BACKGROUND: Systemic anticancer therapy for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) is associated with efficacy benefits, including longer overall survival (OS), but many patients remain untreated. This observational, real-world, national study aimed to investigate factors associated with receiving systemic anticancer therapy for la/mUC in England.
METHODS: Adults diagnosed with la/mUC between 2013 and 2019 were identified in the National Cancer Registration Dataset and followed until March 2021. Healthcare and comorbidity data were obtained from Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care and Outpatient datasets. Treatment data were obtained from the Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy dataset. Factors associated with treatment were identified using multivariable logistic regression. OS from la/mUC diagnosis was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
RESULTS: Of 16,610 patients diagnosed with la/mUC, 5,191 (31%) received systemic anticancer therapy; 4,700 (91%) received platinum-based chemotherapy. Only 18% of patients were cisplatin ineligible. Patients were significantly less likely to receive treatment if they were female, cisplatin ineligible, older, or diagnosed before 2018; had laUC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >1, or greater comorbidity; or resided outside London or in income-deprived areas. Median OS (95% CI) from diagnosis in treated vs. untreated patients was 19.9 (19.4-20.6) vs. 5.8 (5.6-6.0) months, respectively. Limitations include retrospective analysis of data not initially collected for research purposes.
CONCLUSIONS: From 2013 to 2019, ≈70% of patients with la/mUC in England were untreated, which is high given the availability of effective treatments. Reasons for undertreatment should be addressed. Given the evolving treatment landscape, analysis of more recent data would be informative.
CONCLUSIONS: This study investigated systemic anticancer treatment for patients diagnosed with advanced urothelial carcinoma in England between 2013 and 2019. Of 16,610 patients, 31% received treatment. Various factors were associated with not receiving treatment, including female sex, older age, worse performance status, greater comorbidity, and resident in income-deprived areas. Median overall survival in treated vs. untreated patients was 19.9 vs. 5.8 months.

Although oral antiviral therapy (OAV) is reported to improve outcomes in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is underutilized. We determined the rate and factors associated with OAV utilization among patients with HBV-related HCC in a US population with health insurance.
Patients with HBV-related HCC were identified from the de-identified administrative health claims database for patients with private insurance, Optum Clinformatics (2003-2021).
We identified 2129 patients with HBV-related HCC: 71% male, mean age 62.7 ± 12.5 years, 40% Asian individuals, 72% with cirrhosis, and 37% received OAV. The treatment rate improved over time (40.5% after 2010 vs 26.3% earlier; P < .001). Significantly lower treatment rates were noted for females, non-Asian patients, noncirrhotic patients, and patients without gastroenterologist/hepatologist or infectious disease (GI/ID) specialist care (P < .0001). OAV treatment predictors included Asian race and ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.6; 95% CI, 2.8-4.5; P < .001), male sex (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0; P < .001), seeing a GI/ID specialist (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.10-1.99; P = .0091), having compensated cirrhosis (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.7-2.8; P < .001), and being treated from 2011 to 2021 (aOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.8-3.0; P < .001); being younger (aOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99; P < .001) was less likely for treatment. OAV initiated at or before HCC diagnosis was associated independently with improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.99; P = .037).
Among patients with HBV-related HCC, only 1 in 3 received OAV despite having insurance coverage. Efforts must continue to develop ways to improve HBV OAV treatment, especially among females, non-Asian patients, and patients without cirrhosis or not seen by specialists.

暂无摘要。

Guidelines recommend treatment of metabolic acidosis (MA) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but the diagnosis and treatment rates in real-world settings are unknown. We investigated the frequency of MA treatment and diagnosis in patients with CKD.
In this retrospective cohort study, we examined administrative health data from two US databases [Optum\'s de-identified Integrated Claims + Clinical Electronic Health Record Database (US EMR cohort; 1 January 2007 to 30 June 2019) and Symphony Health Solutions IDV® (US claims cohort; 1 May 2016 to 30 April 2019)] and population-level databases from Manitoba, Canada (1 April 2006 to 31 March 2018). Patients who met laboratory criteria indicative of CKD and chronic MA were included: two consecutive estimated glomerular filtration results <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and two serum bicarbonate results 12 to <22 mEq/L over 28-365 days. Outcomes included treatment of MA (defined as a prescription for oral sodium bicarbonate) and a diagnosis of MA (defined using administrative records). Outcomes were assessed over a 3-year period (1 year pre-index, 2 years post-index).
A total of 96 184 patients were included: US EMR, 6179; Manitoba, 3223; US Claims, 86 782. Sodium bicarbonate treatment was prescribed for 17.6%, 8.7% and 15.3% of patients, and a diagnosis was found for 44.7%, 20.9% and 20.9% of patients, for the US EMR, Manitoba and US Claims cohorts, respectively.
This analysis of 96 184 patients with laboratory-confirmed MA from three independent cohorts of patients with CKD and MA highlights an important diagnosis and treatment gap for this disease-modifying complication.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2) pandemic forced hospitals to redistribute resources for the treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), yet the impact on elective and emergency inpatient procedure volumes is unclear.
We analyzed anonymized data on 234 921 hospitalizations in 2017-2020 (55.9% elective) from a big Swiss health insurer. We used linear regression models to predict, based on pre-pandemic data, the expected weekly numbers of procedures in 2020 in the absence of a pandemic and compared these to the observed numbers in 2020. Compensation effects were investigated by discretely integrating the difference between the two numbers over time.
During the first COVID-19 wave in spring 2020, elective procedure numbers decreased by 52.9% (95% confidence interval -64.5% to -42.5%), with cardiovascular and orthopedic elective procedure numbers specifically decreasing by 45.5% and 72.4%. Elective procedure numbers normalized during summer with some compensation of postponed procedures, leaving a deficit of -9.9% (-15.8% to -4.5%) for the whole year 2020. Emergency procedure numbers also decreased by 17.1% (-23.7% to -9.8%) during the first wave, but over the whole year 2020, net emergency procedure volumes were similar to control years.
Inpatient procedure volumes in Switzerland decreased considerably in the beginning of the pandemic but recovered quickly after the first wave. Still, there was a net deficit in procedures at the end of the year. Health system leaders must work to ensure that adequate access to non-COVID-19 related care is maintained during future pandemic phases in order to prevent negative health consequences.

UNASSIGNED: Management of diabetes in elderly individuals requires a complex approach, considering the negative consequences. Glycemic overtreatment and undertreatment are relatively common conditions among this population. This study aimed to determine the potential overtreatment and undertreatment frequencies in older adults and the factors associated with these conditions.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study included 405 diabetic older adults aged >65 years. Sociodemographic characteristics, additional comorbidities, medications, HbA1c and fasting glucose levels of the patients have been recorded.
UNASSIGNED: The median age of the patients was 71 years. The frequency of potential overtreatment and undertreatment has been found to be 20.2% and 17.8%, respectively. Insulin and sulfonylureas were found to be associated with increased risk of potential overtreatment (p = 0.000, OR = 14.91 and p = 0.000, OR = 8.48, respectively) and reduced risk of potential undertreatment (p = 0.001, OR = 0.16 and p = 0.000, OR = 0.05, respectively), while DPP-4 inhibitors were found to be associated with reduced risk of potential undertreatment (p = 0.000, OR = 0.12).
UNASSIGNED: Our study has shown that potential glycemic overtreatment and undertreatment are common problems in diabetic older adults. It was found that agents with a high risk of hypoglycemia, such as insulin and sulfonylureas, were more closely associated with potential overtreatment. In the management of diabetes in the elderly, it should be aimed to choose treatment agents that lead to less negative consequences and to follow up the patients more closely.

Physicians do not prescribe opioid analgesics for pain treatment equally across groups, and such disparities may pose significant public health concerns. Although research suggests that institutional constraints and cultural stereotypes influence doctors\' treatment of pain, prior quantitative evidence is mixed. The objective of this secondary analysis is therefore to clarify which institutional constraints and patient demographics bias provider prescribing of opioid analgesics.
We used electronic medical record data from an emergency department of a large U.S hospital during years 2008-2014. We ran multi-level logistic regression models to estimate factors associated with providing an opioid prescription during a given visit while controlling for ICD-9 diagnosis codes and between-patient heterogeneity.
A total of 180,829 patient visits for 63,513 unique patients were recorded during the period of analysis. Overall, providers were significantly less likely to prescribe opioids to the same individual patient when the visit occurred during higher rates of emergency department crowding, later times of day, earlier in the week, later years in our sample, and when the patient had received fewer previous opioid prescriptions. Across all patients, providers were significantly more likely to prescribe opioids to patients who were middle-aged, white, and married. We found no bias towards women and no interaction effects between race and crowding or between race and sex.
Providers tend to prescribe fewer opioids during constrained diagnostic situations and undertreat pain for patients from high-risk and marginalized demographic groups. Potential harms resulting from previous treatment decisions may accumulate by informing future treatment decisions.

This study aimed to explore the pattern of use of different treatment lines in psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients from Southern Italy. A retrospective cohort study was performed during the years 2010-2018 using data from the Caserta Local Health Unit (LHU) claims database. All of the PsO or PsA patients were identified. The proportion of PsO/PsA patients untreated or treated with ≥1 drug classes (i.e., non-disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (non-DMARDs), conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), biological drugs (bDMARDs) or targeted synthetic small molecules (tsDMARDs)) was calculated in the years 2016-2018. Among the bDMARD users, the median times from the first registered PsO/PsA diagnosis/from the first csDMARD to the first bDMARD were calculated. Overall, 10,296 (1.1%) and 1724 (0.2%) PsO and PsA patients were identified. More than half of the PsO patients (N = 5301; 51.6%) and 15% of the PsA patients (N = 251) were not treated with any drug. A very low proportion of PsO patients (N = 121; 1.2%) received csDMARDs/bDMARDs dispensing. Instead, 538 (32.2%) PsA patients were treated with bDMARDs. The median times from the first diagnosis to the first bDMARD dispensing were 54.0 (Q1-Q3: 30.5-72.2) and 13.3 (Q1-Q3: 3.1-43.9) months in the PsO and PsA patients, respectively. The median time from the first csDMARD to the first bDMARD dispensing was shorter in the PsO [9.2 months (Q1-Q3: 5.5-30.0)] than in the PsA [14.5 months (Q1-Q3: 8.6-33.5)] patients. A potential undertreatment of PsO (much less for PsA) in an LHU from Southern Italy, with a particularly low use of more recently marketed drugs, such as biological ones, was shown.

Operation room (OR) planning is a complex process, especially in large hospitals with high rates of unplanned emergency procedures. Postponing elective surgery in order to provide capacity for emergency operations is inevitable at times. Elderly patients, residents of nursing homes, women, patients with low socioeconomic status and ethnic minorities are at risk for undertreatment in other contexts, as suggested by reports in the medical literature. We hypothesized that specific patient groups could be at higher risk for having their elective surgery rescheduled for non-medical reasons.
In this single center, prospective observational trial, we analysed 2519 patients undergoing elective surgery from October 2018 to May 2019. A 14-item questionnaire was handed out to illicit patient details. Additional characteristics were collected using electronic patient records. Information on the timely performance of the scheduled surgery was obtained using the OR\'s patient data management system. 6.45% of all planned procedures analysed were postponed. Association of specific variables with postponement rates were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher\'s exact test/χ2-test.
Significantly higher rates of postponing elective surgery were found in elderly patients. No significant differences in postponing rates were found for the variables gender, nationality (Germany, EU, non-EU), native language, professional medical background and level of education. Significantly lower rescheduling rates were found in patients with ties to hospital staff and in patients with a private health insurer.
Elderly patients, retirees and nursing home residents seem to be at higher risk for having their elective surgery rescheduled. However, owing to the study design, causality could not be proven. Our findings raise concern about possible undertreatment of these patient groups and provide data on short-term postponement of elective surgery. Trial registration DRKS00015836. Retrospectively registered.

UNASSIGNED: The study aimed to determine the prevalence of dementia, its types, and treatment in geriatric ward patients.
UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional study of 406 patients (77.8% women, median age 82, IQR (77-86) years) who underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment in one of the Polish hospitals between September 2014 and April 2015 was conducted.
UNASSIGNED: Dementia was diagnosed in 132 (32.5%) patients (46% mixed dementia; 32% Alzheimer\'s disease; 10%vascular dementia; 5% dementia in Parkinson\'s disease; 4% frontotemporal; 3% atypical parkinsonism). A total of 95 (72%) dementia cases were not detected before, and in the above half of these patients, it was not mentioned in the referral document. Only 33.3% of dementia patients were on cognitive enhancers (donepezil, rivastigmine, or memantine); 36.4% received antipsychotics, 45.5% received anti-depressants, 25.8% received nootropics, and 16.7% received anxiolytics/hypnotics.
UNASSIGNED: The results confirmed the high incidence of underdiagnoses and undertreatment of dementia in patients admitted to the geriatric ward. It is partly due to the lack of systematic cognitive assessment in primary care settings, although other factors can play a role.