Therapeutic Irrigation

治疗性灌溉
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是使用各种冲洗激活技术评估根管冲洗液的穿透深度和涂抹层去除。
    方法:在这项调查中,选择了60颗用于正畸目的的单根前磨牙。钻石毛刺被用来制造一个进入腔,和#10K文件用于确定通畅性。将约60个样本分为以下三组(每组20个样本),第一组:用常规针头冲洗,第二组:EndoVac系统的激活,第三组:被动超声冲洗(PUI)。使用扫描电子显微镜在X2000放大倍数下评估涂片层的功效。单因素方差分析用于记录和分析数据。所有统计分析均以p<0.05的显著性水平进行。
    结果:在日冕第三,最大涂片层在II组(1.26±0.02)中被去除,其次是III组(1.84±0.16)和I组(2.89±0.21)。在中间三分之一,I组(1.18±0.10),其次是III组(1.72±0.09)和I组(2.66±0.18)。在顶端第三,Ⅱ组(1.02±0.01),其次是Ⅲ组(1.58±0.08)和Ⅰ组(2.38±0.06)。在所有三个水平上,三种不同的灌溉系统之间存在非常显着的差异(p<0.001)。
    结论:结论:评估的每个冲洗装置都成功地从根管中去除涂抹层。然而,与PUI和常规针组相比,EndoVac系统组去除了更多的涂片层。
    结论:为了促进超越机械设备能力的清洁,冲洗是根管治疗的关键部分。如果使用高效的灌溉输送系统,灌水可以达到工作长度(WL)。这种类型的分配系统需要提供适量的灌溉直到WL,以及有足够的流量和有效的清创整个运河系统。如何引用这篇文章:PujariMD,DasM,DasA,etal.使用不同灌溉激活系统评估根管冲洗液的涂抹层去除和渗透深度:比较研究。JContempDentPract2024;25(4):331-334。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the penetration depth and smear layer removal of root canal irrigant using various irrigation activation techniques.
    METHODS: In this investigation, sixty single-rooted premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were chosen. Diamond burs were used to create an access cavity, and #10 K-file was used to determine the patency. About sixty samples were divided into the following three groups (20 samples in each group), group I: Irrigation with conventional needle, group II: Activation of EndoVac system, group III: Passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI). The efficacy of the smear layer was assessed using a scanning electron microscopy at a ×2000 magnification. One-way ANOVA was used to record and analyze the data. All statistical analyses were performed with a significance level of p < 0.05.
    RESULTS: At coronal third, the maximum smear layer was removed in group II (1.26 ± 0.02) followed by group III (1.84 ± 0.16) and group I (2.89 ± 0.21). At middle third, smear layer removal was maximum in group I (1.18 ± 0.10) followed by group III (1.72 ± 0.09) and group I (2.66 ± 0.18). At apical third, the more smear layer was removed in group II (1.02 ± 0.01) followed by group III (1.58 ± 0.08) and group I (2.38 ± 0.06). There was a highly significant difference found between the three different irrigation systems at all three levels (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, every irrigation device that was evaluated was successful in removing the smear layer from the root canal. However, the EndoVac system group removed a greater amount of smear layer compared with PUI and conventional needle group.
    CONCLUSIONS: With the goal of promoting cleaning that is beyond the ability of mechanical devices, irrigation is a crucial part of root canal therapy. If an efficient irrigation delivery system is used, the irrigants can reach the working length (WL). This type of distribution system needs to provide a suitable amount of irrigants up to the WL, as well as have enough flow and be effective at debriding the entire canal system. How to cite this article: Pujari MD, Das M, Das A, et al. Assessment of Smear Layer Removal and Penetration Depth of Root Canal Irrigant Using Different Irrigation Activation Systems: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(4):331-334.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估手动动态激活(MDA)的效果,被动超声冲洗(PUI),和激光激活冲洗(冲击波增强发射光声流(SWEEPS))对非手术根管治疗后较大根尖周病变的根尖周愈合。
    方法:本研究共纳入56例全身健康患者,其下颌单根牙齿具有牙髓起源的根尖周病变,根尖周指数评分为3或更高。在治疗程序之前,使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)对病灶体积进行测定.患者被随机分组治疗(MDA,PUI,SWEEPS)和对照组(n=14)。根管治疗和冲洗程序由校准的研究生操作员进行,并在一次访问中完成。对于常规随访,根据Molven的标准,在3,6和9个月时由盲法评估人员使用根尖周(PA)X线照片进行临床和影像学评估.12个月时,使用CBCT(ITK-SNAP)对病灶体积进行定量.采用Wilcoxon检验对数据进行统计分析。显著性水平设定为p<0.05。
    结果:在所有组中,治疗后的平均病灶体积显著小于治疗前的平均病灶体积(p=0.001).在56颗牙齿中,11颗牙齿“完全愈合”,39颗牙齿在PAX光片上减少。在任何组中都未检测到“放大”。在CBCT上,病变体积按以下顺序减少:LAI-SWEEPS(86.9%)>PUI(85.4%)>MDA(80.4%)>对照组(74.5%),差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。
    结论:尽管本研究有局限性,尽管在LAI-SWEEPS和PUI组中观察到更高的愈合百分比,在12个月的随访中,冲洗程序对单根根管的根尖周病变的愈合没有统计学意义。另一方面,在具有弯曲和复杂根管系统的多根牙齿中,结果可能会发生变化。
    结论:在短期和单管牙齿中,先进的灌溉搅拌方法,如激光和超声波,除了手动灌溉搅拌外,在愈合方面没有什么不同。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of manual dynamic activation (MDA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and laser-activated irrigation (shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS)) on the periapical healing of large periapical lesions following nonsurgical root canal treatment.
    METHODS: A total of fifty-six systemically healthy patients with a mandibular single-rooted tooth with periapical lesions of endodontic origin and a periapical index score of 3 or higher were included in the study. Before the treatment procedures, lesion volumes were determined volumetrically using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Patients were randomized into treatment (MDA, PUI, SWEEPS) and control groups (n = 14). Root canal treatment and irrigation procedures were performed by a calibrated postgraduate operator and completed at one visit. For routine follow-up, clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed by a blinded evaluator using periapical (PA) radiographs according to Molven\'s criteria at 3, 6, and 9 months. At 12 months, lesion volumes were quantified volumetrically using CBCT (ITK-SNAP). The data were statistically analyzed with the Wilcoxon test. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.
    RESULTS: In all groups, the mean lesion volume after treatment was significantly smaller than the mean volume before treatment (p = 0.001). Among the 56 teeth, 11 teeth were \'totally healed\', and 39 teeth were \'reduced\' on PA radiographs. No \'enlargement\' was detected in any group. On CBCT, the lesion volume decreased in the following order: LAI-SWEEPS (86.9%) > PUI (85.4%) > MDA (80.4%) > control (74.5%), with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of the present study, although a greater percentage of healing was observed in the LAI-SWEEPS and PUI groups, irrigation procedures had no statistically significant effect on the healing of periapical lesions with a single root canal at the 12-month follow-up. On the other hand, the outcome may change in multirooted teeth with curved and complex root canal systems.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the short term and in single-canal teeth, advanced irrigation agitation methods such as laser and ultrasonic did not make a difference in healing other than manual irrigation agitation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目的是确定逆行肾内手术期间冲洗技术对人体肾内压力的影响。
    方法:一项平行随机试验招募了三家医院的患者。接受11/13-Fr输尿管入路鞘逆行肾内手术治疗肾结石的患者随机分配到100mmHg加压袋(PB)或手动泵(HP)冲洗。主要结果是平均程序肾内压力。次要结果包括最大肾内压力,方差,可视化,HP使用力,程序持续时间,石材间隙,和临床结果。使用COMETTMII压力导丝进行实时肾内压力监测,膀胱镜下部署到肾盂。操作团队对肾内压力视而不见。
    结果:在2023年7月至11月之间随机分配了38例患者(试验结束)。最终分析包括34例患者(PB16;HP18)。与PB灌溉相比,HP冲洗导致平均肾内压力显着升高(平均(s.d.)62.29(27.45)与38.16(16.84)mmHg;平均值(MD)7.97至40.29mmHg的差异为95%c.i;P=0.005)和最大肾内压力(192.71(106.23)与68.04(24.16)mmHg;MD的95%c.i为70.76至178.59mmHg<0.001随着肾内压力的变化(对数转换)(6.23(1.59)对4.60(1.30);MD为0.62至2.66的95%c.i;P=0.001)。与HP灌洗相比,PB对手术视力的满意度为10分(平均值(s.d.)8.75(0.58)比6.28(1.27);MD为1.79至3.16的95%c.i;P<0.001)。主观HP使用力与传输的肾内压力没有显着相关(PearsonR=-0.15,P=0.57)。一名患者(HP组)出现尿脓毒症。
    结论:与100-mmHgPB灌洗相比,手动HP灌洗导致肾内压力迹线更高,更波动(视觉清晰度较差)。
    背景:osf.io/jmg2h(https://osf.io/)。
    BACKGROUND: The aim was to ascertain the impact of irrigation technique on human intrarenal pressure during retrograde intrarenal surgery.
    METHODS: A parallel randomized trial recruited patients across three hospital sites. Patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone treatment with an 11/13-Fr ureteral access sheath were allocated randomly to 100 mmHg pressurized-bag (PB) or manual hand-pump (HP) irrigation. The primary outcome was mean procedural intrarenal pressure. Secondary outcomes included maximum intrarenal pressure, variance, visualization, HP force of usage, procedure duration, stone clearance, and clinical outcomes. Live intrarenal pressure monitoring was performed using a COMETTMII pressure guidewire, deployed cystoscopically to the renal pelvis. The operating team was blinded to the intrarenal pressure.
    RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were randomized between July and November 2023 (trial closure). The final analysis included 34 patients (PB 16; HP 18). Compared with PB irrigation, HP irrigation resulted in significantly higher mean intrarenal pressure (mean(s.d.) 62.29(27.45) versus 38.16(16.84) mmHg; 95% c.i. for difference in means (MD) 7.97 to 40.29 mmHg; P = 0.005) and maximum intrarenal pressure (192.71(106.23) versus 68.04(24.16) mmHg; 95% c.i. for MD 70.76 to 178.59 mmHg; P < 0.001), along with greater variance in intrarenal pressure (log transformed) (6.23(1.59) versus 4.60(1.30); 95% c.i. for MD 0.62 to 2.66; P = 0.001). Surgeon satisfaction with procedural vision reported on a scale of 10 was higher with PB compared with HP irrigation (mean(s.d.) 8.75(0.58) versus 6.28(1.27); 95% c.i. for MD 1.79 to 3.16; P < 0.001). Subjective HP usage force did not correlate significantly with transmitted intrarenal pressure (Pearson R = -0.15, P = 0.57). One patient (HP arm) developed urosepsis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Manual HP irrigation resulted in higher and more fluctuant intrarenal pressure trace (with inferior visual clarity) than 100-mmHg PB irrigation.
    BACKGROUND: osf.io/jmg2h (https://osf.io/).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Ho:YAG激光碎石术广泛用于泌尿系结石治疗,但人们仍然担心它对肾组织的热效应。这项研究旨在使用Ho:YAG激光逆行肾内手术监测肾结石治疗期间肾内温度的变化。15名患者入选。各种激光功率设置(0.8J/10Hz,1.2J/12Hz)和灌溉模式(10cc/min,15cc/min,20cc/min,重力灌溉,和手动泵灌溉)。将无菌热探针连接到柔性输尿管镜上,并通过输尿管进入鞘管输送到肾管系统中。用T型热探针以±0.1°C的精度记录温度变化。激光功率显著影响平均温度,14W和8W激光功率之间的差异为4.981°C(p<0.001)。重力灌溉的平均温度高2.075°C,手动泵灌溉的平均温度低2.828°C(分别为p=0.038和p=0.005)。身体质量指数,激光功率,灌溉模型,和操作员占空比解释了49.5%的平均温度变异性(Adj.R2=0.495)。激光功率和操作员占空比对平均温度有积极影响,而体重指数和特定的灌溉模型对其产生了负面影响。在Ho:YAG激光碎石术中,激光功率和冲洗速率对肾内温度至关重要。最佳设置和灌溉策略对于最大程度地减少热损伤风险至关重要。这项研究强调了正在进行的研究以了解和减轻激光碎石术中的热效应的必要性。
    Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy is widely used for urinary stone treatment, but concerns persist regarding its thermal effects on renal tissues. This study aimed to monitor intrarenal temperature changes during kidney stone treatment using retrograde intrarenal surgery with Ho: YAG laser. Fifteen patients were enrolled. Various laser power settings (0.8 J/10 Hz, 1.2 J/12 Hz) and irrigation modes (10 cc/min, 15 cc/min, 20 cc/min, gravity irrigation, and manual pump irrigation) were used. A sterile thermal probe was attached to a flexible ureterorenoscope and delivered into the calyceal system via the ureteral access sheath. Temperature changes were recorded with a T-type thermal probe with ± 0.1 °C accuracy. Laser power significantly influenced mean temperature, with a 4.981 °C difference between 14 W and 8 W laser power (p < 0.001). The mean temperature was 2.075 °C higher with gravity irrigation and 2.828 °C lower with manual pump irrigation (p = 0.038 and p = 0.005, respectively). Body mass index, laser power, irrigation model, and operator duty cycle explained 49.5% of mean temperature variability (Adj. R2 = 0.495). Laser power and operator duty cycle positively impacted mean temperature, while body mass index and specific irrigation models affected it negatively. Laser power and irrigation rate are critical for intrarenal temperature during Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy. Optimal settings and irrigation strategies are vital for minimizing thermal injury risk. This study underscores the need for ongoing research to understand and mitigate thermal effects during laser lithotripsy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:维持静脉通路具有重要的临床意义。在外周静脉导管(PIVC)中通常使用缓慢连续输注以保持静脉开放(KVO)。先前的研究比较了通过外周插入的中央导管(PICCs)间歇性冲洗和连续输注的效果。在这项研究中,我们将KVO应用于中心静脉导管(CVC),并比较了该技术与间歇冲洗技术的闭塞率.
    方法:这是一项中国14家医院的随机对照试验。这项研究将招募250名患者,他们将以1:1的比例随机化。纳入研究后,将接受CVC插入的患者将接受用预充式盐水注射器间歇冲洗(对照组)或用弹性泵输注KVO(试验组).在第3天和第7天,通过检查导管注射和抽吸(CINAS)分类来检查所有导管的通畅性。主要结果是7天内导管闭塞率。将对患者进行随访,直到CVC插入后9天,导管闭塞,或导管移除。次要结果是3天内导管闭塞率,护士满意度,成本效益,不良事件发生率,导管相关血流感染率,导管相关血栓形成率,外渗率,静脉炎发生率,和导管迁移。
    结论:我们希望该试验将产生可为临床导管冲洗技术的改进和优化提供循证依据的发现。
    背景:中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2200064007。2022年9月23日注册。https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177311。
    BACKGROUND: Maintaining venous access is of great clinical importance. Running a slow continuous infusion to keep the vein open (KVO) is often used in peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs). Previous studies have compared the effects of intermittent flushing and continuous infusion via peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). In this study, we applied KVO to central venous catheters (CVCs) and compared the occlusion rate of this technique with that of the intermittent flushing technique.
    METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial of 14 hospitals in China. A total of 250 patients will be recruited in this study, and they will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio. After study inclusion, patients who will undergo CVC insertion will receive intermittent flushing with prefilled saline syringes (control group) or KVO infusion with elastic pumps (test group). All the catheters will be checked for patency by scoping Catheter Injection and Aspiration (CINAS) Classification on Days 3 and 7. The primary outcome is the rate of catheter occlusion in 7 days. Patients will be followed up until 9 days after CVC insertion, catheter occlusion, or catheter removal. The secondary outcomes are the rate of catheter occlusion in 3 days, nurse satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, adverse event rate, catheter-related bloodstream infection rate, catheter-related thrombosis rate, extravasation rate, phlebitis rate, and catheter migration.
    CONCLUSIONS: We expect that the trial will generate findings that can provide an evidence-based basis for the improvement and optimization of clinical catheter flushing techniques.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200064007. Registered on 23 September 2022. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177311 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性硬膜下血肿是一种常见的颅内急症。钻孔引流手术,清除慢性硬膜下血肿,涉及三个要素:创建一个用于访问的毛刺孔,冲洗硬膜下空间,并插入硬膜下引流管。虽然硬膜下引流已被确定为有益的,硬膜下冲洗的治疗效果尚未得到解决。
    方法:FINISH试验由研究者发起,务实,多中心,全国范围内,随机化,控制,平行组,在芬兰的五个神经外科病房中进行的非劣效性试验,纳入了18岁或以上患有需要钻孔引流的慢性硬膜下血肿的成年人。通过计算机生成的区组随机化将患者随机分配(1:1),区组大小为4,六,或者八个,按地点分层,在有或没有硬膜下冲洗的情况下进行钻孔引流。除神经外科医生和手术室工作人员外,所有患者和工作人员都被掩盖了治疗任务。两组均在最大血肿厚度处钻了一个毛刺孔,并且在插入硬膜下引流之前,硬膜下间隙已灌注或未灌注,它保持在原地48小时。再操作,功能结果,死亡率,并记录术后6个月的不良事件。主要结果是6个月内的再手术率。非劣效性利润率设定为7·5%。得出非劣效性还需要的关键次要结果是具有不利功能结果的参与者的比例(即,改良的Rankin量表评分为4-6分,其中0表示无症状,6表示死亡)和6个月时的死亡率。在意向治疗和符合方案的人群中进行了主要和关键的次要分析。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04203550)注册,并已完成。
    结果:从2020年1月1日至2022年8月17日,我们评估了1644例患者的资格,将589例(36%)患者随机分配到治疗组并接受治疗(294例分配给冲洗引流,295例分配给不冲洗引流;165[28%]女性和424[72%]男性)。6个月的随访期延长至2023年2月14日。在意向治疗分析中,在分配给不接受灌溉的组中,295名参与者中有54名(18·3%)需要再次手术,而在分配给接受灌溉的组中,294名参与者中有37名(12·6%)(差异为6·0个百分点,95%CI0·2-11·7;p=0·30;根据研究地点调整)。改良Rankin量表评分为4-6分(无灌溉组283人中的37[13·1%]与285人中的36[12·6%]在两组之间没有显着差异。灌溉组;p=0·89)或死亡率(无灌溉组295人中的18[6·1%]与灌溉组294人中的21[7·1%];p=58)。在符合方案分析中,主要意向治疗分析的结果没有实质性改变。不良事件的数量无显著组间差异,最常见的严重不良事件是全身感染(295名没有接受灌溉的参与者中有26[8·8%],294名接受灌溉的参与者中有22[7·5%]),颅内出血(13[4·4%]vs7[2·4%]),和癫痫发作(5[1·7%]对9[3·1%])。
    结论:我们无法得出不灌溉的毛刺孔排水的非劣效性。不进行硬膜下冲洗的钻孔引流比硬膜下冲洗的再手术率高6·0个百分点。考虑到两组之间的功能结局或死亡率没有差异,该试验倾向于使用硬膜下冲洗。
    背景:大学健康研究国家基金(赫尔辛基大学医院),FinskaLäkaresällskapet,MedicinskaUnderstödsföreningenLivochHälsa,还有SvenskaKulturfonden.
    BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural haematoma is a common surgically treated intracranial emergency. Burr-hole drainage surgery, to evacuate chronic subdural haematoma, involves three elements: creation of a burr hole for access, irrigation of the subdural space, and insertion of a subdural drain. Although the subdural drain has been established as beneficial, the therapeutic effect of subdural irrigation has not been addressed.
    METHODS: The FINISH trial was an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, multicentre, nationwide, randomised, controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial in five neurosurgical units in Finland that enrolled adults aged 18 years or older with a chronic subdural haematoma requiring burr-hole drainage. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated block randomisation with block sizes of four, six, or eight, stratified by site, to burr-hole drainage either with or without subdural irrigation. All patients and staff were masked to treatment assignment apart from the neurosurgeon and operating room staff. A burr hole was drilled at the site of maximum haematoma thickness in both groups, and the subdural space was either irrigated or not irrigated before inserting a subdural drain, which remained in place for 48 h. Reoperations, functional outcome, mortality, and adverse events were recorded for 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the reoperation rate within 6 months. The non-inferiority margin was set at 7·5%. Key secondary outcomes that were also required to conclude non-inferiority were the proportion of participants with unfavourable functional outcomes (ie, modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6, where 0 indicates no symptoms and 6 indicates death) and mortality rate at 6 months. The primary and key secondary analyses were done in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04203550) and is completed.
    RESULTS: From Jan 1, 2020, to Aug 17, 2022, we assessed 1644 patients for eligibility and 589 (36%) patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group and treated (294 assigned to drainage with irrigation and 295 assigned to drainage without irrigation; 165 [28%] women and 424 [72%] men). The 6-month follow-up period extended until Feb 14, 2023. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 54 (18·3%) of 295 participants required reoperation in the group assigned to receive no irrigation versus 37 (12·6%) of 294 in the group assigned to receive irrigation (difference of 6·0 percentage points, 95% CI 0·2-11·7; p=0·30; adjusted for study site). There were no significant between-group differences in the proportion of people with modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6 (37 [13·1%] of 283 in the no-irrigation group vs 36 [12·6%] of 285 in the irrigation group; p=0·89) or mortality rate (18 [6·1%] of 295 in the no-irrigation group vs 21 [7·1%] of 294 in the irrigation group; p=0·58). The findings of the primary intention-to-treat analysis were not materially altered in the per-protocol analysis. There were no significant between-group differences in the number of adverse events, and the most frequent severe adverse events were systemic infections (26 [8·8%] of 295 participants who did not receive irrigation vs 22 [7·5%] of 294 participants who received irrigation), intracranial haemorrhage (13 [4·4%] vs seven [2·4%]), and epileptic seizures (five [1·7%] vs nine [3·1%]).
    CONCLUSIONS: We could not conclude non-inferiority of burr-hole drainage without irrigation. The reoperation rate was 6·0 percentage points higher after burr-hole drainage without subdural irrigation than with subdural irrigation. Considering that there were no differences in functional outcome or mortality between the groups, the trial favours the use of subdural irrigation.
    BACKGROUND: State Fund for University Level Health Research (Helsinki University Hospital), Finska Läkaresällskapet, Medicinska Understödsföreningen Liv och Hälsa, and Svenska Kulturfonden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是调查是否使用硅胶尖端冲洗/抽吸(I/A)手机CapsuleGuard®(BauschLomb,拉瓦尔,加拿大)降低了白内障手术期间后囊破裂(PCR)的发生率。
    方法:皇家眼科医生学院国家眼科数据库(NOD)2010年01月04日和2021年03月31日的白内障审核数据和Bausch+Lomb销售数据相结合,以确定参与国家白内障审核的中心,这些中心通常采用硅胶尖端I/A手机,CapsuleGuard®。仅包括在采用CapsuleGuard®之前和之后记录在NOD上的合格白内障手术中心的数据。对文献进行了审查,以估计在I/A期间发生的PCR比例,评估采用CapsuleGuard®对这一手术阶段发生的PCR的影响。
    结果:在研究期间,在采用CapsuleGuard®之前和之后,在14个中心进行了267371例符合条件的白内障手术,其中>50例符合条件的手术。在采用CapsuleGuard®的中心内,PCR发生率降低为16.4%。在采用CapsuleGuard®之前和之后,PCR的中值变化为21.7%减少(IQR:4.8%至37.7%减少)。
    结论:在白内障手术中定期使用CapsuleGuard®后,PCR率降低。对已发表的将PCR归因于白内障手术的各种组成部分的研究的回顾表明,大约25%的PCR可能发生在I/A期间;采用CapsuleGuard可能,因此,与在该手术阶段避免相当大比例的PCR有关。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of the silicone tipped irrigation/aspiration (I/A) handpiece CapsuleGuard® (Bausch + Lomb, Laval, Canada) reduced rates of posterior capsule rupture (PCR) during cataract surgery.
    METHODS: Royal College of Ophthalmologists\' National Ophthalmology Database (NOD) Cataract Audit data from 01/04/2010 and 31/03/2021 and Bausch + Lomb sales figures were combined to identify centres participating in national cataract audit who have routinely adopted the silicone tipped I/A handpiece, CapsuleGuard®. Data were included only from centres with eligible cataract operations recorded on the NOD both before and after adopting CapsuleGuard®. Review of the literature was undertaken to estimate the proportion of PCR that occurs during I/A, to evaluate the impact of adoption of CapsuleGuard® on PCR occurring in this phase of surgery.
    RESULTS: Within the study period, 267 371 eligible cataract operations were performed in 14 centres with >50 eligible operations both before and after adopting CapsuleGuard®. Within centres adopting CapsuleGuard®, the rate of PCR occurrence reduction was 16.4%. Before and after the adoption of CapsuleGuard® the median change of PCR was 21.7% reduction (IQR: 4.8% to 37.7% reduction).
    CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in the rate of PCR was seen after regular adoption of CapsuleGuard® during cataract operations. Review of published studies attributing PCR to various components of the cataract operation suggest around 25% of PCR may occur during I/A; adoption of CapsuleGuard may, therefore, be associated with avoidance of a substantial proportion of the PCR during that phase of surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    目的:非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)可以复发,部分原因是经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)后游离肿瘤细胞的接种。TURBT术后膀胱内化疗可以降低风险,但由于成本原因,使用不频繁且不一致。复杂性和副作用。这项研究的目的是前瞻性地评估使用水的连续膀胱冲洗,这可能是一种更安全、更容易的替代方案,具有相当的有效性。
    方法:WATIP是一种前瞻性,对于成像或柔性膀胱镜检查中发现的膀胱肿瘤,在TURBT期间和之后至少3小时进行水冲洗的单臂第二阶段研究。参与者在临床上评估不良反应,并在24小时内对钠进行血液检查。血红蛋白和乳酸脱氢酶.主要终点为安全性(定义为CTCAE≥3级的不良事件<10%),和可行性(定义为在>90%的病例中按计划实施干预),次要终点为无复发率(RFR).
    结果:30名参与者中有29名(97%)按计划进行了水灌溉(中位年龄67岁,25(83%)男性)。唯一的不良事件(2级)是一名(3.3%)参与者的血块滞留。随着时间的推移,水冲洗显著减少了导管流出物中的尿路上皮细胞计数,不像盐水灌溉。首次膀胱镜检查(中位间隔108天)时,RFR为56.2%(9/16参与者为低风险NMIBC),12个月时为62.5%(5/8可评估的低风险NMIBC)。
    结论:TURBT期间和之后的水灌溉是可行且安全的。在建议将其用于常规临床实践之前,需要前瞻性评估其对NMIBC复发的影响,与TURBT膀胱灌注化疗后相比。2019年4月1日试用注册ANZCTR注册IDACTRN12619000517178。
    OBJECTIVE: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) can recur, partly due to seeding of free tumour cells after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). Intravesical chemotherapy post-TURBT can reduce the risk but is used infrequently and inconsistently due to cost, complexity and side effects. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess continuous bladder irrigation using water, which may be a safer and easier alternative with comparable effectiveness.
    METHODS: WATIP was a prospective, single-arm phase 2 study of water irrigation during and for at least 3 h after TURBT for bladder tumours noted on imaging or flexible cystoscopy. Participants were assessed clinically for adverse effects and with blood tests within 24 h for sodium, haemoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase. The primary endpoints were safety (defined as < 10% adverse events of CTCAE grade ≥ 3), and feasibility (defined as the intervention being delivered as planned in > 90% of cases) and secondary endpoint was recurrence-free rates (RFR).
    RESULTS: Water irrigation was delivered as planned in 29 (97%) of 30 participants (median age 67 years, 25 (83%) males). The only adverse event (grade 2) was clot retention in one (3.3%) participant. Water irrigation significantly reduced urothelial cell counts in catheter effluent over time, unlike saline irrigation which did not. RFR was 56.2% (9/16 participants with low-risk NMIBC) at first cystoscopy (median interval 108 days) and 62.5% (5/8 evaluable low-risk NMIBC) at 12 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: Water irrigation during and after TURBT is feasible and safe. Prospective assessment of its effect on NMIBC recurrence compared to post-TURBT intravesical chemotherapy is needed before recommending its use in routine clinical practice. Trial registration ANZCTR registration ID ACTRN12619000517178 on 1 April 2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:无细胞DNA(cfDNA)在可手术的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估胸膜灌洗液中cfDNA在可切除的NSCLC中鉴定的可行性及其与血浆的相关性。
    方法:对连续切除的NSCLCs进行术前血浆(PLS1)cfDNA水平评估,术中胸腔灌洗(PLV)和术后(1个月)血浆样本(PLS2)。使用人β-肌动蛋白基因作为扩增靶标,在TaqMan探针检测方法中通过qPCR分离和定量测量CfDNA。
    结果:所有(n=34),除1例外,PLV细胞学检查均未见恶性细胞。CfDNA可以从所有三个样品中分离(PLS1,PLV,和PLS2)在每位患者中成功。PLS1,PLV和PLS2中的cfDNA中位数水平为118ng/mL(IQR61-158),167ng/mL(IQR59.9-179.9)和103ng/mL(IQR66.5-125.4)。中位随访时间为34.1个月(IQR25.2-41.6)。对于cfDNA水平截止值为125、170和100ng/mL的患者,记录了显着的总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。分别用于PLS1、PLV、和PLS2。在PLS1(>125ng/mL)和PLV(>170ng/mL)中cfDNA升高的患者2年OS明显较差,分别为p=0.005和p=0.012。对于PLV中cfDNA升高的患者,风险(OS)也较高(HR=5.779,95%CI=1.162-28.745,p=0.032)。PLV(>170ng/mL)的胸膜复发增加(p=0.021),并与2年DFS较差(p=0.001)显着相关,风险增加(HR=9.767,95%CI=2.098-45.451,p=0.004)。多变量分析表明,PLV中较高的cfDNA是OS和DFS的不良预后因素。
    结论:在可手术的非小细胞肺癌患者中,在胸膜灌洗中鉴定cfDNA并将PLVcfDNA与胸膜复发和预后相关联是可行的。
    OBJECTIVE: The role of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in operable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. This study was aimed to evaluate the feasibility for identification of cfDNA in pleural lavage fluid and its correlation with plasma in resectable NSCLCs.
    METHODS: Consecutively resected NSCLCs were evaluated for cfDNA levels in preoperative plasma (PLS1), intraoperative pleural-lavage (PLV) and postoperative (at 1 month) plasma sample (PLS2). CfDNA was isolated and measured quantitatively by qPCR in a TaqMan probe-detection approach using the human β-actin gene as the amplifying target.
    RESULTS: All (n = 34) except one were negative for malignant cells in PLV cytology. CfDNA could be isolated from all the three samples (PLS1, PLV, and PLS2) successfully in each patient. The median cfDNA levels in PLS1, PLV and PLS2 were 118 ng/mL (IQR 61-158), 167 ng/mL (IQR 59.9-179.9) and 103 ng/mL (IQR 66.5-125.4) respectively. The median follow-up was 34.1 months (IQR 25.2-41.6). A significant overall-survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were recorded for patients with cfDNA level cut-offs at 125, 170, and 100 ng/mL, respectively for PLS1, PLV, and PLS2. Patients with raised cfDNA in PLS1 (>125 ng/mL) and PLV (>170 ng/mL) had significantly poorer 2-year OS, p = 0.005 and p = 0.012, respectively. The hazards (OS) were also higher for those with raised cfDNA in PLV (HR = 5.779, 95% CI = 1.162-28.745, p = 0.032). PLV (>170 ng/mL) had increased pleural recurrences (p = 0.021) and correlated significantly with poorer DFS at 2-years (p = 0.001) with increased hazards (HR = 9.767, 95% CI = 2.098-45.451, p = 0.004). Multivariable analysis suggested higher cfDNA in PLV as a poor prognostic factor for both OS and DFS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with operable NSCLC, it is feasible to identify cfDNA in pleural lavage and correlate PLV cfDNA with pleural recurrences and outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号