Undertreatment

治疗不足
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:根据2015年荷兰甲状腺癌指南(NL-15)和美国甲状腺协会指南(ATA-15)评估分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)当前降阶梯的治疗结果。
    方法:回顾,对NL-15和ATA-15指南的建议进行了评估,以估计潜在的足够,2007年至2017年在格罗宁根大学医学中心接受治疗的患者中DTC治疗不足和过度。
    方法:共有240例cT1-T3aN0-1aM0DTC患者符合纳入标准。
    方法:经过实际治疗,根据这两个指南,患者再次被分类为低,中间,或基于肿瘤状态的高风险。接下来,他们被归类为一致的低风险(n=60),一致高风险(n=73),或不一致风险组(n=107)。后续数据用于估计潜在足够的比例,under-,和过度治疗根据这两个指南。
    结果:比较NL-15和ATA-15推荐的治疗方法显示,当遵循NL-15推荐时,治疗过度和充分,ATA-15之后的治疗更少(全部:p<.001)。低风险组的亚分析显示,在遵循NL-15指南时,有64%的人过度治疗(p<.001)。在相同的高风险组中没有发现治疗差异。在ATA-15之后,治疗不足最常见于不一致风险组(p<.001)。
    结论:在遵循NL-15建议时,低风险患者的治疗过于积极,较不积极的ATA-15方法似乎更合适。中危DTC患者的治疗差异很大,根据ATA-15的建议,治疗不足的发生率相对较高,主张进一步完善该患者组的风险分类。
    Assessment of treatment outcome in current de-escalation for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) according to the 2015 Dutch thyroid cancer guidelines (NL-15) and American Thyroid Association guidelines (ATA-15).
    Retrospectively, the recommendations of the NL-15 and ATA-15 guidelines were evaluated to estimate potentially adequate, under- and overtreatment of DTC in patients treated in the University Medical Center Groningen between 2007 and 2017.
    A total of 240 patients with a cT1-T3aN0-1aM0 DTC fulfilled the inclusion criteria.
    After actual treatment was given, patients were again categorized according to both guidelines into low, intermediate, or high-risk based on tumour status. Next, they were categorized into a congruent low-risk (n = 60), congruent high-risk (n = 73), or incongruent risk group (n = 107). Follow-up data were used to estimate the proportion of potentially adequate, under-, and overtreatment according to both guidelines.
    Comparing treatment recommended by NL-15 and ATA-15 showed significantly more over- and adequate treatment when following NL-15 recommendations, and more undertreatment following ATA-15 (all: p < .001). Subanalysis of the congruent low-risk group showed overtreatment in 64% when following NL-15 guidelines (p < .001). No treatment differences were found in the congruent high-risk group. Undertreatment was most often seen in the incongruent risk group when following ATA-15 (p < .001).
    Low-risk patients were treated too aggressively when following NL-15 recommendations, where the less aggressive ATA-15 approach seemed more adequate. Treatment of intermediate risk DTC patients varies greatly, with a relative higher rate of undertreatment according to the recommendations of the ATA-15, advocating further refining of the risk classification in this patient group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Guidelines for the severity classification and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) were published by Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) in 2010; however, compliance and efficacy of these guidelines has not been widely investigated. This present study assessed compliance with guidelines and its effect on CDI patient outcomes as compared with before these recommendations. A retrospective study included all adult inpatients with an initial episode of CDI treated in a single academic center from January 2009 to August 2014. Patients after guideline publication were compared with patients treated in 2009-2010. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected to stratify for disease severity. Outcome measures included compliance with guidelines, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and surgical intervention for CDI. A total of 1021 patients with CDI were included. Based upon the 2010 guidelines, 42 (28·8%) of 146 patients treated in 2009 would have been considered undertreated, and treatment progressively improved over time, as inadequate treatment decreased to 10·0% (15/148 patients) in 2014 (P = 0·0005). Overall, patient outcomes with guideline-adherent treatment decreased CDI attributable mortality twofold (P = 0·006) and CDI-related LOS by 1·9 days (P = 0·0009) when compared with undertreated patients. Compliance with IDSA/SHEA guidelines was associated with a decreased risk of mortality and LOS in hospitalized patients with CDI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Over recent years, adjuvant systemic treatment guidelines (AST) for early-stage breast cancer have changed considerably. We aimed to assess the impact of these guideline changes on the administration of AST in early-stage breast cancer patients and to what extent these guidelines are adhered to at a nation-wide level. We used Netherlands Cancer Registry data to describe trends in AST prescription, adherence to AST guidelines, and to identify clinicopathological determinants of nonadherence. Between 1990 and 2012, 231,648 Dutch patients were diagnosed with early breast cancer, of whom 124,472 received AST. Adjuvant endocrine treatment (ET) use increased from 23 % of patients (1990) to 56 % (2012), and chemotherapy from 11 to 44 %. In 2009-2012, 8 % of patients received ET and 3 % received chemotherapy without guideline indication. Conversely, 10-29 % of patients did not receive ET and chemotherapy, respectively, despite a guideline indication. Unfavorable clinicopathological characteristics generally decreased the chance of undertreatment and increased the chance for overtreatment. Remarkable was the increased chance of ET undertreatment in younger women (RR < 35 vs 60-69 years 1.79; 95 % CI 1.30-2.47) and in women with HER2+ disease (RR 1.64; 95 % CI 1.46-1.85). Over the years, AST guidelines expanded resulting in much more Dutch early breast cancer patients receiving AST. In the majority of cases, AST administration was guideline concordant, but the high frequency of chemotherapy undertreatment in some subgroups suggests limited AST guideline support in these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号