.5% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: British guidelines are more resource intensive, result in prolonged follow-up with increasing rates of special clearance. The European Association of Urology permits clearance, not special clearance, after a single non-centrifuged sample demonstrating azoospermia or RNMS. Bringing British recommendations in-line with European guidance would enable clearance in up to 97.5% of patients following a single sample at 12 weeks.

The objective was to develop a laboratory procedure to validate American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline on vasectomy success when nonmotile spermatozoa are found in the post-vasectomy ejaculate. The neutral α-glucosidase (NAG) an epididymal protein assay modified to determine the activity at 30 and 90 min of incubation from 24 pre- and 47 post-vasectomy ejaculates. The difference between the two points in the relative activity was calculated and if the difference was nonsignificant will confirm vasectomy success. The mean differences in the relative NAG activity were significantly different in pre- and post-vasectomy ejaculates, respectively. The mean differences in the relative NAG activity were similar in post-vasectomy ejaculates with and without nonmotile spermatozoa. No difference in relative NAG activity in post-vasectomy ejaculates between two time points of incubation may be a reliable method to confirm occlusion of the vas deferens. It also validates the recommendation by AUA Guideline on vasectomy success in the presence of few nonmotile spermatozoa.

In 2012 the American Urological Association published vasectomy guidelines to promote best practices, including when to obtain post-vasectomy semen analyses. In this study we assessed practice patterns of post-vasectomy semen analysis since this guideline publication.
We retrospectively analyzed a database of men who underwent post-vasectomy semen analysis between 2013 and 2017. Vasectomies were performed by urologist and nonurologist providers in academic and community settings.
A total of 4,827 men underwent post-vasectomy semen analysis with 22.3% undergoing 1 or more repeat analyses. On initial analysis 58.2% were azoospermic, 28.3% had less than 100,000/ml rare nonmotile sperm, 8.7% had greater than 100,000/ml nonmotile sperm and 4.8% had motile sperm. The rate of repeat post-vasectomy semen analysis decreased from 30.7% in 2013 to 18.6% in 2016. Overall 72% of repeat post-vasectomy semen analyses were performed for patients with azoospermia or rare nonmotile sperm on initial post-vasectomy semen analysis. Of the 421 men with greater than 100,000/ml nonmotile sperm, 61.3% did not obtain a repeat analysis. Among cases of repeat analysis after initially having greater than 100,000/ml nonmotile sperm, 67.5% were downgraded to rare nonmotile sperm or azoospermia, 32.5% had a persistent count greater than 100,000/ml nonmotile sperm and none developed motile sperm.
The rate of repeat post-vasectomy semen analysis is decreasing, likely highlighting a decrease in unnecessary testing. However, there is ongoing discordance between vasectomy guidelines and practice patterns, with 72% of repeat post-vasectomy semen analyses obtained unnecessarily based on guideline recommendations. Interestingly, no men with greater than 100,000/ml nonmotile sperm went on to have motile sperm on repeat post-vasectomy semen analysis. Further provider education is warranted and subsequent studies may allow for guideline modification wherein all nonmotile sperm are characterized similarly.

UNASSIGNED: Fournir des lignes directrices aux fournisseurs de soins quant à l\'utilisation de modes de contraception pour la prévention de la grossesse et quant à la promotion d\'une sexualité saine.
OBJECTIVE: Orientation des praticiens canadiens en ce qui concerne l\'efficacité globale, le mécanisme d\'action, les indications, les contre-indications, les avantages n\'étant pas liés à la contraception, les effets indésirables, les risques et le protocole de mise en œuvre des modes de contraception abordés; planification familiale dans le contexte de la santé sexuelle et du bien-être général; méthodes de counseling en matière de contraception; et accessibilité et disponibilité des modes de contraception abordés au Canada. RéSULTATS: La littérature publiée a été récupérée par l\'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans MEDLINE et The Cochrane Library entre janvier 1994 et janvier 2015 au moyen d\'un vocabulaire contrôlé (p. ex. contraception, sexuality, sexual health) et de mots clés (p. ex. contraception, family planning, hormonal contraception, emergency contraception) appropriés. Les résultats ont été restreints aux analyses systématiques, aux études observationnelles et aux essais comparatifs randomisés / essais cliniques comparatifs publiés en anglais entre janvier 1994 et janvier 2015. Les recherches ont été mises à jour de façon régulière et intégrées à la directive clinique jusqu\'en juin 2015. La littérature grise (non publiée) a été identifiée par l\'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans les sites Web d\'organismes s\'intéressant à l\'évaluation des technologies dans le domaine de la santé et d\'organismes connexes, dans des collections de directives cliniques, dans des registres d\'essais cliniques et auprès de sociétés de spécialité médicale nationales et internationales.
UNASSIGNED: La qualité des résultats a été évaluée au moyen des critères décrits dans le rapport du Groupe d\'étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs (Tableau 1). CHAPITRE 7 : CONTRACEPTION INTRA-UTéRINE: Déclarations sommaires RECOMMANDATIONS.

The increasingly stringent laboratory-approach to diagnosing azoospermia for post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) continues to be at odds with the simpler approach desired by clinicians. This study describes the analysis of 10 years of PVSA and discusses the outcome in relation to risk, cost and assesses whether more stringent procedures are required. PVSA was performed on 4788 patients initially using a 2-test strategy (16 and 20 weeks post-surgery), moving to 1 test during 2013-2014. Azoospermia was confirmed by the analysis of 10 µl of semen followed by 10 µl of centrifuged pellet. In total, there were 9260 tests with a median of 1.93 tests/patient and 18.7 weeks to clearance. Surgical failure occurred in 1.75%, falling to 1.1% between 2011 and 2016. There were no cases of unwanted pregnancy, recanalization or complaints although misdiagnosis was detected in 1 case as a result of failure to confirm patient identification. Azoospermia performed according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines is sufficiently robust to confirm success/failure of vasectomy. With uncertainty surrounding the diagnosis, efforts to improve detection of occasional non-motile sperm are futile, cost more and fail to reduce risk of inappropriate clearance. Misdiagnosis is more likely from patient identification error and mitigation may include reverting to the safety net of a 2-test strategy.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: To survey urologists and family medicine physicians (FMPs) within a single institution to determine current vasectomy practice patterns and determine compliance with 2012 American Urological Association (AUA) vasectomy guidelines.
METHODS: In 2016, a single-institution survey was conducted to understand the vasectomy practice patterns among urologists and nonurologists. The survey questions and 3 clinical scenarios were designed based on the 2012 AUA vasectomy guidelines. Results of the survey were compiled between urologists and nonurologists and then compared with the guideline recommendations.
RESULTS: A total of 23 FMPs and 6 urologists responded. Fewer prevasectomy counseling topics were discussed by FMPs compared with urologists. A variety of vasectomy techniques were used among FMPs. Vas deferens segments were more likely to be sent for histology by FMPs than urologists (65% vs 17%, P = .02). FMPs were more likely to send postvasectomy semen analyses earlier than urologists (P = .02) and more likely to send multiple postvasectomy semen analyses (P = .006) before forgoing alternative contraceptive methods. Regarding the clinical scenario questions, FMPs were more likely to answer discordantly from guideline recommendations compared with urologists.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant vasectomy practice pattern heterogeneity still exists among nonurologists surveyed within our institution. The 2012 AUA vasectomy guidelines have yet to be broadly implemented within nonurology practices. Further studies are warranted to investigate national trends in nonurologist vasectomy practice patterns and determine how the guidelines can be better implemented in nonurologic practices.