Tracheal Stenosis

气管狭窄
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中央气道阻塞(CAO),见于各种恶性和非恶性气道疾病,与预后不良有关。CAO的管理依赖于提供商的培训和当地资源,这可能使临床方法和结果高度可变。我们回顾了当前的文献,并为CAO的管理提供了基于证据的建议。
    方法:一个多学科专家小组使用PICO(患者,干预,比较器,和结果)格式,并使用MEDLINE(PubMed)和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统的文献检索。小组筛选了纳入的参考文献,并使用经过审查的评估工具来评估纳入研究的质量并提取数据,并对支持每个建议的证据水平进行分级。使用改进的Delphi技术就建议达成共识。
    结果:九千,审查了68份摘要,评估了150篇全文,31项研究纳入分析.编写了一份良好做法说明和十项分级建议。证据的总体确定性很低。
    结论:支气管镜治疗可以改善症状,生活质量,恶性和非恶性CAO患者的生存率。多模式治疗选择,包括全身麻醉的硬支气管镜检查,肿瘤/组织清创术,消融,膨胀,和支架放置应在适当的时候使用。治疗选择和结果取决于CAO的潜在病因。强烈鼓励多学科方法和与患者共同决策。
    BACKGROUND: Central airway obstruction (CAO), seen in a variety of malignant and non-malignant airway disorders, is associated with a poor prognosis. The management of CAO is dependent on provider training and local resources, which may make the clinical approach and outcomes highly variable. We reviewed the current literature and provided evidence-based recommendations for the management of CAO.
    METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert panel developed key questions using the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes) format and conducted a systematic literature search using MEDLINE (PubMed) and the Cochrane Library. The panel screened references for inclusion and used vetted evaluation tools to assess the quality of included studies and extract data, and graded the level of evidence supporting each recommendation. A modified Delphi technique was used to reach consensus on recommendations.
    RESULTS: A total of 9,688 abstracts were reviewed, 150 full-text articles were assessed, and 31 studies were included in the analysis. One good practice statement and 10 graded recommendations were developed. The overall certainty of evidence was very low.
    CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic bronchoscopy can improve the symptoms, quality of life, and survival of patients with malignant and non-malignant CAO. Multi-modality therapeutic options, including rigid bronchoscopy with general anesthesia, tumor/tissue debridement, ablation, dilation, and stent placement, should be utilized when appropriate. Therapeutic options and outcomes are dependent on the underlying etiology of CAO. A multidisciplinary approach and shared decision-making with the patient are strongly encouraged.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为小儿先天性气管狭窄的诊断和治疗提供专家共识。
    方法:通过使用迭代德尔菲法完成18项调查并回顾文献,征求了国际小儿耳鼻喉科小组(IPOG)成员的专家意见。
    结果:43名成员完成了调查,提供了有关初始历史的建议,临床评估,诊断评估,临时措施,最终修复,先天性气管狭窄患儿的修复后护理。
    结论:这些建议旨在用于支持有关先天性气管狭窄患儿的评估和管理的临床决策。回应强调了多样化的管理策略以及多学科方法对这些患者的护理的重要性。
    OBJECTIVE: To outline an expert-based consensus of recommendations for the diagnosis and management of pediatric patients with congenital tracheal stenosis.
    METHODS: Expert opinions were sought from members of the International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group (IPOG) via completion of an 18-item survey utilizing an iterative Delphi method and review of the literature.
    RESULTS: Forty-three members completed the survey providing recommendations regarding the initial history, clinical evaluation, diagnostic evaluation, temporizing measures, definitive repair, and post-repair care of children with congenital tracheal stenosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are intended to be used to support clinical decision-making regarding the evaluation and management of children with congenital tracheal stenosis. Responses highlight the diverse management strategies and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to care of these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The management of laryngotracheal stenosis is challenging, as patients usually require in-time interventions. The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has added unique challenges to this procedure. The presence of the virus in high concentrations in the aerodigestive tract and the need for an open airway during surgery can increase the risk of aerosolization of the virus and subsequent infection of the surgical, anesthetic, and operating room (OR) personnel.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: University hospital.
    METHODS: Patients who underwent airway interventions between March and October 2020.
    METHODS: A protocolized strategy was initiated during the COVID-19 pandemic to facilitate the consistent management of all patients undergoing airway interventions.
    RESULTS: During a seven-month period, 34 patients were managed with this policy. All threatened airways were managed successfully and no healthcare workers dealing with such procedures were infected. Priorities during the current novel coronavirus pandemic are ensuring the safety of healthcare professionals and offering urgent bronchoscopic and surgical airway interventions for patients with progressive symptoms and threatened airways.
    CONCLUSIONS: Surgical and bronchoscopic management of laryngotracheal stenosis presents a unique challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic, requiring careful consideration of patient triage and the development of protocols that minimize risk to patients and healthcare professionals. Close collaboration between thoracic surgeons and anesthesiology teams is essential to safely navigate and handle these threatened airways while mitigating the risk of viral aerosolization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Adult and pediatric laryngotracheal stenoses (LTS) comprise a wide array of various conditions that require precise preoperative assessment and classification to improve comparison of different therapeutic modalities in a matched series of patients. This consensus paper of the European Laryngological Society proposes a five-step endoscopic airway assessment and a standardized reporting system to better differentiate fresh, incipient from mature, cicatricial LTSs, simple one-level from complex multilevel LTSs and finally \"healthy\" from \"severely morbid\" patients. The proposed scoring system, which integrates all of these parameters, may be used to help define different groups of LTS patients, choose the best treatment modality for each individual patient and assess distinct post-treatment outcomes accordingly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小儿喉气管狭窄(LTS)的外科重建仅在过去30年中得到发展,但是在此期间取得了巨大的进步,手术现在非常适合个体患者的需求。封闭(内窥镜)技术在LTS的矫正中具有非常有限的地位。在开放手术技术中,软骨移植喉气管重建(LTR)可以精确地纠正II级和轻度III级狭窄,发病率最低,脱管率高。部分环气管切除术(PCTR)可以为更严重的狭窄提供高成功率,但这是一个更复杂的过程。因为LTR更直接,对于II级和轻度III级狭窄,它往往是首选。对于一个有经验的外科医生来说,PCTR是IV级和严重III级狭窄的首选方案。尤其是狭窄和声带之间有明显的边缘。患者的最佳机会在于第一次手术:这意味着处理问题的外科医生必须接受儿科气道内窥镜检查和喉气管手术的全面培训,由于LTS的初始管理不当可能导致永久性的难治性后遗症。
    Surgical reconstruction of paediatric laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) has only been developed over the last 30 years, but during that period great advances have been made, and the operation is now very much tailored to the needs of the individual patient. Closed (endoscopic) techniques have a very limited place in the correction of LTS. Of the open surgical techniques, laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) with cartilage grafting can precisely correct grade II and mild grade III stenosis with minimal morbidity and high decannulation rates. Partial cricotracheal resection (PCTR) can deliver high success rates for more severe stenoses, but it is a more complex procedure. Because LTR is more straightforward, it tends to be preferred for grade II and mild grade III stenosis. For a suitably experienced surgeon, PCTR is the preferred option for grade IV and severe grade III stenosis, especially where there is a clear margin between the stenosis and the vocal cords. The best chance for the patient lies in the first operation: this means that the surgeon managing the problem must be fully trained in paediatric airway endoscopy and laryngotracheal surgery, since inappropriate initial management of LTS may lead to permanent intractable sequelae.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号