BACKGROUND: Workplace cancer screening programs are determined as part of an employee\'s benefits package and health checkups are perceived positively. However, the current status of workplace cancer screening programs in Japan is unavailable. This study aimed to assess the adherence to national guidelines for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings in the workplace among Japanese enterprises and identify factors associated with excessive or inadequate screenings.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was employed. Data were obtained from a survey conducted by the \"Corporate Action to Promote Cancer Control\" between November and December 2022 among registered partner enterprises in Japan. The survey included questions on background characteristics, cancer screening practices, and intervention approaches. The analysis included 432 enterprises that provided complete responses regarding colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings.
RESULTS: The guideline-adherence rates for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings in the workplace were 12.7%, 3.0%, and 8.8%, respectively. Enterprises had lower adherence to screening guidelines than local governments. Colorectal (70.8%) and breast (67.1%) cancer screenings were predominantly categorized as \"overscreening\" and cervical (60.6%) cancer screening, as \"underscreening.\" Factors such as enterprise scale, health insurance associations, and the number of interventional approaches were significantly associated with increased \"overscreening\" (101-1000: β = 0.13, p = 0.01; ≥ 1000: β = 0.17, p < 0.01; health insurance association: β = 0.23, p < 0.01; and approaches: β = 0.42, p < 0.01) and reduced \"underscreening\" (101-1000: β = -0.13, p = 0.01; ≥ 1000: β = -0.17, p < 0.01; health insurance association: β = -0.18, p < 0.01; and approaches: β = -0.48, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to national guidelines for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings in the workplace was suboptimal among Japanese enterprises. Therefore, appropriate cancer screening measures and interventions to ensure guideline adherence and optimization of screening benefits while minimizing potential harms should be expeditiously implemented.

BACKGROUND: The 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on cervical cancer screening and treatment provide countries with evidence-based recommendations to accelerate disease elimination. However, evidence shows that health providers\' adherence to screening guidelines is low. We conducted a study in Argentina to analyze health providers\' knowledge and perceptions regarding the 2021 WHO Guidelines.
METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted based on individual, semi-structured interviews with health providers specializing in gynecology (n = 15). The themes explored were selected and analyzed using domains and constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
RESULTS: Although health providers perceive WHO as a reliable institution, they do not know the 2021 guidelines, its supporting evidence, and its elaboration process. Their clinical practice is mainly guided by local recommendations developed by national professional medical associations (PMAs). For interviewees, WHO guidelines should be disseminated through health authorities and national PMAs, mainly through in-service training. Health providers had a positive assessment regarding WHO Recommendation 1 (screen, triage, and treatment for women aged 30 + with HPV-testing every 5 to 10 years) and perceived a favorable climate for its implementation. HPV-testing followed by triage was considered a low-complexity practice, enabling a better detection of HPV, a better selection of the patients who will need diagnosis and treatment, and a more efficient use of health system resources. However, they suggested adapting this recommendation by removing screening interval beyond 5 years. WHO Recommendation 2 (screen-and-treat approach with HPV-testing for women aged 30 + every 5 to 10 years) was predominantly rejected by interviewees, was considered an algorithm that did not respond to women\'s needs, and was not adequate for the Argentinean context. Regarding the HPV-test modality, clinician-collected tests were the preferred mode. Health providers considered that HPV self-collection should be used primarily among socially vulnerable women to increase screening coverage.
CONCLUSIONS: WHO guidelines should be widely disseminated among health providers, especially in settings that could benefit from a screen-and-treat approach. Identifying areas of partnership and collaboration with PMAs in implementing WHO guidelines is essential.

近年来，子宫颈癌的筛查策略发生了一些变化，高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测被推荐为宫颈癌的初筛方法，但初筛阳性女性的管理仍存在一定的不足，宫颈p16/Ki-67免疫细胞化学双染技术有助于进一步的分流。为了更好地指导及规范双染技术的应用，中华医学会病理学分会细胞病理学组组织相关专家特制定本共识，对p16/Ki-67双染技术的制片、判读、临床应用等进行规范，以更好地用于指导宫颈癌的筛查及管理。.

BACKGROUND:  The World Health Organization\'s (WHO) call to eliminate cervical cancer is essential in improving structures and processes at primary healthcare facilities by galvanising change in providing cervical cancer screening services.
OBJECTIVE:  The main objective of this study was to explore challenges affecting the implementation of cervical cancer screening guidelines in selected districts in Limpopo Province.
METHODS:  The study was carried out at primary health care services (PHCs) in Vhembe and Mopani districts, Limpopo province.
METHODS:  Qualitative non-experimental research design of an exploratory, descriptive and contextual nature of a qualitative paradigm to understand cervical cancer screening programme challenges from healthcare professionals\' perspectives. The study population comprised two males and 16 female professional registered nurses working in Limpopo province\'s PHC services. The sample size was 18 professional nurses. A face-to-face interview guided by unstructured questionnaires was undertaken to elicit information regarding the implementation of cervical cancer screening services. Captured data were analysed using Tesch\'s open-coding method.
RESULTS:  The study revealed that the cervical cancer guidelines were not effectively implemented as there were contradictions and gaps when applying the guidelines about the management of HIV and AIDS, age restrictions and gestation. Furthermore, structural factors contributed to the inadequacy rate and failure to reach the set targets.
CONCLUSIONS:  Primary health care is an essential health care and human right; therefore, the government should ensure that guidelines and policies are supported financially and that professional nurses are capacitated for the efficient implementation of services.Contribution: Addressing the inequalities in the implementation of social policies for the prevention of cervical cancer prevention and improving the nurses\' knowledge and practice behaviour regarding cervical cancer prevention are imperative.

Clinically validated human papillomavirus (HPV) assays are crucial in cervical cancer screening. In this study, we evaluated the Allplex HPV HR Detection assay (Seegene, SouthKorea) for its clinical accuracy and reproducibility according to the international criteria, using the RealTime High Risk HPV m2000 assay (Abbott, USA) as standard comparator. The Allplex HPV HR assay exhibits significant non-inferior sensitivity to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade (CIN) 2 or worse (CIN2+) with a ratio of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97-1.03, P = 0.006), insignificant non-inferior sensitivity to detect CIN3+ with a ratio of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.88-1.13, P = 0.098), and non-inferior specificity to exclude CIN2+ with a ratio of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-1.00, P < 0.001) compared to the standard comparator. In addition, the assay shows an excellent reproducibility within the same laboratory [96.5% (95% CI: 94.6-97.9) with a kappa value of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95)] and between laboratories [96.7% (95% CI: 94.8-98.0) with a kappa value of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95)] for overall high-risk HPV positivity as well as for each individual HPV type. Pooling our study data with those of another independent study supports the consistency of our findings. We conclude that both the clinical accuracy to detect cervical precancer and the reproducibility of Allplex HPV HR Detection assay fulfill the international validation criteria of use in cervical cancer screening.IMPORTANCEThe clinical validation of human papillomavirus (HPV) assays in accordance with well-established international guidelines is crucial to ensure that only validated assays are used in the context of screening (Meijer et al., Int J Cancer, 2009). The guidelines, developed by an international consortium, require that a novel HPV assay has non-inferior accuracy against a standard comparator test for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade (CIN) 2 or worse (CIN2+). Additionally, a new HPV assay should meet specific criteria for both intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility to ensure the assay consistently exhibits technical precision and robust performance. Pooling our study data with those of another independent study supports the consistency of our findings. In conclusion, both the clinical accuracy to detect cervical precancer and the reproducibility of Allplex HPV HR Detection assay fulfill the international validation criteria of use in cervical cancer screening.

高危型人乳头状瘤病毒（HR-HPV）持续感染是唯一明确的子宫颈癌致病因素，并且与子宫颈上皮内瘤变（CIN）的发生密切相关。外用免疫调节剂（如外用红色诺卡菌细胞壁骨架）的出现有望改变子宫颈HR-HPV持续感染的治疗现状。本共识专家组由全国27位妇科临床专家、病毒学专家及流行病学专家组成，基于国内外研究证据和专家经验，经讨论就外用免疫调节剂的临床应用达成共识，推荐用于子宫颈单纯性HR-HPV持续感染、低级别鳞状上皮内病变［LSIL（CINⅠ）］合并HR-HPV持续感染以及高级别鳞状上皮内病变［HSIL（CIN Ⅱ/Ⅲ）］术后合并HR-HPV持续感染。.

OBJECTIVE: The fight against cervical cancer requires effective screening together with optimal and on-time treatment along the care continuum. We examined the impact of cervical cancer testing and treatment guidelines on testing practices, and follow-up adherence to guidelines.
METHODS: Data from Estonian electronic health records and healthcare provision claims for 50,702 women was used. The annual rates of PAP tests, HPV tests and colposcopies during two guideline periods (2nd version 2012-2014 vs 3rd version 2016-2019) were compared. To assess the adherence to guidelines, the subjects were classified as adherent, over- or undertested based on the timing of the appropriate follow-up test.
RESULTS: The number of PAP tests decreased and HPV tests increased during the 3rd guideline period (p < 0.01). During the 3rd guideline period, among 21-29-year-old women, the adherence to guidelines ranged from 38.7% (44.4…50.1) for ASC-US to 73.4% (62.6…84.3) for HSIL and among 30-59-year-old from 49.0% (45.9…52.2) for ASC-US to 65.7% (58.8…72.7) for ASCH. The highest rate of undertested women was for ASC-US (21-29y: 25.7%; 30-59y: 21.9%). The rates of over-tested women remained below 12% for all cervical pathologies observed. There were 55.2% (95% CI 49.7…60.8) of 21-24-year-olds and 57.1% (95% CI 53.6…60.6) of 25-29-year-old women who received HPV test not adherent to guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted some shortcomings in guideline adherence, especially among women under 30. The insights gained from this study help to improve the quality of care and, thus, reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality.

UNASSIGNED: Follow-up of abnormal results is essential to cervical cancer screening, but data on adherence to follow-up are limited. We describe patterns of follow-up after screening abnormalities and identify predictors of guideline-concordant follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: We identified the index screening abnormality (positive human papillomavirus test or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or more severe cytology) among women of ages 25 to 65 years at three US healthcare systems during 2010 to 2019. We estimated the cumulative incidence of surveillance testing, colposcopy, or treatment after the index abnormality and initial colposcopy. Logistic regressions were fit to identify predictors of guideline-concordant follow-up according to contemporaneous guidelines.
UNASSIGNED: Among 43,007 patients with an index abnormality, the cumulative incidence of any follow-up was 49.6% by 4 years for those with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/human papillomavirus-negative and higher for abnormalities warranting immediate colposcopy. The 1-year cumulative incidence of any follow-up after colposcopy was 70% for patients with normal results or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I and 90% for patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II+. Rates of concordant follow-up after screening and colposcopy were 52% and 47%, respectively. Discordant follow-up was associated with factors including age, race/ethnicity, overweight/obese body mass index, and specific types of public payor coverage or being uninsured.
UNASSIGNED: Adherence to the recommended follow-up of cytologic and histopathologic abnormalities is inconsistent in clinical practice. Concordance was poor for mild abnormalities and improved, although suboptimal, for more severe abnormalities.
UNASSIGNED: There remain gaps in the cervical cancer screening process in clinical practice. Further study is needed to understand the barriers to the appropriate management of cervical abnormalities.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is a global public health concern. Despite ESGO recommendations and FIGO classification changes, management of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) remains debated in France. Our study aimed to review LACC treatment practices and assess adherence to ESGO recommendations among different practitioners.
METHODS: From February 2021 to August 2022, we conducted a survey among gynecologic oncology surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists practicing in France and managing LACC (FIGO stages IB3-IVA) according to the 2018 FIGO classification. We analyzed responses against the 2018 ESGO recommendations as a \"gold standard.\"
RESULTS: Among 115 respondents (56% radiation oncologists, 30% surgeons, 13% medical oncologists), 48.6% of gynecologic surgeons didn\'t perform para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL) with significant radiologic pelvic involvement. PAL, when indicated by PET-CT, was more common in university hospitals (66.7% of surgeons). Surgeons in university hospitals also followed ESGO recommendations more closely. Overall, compliance with all ESGO recommendations was low: 5.7% of surgeons, 21.5% of radiation oncologists, and 60% of medical oncologists. Prophylactic para-aortic irradiation, per ESGO, was more frequent in comprehensive cancer centers (52% of radiation oncologists).
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to ESGO recommendations for LACC treatment appears low in France, particularly in surgery, with limited PAL in cases of lymph node negativity on PET-CT. However, these recommendations are more often followed by surgeons in university hospitals and radiation oncologists in cancer centers. Adherence to these recommendations may impact patient survival and warrants evaluation of care quality, justifying the organization of LACC management in expert centers.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer poses a significant burden, particularly in low-and-middle income countries (LMIC) with limited access to healthcare. High-income countries have made progress in prevention, while LMIC face unacceptably high incidence and mortality rates, often lacking official screening recommendations. We analysed the presence and content of cervical cancer screening guidelines for the secondary prevention of cervical cancer in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and compared it to the current World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention.
METHODS: A review of national cervical cancer guidelines across the SADC region was conducted. Data was obtained from government websites, international cancer control platforms, and WHO resources. Search terms included \"cervical cancer\" and \"cervical cancer control guidelines\", amongst others. There were no limitations on publication years, and the most recent versions of the guidelines were analysed, regardless of language. Each guideline was assessed for specific screening and treatment recommendations, in relation to the current WHO guidelines. Points were assigned for each data element.
RESULTS: While most countries contributed data to this analysis there was a notable absence of adherence to the WHO guidelines. The most common screening method was naked eye visual inspection. There was a consensus on the age of screening initiation. Most countries recommended treatment by cryotherapy and loop excision.
CONCLUSIONS: Effective cervical cancer screening programmes, guided by evidence-based recommendations, can enhance early intervention and outcomes. This study highlights the need for standardized and evidence-based cervical cancer screening guidelines in the SADC region, to reduce the burden of cervical cancer and improve the health outcomes of women in these areas.