UNASSIGNED:要比较安全性,功效,单切口阴囊睾丸固定术(SISO)和传统双切口腹股沟睾丸固定术(TTIO)治疗儿童原发性可触及未降睾丸(PUDT)的美容结果。
UNASSIGNED:对PubMed上发表的所有相关研究进行系统的文献检索,Embase,Medline,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience数据库,和万方数据直到2021年7月进行。手术时间,住院时间,转化率,伤口感染或裂开,阴囊血肿或肿胀,睾丸萎缩,重新思考,疝或鞘膜积液,需要镇痛药,使用Mantel-Haenszel或逆方差方法比较SISO和TTIO之间的美容结果。
UNASSIGNED:最终分析共纳入17项研究,涉及2,627名儿童(1,362SISO和1,265TTIO)。SISO的转化率为3.6%。对于PUDT,SISO方法的手术时间比TTIO方法的手术时间有统计学意义(加权平均差-11.96,95%置信区间-14.33至-9.59,I2=79%,P<0.00001)和较短的住院时间(加权平均差-1.05,95%置信区间-2.07至-0.03,P=0.04)。SISO需要更少的镇痛药,并且比TTIO具有更好的美容效果。SISO的总数相似,短期,或长期并发症发生率与TTIO。
UNASSIGNED:与TTIO相比,SISO具有手术时间短的优点,住院时间较短,术后疼痛减少,和更好的化妆品吸引人的结果。SISO是一个保险箱,有效,有希望的,和潜在的PUDT微创手术方法。在选定的隐睾患者中,SISO是TTIO的替代品,尤其是位置较低的。
UNASSIGNED:https://www。crd.约克。AC.英国/PROSPERO/,标识符:CRD42021268562。
UNASSIGNED: To compare the safety, efficacy, and cosmetic results of single-incision scrotal orchiopexy (SISO) and traditional two-incision inguinal orchiopexy (TTIO) for primary palpable undescended testes (PUDTs) in children.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search of all relevant studies published on PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science database, and Wanfang data until July 2021 was conducted. The operative time, hospitalization duration, conversion rate, wound infection or dehiscence, scrotal hematoma or swelling, testicular atrophy, reascent, hernia or hydrocele, analgesics needs, and cosmetic results were compared between SISO and TTIO using the Mantel-Haenszel or inverse-variance method.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 17 studies involving 2,627 children (1,362 SISOs and 1,265 TTIOs) were included in the final analysis. The conversion rate of SISO was 3.6%. The SISO approach had a statistically significant shorter operative time than the TTIO approach for PUDT (weighted mean difference-11.96, 95% confidence interval -14.33 to -9.59, I2 = 79%, P < 0.00001) and a shorter hospital stay (weighted mean difference-1.05, 95% confidence interval -2.07 to -0.03, P = 0.04). SISO needed fewer analgesics and had better cosmetic results than TTIO. SISO had a similar total, short-term, or long-term complication rate with TTIO.
UNASSIGNED: Compared with TTIO, SISO has the advantages of shorter operative time, shorter hospitalization duration, less postoperative pain, and better cosmetic appealing results. SISO is a safe, effective, promising, and potential minimal invasive surgical approach for PUDT. SISO is an alternative to TTIO in selected cryptorchid patients, especially for lower positioned ones.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42021268562.