Systemic Sclerosis

系统性硬化症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    炎症性风湿性疾病是与失调的免疫反应相关的不同病理状况。沿着一系列的疾病编纂,自身炎症和自身免疫性疾病作为这种连续体的两端表型。尽管存在致病差异,炎症性风湿性疾病通常使用有限数量的免疫抑制药物进行治疗,有时与部分证据或转移医生的知识在不同的患者。此外,几个随机临床试验,招募这些病人,未达到主要的预先确定的结局,这些发现可能与炎症性风湿性疾病的潜在分子多样性有关.事实上,由此产生的患者异质性可能是由潜在分子病理学差异所驱动的,这些差异也导致了对免疫抑制药物的不同反应.因此,不同临床亚群的识别可能克服了限制这些炎症性风湿性疾病患者发展更有效治疗策略的主要障碍.这种临床异质性可能需要多样化的治疗管理,以改善患者的预后并增加临床缓解的频率。因此,根据精准医学原则,越来越多地指出更好的患者分层和定性的重要性,也提出了一种新的疾病治疗方法。事实上,基于更好的患者概况,临床医生可以更恰当地平衡治疗管理.在这些基础上,我们综合并讨论了有关炎症性风湿性疾病治疗的患者概况的现有文献,主要集中于随机临床试验。我们概述了更好地对炎症性风湿性疾病患者的临床异质性进行分层和表征的重要性,认为这一点对于改善这些患者的管理至关重要。
    Inflammatory rheumatic diseases are different pathologic conditions associated with a deregulated immune response, codified along a spectrum of disorders, with autoinflammatory and autoimmune diseases as two-end phenotypes of this continuum. Despite pathogenic differences, inflammatory rheumatic diseases are commonly managed with a limited number of immunosuppressive drugs, sometimes with partial evidence or transferring physicians\' knowledge in different patients. In addition, several randomized clinical trials, enrolling these patients, did not meet the primary pre-established outcomes and these findings could be linked to the underlying molecular diversities along the spectrum of inflammatory rheumatic disorders. In fact, the resulting patient heterogeneity may be driven by differences in underlying molecular pathology also resulting in variable responses to immunosuppressive drugs. Thus, the identification of different clinical subsets may possibly overcome the major obstacles that limit the development more effective therapeutic strategies for these patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. This clinical heterogeneity could require a diverse therapeutic management to improve patient outcomes and increase the frequency of clinical remission. Therefore, the importance of better patient stratification and characterization is increasingly pointed out according to the precision medicine principles, also suggesting a new approach for disease treatment. In fact, based on a better proposed patient profiling, clinicians could more appropriately balance the therapeutic management. On these bases, we synthetized and discussed the available literature about the patient profiling in regard to therapy in the context of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, mainly focusing on randomized clinical trials. We provided an overview of the importance of a better stratification and characterization of the clinical heterogeneity of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases identifying this point as crucial in improving the management of these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:系统性硬化症(SSc)是一种罕见的具有异质性表现的慢性自身免疫性疾病。在过去的十年里,已经进行了几项临床试验来评估SSc的新治疗方案.这项工作的目的是根据可用于SSc药理学管理的新证据更新巴西风湿病学会的建议。
    方法:系统综述,包括根据患者/人群阐述的预定义问题的随机临床试验(RCT),干预,比较,和结果(PICO)战略进行。可用证据的评级是根据建议评估的等级进行的,开发和评估(等级)方法。成为一个推荐,至少需要75%的投票小组同意。
    结果:阐述了关于雷诺现象的药物治疗的六项建议,治疗(愈合)和预防数字溃疡,皮肤受累,根据RCT的结果,SSc患者的间质性肺病(ILD)和胃肠道受累。新药,如利妥昔单抗,作为皮肤受累的治疗选择,利妥昔单抗,托珠单抗和尼达尼布被纳入ILD的治疗方案.根据投票小组的专家意见,详细阐述了硬皮病肾危象和肌肉骨骼受累的药物治疗建议,因为没有发现安慰剂对照的随机对照试验。
    结论:本指南根据文献证据和专家意见更新并纳入新的SSc治疗方案。为临床实践决策提供支持。
    BACKGROUND: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare chronic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous manifestations. In the last decade, several clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate new treatment options for SSc. The purpose of this work is to update the recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology in light of the new evidence available for the pharmacological management of SSc.
    METHODS: A systematic review including randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for predefined questions that were elaborated according to the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) strategy was conducted. The rating of the available evidence was performed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. To become a recommendation, at least 75% agreement of the voting panel was needed.
    RESULTS: Six recommendations were elaborated regarding the pharmacological treatment of Raynaud\'s phenomenon, the treatment (healing) and prevention of digital ulcers, skin involvement, interstitial lung disease (ILD) and gastrointestinal involvement in SSc patients based on results available from RCTs. New drugs, such as rituximab, were included as therapeutic options for skin involvement, and rituximab, tocilizumab and nintedanib were included as therapeutic options for ILD. Recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of scleroderma renal crisis and musculoskeletal involvement were elaborated based on the expert opinion of the voting panel, as no placebo-controlled RCTs were found.
    CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines updated and incorporated new treatment options for the management of SSc based on evidence from the literature and expert opinion regarding SSc, providing support for decision-making in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:间质性肺病(ILD)是系统性硬化症(SSc)患者发病和死亡的重要原因。迄今为止,关于SSc-ILD患者治疗的临床实践指南主要基于共识.方法:由24名风湿病专家组成的国际专家指导委员会,SSc,肺科,ILD,方法论,并结合SSc-ILD的个人经验,讨论了使用建议分级评估的已发布证据的系统评价,评估,开发和评估(等级)方法。采用了预先确定的利益冲突管理策略,仅由非冲突小组成员就支持或反对特定治疗干预措施提出了建议.对效果估计的信心,研究结果的重要性,治疗的理想和不良后果的平衡,成本,可行性,干预的可接受性,并在提出建议时考虑了对健康公平的影响。这符合美国胸科学会指南的制定过程,该过程符合医学研究所的可信赖指南标准。结果:对于SSc-ILD患者的治疗,委员会:(1)建议使用霉酚酸酯;(2)建议进一步研究(a)吡非尼酮和(b)吡非尼酮联合霉酚酸酯的安全性和有效性;(3)建议使用(a)环磷酰胺,(b)利妥昔单抗,(c)托珠单抗,(d)尼达尼布,和(e)尼达尼布加霉酚酸酯的组合。结论:本文的建议为SSc-ILD患者的治疗提供了基于证据的临床实践指南,旨在作为临床医生和患者知情和共同决策的基础。
    Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). To date, clinical practice guidelines regarding treatment for patients with SSc-ILD are primarily consensus based. Methods: An international expert guideline committee composed of 24 individuals with expertise in rheumatology, SSc, pulmonology, ILD, or methodology, and with personal experience with SSc-ILD, discussed systematic reviews of the published evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Predetermined conflict-of-interest management strategies were applied, and recommendations were made for or against specific treatment interventions exclusively by the nonconflicted panelists. The confidence in effect estimates, importance of outcomes studied, balance of desirable and undesirable consequences of treatment, cost, feasibility, acceptability of the intervention, and implications for health equity were all considered in making the recommendations. This was in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guideline development process, which is in compliance with the Institute of Medicine standards for trustworthy guidelines. Results: For treatment of patients with SSc-ILD, the committee: 1) recommends the use of mycophenolate; 2) recommends further research into the safety and efficacy of (a) pirfenidone and (b) the combination of pirfenidone plus mycophenolate; and 3) suggests the use of (a) cyclophosphamide, (b) rituximab, (c) tocilizumab, (d) nintedanib, and (e) the combination of nintedanib plus mycophenolate. Conclusions: The recommendations herein provide an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the treatment of patients with SSc-ILD and are intended to serve as the basis for informed and shared decision making by clinicians and patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心脏受累是系统性硬化症的常见问题。最近,已经提出了系统性硬化症原发性心脏受累的定义.我们的目的是建立关于筛查的共识指导,系统性硬化症原发性心脏病患者的诊断和随访。
    进行了系统文献综述,以研究用于评估系统性硬化症患者心脏受累的测试。提取的数据被分类到相关领域(传统放射学,心电图,超声心动图,心脏磁共振成像,实验室,和其他),并提交给专家和一名患者研究伙伴,他们讨论了数据并补充了他们的意见。这导致制定了总体原则和指导声明,然后审查并投票同意。当平均协议是7/10和70%的选民达成共识时,达成了共识。
    在2650种出版物中,168人符合资格标准;提取的数据在三次会议上进行了讨论。创建了7项总体原则和10个指导点,修改并投票。共识强调了患者咨询的重要性,鉴别诊断和多学科团队管理,以及定义筛查和诊断方法。初步的核心评价要结合历史,体检,休息心电图,经胸超声心动图和标准血清心脏生物标志物。进一步的调查应单独定制,并通过多学科管理来决定。总体平均一致为9.1/10,平均93%的专家投票超过7/10。
    这份基于共识的筛查指南,系统性硬化症原发性心脏受累的诊断和随访为标准护理和未来可行性研究奠定了基础,这些研究正在进行中,以支持其在临床实践中的应用.
    UNASSIGNED: Heart involvement is a common problem in systemic sclerosis. Recently, a definition of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement had been proposed. Our aim was to establish consensus guidance on the screening, diagnosis and follow-up of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature review was performed to investigate the tests used to evaluate heart involvement in systemic sclerosis. The extracted data were categorized into relevant domains (conventional radiology, electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, laboratory, and others) and presented to experts and one patient research partner, who discussed the data and added their opinion. This led to the formulation of overarching principles and guidance statements, then reviewed and voted on for agreement. Consensus was attained when the mean agreement was ⩾7/10 and of ⩾70% of voters.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 2650 publications, 168 met eligibility criteria; the data extracted were discussed over three meetings. Seven overarching principles and 10 guidance points were created, revised and voted on. The consensus highlighted the importance of patient counseling, differential diagnosis and multidisciplinary team management, as well as defining screening and diagnostic approaches. The initial core evaluation should integrate history, physical examination, rest electrocardiography, trans-thoracic echocardiography and standard serum cardiac biomarkers. Further investigations should be individually tailored and decided through a multidisciplinary management. The overall mean agreement was 9.1/10, with mean 93% of experts voting above 7/10.
    UNASSIGNED: This consensus-based guidance on screening, diagnosis and follow-up of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement provides a foundation for standard of care and future feasibility studies that are ongoing to support its application in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经批准:肺动脉高压(PAH),定义为存在平均肺动脉压>20mmHg,肺动脉楔压≤15mmHg,根据专家共识,肺血管阻力(PVR)>2木质单位,其特点是PVR逐渐持续增加,这可能会导致右心衰竭和死亡。PAH是一种众所周知的结缔组织疾病(CTDs)的并发症,比如系统性硬化症,系统性红斑狼疮,干燥综合征,和其他自身免疫性疾病。在过去的几年里,在理解PAH发病机制方面取得了巨大进展,在全球范围内提出了各种新的诊断和筛查方法,用于早期检测PAH。
    UNASSIGNED:本研究旨在获得全面的了解,并为台湾CTD-PAH的管理提供建议,专注于它的临床重要性,预后,风险分层,诊断和筛选算法,和药物治疗。
    UNASSIGNED:台湾心脏病学会(TSOC)和台湾风湿病学院(TCR)的成员全面回顾了相关文献,并整合了临床试验证据和实际临床经验,以发展这一共识。
    UNASSIGNED:通过定期筛查合并有相关自身抗体和生物标志物的高危患者进行早期检测可能会导致CTD-PAH的更好结局。该共识为不同类型的CTD提出了具体的筛选流程图,适用于台湾临床情景的风险评估工具,以及CTD-PAH管理中的药物建议。
    UNASSIGNED: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), defined as the presence of a mean pulmonary artery pressure > 20 mmHg, pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤ 15 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 2 Wood units based on expert consensus, is characterized by a progressive and sustained increase in PVR, which may lead to right heart failure and death. PAH is a well-known complication of connective tissue diseases (CTDs), such as systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjogren\'s syndrome, and other autoimmune conditions. In the past few years, tremendous progress in the understanding of PAH pathogenesis has been made, with various novel diagnostic and screening methods for the early detection of PAH proposed worldwide.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to obtain a comprehensive understanding and provide recommendations for the management of CTD-PAH in Taiwan, focusing on its clinical importance, prognosis, risk stratification, diagnostic and screening algorithm, and pharmacological treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: The members of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC) and Taiwan College of Rheumatology (TCR) reviewed the related literature thoroughly and integrated clinical trial evidence and real-world clinical experience for the development of this consensus.
    UNASSIGNED: Early detection by regularly screening at-risk patients with incorporations of relevant autoantibodies and biomarkers may lead to better outcomes of CTD-PAH. This consensus proposed specific screening flowcharts for different types of CTDs, the risk assessment tools applicable to the clinical scenario in Taiwan, and a recommendation of medications in the management of CTD-PAH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是建立基于克罗地亚德尔菲的专家共识,以筛查与结缔组织病(CTD)相关的间质性肺病(ILD)。对ILD发展的危险因素进行了系统的文献综述,ILD的患病率和发病率,ILD的诊断和筛查方法,特发性炎性肌病(IIM)的ILD和预后,混合性结缔组织病(MCTD),原发性干燥综合征(PSS),类风湿性关节炎(RA),系统性红斑狼疮(SLE),和系统性硬化症(SSc)。根据发现的证据,专家开发了用于筛查和监测每个CTD中ILD的问卷,这是通过在线调查提供的。在电子调查之后,基于共识意见,开发了两种筛选算法.ILD的检测策略包括高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)以及IIM的肺功能测试,MCTD,SSC。和新诊断的pSS的肺功能检测,RA和SLE。然而,在具有ILDHRCT危险因素的患者中,这些测试也应该进行。早期识别各种CTD-ILD患者的筛查策略最初是由风湿病学家的多学科团队开发的,肺病学家,和放射科医生确定早期CTD患者有ILD风险,CTD的严重关节外表现。
    The aim of this study was to develop a Croatian Delphi-based expert consensus for screening interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with connective tissue disease (CTD). A systematic literature review was conducted on risk factors for the development of ILD, prevalence and incidence of ILD, diagnostic and screening methods for ILD, and prognosis of ILD in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), primary Sjögren\'s syndrome (pSS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and systemic sclerosis (SSc) were performed. Based on the evidence found, experts developed questionnaires for screening and monitoring ILD in each CTD, which were provided via an online survey. Following the electronic survey, two screening algorithms were developed based on the consensus opinions. The detection strategy for ILD included high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in addition to pulmonary function testing for IIM, MCTD, and SSc. and pulmonary function testing for newly diagnosed pSS, RA and SLE. However, in patients with identified risk factors for ILD HRCT, these tests should also be performed. A screening strategy for early identification of patients with various CTD-ILD was first developed by a multidisciplinary team of rheumatologists, pulmonologists, and radiologists to identify early CTD patients at risk of ILD, a severe extra-articular manifestation of CTD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在为系统性硬化症(SSc)患者的初级保健物理治疗提供交流和研究生教育建议。
    方法:将虚拟名义小组技术与交流(n=18)和教育(n=21)的任务部队一起使用。两者都包括风湿病学家,初级物理治疗师(PT),二级或三级护理,风湿病护士,高级护士和病人代表。为每个工作队组织了三次在线会议,讨论(1)当前的瓶颈;(2)潜在的解决办法;(3)由此产生的建议草案。经过最后的调整,参与者将他们对每项建议的同意程度从0(完全不同意)到100(完全同意),使用在线问卷。
    结果:为交流和教育制定了19和34条建议,分别。为了交流,主要建议涉及向患者和风湿病专家提供具有风湿病和肌肉骨骼疾病专业知识的初级保健物理治疗师的概述。在物理治疗师的疑问或疑虑的情况下,将风湿病学家的适应症纳入转诊给物理治疗师,并与风湿病学家进行低阈值沟通。对于研究生教育,建议使用三种类型的“按需”教育产品,内容和持续时间各不相同,以匹配个人初级保健物理治疗师的能力和偏好。
    结论:使用系统的定性方法,两个多利益相关方工作组为初级保健物理治疗师与医院护理提供者的沟通和关于SSc患者治疗的研究生教育制定了实用建议.
    This study aimed to develop recommendations for communication and postgraduate education regarding primary care physical therapy for systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients.
    A virtual Nominal Group Technique was used with tasks forces for communication (n = 18) and education (n = 21). Both included rheumatologists, physical therapists (PTs) in primary, secondary or tertiary care, rheumatology nurses, advanced nurse practictioners and patient representatives. Three online meetings were organised for each task force to discuss (1) current bottlenecks; (2) potential solutions; and (3) the resulting draft recommendations. After the final adjustments, participants rated their level of agreement with each recommendation on a scale from 0 (not at all agree) to 100 (totally agree), using an online questionnaire.
    19 and 34 recommendations were formulated for communication and education, respectively. For communication the main recommendations concerned the provision of an overview of primary care physical therapists with expertise in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases to patients and rheumatologists, the inclusion of the indication by the rheumatologist in the referral to the physical therapist and low-threshold communication with the rheumatologist in case of questions or concerns of the physical therapist. For postgraduate education three types of \"on demand\" educational offerings were recommended with varying levels of content and duration, to match the competencies and preferences of individual primary care physical therapists.
    Using a systematic qualitative approach, two multi-stakeholder task forces developed practical recommendations for primary care physical therapists\' communication with hospital-based care providers and postgraduate education regarding the treatment of SSc patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:系统性硬化症的原发性心脏受累可能会导致形态功能和电心脏异常,并且是常见的死亡原因。缺乏系统性硬化症原发性心脏受累的明确定义限制了我们对临床研究的理解和专注能力。我们旨在为系统性硬化症的原发性心脏受累建立专家共识定义。
    UNASSIGNED:对系统性硬化症的心脏受累和表现进行了系统文献综述,以告知国际和多学科工作组。此外,名义组技术被用来得出一个定义,然后接受投票。总共对16例临床病例进行了面部有效性评估,可行性,新创建定义的可靠性和标准有效性。
    未经批准:总共,171份出版物符合资格标准。使用标称分组技术,专家补充了他们的意见,提供了要考虑的声明并对其进行排名以创建共识定义,它获得了100%的表面有效性协议。单个病例的可行性中位数为60(5-300)秒。评分者之间的一致性中等(第一轮mKappa(95%CI)=0.56(0.46-1.00),第二轮为0.55(0.44-1.00)),评分者之间的一致性良好(mKappa(95%CI)=0.77(0.47-1.00))。标准有效性显示与黄金标准相比有78(73-84)%的正确性。
    UNASSIGNED:建立并部分验证了系统性硬化症共识定义中的初步原发性心脏受累,用于未来的临床研究。
    UNASSIGNED: Primary heart involvement in systemic sclerosis may cause morpho-functional and electrical cardiac abnormalities and is a common cause of death. The absence of a clear definition of primary heart involvement in systemic sclerosis limits our understanding and ability to focus on clinical research. We aimed to create an expert consensus definition for primary heart involvement in systemic sclerosis.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature review of cardiac involvement and manifestations in systemic sclerosis was conducted to inform an international and multi-disciplinary task force. In addition, the nominal group technique was used to derive a definition that was then subject to voting. A total of 16 clinical cases were evaluated to test face validity, feasibility, reliability and criterion validity of the newly created definition.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 171 publications met eligibility criteria. Using the nominal group technique, experts added their opinion, provided statements to consider and ranked them to create the consensus definition, which received 100% agreement on face validity. A median 60(5-300) seconds was taken for the feasibility on a single case. Inter-rater agreement was moderate (mKappa (95% CI) = 0.56 (0.46-1.00) for the first round and 0.55 (0.44-1.00) for the second round) and intra-rater agreement was good (mKappa (95% CI) = 0.77 (0.47-1.00)). Criterion validity showed a 78 (73-84)% correctness versus gold standard.
    UNASSIGNED: A preliminary primary heart involvement in systemic sclerosis consensus-based definition was created and partially validated, for use in future clinical research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:这项研究的目的是确定和优先考虑对弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症(dcSSc)患者决策至关重要的方面,并深入了解治疗方案的信息偏好,以指导患者的传单开发。
    UNASSIGNED:对一组dcSSc患者进行了三轮Delphi研究。该问卷是基于关于dcSSc中四个主要治疗方案的益处和危害的系统文献检索:甲氨蝶呤,霉酚酸酯,环磷酰胺脉冲和干细胞移植。要求患者识别对做出治疗决定至关重要的信息。第三轮之后,一个活的,举行在线讨论,以便就这些项目达成共识,并讨论传单的内容和设计。共识被定义为小组成员之间75%的协议。
    未经批准:在邀请的36名患者中,78%(n=28)参加了一轮或多轮比赛,67%(n=24)完成了第一,69%(n=25)第二轮和75%(n=27)第三轮。在最后一轮,参与者的中位年龄为51岁(四分位距,18)和中位疾病持续时间4年(四分位距,5);52%为女性。患者接受过霉酚酸酯治疗(67%),甲氨蝶呤(44%),环磷酰胺(41%),自体干细胞移植(26%),利妥昔单抗(4%)或未接受治疗(7%)。八名患者参加了现场小组讨论。小组就七项益处达成共识(延长无进展生存期,提高生活质量,改善日常功能,改善肺功能,改善皮肤厚度,改善流动性和减少疲劳)和四个危害(治疗相关死亡率,感染,心脏损伤,癌症风险增加)作为决策的重要信息。还制作了传单的设计。
    UNASSIGNED:本研究确定了有关dcSSc治疗方案的信息,应与患者一起解决。我们的结果可用于开发有效的患者信息。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize aspects essential for decision making in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) and to gain insight into information preferences of treatment options which could guide development of a leaflet for patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A three-round Delphi study was conducted with a panel of patients with dcSSc. The questionnaire was based on a systematic literature search regarding benefits and harms of four main treatment options in dcSSc: methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide pulses and stem cell transplantation. Patients were asked to identify information that is essential for making a treatment decision. After the third round, a live, online discussion was held in order to reach consensus on these items and to discuss the content and design of the leaflet. Consensus was defined as ⩾75% agreement among panel members.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 36 patients invited, 78% (n = 28) participated in one or more rounds, 67% (n = 24) completed the first, 69% (n = 25) the second and 75% (n = 27) the third round. In the last round, median age of participants was 51 years (interquartile range, 18) and median disease duration 4 years (interquartile range, 5); 52% were female. Patients had been treated with mycophenolate mofetil (67%), methotrexate (44%), cyclophosphamide (41%), autologous stem cell transplantation (26%), rituximab (4%) or were treatment-naïve (7%). Eight patients joined the live panel discussion. The panel reached consensus on seven benefits (prolonged progression-free survival, improved quality of life, improved daily functioning, improved pulmonary function, improved skin thickness, improved mobility and reduced fatigue) and four harms (treatment-related mortality, infections, cardiac damage, increased risk of cancer) as essential information for decision making. Also a design of a leaflet was made.
    UNASSIGNED: This study identified information about treatment options in dcSSc that should be addressed with patients. Our results can be used to develop effective patient information.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号